Juris Kaminskis juris.kamins...@gmail.com rakstīja:
Hi,
Yesterday i made:
Svn update
Make buildworld
Make buildkernel
Make installkernel
But when I reboot kernel freezes with last line pci1
I can only boot my previous freebsd9.2 kernel, already tried several times, so
can you help me how
Hi,
Yesterday i made:
Svn update
Make buildworld
Make buildkernel
Make installkernel
But when I reboot kernel freezes with last line pci1
I can only boot my previous freebsd9.2 kernel, already tried several times, so
can you help me how to troubleshoot?
Tks
Juris
On Monday, July 29, 2013 3:31:49 am varanasi sainath wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
socket
(UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts
. This is the new method
of talking to disk devices, similarly as the acd interface for optical
media has been trans- formed into SCSI over ATA (ex device atapicam).
So the disk drive has not been recognized by the kernel, therefore: No
soup for you (i. e., no boot device). :-)
Thanks, Polytropon! I
(UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching
the source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but
when I try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I
as the acd interface for optical media has been trans-
formed into SCSI over ATA (ex device atapicam). So
the disk drive has not been recognized by the kernel,
therefore: No soup for you (i. e., no boot device). :-)
--
Polytropon
Magdeburg, Germany
Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0
Andra moi ennepe
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 21:29:10 +0200, Polytropon wrote:
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using
(upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when
I try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I get this:
Mounting from ufs:/dev/ada0p2 failed with error
(UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching
the source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but
when I try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when I
try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I get this:
Mounting from ufs:/dev/ada0p2
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013 19:04:29 + (UTC), Walter Hurry wrote:
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when I
try to use my custom kenel
On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Walter Hurry wrote:
This is 9.2-RC1 on amd64 (upgraded from 9.2-BETA1 by refetching the
source from releng/9.2 and rebuilding kernel and world).
The kernel compiles and runs fine using the supplied GENERIC, but when I
try to use my custom kenel config file, on reboot I get
Hello,
I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
socket
(UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts as
server,
I have loaded the module using kldload and communication
On 29/07/2013 08:31, varanasi sainath wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX
socket
(UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space).
Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts as
server,
I have loaded
Hi,
I am wondering how one would add support for additional options in the
kernel configuration files. I have found the config(8) program and the
related files '/sys/conf/file' '/sys/conf/options', but am having
trouble finding any documentation leading me beyond there. When I
specify
I think there is an option for this.
But I cannot find it under
9.5. Building and Installing a Custom Kernel
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html
I need to keep several kernels installed, not
just the current and the previous. How to achive this?
Thaknks
Anton
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.ukwrote:
I think there is an option for this.
But I cannot find it under
9.5. Building and Installing a Custom Kernel
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/kernelconfig-building.html
I need to keep several kernels installed
On Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:21:21 -0500, Adam Vande More wrote:
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Anton Shterenlikht me...@bris.ac.ukwrote:
I think there is an option for this.
But I cannot find it under
9.5. Building and Installing a Custom Kernel
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook
.
There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type show warranty for details.
This GDB was configured as amd64-marcel-freebsd...
Unread portion of the kernel message buffer:
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
cpuid = 0; apic id = 00
fault virtual address = 0x8008
fault code = supervisor
great, i managed to compile and install the custom kernel with IPFW kernel
support as discussed, thanks for your help!
i would like to optimise the kernel to be more specific to my hardware,
here is a breakdown of what i have:
https://gist.github.com/nkhine/fcbcbe36221dc39491f9
here is what
hello,
i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and want
to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled.
the way i updated the system was to copy /boot/kernel.old to /boot/GENERIC
then followed ch25
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/handbook/updating-upgrading
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:37:02 +0200, Norman Khine wrote:
hello,
i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and want
to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled.
Why not use the module for this? For many years now, you
do not need a custom kernel if you want to use
thanks for the quick reply
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 12:54 AM, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013 00:37:02 +0200, Norman Khine wrote:
hello,
i have a dedicated server from OVH and have updated freebsd to 9.1 and
want
to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled
freebsd to 9.1 and
want
to enable IPFW in the kernel as this is not enabled.
Why not use the module for this? For many years now, you
do not need a custom kernel if you want to use IPFW (which
_had_ to be compiled into the kernel in the past). Use
# kldload ipfw.ko
Is ctl-alt-esc working for others on 8.x 9.x?
