On Mon, 2007-07-02 at 12:44 -0400, Chuck Swiger wrote:
> Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
> > Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home net,
> >> 1
> >> NIC for the DSL
> >>- same as above
Norberto Meijome wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home net, 1
NIC for the DSL
- same as above, just have to tell your box how to connect to your ISP
ok, this is interest
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:33:50 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :) i figured...but i asked just in the crazy chance that PPoE meant u
> could use any Ethernet capable device (like a NIC) to connect to DSL.
> Oh well, it'd been cool if true :D
>
If I were you I'd go with your origi
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 14:33:50 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> :) i figured...but i asked just in the crazy chance that PPoE
> meant u could use any Ethernet capable device (like a NIC) to
> connect to DSL. Oh well, it'd been cool if true :D
I can't speak in the general case, b
On Mon, 2 Jul 2007 04:16:13 +0200
Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 02 July 2007 03:45:39 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> > On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
> >
> > Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home
On Monday 02 July 2007 03:45:39 Norberto Meijome wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
>
> Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home
> > net, 1 NIC for the DSL
^^
> > - same as above, just ha
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:46:10 +0200
Momchil Ivanov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 4) Forget about the DSL router. Box with wireless NIC, 1 NIC for home net, 1
> NIC for the DSL
> - same as above, just have to tell your box how to connect to your ISP
ok, this is interesting. You mean, plug the
At 11:43 AM 6/29/2007, zbigniew szalbot wrote:
As far as I remember, when installing FBSD I chose not to install
Linux binary compatibility (not sure if that matters though). But my
question is more general. Can Linux software be safely (and
securely) used on a unix platform? I am happy to use
On Friday 29 June 2007 09:13:09 zigniew szalbot wrote:
> >
> > If you use the wireless in the DSL modem, you'll be bypassing the BSD
> > server.
>
> Just one question here. If I plug the router to the lan NIC and configure
> it to take DHCP and DNS settings from the BSD box, then the wireless will
Hello,
> I'll 2nd the suggestion for IPCop www.ipcop.org It's Linux, not BSD --
not my first OS choice, but it's a mature, feature laden product (that
already has squid built in) that is better and more secure than
something
> you could whip up yourself in a weekend.
As far as I remember, when i
Gaye Abdoulaye wrote:
ADSL line. At some point I would like to use an old pc with freebsd on it
to sit between the router and the rest of my home network.
If your are searching a BSD like solution, you have pfsense:
http://www.pfsense.org/
But what I use IPCOP: http://www.ipcop.org/
With so
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 17:00:01 +1000
Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:42:58 +0200 (CEST)
> "zigniew szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Great! OK I am encouraged to give it a try. But hardware-wise I
> > will need to NICs and plug my modem line into one NIC
Hi there again,
>> Great! OK I am encouraged to give it a try. But hardware-wise I will
>> need
>> to NICs and plug my modem line into one NIC and then the other NIC will
>> be
>> used to connect the Dlink router. I figure the Dlink router essentially
>> becomes redundant but it is a wireless mach
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:42:58 +0200 (CEST)
"zigniew szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Great! OK I am encouraged to give it a try. But hardware-wise I will need
> to NICs and plug my modem line into one NIC and then the other NIC will be
> used to connect the Dlink router. I figure the Dlink rou
Hi,
> Back in '96 I used to run squid on a (linux Slackware) 486 DX 100Mhz, 64
> MB RAM
> for 20 to 30 computers, with a dialup line. I can't imagine why it
> wouldn't
> work or be overkill for your setup :) I actually have the same setup in
> mind
> (down to the compaq + Dlink in bridged mode :-D
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 01:07:05 +0200 (CEST)
"zigniew szalbot" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Basically, will squid not be an
> overkill for a family network consisting of 3-4 machines? The box I want
> to devote for gateway/pc purposes is a Compaq PIII 866 Mhz with 512 MB RAM
> and 40GB HD.
Hi Zignie
On Jun 28, 2007, at 4:07 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
I use squid and dansguardian. Very easy to setup.
/usr/ports/www/dansguardian
I have never tried squid but it seems quite a big package. I have also
seen oops but not sure which to choose. Basically, will squid not
be an
overkill for
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
>> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
>> > have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based on
which
>> > sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
gateway.
>> > I'd rather u
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
>> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
>> > would
>> > have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
>> > on which
>> > sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
>> > gateway.
>>
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
>> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
>> > would
>> > have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
>> > on which
>> > sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
>> > gateway.
>>
Hello,
Thank you all who have responded!
>> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
>> > would
>> > have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
>> > on which
>> > sites containing them would get automatically blocked on the fbsd
>> > gateway.
>>
On Thursday 28 June 2007 18:08:33 Jeffrey Goldberg wrote:
> On Jun 28, 2007, at 3:40 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
> > On the software side I am also looking for some kind of parental
> > control
> > utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
> > would
> > have to be something
On Jun 28, 2007, at 3:40 PM, zigniew szalbot wrote:
On the software side I am also looking for some kind of parental
control
utility. I guess I can use pf. But would that be enough? I think it
would
have to be something that would allow me to define keywords based
on which
sites containing
zigniew szalbot a écrit :
Hello,
I am looking for advice. I have a dlink router/modem that connects to my
ADSL line. At some point I would like to use an old pc with freebsd on it
to sit between the router and the rest of my home network.
What kind of set up should I be aiming for to make it po
24 matches
Mail list logo
