Juris Kaminskis rakstīja:
>Hi,
>
>Yesterday i made:
>Svn update
>Make buildworld
>Make buildkernel
>Make installkernel
>
>But when I reboot kernel freezes with last line pci1
>
>I can only boot my previous freebsd9.2 kernel, already tried several times, so
>
Hi,
Yesterday i made:
Svn update
Make buildworld
Make buildkernel
Make installkernel
But when I reboot kernel freezes with last line pci1
I can only boot my previous freebsd9.2 kernel, already tried several times, so
can you help me how to troubleshoot?
Tks
Juris
On Monday, July 29, 2013 3:31:49 am varanasi sainath wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
> socket
> (UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
> Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User
Correct. Line 84 and 264 have it commented out. This is the "new" method
> of talking to disk devices, similarly as the acd interface for optical
> media has been trans- formed into "SCSI over ATA" (ex device atapicam).
> So the disk drive has not been recognized by t
alking to disk devices, similarly
as the acd interface for optical media has been trans-
formed into "SCSI over ATA" (ex device atapicam). So
the disk drive has not been recognized by the kernel,
therefore: No soup for you (i. e., no boot device). :-)
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy
0 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> > >> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching
> > >> the source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
> > >>
> > >> The kernel compiles and runs fine using the s
0 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> > >> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching
> > >> the source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
> > >>
> > >> The kernel compiles and runs fine using the s
amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
> >> source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
> >>
> >> The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when
> >> I try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I get thi
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:29:10 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
>> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
>> source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
>>
>> The kernel c
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Walter Hurry wrote:
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when I
try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I get
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
> This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
> source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
>
> The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when I
> try t
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when I
try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I get this:
Mounting from ufs:/dev/ada0p2
On 29/07/2013 08:31, varanasi sainath wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
socket
(UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts as
server,
I have loaded
Hello,
I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
socket
(UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts as
server,
I have loaded the module using kldload and communication
Hi,
I am wondering how one would add support for additional options in the
kernel configuration files. I have found the config(8) program and the
related files '/sys/conf/file' & '/sys/conf/options', but am having
trouble finding any documentation leading me beyon
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:21:21 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
> > I think there is an option for this.
> > But I cannot find it under
> > 9.5. Building and Installing a Custom Kernel
> > http://www.freebsd
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> I think there is an option for this.
> But I cannot find it under
> 9.5. Building and Installing a Custom Kernel
> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html
>
> I need to keep several kernels ins
I think there is an option for this.
But I cannot find it under
9.5. Building and Installing a Custom Kernel
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html
I need to keep several kernels installed, not
just the current and the previous. How to achive this?
Thaknks
Anton
.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details.
This GDB was configured as "amd64-marcel-freebsd"...
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual
great, i managed to compile and install the custom kernel with IPFW kernel
support as discussed, thanks for your help!
i would like to optimise the kernel to be more specific to my hardware,
here is a breakdown of what i have:
https://gist.github.com/nkhine/fcbcbe36221dc39491f9
here is what is
rver from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and
> > want
> > > to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled.
> >
> > Why not use the module for this? For many years now, you
> > do not need a custom kernel if you want to use IPFW (which
> > _had_ to be
thanks for the quick reply
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Polytropon wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:37:02 +0200, Norman Khine wrote:
> > hello,
> > i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and
> want
> > to enable IPFW in the kernel as this
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:37:02 +0200, Norman Khine wrote:
> hello,
> i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and want
> to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled.
Why not use the module for this? For many years now, you
do not need a custom kernel if yo
hello,
i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and want
to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled.
the way i updated the system was to copy /boot/kernel.old to /boot/GENERIC
then followed ch25
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/updating-upgrading
Is ctl-alt-esc "working" for others on 8.x & 9.x?
