; to /boot/loader.conf when setting up NAT.
The mailing list message linked above suggests that the handbook
information is the "old way" and that the correct way is to set
ipfw_enable and natd_enable in rc.conf. "Then /etc/rc.d/ipfw will
load ipfw.ko, and if natd_enable is set, will inv
Olivier Nicole wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> The mailing list message linked above suggests that the handbook
>> information is the "old way" and that the correct way is to set
>> ipfw_enable and natd_enable in rc.conf. "Then /etc/rc.d/ipfw will
>> load ipfw.ko
hings, add the
> line ipdivert_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf when setting up NAT.
>
> The mailing list message linked above suggests that the handbook
> information is the "old way" and that the correct way is to set
> ipfw_enable and natd_enable in rc.conf. "T
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-natd.html
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/2011-April/229017.html
Hello,
Handbook section 31.9.3 suggests I should, among other things, add the
line ipdivert_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf when setting up NAT.
The ma
ferent meaning with portmaster than it does with
> portupgrade. It does not mean "recursive" like lowercase "-r".
>
> pkg_libchk from sysutils/bsdadminscripts can be used to detect installed
> ports that depend on missing libraries. From that, it may be possible to
> ju
an be used to detect installed
ports that depend on missing libraries. From that, it may be possible
to just give a list of all the ones that are missing pixman to
portmaster.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mail
exlive-docs.)
Cheers,
Jan Henrik
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
but it does not work :(
>> I get
>>
>> Could not execute shell
>> "/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1192: warning "/usr/bin/awk
>> '/^#define[[:blank:]]FreeBSD_version/ {print $3}
>> > /usr/local/sbin/portmaster: rm: Argument list
"/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk", line 1192: warning "/usr/bin/awk
> '/^#define[[:blank:]]FreeBSD_version/ {print $3}
> /usr/local/sbin/portmaster: rm: Argument list too long
>
> and it justs sits there. Out of 3 machines only 1 is working because
> I overlooked the
software dependent on pixman, run:
>>
>> # portmaster -r pixman
>> or
>> # portupgrade -rf pixman
>>
>> The messages are that a pkg texlive-ub* and that #!/bin/sh list
>> too long. I try to run
>> # portmaster -d -r pixman -x 'texlive-*
bumped in all dependent ports. If you have external software that
> depends on pixman, this software needs to be recompiled.
> To recompile all software dependent on pixman, run:
>
> # portmaster -r pixman
> or
> # portupgrade -rf pixman
>
> The messages are th
depends on pixman, this software needs to be recompiled.
To recompile all software dependent on pixman, run:
# portmaster -r pixman
or
# portupgrade -rf pixman
The messages are that a pkg texlive-ub* and that #!/bin/sh list
too long. I try to run
# portmaster -d -r pixman -x 'te
using this domain, thus
>> I would like to be unbanned (the mail wasn't sent and postfix was saying
>> that my domain is forbidden...).
>>
>> Can you unban my domain please? If I don't post to the good
>> mailing-list, just le me know.
>
> No, it'
x27;t sent and postfix was saying
> that my domain is forbidden...).
>
> Can you unban my domain please? If I don't post to the good
> mailing-list, just le me know.
No, it's not correct to mail the list for this.
For list specific issues:
Most lists on Internet u
idden...).
Can you unban my domain please? If I don't post to the good
mailing-list, just le me know.
Regards,
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail t
he CERT advisories appeared.
cheers, Ian
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
VE-2013-3077
>
> 2) http://web.nvd.nist.gov/view/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2013-5209
>
> I just thought that users should be aware of this.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questi
.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
w/vuln/detail?vulnId=CVE-2013-5209
I just thought that users should be aware of this.
--
Jerry ♔
Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored.
Please do not ignore the Reply-To
27;s why I wanted to ask, what about our own mailing list like
freebsd-printing@ ?
Even in the new age of colourful images, printing is essential for
servers, and sometimes a tough job.
Comments?
matthias
--
Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.ascii
On May 20, 2013, at 4:28 PM, Joe wrote:
[…]
> Without netgraph compiled into the kernel, issuing "ngctl list" command on
> the host only shows the socket for ngctl.