See
http://forums.freebsd.org/showthread.php?t=40111
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
Hi,
I upgraded to 9.1 ( 9.1-STABLE FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE #0 r251140: ) today and my
dmesg kernel prints:
wbwd0: DevID 0x60 DevRev 0x12, please report this.
wbwd0: DevID 0x60 DevRev 0x12, please report this.
wbwd0: Unknown Winbond/Nuvoton model at port 0x2e-0x2f on isa0
wbwd0: Before watchdog
Hello.
I am using FreeBSD9.1
[root@h-qa-033 ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD h-qa-033 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0: Tue May 28 11:26:45 IDT
2013 root@h-qa-033:/usr/obj/lab/odeds/freebsd/9.1.0/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
OFED and IB support are compiled in kernel.
1. How can I unload/load modules
[root@h-qa-033 ~]# uname -a
FreeBSD h-qa-033 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0: Tue May 28 11:26:45 IDT
2013 root@h-qa-033:/usr/obj/lab/odeds/freebsd/9.1.0/sys/MYKERNEL amd64
OFED and IB support are compiled in kernel.
1. How can I unload/load modules that complied inside
/odeds/freebsd/9.1.0/sys/MYKERNEL
amd64
OFED and IB support are compiled in kernel.
1. How can I unload/load modules that complied inside the kernel?
kldload and kldunload should be what you are looking for.
[Unless things have got more flexible] I dont believe you can
, and configured the
network setting in Preference-Advanced of Firefox, and I could access
Internet.
Now I need to build my own customized kernel, but there is no src subdirectory
in /usr, so here is my question:
1. Is there any way to install kernel source when I create the virtual
machine
Firefox 20.0 by AppCafe, and
configured the network setting in Preference-Advanced of Firefox, and I
could access Internet.
Now I need to build my own customized kernel, but there is no src
subdirectory in /usr, so here is my question:
1. Is there any way to install kernel source when I
-DVD.iso , and
setup network configuration and installed Firefox 20.0 by AppCafe, and
configured the network setting in Preference-Advanced of Firefox, and I
could access Internet.
Now I need to build my own customized kernel, but there is no src
subdirectory in /usr, so here is my question
Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com writes:
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I installed 9.1 from DVD with src only and did 'freebsd-update fetch
install'. Then I proceed to compile the lean kernel. I'm unable to
compile a lean (no SCSI, RAID
Hi everyone,
I installed 9.1 from DVD with src only and did 'freebsd-update fetch
install'. Then I proceed to compile the lean kernel. I'm unable to
compile a lean (no SCSI, RAID, sound, USB, Firewire, NICs) kernel of 9.1 p3
and without lib32 support. I only needed SATA disk and em NIC support
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:43 AM, Tommy Pham tommy...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I installed 9.1 from DVD with src only and did 'freebsd-update fetch
install'. Then I proceed to compile the lean kernel. I'm unable to
compile a lean (no SCSI, RAID, sound, USB, Firewire, NICs) kernel
Hi,
since last freebsd-update fetch install I always get this message after
freebsd-update fetch:
The following files will be updated as part of updating to 9.1-RELEASE-p3:
/boot/kernel/linker.hints
but freebsd-update install doesn't install anything.
Is there something wrong with my system
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 11:22:41AM +0200, Wolfgang Riegler wrote:
Hi,
since last freebsd-update fetch install I always get this message after
freebsd-update fetch:
The following files will be updated as part of updating to 9.1-RELEASE-p3:
/boot/kernel/linker.hints
but freebsd-update
Hi,
I just wanted to know if there were any plans to have VIMAGE function /
features included in GENERIC kernels sometimes soon ?
Sincerely yours.
«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§«?»¥«?»§
I was talking with BZ about this a few months ago, and it does not look
terribly likely to happen any time soon, although I am still willing to
pay good money for anyone willing and able to fix the problems with it.
---
[1]Markham Breitbach
Network Operations
SSi People,
On Wed, 01 May 2013 20:33:21 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Text file .
Thank you very much .
OK. Sorry for the delay.
It's at http://pastebin.com/wvxQRD9w
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 01 May 2013 20:33:21 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
Text file .
Thank you very much .
OK. Sorry for the delay.
