I have never posted a question before so hopefully this ends up in the right
place.
I downloaded and installed version 6.1. Everything went relatively smoothly.
My system dual boots with WindowsXP.
Today I downloaded and tried to install version 6.2 as a complete new
standard install not an
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 01:04:48AM +, Lloyd Martin wrote:
I have never posted a question before so hopefully this ends up in the
right place.
I downloaded and installed version 6.1. Everything went relatively
smoothly. My system dual boots with WindowsXP.
Today I downloaded and
--- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Jason Artz wrote:
Hello,
I want to install FreeBSD 6.1 on my system, but I
only
have a version 5.3 CD. I can tell sysinstall to
get
6.1 instead of 5.3 via FTP (under Options,
Release
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 02:12:24PM -0700, Jason Artz wrote:
Is there a way to do a binary install instead of
downloading all the new sources and compiling them as
an upgrade?
Sort of. You can do it by hand if you're careful (the install files
-- base.aa, etc -- are just .tar.bz2 files cut up
--- Jason Artz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sep 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Jason Artz wrote:
Hello,
I want to install FreeBSD 6.1 on my system, but
I
only
have a version 5.3 CD. I can tell sysinstall to
get
On Sun, Sep 24, 2006 at 05:49:59PM -0700, backyard wrote:
I thought if you went to the options in sysinstall and
go to the part that says Release Name and it likely is
going to say 5.3-RELEASE change that to 6.1-RELEASE
and then do an ftp install. You should get the newer
version of the
Hello,
I want to install FreeBSD 6.1 on my system, but I only
have a version 5.3 CD. I can tell sysinstall to get
6.1 instead of 5.3 via FTP (under Options, Release
name), but I read that using an old sysinstall to
install a new version is a bad idea. I cannot figure
out how to obtain a new
On Sep 23, 2006, at 2:34 PM, Jason Artz wrote:
Hello,
I want to install FreeBSD 6.1 on my system, but I only
have a version 5.3 CD. I can tell sysinstall to get
6.1 instead of 5.3 via FTP (under Options, Release
name), but I read that using an old sysinstall to
install a new version is a bad
Hello,
I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.1-STABLE.
But it will not work, it fails out when dealing with umass.
This is a freshly installed system.
The command I issued was: make buildworld KERNCONF=SURIA
#
# /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/SURIA
#
machine i386
cpu
On Saturday 22 July 2006 10:49, Kyrre Nygard wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.1-STABLE.
But it will not work, it fails out when dealing with umass.
This is a freshly installed system.
The command I issued was: make buildworld KERNCONF=SURIA
You really
At 19:27 22.07.2006, Donald J. O'Neill wrote:
On Saturday 22 July 2006 10:49, Kyrre Nygard wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to upgrade my kernel from 6.1-RELEASE to 6.1-STABLE.
But it will not work, it fails out when dealing with umass.
This is a freshly installed system.
The command I issued
On Wed, 31 May 2006 12:49:42 -, mehmet gogebakan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i would like to install 6.1-RELEASE to my computer , configuration is:
128 MB SDRAM
LG cdrom 52x
8 MB Grafic card
40 gb hd
p3 800 mhz processor
azza motherboard
could you please tell me whether this configuration is
i would like to install 6.1-RELEASE to my computer , configuration is:
128 MB SDRAM
LG cdrom 52x
8 MB Grafic card
40 gb hd
p3 800 mhz processor
azza motherboard
could you please tell me whether this configuration is suitable, if not tell
me the minimum configuration it should be..