>
> After I issue the kldload command on the host for netgraph ng_bridge
> ng_eiface ng_ether ng_so
Teske
Here is my results
Without netgraph compiled into the kernel, issuing "ngctl list" command
on the host only shows the socket for ngctl.
After I issue the kldload command on the host for netgraph ng_bridge
ng_eiface ng_ether ng_socket, then issuing "ngctl list" co
On May 19, 2013, at 1:47 PM, Joe wrote:
When I issue "ngctl list" command on the host it only shows the socket for
ngctl.
I thought it would also show the real NIC interface device names.
Am I wrong in thinking that?
No, you're not wrong, however one wrinkle is that ng_eth
When I issue "ngctl list" command on the host it only shows the socket
for ngctl.
I thought it would also show the real NIC interface device names.
Am I wrong in thinking that?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.f
t; > > > On Fri, 17 May 2013 12:54:29 +0100
> > > > Bruce Cran wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Yes, seriously. Have you seen the number of people who post
> > > > > messages "PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!!",
> > >
k has produced far more pointless email
> than all the spam I've gotten from this list in the last month.
What he said, +infinity.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubsc
On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 10:53 -0700, Robison, Dave wrote:
> All this bike shedding and crosstalk has produced far more pointless
> email than all the spam I've gotten from this list in the last month.
I don't know if those mails where pointless, but there were much mails
and I
On 05/17/2013 05:45, Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:19:32 +0100
>
>> It seems to me that the level of spam in list is pretty much
>> negligible.
>
> That would be a subjective statement. It is like asking how many times
> you have to slap your wife before you a
> > > > Yes, seriously. Have you seen the number of people who post
> > > > messages "PLEASE REMOVE ME FROM THIS MAILING LIST!!", apparently
> > > > not understanding how to manage their subscription?
> > >
> > > There's al
On Fri, 17 May 2013 08:45:29 -0400
Jerry wrote:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:19:32 +0100
> RW articulated:
>
> > On Fri, 17 May 2013 12:54:29 +0100
> > Bruce Cran wrote:
> >
> > > Yes, seriously. Have you seen the number of people who post
> > > mess
On Fri, 17 May 2013 13:19:32 +0100
RW articulated:
> On Fri, 17 May 2013 12:54:29 +0100
> Bruce Cran wrote:
>
> > On 17/05/2013 11:42, Jerry wrote:
> > > Seriously? If some potential poster were so brain dead that
> > > he/she could not comprehend how to subscri
On Fri, 17 May 2013 12:54:29 +0100
Bruce Cran wrote:
> On 17/05/2013 11:42, Jerry wrote:
> > Seriously? If some potential poster were so brain dead that he/she
> > could not comprehend how to subscribe to the mailing list then I
> > would seriously doubt that they would
On 17/05/2013 11:42, Jerry wrote:
Seriously? If some potential poster were so brain dead that he/she
could not comprehend how to subscribe to the mailing list then I would
seriously doubt that they would possess the necessary skills to
install and run FreeBSD to begin with. Lets be honest here
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:18:18PM +1000, Da Rock wrote:
> I'm a big fan of _not_ having to subscribe to a list to get a quick
> hand with a one off problem (obviously not this one!)- otherwise too
> many lists get subscribed to, oodles of messages come in which you
> can't
al poster were so brain dead that he/she
could not comprehend how to subscribe to the mailing list then I would
seriously doubt that they would possess the necessary skills to install
and run FreeBSD to begin with.
Lets be honest here. All that the present system does is act as an
enabler for Spam
s be done
here?
Get a group of volunteers in different time zones to handle this and
off we go.
Of course, I could be one of them in the Eastern World.
Erich
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
g Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com
Reply below not above, like a play script. Indent old text with "> ".
Send plain text. No quoted-printable, HTML, base64, multipart/alternative.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lis
ng put off posting to it.
--
Bruce Cran
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On May 14, 2013, at 10:18 PM, Da Rock
wrote:
> I'm a big fan of _not_ having to subscribe to a list to get a quick hand with
> a one off problem (obviously not this one!)- otherwise too many lists get
> subscribed to, oodles of messages come in which you can't do anyth
On 05/12/13 22:04, Rich Kulawiec wrote:
1. Restricting mailing lists to "subscribers only" has been a best
practice since the last century. It's a very good anti-spam tactic.
