Re: help install new kernel on root-on-ZFS on 11-STABLE

On 17/10/2016 09:01, Ben Woods wrote: On Monday, 17 October 2016, Brandon J. Wandersee < brandon.wander...@gmail.com> wrote: Last I checked, the automated installer created a separate pool called "bootpool," with a symlink from /boot to /bootpool. I believe this is the case if the option

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 05:32:57PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... > I believe sshd no longer supports ssh1 compatibility and it looks like you > might still have an entry in /etc/sshd/sshd.config trying to touch v1. > Check the file for any non-default entries. Compare your sshd_config with >

I'm upset about FreeBSD

Hi, I've been using FreeBSD for many years. Not as my main operating system, though. But anyway several bugs and patches were contributed and somebody even added my name into the additional contributors list. That's pleasing but today I tried to install the FreeBSD 11.0 and I'm upset about this

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:45 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:29:00AM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > > ... > > On 10/16/16 09:26, David Wolfskill wrote: > > > And over the last year or so, it's worked pretty well: I have the > > > machine set up (as is

Your recovery email address changed

Your recovery email address changed Hi VNS娱乐城876502.com注册送88元,网上最火爆的游戏平台,超好赢钱游戏, The recovery email for your Google Account maxhill...@gmail.com was recently changed. *Don't recognize this activity?* Review your recently used devices

Re: help install new kernel on root-on-ZFS on 11-STABLE

The bug report pointed to says the same thing but the new issue is it is not documented in the Handbook and/or not mounted by default (for someone who is brand new to ZFS it is very counter intutive to see a symlink pointing off into space) On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Brandon J. Wandersee <

Re: help install new kernel on root-on-ZFS on 11-STABLE

On Monday, 17 October 2016, Brandon J. Wandersee < brandon.wander...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Last I checked, the automated installer created a separate pool called > "bootpool," with a symlink from /boot to /bootpool. > I believe this is the case if the option for full disk encryption is selected

Re: help install new kernel on root-on-ZFS on 11-STABLE

Aryeh Friedman writes: > I just installed 11-STABLE on a brand new system and can't find a valid > /boot in which to do "make installkernel" to. I am used to how to do make > world on UFS. How do I do it on root-on-ZFS? Last I checked, the automated installer created a separate pool called

Re: Clandestine USB SD card slot

On 10/16/16 14:16, Warner Losh wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Warren Block wrote: >> On Sun, 16 Oct 2016, George Mitchell wrote: >> So not only is it (apparently) recognized, but the sdhci_pci driver attached to it! But inserting or removing a card shows

help install new kernel on root-on-ZFS on 11-STABLE

I just installed 11-STABLE on a brand new system and can't find a valid /boot in which to do "make installkernel" to. I am used to how to do make world on UFS. How do I do it on root-on-ZFS? -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org

Re: zfs/raidz: seems like I'm failing with math

Hi. On 16.10.2016 23:42, Gary Palmer wrote: You're confusing disk manufacturer gigabytes with real (power of two) gigabytes. The below turns 960 197 124 096 into real gigabytes Yup, I thought that smartctl is better than that and already displayed the size with base 1024. :) Thanks.

Re: zfs/raidz: seems like I'm failing with math

Hi. On 16.10.2016 22:06, Alan Somers wrote: It's raw size, but the discrepancy is between 1000 and 1024. Smartctl is reporting base 10 size, but zpool is reporting base 1024.. 960197124096.0*6/1024**4 = 5.24 TB, which is pretty close to what zpool says. Thanks ! It does explain it. But then

Re: zfs/raidz: seems like I'm failing with math

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 09:56:10PM +0500, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 r303979, zfs raidz1: > > ===Cut=== > > # zpool status gamestop >pool: gamestop > state: ONLINE >scan: none requested > config: > > NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM >

Re: Building FreeBSD 11.0-stable on FreeBSD 10.1-stable fails

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 16 Oct 2016, at 17:22, Warner Losh wrote: >> >> On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >>> On 16 Oct 2016, at 12:20, Torfinn Ingolfsen

stable/11: lock contention on zone_fetch_slab

@ CPU_CLK_UNHALTED_CORE [271718 samples] 22.48% [61081]lock_delay @ /boot/kernel/kernel 99.72% [60908] __mtx_lock_sleep 67.69% [41230] zone_fetch_slab 100.0% [41230] zone_import 100.0% [41230]zone_alloc_item 99.99% [41226] uma_zalloc_arg

Re: Building FreeBSD 11.0-stable on FreeBSD 10.1-stable fails

On 16 Oct 2016, at 17:22, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: >> On 16 Oct 2016, at 12:20, Torfinn Ingolfsen >> wrote: >>> I am trying to build FreeBSD 11.0-stable on a machine which

Re: Clandestine USB SD card slot

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016, George Mitchell wrote: > >>> So not only is it (apparently) recognized, but the sdhci_pci driver >>> attached to it! But inserting or removing a card shows no activity. >>> What's my next step?