See
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=40111
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-qu
Hi,
I upgraded to 9.1 ( 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r251140: ) today and my
dmesg kernel prints:
wbwd0: DevID 0x60 DevRev 0x12, please report this.
wbwd0: DevID 0x60 DevRev 0x12, please report this.
wbwd0: at port 0x2e-0x2f on isa0
wbwd0: Before watchdog attach: Watchdog enabled
sr/obj/lab/odeds/freebsd/9.1.0/sys/MYKERNEL
> > amd64
> >
> > OFED and IB support are compiled in kernel.
> >
> >
> > 1. How can I unload/load modules that complied inside the kernel?
>
> kldload and kldunload should be what you are looking for.
[U
> [root@h-qa-033 ~]# uname -a
> FreeBSD h-qa-033 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0: Tue May 28 11:26:45 IDT
> 2013 root@h-qa-033:/usr/obj/lab/odeds/freebsd/9.1.0/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
>
> OFED and IB support are compiled in kernel.
>
>
> 1. How can I unload/lo
Hello.
I am using FreeBSD9.1
[root@h-qa-033 ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD h-qa-033 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0: Tue May 28 11:26:45 IDT
2013 root@h-qa-033:/usr/obj/lab/odeds/freebsd/9.1.0/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
OFED and IB support are compiled in kernel.
1. How can I unload/load modules
4-DVD.iso , and
> setup network configuration and installed Firefox 20.0 by AppCafe, and
> configured the network setting in Preference->Advanced of Firefox, and I
> could access Internet.
>
> Now I need to build my own customized kernel, but there is no src
> subdirectory in /
configuration and installed Firefox 20.0 by AppCafe, and
> configured the network setting in Preference->Advanced of Firefox, and I
> could access Internet.
>
> Now I need to build my own customized kernel, but there is no src
> subdirectory in /usr, so here is my question:
>
>
, and configured the
network setting in Preference->Advanced of Firefox, and I could access
Internet.
Now I need to build my own customized kernel, but there is no src subdirectory
in /usr, so here is my question:
1. Is there any way to install kernel source when I create the virtual
mach
Tommy Pham writes:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I installed 9.1 from DVD with src only and did 'freebsd-update fetch
>> install'. Then I proceed to compile the lean kernel. I'm unable to
>>
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tommy Pham wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I installed 9.1 from DVD with src only and did 'freebsd-update fetch
> install'. Then I proceed to compile the lean kernel. I'm unable to
> compile a lean (no SCSI, RAID, sound, USB, Firewire
Hi everyone,
I installed 9.1 from DVD with src only and did 'freebsd-update fetch
install'. Then I proceed to compile the lean kernel. I'm unable to
compile a lean (no SCSI, RAID, sound, USB, Firewire, NICs) kernel of 9.1 p3
and without lib32 support. I only needed SATA disk and
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:22:41AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> since last freebsd-update fetch install I always get this message after
> freebsd-update fetch:
>
> The following files will be updated as part of updating to 9.1-RELEASE-p3:
> /boot/kernel/linker.h
Hi,
since last freebsd-update fetch install I always get this message after
freebsd-update fetch:
The following files will be updated as part of updating to 9.1-RELEASE-p3:
/boot/kernel/linker.hints
but freebsd-update install doesn't install anything.
Is there something wrong with my s
I was talking with BZ about this a few months ago, and it does not look
terribly likely to happen any time soon, although I am still willing to
pay good money for anyone willing and able to fix the problems with it.
---
[1]Markham Breitbach
Network Operations
SSi People, Idea
Hi,
I just wanted to know if there were any plans to have VIMAGE function /
features included in GENERIC kernels sometimes soon ?
Sincerely yours.
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
¯¯
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Tue, 07 May 2013 11:16:50 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> > On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Walter Hurry
> > wrote:
> >
> > Access to PasteBin from Turkey is PROHIBITED .
>
> Oh. Try this then:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.co
On Tue, 07 May 2013 11:16:50 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Walter Hurry
> wrote:
>
> Access to PasteBin from Turkey is PROHIBITED .
Oh. Try this then:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6106778/kernel_modules.txt
_
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 20:33:21 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
>
> > Text file .