2. However, doing so -- for a list run via Mailman, like this one --
does not pose a significant imp
Excerpt from Rich Kulawiec :
> 3. Note that Mailman, as part of that same mechanism, allows list-owners
> to add non-subscribers to a list of those permitted to send traffic to
> the list without approval. This feature is probably more often used to
> allow traffic from alternative a
1. Restricting mailing lists to "subscribers only" has been a best
practice since the last century. It's a very good anti-spam tactic.
2. However, doing so -- for a list run via Mailman, like this one --
does not pose a significant impediment for non-subscribers. By default,
Ma
On Sun, 12 May 2013 07:39:31 +0100
Steve O'Hara-Smith articulated:
> On Sat, 11 May 2013 19:44:46 +0200
> "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > "Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
> > > On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
> > > "
On Sat, 11 May 2013 19:44:46 +0200
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> Hi,
> "Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
> > On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
> > "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> >
> > > If list write access was changed
> I'm curious how much spam you get through this list.
>
> Just counted, and I have about 2 Spams per week for the last month,
> that's more than usual.
Personaly I'm on ~ 47 freebsd lists or so my MH dirs + procmail
filter boxes suggest, so when someone spams multip
mp; Video Campaigns-Inventory Needed
Message-id: <1368039547.0568389241738...@mf7.sendgrid.net>
Happy hump-day,
We have an opportunity with an RTB partner to monetize
INT Geo's; UK, CAN, AUS
Video: (Pre-roll, mid-roll and post-roll)
If list write access was changed to Subscribers
Hi,
"Steve O'Hara-Smith" wrote:
> On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
> "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
>
> > If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
> > - List could silently discard such spam.
> > - Postmaster@ (& webmaster@
On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
> If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
> - List could silently discard such spam.
> - Postmaster@ (& webmaster@ weeding web archives) would have less work.
> - Less individual need to s
Hi,
> From: Erich Dollansky
> Date: Thu, 9 May 2013 08:33:47 +0700
Erich Dollansky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
> "Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
>
> >
> > If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
&g
Hi,
On Thu, 09 May 2013 02:26:26 +0200
"Julian H. Stacey" wrote:
>
> If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
some lists are like this anyway. Why are not all like this?
I notice that my postings get delayed and obviously check when I use
by accident my rea
Most of the spam I've seen get through is actually obvious from the
subject line. I've seen more posts by people who weren't subscribed and
asked to be cc'd than I've seen spam. Making the list subscribers only
would only hinder the the lucky spammers, and stop more
lt;1368039547.0568389241738...@mf7.sendgrid.net>
> Happy hump-day,
>
> We have an opportunity with an RTB partner to monetize
>
> INT Geo's; UK, CAN, AUS
>
> Video: (Pre-roll, mid-roll and post-roll)
If list write access was changed to Subscribers Only:
On Sun, 2013-04-07 at 07:53 -0400, Robert Huff wrote:
> (Yes - I know there's a list owner's address.
> I send mail there.
> Nothing happens. I am chosing to believe this is a technical
> problem, perhaps part of the same problem about which I wish to
&
(Yes - I know there's a list owner's address.
I send mail there.
Nothing happens. I am chosing to believe this is a technical
problem, perhaps part of the same problem about which I wish to
complain.)
Hello:
Would someone repsonsible for the mamageme
o get our full product list with photos and specifictions, please
just reply this mail. Thanks!
Best regardsChuck
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any ma
7;t start a login shell, they're not going to show up as
logged in. Most terminal programs have an option to start them as login
shells, but I don't know KDE well enough to know what the normal
practice there would be.
___
freebsd-questions@fr
2013. március 19. 18:44 napon Nikos Vassiliadis írta:
> On 19/3/2013 6:03 μμ, Ruben de Groot wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Istvan Gabor typed:
> >> Hello:
> >>
> >> I have both FreeBSD 9.0 and 9.1 on two different computers.