On Wed, 31 May 2006 15:49:42 +0300
mehmet gogebakan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
128 MB SDRAM
LG cdrom 52x
8 MB Grafic card
40 gb hd
p3 800 mhz processor
azza motherboard
she'll be right mate :)
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:49:42PM +0300, mehmet gogebakan wrote:
i would like to install 6.1-RELEASE to my computer , configuration is:
128 MB SDRAM
LG cdrom 52x
8 MB Grafic card
40 gb hd
p3 800 mhz processor
azza motherboard
could you please tell me whether this configuration is
i would like to install 6.1-RELEASE to my computer , configuration is:
128 MB SDRAM
LG cdrom 52x
8 MB Grafic card
40 gb hd
p3 800 mhz processor
azza motherboard
could you please tell me whether this configuration is suitable, if not
tell me the minimum configuration it should
From: Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:49:42PM +0300, mehmet gogebakan wrote:
i would like to install 6.1-RELEASE to my computer , configuration is:
128 MB SDRAM
LG cdrom 52x
8 MB Grafic card
40 gb hd
p3 800 mhz processor
azza motherboard
could you please tell
On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 10:43 -0700, jdow wrote:
From: Erik Trulsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 03:49:42PM +0300, mehmet gogebakan wrote:
i would like to install 6.1-RELEASE to my computer , configuration is:
128 MB SDRAM
LG cdrom 52x
8 MB Grafic card
40 gb hd
p3
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Alex, you would lose that bet, zlib 1.2.2 has a hole in it, it
should have been replaced with 1.2.3 See the zlib website
for more info.
Nospam, good catch, if none of the hip-shooters here file a PR I'll
get around to it the next time I get a running build off the
cvs.
did i ever mention i love communities! ;-)
well, 1st of all, thx 2 all the people who gave it a whirl and
went deeper into cvs as i would ever do (i'm definitely not a
dev ;-), btw. that was my reason for asking this on the list )
2nd, the thing alex brought up is very confusing, because it
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 10:18:08AM +0100, Alex Zbyslaw wrote:
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
Alex, you would lose that bet, zlib 1.2.2 has a hole in it, it
should have been replaced with 1.2.3 See the zlib website
for more info.
Nospam, good catch, if none of the hip-shooters here file a PR
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:46:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:42:44PM +0200, martinko wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:46:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 08:42:44PM +0200, martinko wrote:
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:46:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no
On Wed, Apr 12, 2006 at 09:07:11PM +0200, martinko wrote:
and it feels they're not going to release 1.0 any time soon.. i've been
seeing 0.9.something for longer than i can remember.
and btw i've always thought of openssl and openssh as somehow
coupled/interconnected. but openssl hasn't
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 4:00 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: upcoming release 6.1: old version of some core components
did i ever mention i love
-Original Message-
From: Kris Kennaway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2006 10:53 AM
To: Alex Zbyslaw
Cc: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: upcoming release 6.1: old version of some core components
So unless the fixes somehow were un
hi together,
during testing the 6.1-BETA4 i found only one major thing
i really like to discuss on the list for my understanding.
why are some major parts of the os are not updated to the
current versions (see examples beyond)? code-improvements
and security-/functionality-fixes come to my mind
On Tue, 11 Apr 2006 14:55:06 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi together,
during testing the 6.1-BETA4 i found only one major thing
i really like to discuss on the list for my understanding.
why are some major parts of the os are not updated to the
current
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
during testing the 6.1-BETA4 i found only one major thing
i really like to discuss on the list for my understanding.
why are some major parts of the os are not updated to the
current versions (see examples beyond)? code-improvements
and
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh you can get latest versions through the
ports. Not an option for everything -- I see no zlib for
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh you can get latest versions through the
ports. Not
In the last episode (Apr 11), [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net said:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh you can get latest versions
On Tue, Apr 11, 2006 at 05:46:06PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
I can't answer you main question, but I would say that you can bet your
shirt on the fact that there will be no known security issues in the
older packages.
At least for openssl and openssh you can get
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Alex Zbyslaw
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 6:25 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: upcoming release 6.1: old version of some core components
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net wrote:
during testing the 6.1-BETA4 i found
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]@mgEDV.net
Sent: Tuesday, April 11, 2006 5:55 AM
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: upcoming release 6.1: old version of some core components
hi together,
during testing the 6.1-BETA4 i found only one major thing
i really like to discuss
I have a 6.1-prerelease system, originally a 6-release. I had installed
KDE and a few things from packages while installing the OS (a clean
install) but most everything has worked.
Recently, I've tried to build python IDEs from ports and they all fail.
Boa-constructor yields the following:
37 matches
Mail list logo