> >
> > Thank you very much .
>
> OK. Sorry for the delay.
> It's at http://pastebin.com/wvxQRD9w
>
>
Thank you really .
Access to PasteBin from Turkey is
On Wed, 01 May 2013 20:33:21 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
> Text file .
>
> Thank you very much .
OK. Sorry for the delay.
It's at http://pastebin.com/wvxQRD9w
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/list
>
> >> > On 30 April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
> >> >> what they do, or are for (none
t;>> On 30 April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
>>>>> what they do, or are for (none has a man page). I su
>> FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
>> >>
>> >> I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
>> >> what they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many
>> >> of them are drivers for particular devices.
>> >>
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:13 -0400, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Walter Hurry wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:13 -0400, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > On 30 April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry wrote:
> >
> >> FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
> >>
> >> I have a list of about 220 kernel modules
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:13 -0400, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 30 April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry wrote:
>
>> FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
>>
>> I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
>> what they do, or are for (none has a man page). I su
kpn...@pobox.com writes:
> > alias_cuseeme
>
> I don't know this one. Google?
CU-SeeMe is a video conferencing product; I have no idea what
this module does.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.or
Walter Hurry writes:
> I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out what
> they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many of them
> are drivers for particular devices.
> ahc_eisa
> ahc_isa
> ahc_pci
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
what
they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many of them
are drivers for particular devices.
Is there any resource or documentation available?
Thanks.
P.S
On 30 April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry wrote:
> FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
>
> I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out what
> they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many of them
> are drivers for particular devices.
>
> Is
FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out what
they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many of them
are drivers for particular devices.
Is there any resource or documentation available?
Thanks.
P.S. Here are the first few
following:
> On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:37:06 +0200, andreas scherrer wrote:
>> For some reason I was under the impression that /usr/src/sys is not
>> being updated by freebsd-update if I remove "kernel" from the
>> "Components" directive in freebsd
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:37:06 +0200, andreas scherrer wrote:
> For some reason I was under the impression that /usr/src/sys is not
> being updated by freebsd-update if I remove "kernel" from the
> "Components" directive in freebsd-update.conf. But I might be wrong (I
on 17.4.13 21:18 Brett Glass said the following:
> I've just had to resurrect a machine which apparently failed because the
> kernel was built with the make -j option.
[snip]
> The result was a kernel in which some compiled-in modules -- in
> particular, netgraph nodes -- w
I want to "track" RELEASE (not a
>> development branch) and I want to receive security related updates. And
>> I want to run a custom kernel.
>
> Without actually havint tested it, it seems that if you want
> to use freebsd-update (binary updating), you should note thi
Everyone:
I've just had to resurrect a machine which apparently failed
because the kernel was built with the make -j option.
As reported in the make(1) man page, the purpose of the -j option
is to let the make program build multiple portions of a program
concurrently on a machine
kernel.
Furthermore, this tool syncs sources (by default). So if you are using
custom kernel, you just have to rebuild and install your custom kernel.
It is recommended to not use SVN to update your system sources if you are
using freebsd-update tool to avoid troubles.
Regards,
Alexandre
On Tue, Apr
On 4/16/2013 1:36 AM, J David wrote:
loader.conf was empty and there's no 4k gnops, geli, anything like that.
This is a 100% normal install.
Although, since you mentioned 4k blocks, I did leave a gap between
ada0p1 and ada0p2 to start the root partition on a 4k boundary. (It's
an SSD that wil
I want to receive security related updates. And
> I want to run a custom kernel.
Without actually havint tested it, it seems that if you want
to use freebsd-update (binary updating), you should note this:
In /etc/freebsd-update.conf, you should have the line for what
to update as "Components s
Dear FreeBSD savvies
I am (still) struggling to understand how to keep my FreeBSD system up
to date ("world"/system, not ports). I want to "track" RELEASE (not a
development branch) and I want to receive security related updates. And
I want to run a custom kernel.