> >
2013. március 19. 17:03 napon Ruben de Groot írta:
> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Istvan Gabor typed:
> > Hello:
> >
> > I have both FreeBSD 9.0 and 9.1 on two different computers.
> > w and who commands do not list logged in users in any of them
> &
n.
I did not know about "let me google that for you", thanks for that.
Istvan
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 19/3/2013 6:03 μμ, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Istvan Gabor typed:
Hello:
I have both FreeBSD 9.0 and 9.1 on two different computers.
w and who commands do not list logged in users in any of them
(either for root or a regular user).
The output of w is
n, but you're at least not the first
who experienced this issue.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:59:56PM +0100, Istvan Gabor typed:
> Hello:
>
> I have both FreeBSD 9.0 and 9.1 on two different computers.
> w and who commands do not list logged in users in any of them
> (either for root or a regular user).
>
> The output of w is:
>
> ro
Hello:
I have both FreeBSD 9.0 and 9.1 on two different computers.
w and who commands do not list logged in users in any of them
(either for root or a regular user).
The output of w is:
root@:/root # w
4:56PM up 10 mins, 0 users, load averages: 0.18, 0.26, 0.20
USER TTY FROM
;s probably easier
to use SVN directly to find out.
-cpghost.
--
Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to &q
is there a site or other location that lists *NEW* (not updated) ports
since a given date?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ques
reebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
en my list membership is disabled.
Just a few days ago, I switched my FreeBSD lists email address back to the
old-but-still-working AT&T-Yahoo bellsouth.net email.
But synacor.com only filtered out a small percentage of FreeBSD list messages,
some but not all of which were sp
org is the leading whitelist provider for email filtering. It
> has over 80'000 users and contains more than 150'000 entries of "good
> mailservers".
> ___
> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://l
nd contains more than 150'000 entries of "good
mailservers".
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
biology.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
it out.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ink?
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
And because I think geom(8) and awk(1) are awesome...
geom disk list | awk '
BEGIN { FS=": *" }
$1 == "Geom name" { device=$2 }
$1 ~ "^ +Mediasize$" {
match($2, /\([^)]+\)/)
size=substr($2, RSTART+1, RLENGTH-2)
}
$1 ~ &qu
On Thu, Dec 06, 2012 at 04:23:54PM -0800, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> if ($bytes >= (1024 * 1024 * 1024 * 1024)) {
You know about the exponentiation operator in Perl -- right?
if ($bytes >= (1024 ** 4)) {
I don't think typing 1024 four times with * between each pair is really a
helpful
1024)) {
$count = $bytes / (1024 * 1024);
$suffix = "MiB";
} else {
die "$dname is too small!\n";
}
$count = sprintf ('%.1f', $count);
return "$count $suffix";
}
foreach my $line (`atacontrol list`) {
if ($line =~ m/: (ad[0-9]+) (.*)/) {
ities.
The following simple script works well for both PATA/SATA and USB hard
drives,
but it does not list drive capacities:
#!/bin/sh
atacontrol list | grep ': ad[0-9]' | sed 's/^.*: //'
camcontrol devlist | grep '(da[0-9]' | sed -E 's/^(.*)
\((da[0-9]+).*$/\2
tem, along with their
>> product identifiers and their respective capacities.
>>
>> The following simple script works well for both PATA/SATA and USB hard drive
>s,
>> but it does not list drive capacities:
>>
>> #!/bin/sh
>>
>> atacontrol list | grep
l for both PATA/SATA and USB hard drives,
but it does not list drive capacities:
#!/bin/sh
atacontrol list | grep ': ad[0-9]' | sed 's/^.*: //'
camcontrol devlist | grep '(da[0-9]' | sed -E 's/^(.*) \((da[0-9]+).*$/\2 \1/'
How can I modify the scr
s not list drive capacities:
#!/bin/sh
atacontrol list | grep ': ad[0-9]' | sed 's/^.*: //'
camcontrol devlist | grep '(da[0-9]' | sed -E 's/^(.*) \((da[0-9]+).*$/\2 \1/'
How can I modify the script above in order to get it
lude a brief tutorial on vim/gvim.
TIA, people... .
