I use Linux for surfing + mail , and Freebsd for coding + research.
The choice of which to use for what was just how it happened - rather
than any deficiency in either product. I think they are both great.
Good to be spoilt for choice.
P.s : notice I did not mention that "other" operationg syst
For instance, I'm writing this on a Linux box, but have 3 FBSD servers I
administer, as well as a small handful of Windows servers I'm responsible
for. I also use windows 2000 and XP as well as FBSD and more than 2
distros of Linux at the desktop, from various work and home locations.
*
Your conclusion that people mailing from Windows systems don't run
FreeBSD is not valid, for one thing. Check your logic.
In my case, my webserver is running FreeBSD for my domains. I use Mac
OS X's mail.app for email. Plus the obvious, an x86 machine running
windows can dual boot FreeBSD.
--On Saturday, August 30, 2003 19:13 +0700 Denis Troshin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Looking at the field MAILER of e-mails' headers, I see that there a
lot of people here who are using mail programs like Outlook, Eudora,
Mozillafor win32. This means that they run windows systems. S
Denis Troshin wrote:
Looking at the field MAILER of e-mails' headers, I see that there a
lot of people here who are using mail programs like Outlook, Eudora,
Mozillafor win32. This means that they run windows systems. So
I'm asking why still a lot of people here who hadn't move to Fr
- Original Message -
From: "Denis Troshin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, August 30, 2003 7:13 AM
Subject: Why people are not satisfied with FreeBSD?
> Hi!
>
> Looking at the field MAILER of e-mails' headers, I see that there a
> lot of people here who a
Adam McLaurin wrote:
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 08:13, Denis Troshin wrote:
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
To use windows doesn't implicate that the user prefers Windows. Using
Windows more often implicates to hate it :).
On 8/30/2003 at 7:13 PM Denis Troshin wrote:
|Hi!
Hi.
|Looking at the field MAILER of e-mails' headers, I see that there a
|lot of people here who are using mail programs like Outlook, Eudora,
|Mozillafor win32. This means that they run windows systems. So
|I'm asking why still a
At 07:13 PM 30/08/2003 +0700, Denis Troshin wrote:
Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
As a desktop I still like the interface better. There are also a lot of
applications I use on a regular basis that are not available
On Sat, 2003-08-30 at 08:13, Denis Troshin wrote:
> Looking at the field MAILER of e-mails' headers, I see that there a
> lot of people here who are using mail programs like Outlook, Eudora,
> Mozillafor win32. This means that they run windows systems. So
> I'm asking why still a lot
Denis Troshin wrote:
Hi!
Looking at the field MAILER of e-mails' headers, I see that
> there a lot of people here who are using mail programs like
> Outlook, Eudora, Mozillafor win32. This means that they
> run windows systems. So I'm asking why still a lot of people
> here who hadn'
On Saturday 30 August 2003 08:13 am, Denis Troshin wrote:
> Are there any common reasons of why people are not satisfied with
> FreeBSD? Why do they still prefer windows?
I think a lot of people use this list to get advice on how to install FreeBSD
and how to resolve issues. I know when I
Uh, you're assuming everyone on the list use only one type of machine.
For instance, I'm writing this on a Linux box, but have 3 FBSD servers I administer,
as well as a small handful of Windows servers I'm responsible for. I also use windows
2000 and XP as well as FBSD and more than 2 distros o
13 matches
Mail list logo