Re: Clandestine USB SD card slot

On Sun, 16 Oct 2016, George Mitchell wrote: So not only is it (apparently) recognized, but the sdhci_pci driver attached to it! But inserting or removing a card shows no activity. What's my next step? -- George Is a device created for the empty reader?

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:29:00AM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > ... > On 10/16/16 09:26, David Wolfskill wrote: > > And over the last year or so, it's worked pretty well: I have the > > machine set up (as is usually my approach) to be able to boot from > > either of a couple of slices. I use a "dump

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

On 10/16/16 09:26, David Wolfskill wrote: > And over the last year or so, it's worked pretty well: I have the > machine set up (as is usually my approach) to be able to boot from > either of a couple of slices. I use a "dump | restore" pipeline > to copy the / and /usr file systems from the

Re: zfs/raidz: seems like I'm failing with math

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 10:56 AM, Eugene M. Zheganin wrote: > Hi. > > FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 r303979, zfs raidz1: > > ===Cut=== > > # zpool status gamestop > pool: gamestop > state: ONLINE > scan: none requested > config: > > NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM >

Re: update from 9.3 to 11.0

> On 16 October 2016, at 08:24, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote: >> I would like to know what experience and tips people on this list have >> regarding this update. Doug Hardie made it successfully. To my eyes, >> it is

zfs/raidz: seems like I'm failing with math

Hi. FreeBSD 11.0-RC1 r303979, zfs raidz1: ===Cut=== # zpool status gamestop pool: gamestop state: ONLINE scan: none requested config: NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM gamestopONLINE 0 0 0 raidz1-0 ONLINE 0 0 0

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:35:01PM -0400, Brandon Allbery wrote: > On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:26 PM, David Wolfskill > wrote: > > > This weekend, though, I was planning to update my other systems tfrom > > stable/10 to stable/11, so I figured I'd try freebsd-update on this

Re: sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:26 PM, David Wolfskill wrote: > This weekend, though, I was planning to update my other systems tfrom > stable/10 to stable/11, so I figured I'd try freebsd-update on this > machine first. > Wait, you used freebsd-update on a machine running

sshd whines & dies after releng/10 "freebsd-update" run

For most of my experience with FreeBSD (since 1998) and for most of my machines, I build from source (either on the machine itself or a dedicated "build machine"); this has been ... occasionally turbulent, but overall, a fairly stable approach for me (and it's a great deal less turbulent --

Re: update from 9.3 to 11.0

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Zoran Kolic wrote: > I would like to know what experience and tips people on this list have > regarding this update. Doug Hardie made it successfully. To my eyes, > it is the mere change of one charracter in the file. > I'm a bit late due to lack of

Re: Building FreeBSD 11.0-stable on FreeBSD 10.1-stable fails

On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 16 Oct 2016, at 12:20, Torfinn Ingolfsen > wrote: >> I am trying to build FreeBSD 11.0-stable on a machine which runs: >> tingo@kg-v7$ uname -a >> FreeBSD kg-v7.kg4.no 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD

update from 9.3 to 11.0

I would like to know what experience and tips people on this list have regarding this update. Doug Hardie made it successfully. To my eyes, it is the mere change of one charracter in the file. I'm a bit late due to lack of time to do the task. Best regards all Zoran

Re: Clandestine USB SD card slot

Whoops, I should send this to freebsd-stable instead of freebsd-usb. Sorry! -- George On 10/16/16 09:22, George Mitchell wrote: > On 10/15/16 23:10, Anthony Jenkins wrote: >> On 10/15/16 18:28, George Mitchell wrote: >>> FreeBSD 10.3-RELEASE-p7

Re: Building FreeBSD 11.0-stable on FreeBSD 10.1-stable fails

On 16 Oct 2016, at 12:20, Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote: > I am trying to build FreeBSD 11.0-stable on a machine which runs: > tingo@kg-v7$ uname -a > FreeBSD kg-v7.kg4.no 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r278322: Fri Feb 6 > 21:36:01 CET 2015 >

Building FreeBSD 11.0-stable on FreeBSD 10.1-stable fails

I am trying to build FreeBSD 11.0-stable on a machine which runs: tingo@kg-v7$ uname -a FreeBSD kg-v7.kg4.no 10.1-STABLE FreeBSD 10.1-STABLE #0 r278322: Fri Feb 6 21:36:01 CET 2015 r...@kg-v7.kg4.no:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 I have emptied /usr/src and /usr/obj and fetched the

Re: vale-ctl(-8), ifconfig(8), SIOCAIFADDR: Invalid argument [utilizing netmap(4) providing virtual switches+interfaces to BHyVe]

2016-10-15 11:42 GMT+02:00 Harry Schmalzbauer : > Bezüglich Vincenzo Maffione's Nachricht vom 15.10.2016 09:32 (localtime): > > 2016-10-14 15:38 GMT+02:00 Harry Schmalzbauer : > > … > >> I'm familar with epair(4), but not with tap(4). > >> I don't