It's at http://pastebin.com/wvxQRD9w
Thank you really .
Access to PasteBin from
On Tue, 07 May 2013 11:16:50 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Access to PasteBin from Turkey is PROHIBITED .
Oh. Try this then:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/6106778/kernel_modules.txt
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 07 May 2013 11:16:50 -0700, Mehmet Erol Sanliturk wrote:
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Access to PasteBin from Turkey is PROHIBITED .
Oh. Try this then:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:13 -0400, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
what they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 12:14 PM, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:07:13 -0400, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30 April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like
of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
what they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many of
them are drivers for particular devices.
Is there any resource or documentation available?
fxr.watson.org is a kernel source cross ref
on amd64.
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
what they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many
of them are drivers for particular devices.
Is there any resource or documentation available?
Thanks.
P.S. Here are the first few
...@gmail.com wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
what they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many
of them are drivers for particular devices.
Is there any resource or documentation available?
fxr.watson.org is a kernel
April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
what they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many
of them are drivers for particular devices.
Is there any
FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out what
they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many of them
are drivers for particular devices.
Is there any resource or documentation available?
Thanks.
P.S. Here are the first few
On 30 April 2013 09:39, Walter Hurry walterhu...@gmail.com wrote:
FreeBSD 9.1 on amd64.
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out what
they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many of them
are drivers for particular devices.
Is there any resource
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out
what
they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many of them
are drivers for particular devices.
Is there any resource or documentation available?
Thanks.
P.S
Walter Hurry writes:
I have a list of about 220 kernel modules and would like to find out what
they do, or are for (none has a man page). I suspect that many of them
are drivers for particular devices.
deleted
ahc_eisa
ahc_isa
ahc_pci
Try man 4 ahc
kpn...@pobox.com writes:
alias_cuseeme
I don't know this one. Google?
CU-SeeMe is a video conferencing product; I have no idea what
this module does.
Robert Huff
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
:
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:37:06 +0200, andreas scherrer wrote:
For some reason I was under the impression that /usr/src/sys is not
being updated by freebsd-update if I remove kernel from the
Components directive in freebsd-update.conf. But I might be wrong (I
will check).
According
kernel.
Furthermore, this tool syncs sources (by default). So if you are using
custom kernel, you just have to rebuild and install your custom kernel.
It is recommended to not use SVN to update your system sources if you are
using freebsd-update tool to avoid troubles.
Regards,
Alexandre
On Tue, Apr
Everyone:
I've just had to resurrect a machine which apparently failed
because the kernel was built with the make -j option.
As reported in the make(1) man page, the purpose of the -j option
is to let the make program build multiple portions of a program
concurrently on a machine
(not a
development branch) and I want to receive security related updates. And
I want to run a custom kernel.
Without actually havint tested it, it seems that if you want
to use freebsd-update (binary updating), you should note this:
In /etc/freebsd-update.conf, you should have the line for what
on 17.4.13 21:18 Brett Glass said the following:
I've just had to resurrect a machine which apparently failed because the
kernel was built with the make -j option.
[snip]
The result was a kernel in which some compiled-in modules -- in
particular, netgraph nodes -- weren't accessible. mpd5
On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 22:37:06 +0200, andreas scherrer wrote:
For some reason I was under the impression that /usr/src/sys is not
being updated by freebsd-update if I remove kernel from the
Components directive in freebsd-update.conf. But I might be wrong (I
will check).
According
loader.conf was empty and there's no 4k gnops, geli, anything like that.
This is a 100% normal install.
Although, since you mentioned 4k blocks, I did leave a gap between ada0p1
and ada0p2 to start the root partition on a 4k boundary. (It's an SSD that
will almost never be written to once
Dear FreeBSD savvies
I am (still) struggling to understand how to keep my FreeBSD system up
to date (world/system, not ports). I want to track RELEASE (not a
development branch) and I want to receive security related updates. And
I want to run a custom kernel.
From what I understand I cannot use
want to run a custom kernel.
Without actually havint tested it, it seems that if you want
to use freebsd-update (binary updating), you should note this:
In /etc/freebsd-update.conf, you should have the line for what
to update as Components src world.
This should prevent overwriting of the kernel
On 4/16/2013 1:36 AM, J David wrote:
loader.conf was empty and there's no 4k gnops, geli, anything like that.