>F
loader.conf was empty and there's no 4k gnops, geli, anything like that.
This is a 100% normal install.
Although, since you mentioned 4k blocks, I did leave a gap between ada0p1
and ada0p2 to start the root partition on a 4k boundary. (It's an SSD that
will almost never be written to once instal
fine. If I
then build and install a new 9-STABLE kernel & world, reboots die in the
loader with:
can't load 'kernel'
This is a pretty straightforward system, one drive, not large (128GB SSD).
GPT partitioned, gptboot boot code. One UFS root partition to boot from,
a swap par
After installing 9.1-RELEASE amd64 on a system, it boots up fine. If I
then build and install a new 9-STABLE kernel & world, reboots die in the
loader with:
can't load 'kernel'
This is a pretty straightforward system, one drive, not large (128GB SSD).
GPT partitioned, gptb
On 4/1/2013 11:41 AM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
Copyright covers expressions of ideas. It does not cover the ideas themselves.
You can't copyright a concept, you can't copyright filesystems, and I
believe in the past few years a high court in the EU ruled that you can't
copyright a programming lang
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:26:15 -0400
Joe wrote:
> snip
>
> How do you explain all the forks of UNIX each claiming their own
> copyright.
Look very carefully at the copyrights involved, you will see
copyright attributions retained very carefully (see for example the
file /usr/src/COPY
Hi,
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:26:15 -0400
Joe wrote:
> snip
>
> How do you explain all the forks of UNIX each claiming their own
> copyright. They all provide the same concept, use the same names for
> their commands, use the same programming language, have a filesystem
> as their base. Just
snip
How do you explain all the forks of UNIX each claiming their own
copyright. They all provide the same concept, use the same names for
their commands, use the same programming language, have a filesystem as
their base. Just where is the line drawn between a fork and a rewrite?
___
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:43:27 +0200, Michael Ross wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:31:43 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
> >> Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
> >> a copyright on software?
> >
> > With _which_ gove
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:31:43 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
a copyright on software?
With _which_ government? :-)
Basic understanding of copyright is: The stuff _you_ write
happe
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
> Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
> a copyright on software?
With _which_ government? :-)
Basic understanding of copyright is: The stuff _you_ write
happens "automatically" under _your_ copyright, because you
On Mar 31, 2013, at 6:39 AM, Joe wrote:
> kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 09:22:22AM -0400, Maikoda Sutter wrote:
>>> If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
>>> should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bi
kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 09:22:22AM -0400, Maikoda Sutter wrote:
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could release
it under it's own license?
For example: I would li
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could release
it under it's own license?
For example: I would like to rewrite the headers to be 100% POSIX compliant
and I do like the BSD license, however
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:54:22 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote:
> Back around 4.x there was a File that had all the available kernel
> compile options with their meanings as comments. On 9.1 I don't see that
> file any more. Where can I find that file that lists all the kernel
> compile optio
On 21/03/2013 19:54, Fbsd8 wrote:
Back around 4.x there was a File that had all the available kernel
compile options with their meanings as comments. On 9.1 I don't see that
file any more. Where can I find that file that lists all the kernel
compile options? The 9.1 NOTES file is not that
Back around 4.x there was a File that had all the available kernel
compile options with their meanings as comments. On 9.1 I don't see that
file any more. Where can I find that file that lists all the kernel
compile options? The 9.1 NOTES file is not that file.
I have "makeoptions
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:06:41 -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> Thanks for the replies. Using freebsd-update seemed the simplest method
> since it was already included. Worked just fine for getting the
> sources.
Probably in the future there will be a csup-equivalent
included with the OS, plus con
On 3/17/2013 3:16 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:07:35 -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a
system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world and
kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supp
On Mar 17, 2013 11:07 PM, "Drew Tomlinson" wrote:
>
> I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a
system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world and
kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supported. The handbook talks
about
Le Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:07:35 -0700,
Drew Tomlinson a écrit :
> I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a
> system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world
> and kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supported. The
> han
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:07:35 -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
> I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a
> system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world and
> kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supported.