--
Gary Kline kl...@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix
Twenty-six years of service to the Unix community.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://
ewrote the boot block and boot partition (#1)
>mount /dev/ada0p4 /mnt/ssd/var
>cd /mnt/ssd/var
>restore -r /usr/backup/dump_var_0_20121113_1920
>Cannot find file dump list
ok, after digging around in my notes and memory I have a better understanding
of what actually
/mnt
And that points out a mistake: /mnt can't be unmounted while it is the
PWD. Fixed.
I think PWD is /tmp/oldvar and not /mnt;
Yes, you're correct. Re-fixed. Thanks!___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
rs like Apple/Android
E-mail: g...@unixarea.de | - No HTML/RTF in E-mail
WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | - No proprietary attachments
phone: +49-170-4527211 | - Respect for open standards
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http:
ock/docs/html/backup.html#_em_dump_8_em_em_restore_8_em
Thanks!
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
ot block and boot partition (#1)
>>mount /dev/ada0p4 /mnt/ssd/var
>>cd /mnt/ssd/var
>>restore -r /usr/backup/dump_var_0_20121113_1920
>>Cannot find file dump list
>>
>> Any ideas why I get the "Cannot find file dump list"?
>> What / wher
pon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
n standards
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
From: Polytropon
To: free...@dreamchaser.org
Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 12:27 PM
Subject: Re: ugh. dump / restore problem(s) "Cannot find file dump list"
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:20:14 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 01:20:14 -0700, Gary Aitken wrote:
> mount /dev/ada0p4 /mnt/ssd/var
> cd /mnt/ssd/var
> restore -r /usr/backup/dump_var_0_20121113_1920
> Cannot find file dump list
The last command looks wrong. The restore program requires
the dump file to be provide
t/ssd/var
> restore -r /usr/backup/dump_var_0_20121113_1920
> Cannot find file dump list
>
> Any ideas why I get the "Cannot find file dump list"?
> What / where is it supposed to be?
You need to specify the file containing the DUMP with -f flag; and use
the flag -r only to restore to
newfs the modified partitions (var, tmp, usr)
rewrote the boot block and boot partition (#1)
mount /dev/ada0p4 /mnt/ssd/var
cd /mnt/ssd/var
restore -r /usr/backup/dump_var_0_20121113_1920
Cannot find file dump list
Any ideas why I get the "Cannot find file dump list"?
What / w
James
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
this was the question. :-)
> (This happens to be with a test box FreeBSD 10.* which has worked fine
> other than that.) The BSD install I understand is also for FreeBSD 9.*
> as well.
>
> fd0, /floppy, acd0 /cdrom, acd1 DVD, do not come up although they are
> in /dmesg
.
fd0, /floppy, acd0 /cdrom, acd1 DVD, do not come up although they are
in /dmesg list.
Any help would be appreciated.
~Al Plant - Honolulu, Hawaii - Phone: 808-284-2740
+ http://hawaiidakine.com + http://freebsdinfo.org +
+ http://aloha50.net - Supporting - FreeBSD 7.2 - 8.0 - 9
Niko Jay
FOLLOW INTERNATIONAL CARIBBEAN ARTIST NIKO JAY ON HIS JOURNEY THROUGH MUSIC
INDUSTRY STARDOM!
Congratulations! You have been added to the runtime_reco...@live.com fan list!
Click on the following link to confirm/add your details:
http://fburls.com/updt/178882
Because of FreeBSD lists being mainly unmoderated and open to posting without
subscription, I notice some outright spams that slip through the list filters.
I believe (could possibly be wrong) that the lists have spam filters in place.
it must have and well done. FreeBSD list is for sure more
rd to limit abuse.
> As an alternate, consider the forums (http://forums.freebsd.org/), which
> are moderated.
Because of FreeBSD lists being mainly unmoderated and open to posting without
subscription, I notice some outright spams that slip through the list filters.
I believe (could poss
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On 06/07/2012 11:14, Fbsd8 wrote:
Running ipfilter and trying to list the total amount of the traffic
passing through the external NIC.
Maybe there is some other command to show this info.
Any help is appreciated.
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
1 - 100 of 1449 matches
Mail list logo