This is a 100% normal install.
Although, since you mentioned 4k blocks, I did leave a gap between
ada0p1 and ada0p2 to start the root partition on a 4k boundary. (It's
an SSD that
After installing 9.1-RELEASE amd64 on a system, it boots up fine. If I
then build and install a new 9-STABLE kernel world, reboots die in the
loader with:
can't load 'kernel'
This is a pretty straightforward system, one drive, not large (128GB SSD).
GPT partitioned, gptboot boot code. One
a new 9-STABLE kernel world, reboots die in the
loader with:
can't load 'kernel'
This is a pretty straightforward system, one drive, not large (128GB SSD).
GPT partitioned, gptboot boot code. One UFS root partition to boot from,
a swap partition and, the rest for ZFS.
(At first I tried to do
snip
How do you explain all the forks of UNIX each claiming their own
copyright. They all provide the same concept, use the same names for
their commands, use the same programming language, have a filesystem as
their base. Just where is the line drawn between a fork and a rewrite?
Hi,
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:26:15 -0400
Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
snip
How do you explain all the forks of UNIX each claiming their own
copyright. They all provide the same concept, use the same names for
their commands, use the same programming language, have a filesystem
as
On Mon, 01 Apr 2013 10:26:15 -0400
Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
snip
How do you explain all the forks of UNIX each claiming their own
copyright.
Look very carefully at the copyrights involved, you will see
copyright attributions retained very carefully (see for example the
On 4/1/2013 11:41 AM, kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
Copyright covers expressions of ideas. It does not cover the ideas themselves.
You can't copyright a concept, you can't copyright filesystems, and I
believe in the past few years a high court in the EU ruled that you can't
copyright a programming
kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 09:22:22AM -0400, Maikoda Sutter wrote:
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could release
it under it's own license?
For example: I would like
On Mar 31, 2013, at 6:39 AM, Joe fb...@a1poweruser.com wrote:
kpn...@pobox.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 09:22:22AM -0400, Maikoda Sutter wrote:
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
a copyright on software?
With _which_ government? :-)
Basic understanding of copyright is: The stuff _you_ write
happens automatically under _your_ copyright, because you
are
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:31:43 +0200, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
a copyright on software?
With _which_ government? :-)
Basic understanding of copyright is: The stuff
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:43:27 +0200, Michael Ross wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 16:31:43 +0200, Polytropon free...@edvax.de wrote:
On Sun, 31 Mar 2013 09:39:29 -0400, Joe wrote:
Does one have to file legal paper work with the government to be issued
a copyright on software?
With _which_
If I use the kernel as a basis for my own system and modify the kernel
should I still maintain the licensing of the kernel bits, or could release
it under it's own license?
For example: I would like to rewrite the headers to be 100% POSIX compliant
and I do like the BSD license, however I
Back around 4.x there was a File that had all the available kernel
compile options with their meanings as comments. On 9.1 I don't see that
file any more. Where can I find that file that lists all the kernel
compile options? The 9.1 NOTES file is not that file.
I have makeoptions NO_MODULES
On 21/03/2013 19:54, Fbsd8 wrote:
Back around 4.x there was a File that had all the available kernel
compile options with their meanings as comments. On 9.1 I don't see that
file any more. Where can I find that file that lists all the kernel
compile options? The 9.1 NOTES file is not that file
On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 15:54:22 -0400, Fbsd8 wrote:
Back around 4.x there was a File that had all the available kernel
compile options with their meanings as comments. On 9.1 I don't see that
file any more. Where can I find that file that lists all the kernel
compile options? The 9.1 NOTES
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 14:06:41 -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
Thanks for the replies. Using freebsd-update seemed the simplest method
since it was already included. Worked just fine for getting the
sources.
Probably in the future there will be a csup-equivalent
included with the OS, plus
On 3/17/2013 3:16 PM, Polytropon wrote:
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:07:35 -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a
system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world and
kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supported
Le Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:07:35 -0700,
Drew Tomlinson d...@mykitchentable.net a écrit :
I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a
system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world
and kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supported. The
handbook
On Mar 17, 2013 11:07 PM, Drew Tomlinson d...@mykitchentable.net wrote:
I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a
system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world and
kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supported. The handbook talks
about
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 15:07:35 -0700, Drew Tomlinson wrote:
I've been away for a while. In the past, the proper way to update a
system was to grab current sources via cvsup and then rebuild world and
kernel. But now I see cvsup is no longer supported.