Correct. The new
I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a
system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world and
kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supported. The handbook talks
about freebsd-update. I do not want binary upgrades but is this the
to
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 15:03 +, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf typed:
> > On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 21:43 +0100, Istvan Gabor wrote:
> > > Can it run linux programs that have their own (linux) kernel module?
> > > If
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf typed:
> On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 21:43 +0100, Istvan Gabor wrote:
> > Can it run linux programs that have their own (linux) kernel module?
> > If yes, how can I install such program, and how can I load the kernel
> > module
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:43:40 -0400, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
On 13 Mar 2013, at 22:26, "Andre Goree" wrote:
I seem to be having trouble building my custom kernel. I've removed
several things that I believe were unnecessary, and added Linux
support, but I don't think
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 21:43 +0100, Istvan Gabor wrote:
> Can it run linux programs that have their own (linux) kernel module?
> If yes, how can I install such program, and how can I load the kernel module?
>
> (If I know correctly nvidia drivers have their own kernel modules, and
&
Hello:
This might be a silly question but I would like to be sure.
FreeBSD can run linux programs with its linux compatibility module
(linuxulator).
Can it run linux programs that have their own (linux) kernel module?
If yes, how can I install such program, and how can I load the kernel module
On 13 Mar 2013, at 22:26, "Andre Goree" wrote:
> I seem to be having trouble building my custom kernel. I've removed several
> things that I believe were unnecessary, and added Linux support, but I don't
> think I'm missing anything that is very important.
I seem to be having trouble building my custom kernel. I've removed
several things that I believe were unnecessary, and added Linux support,
but I don't think I'm missing anything that is very important. Here is
the last few lines of the build:
===> zlib (all)
/usr/lo
Hi,
I have been trying to compile the 9.1 kernel for an older system which
has PAE support, unfortunately because -Werror is enabled, I cannot
complete the compile (see warnings below). I am running a fresh install
of FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE. I can successfully compile the kernel without PAE
On 02/23/2013 07:04 PM, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 22 February 2013 18:56, Andre Goree wrote:
>
>> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
>
> Need to set NO_WERROR perhaps?
>
Thanks for the suggestion, though it did not help. This turned out to
be user error (i.e. a failed patch). After era
On 22 February 2013 18:56, Andre Goree wrote:
> cc1: warnings being treated as errors
Need to set NO_WERROR perhaps?
--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send
I'm running 8.3-STABLE (not sure if I should've posted this to freebsd-stable,
please correct me if so).
I'm able to successfully buildworld after an svn up of /usr/src, however when
I try to build my customer kernel, the build stops at the following:
/usr/local/libexec/ccache/
You can do svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src
Note that you need to install subversion before
Cheers
2013/2/16 Fbsd8
> Before the install media format changed at 9.0, sysinstall had option to
> only install kernel source.
>
> Can I use 9.1 svn to just checkou
Before the install media format changed at 9.0, sysinstall had option to
only install kernel source.
Can I use 9.1 svn to just checkout the kernel src necessary to compile a
custom kernel?
If so, how would I code the svn command to make it happen?
Thanks
ys/amd64/conf/NOTES (9.1-RELEASE):
>
> # Enable Linux ABI emulation
> #XXX#optionsCOMPAT_LINUX
>
> # Enable 32-bit Linux ABI emulation (requires COMPAT_43 and
> COMPAT_FREEBSD32)
> options COMPAT_LINUX32
>
> I think I first ran up against this when I moved to
t Linux ABI emulation (requires COMPAT_43 and
COMPAT_FREEBSD32)
options COMPAT_LINUX32
I think I first ran up against this when I moved to 9.0 some
time ago, but yes, amd64 uses a different kernel config
option than i386 for linux compat.
I tend to leave it as a module & load it if I per
1 - 100 of 4864 matches
Mail list logo