Correct. The new way to obtain sources
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf typed:
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 21:43 +0100, Istvan Gabor wrote:
Can it run linux programs that have their own (linux) kernel module?
If yes, how can I install such program, and how can I load the kernel
module?
(If I know correctly
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 15:03 +, Ruben de Groot wrote:
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 10:42:41PM +0100, Ralf Mardorf typed:
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 21:43 +0100, Istvan Gabor wrote:
Can it run linux programs that have their own (linux) kernel module?
If yes, how can I install such program
Hello:
This might be a silly question but I would like to be sure.
FreeBSD can run linux programs with its linux compatibility module
(linuxulator).
Can it run linux programs that have their own (linux) kernel module?
If yes, how can I install such program, and how can I load the kernel module
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 21:43 +0100, Istvan Gabor wrote:
Can it run linux programs that have their own (linux) kernel module?
If yes, how can I install such program, and how can I load the kernel module?
(If I know correctly nvidia drivers have their own kernel modules, and
FreeBSD can
run
On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 17:43:40 -0400, Damien Fleuriot m...@my.gd wrote:
On 13 Mar 2013, at 22:26, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote:
I seem to be having trouble building my custom kernel. I've removed
several things that I believe were unnecessary, and added Linux
support, but I don't
I seem to be having trouble building my custom kernel. I've removed
several things that I believe were unnecessary, and added Linux support,
but I don't think I'm missing anything that is very important. Here is
the last few lines of the build:
=== zlib (all)
/usr/local/libexec/ccache
On 13 Mar 2013, at 22:26, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote:
I seem to be having trouble building my custom kernel. I've removed several
things that I believe were unnecessary, and added Linux support, but I don't
think I'm missing anything that is very important. Here is the last few
Hi,
I have been trying to compile the 9.1 kernel for an older system which
has PAE support, unfortunately because -Werror is enabled, I cannot
complete the compile (see warnings below). I am running a fresh install
of FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE. I can successfully compile the kernel without PAE
On 02/23/2013 07:04 PM, ill...@gmail.com wrote:
On 22 February 2013 18:56, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
Need to set NO_WERROR perhaps?
Thanks for the suggestion, though it did not help. This turned out to
be user error (i.e. a failed patch).
On 22 February 2013 18:56, Andre Goree an...@drenet.info wrote:
cc1: warnings being treated as errors
Need to set NO_WERROR perhaps?
--
--
___
freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions
To
I'm running 8.3-STABLE (not sure if I should've posted this to freebsd-stable,
please correct me if so).
I'm able to successfully buildworld after an svn up of /usr/src, however when
I try to build my customer kernel, the build stops at the following:
/usr/local/libexec/ccache/world/cc -c -O2
You can do svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src
Note that you need to install subversion before
Cheers
2013/2/16 Fbsd8 fb...@a1poweruser.com
Before the install media format changed at 9.0, sysinstall had option to
only install kernel source.
Can I use 9.1 svn to just
Before the install media format changed at 9.0, sysinstall had option to
only install kernel source.
Can I use 9.1 svn to just checkout the kernel src necessary to compile a
custom kernel?
If so, how would I code the svn command to make it happen?
Thanks
Linux ABI emulation
#XXX#optionsCOMPAT_LINUX
# Enable 32-bit Linux ABI emulation (requires COMPAT_43 and
COMPAT_FREEBSD32)
options COMPAT_LINUX32
I think I first ran up against this when I moved to 9.0 some
time ago, but yes, amd64 uses a different kernel config
option than
This is on amd64 r246552
I added
options COMPAT_43
options COMPAT_LINUX
options COMPAT_LINUX32
to the kernel config,
following sys/amd64/conf/NOTES
On buildkernel I get:
unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
What am I missing?
Thanks
Anton
___
freebsd
On Sun, 10 Feb 2013 00:18:06 GMT, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
This is on amd64 r246552
I added
options COMPAT_43
options COMPAT_LINUX
options COMPAT_LINUX32
to the kernel config,
following sys/amd64/conf/NOTES
On buildkernel I get:
unknown option COMPAT_LINUX
What am I missing
1 - 100 of 4710 matches
Mail list logo
