At 10:21 PM 10/15/2005 -0700, Blair Campbell wrote:
Hi. I just thought that I'd start a topic before I left for two weeks
about a FreeDOS 1.0 release. It has been suggested that I release my
Beta 9 Enhanced Release distro as a FreeDOS 1.0 pre-release distro.
For one, this would mean that it
Hi!
I am very lucky with FreeDOS at the moment. This week it was the first
time, i have had a STABLE FreeDOS system!!!
I may tell you, which drivers i am using(latest versions of drivers):
(FreeDOS kernel from 21. Juli 2005)
himem.exe
udma2.sys
duse.exe (USB support)
ctmouse.exe
atapicdd.sys
Hi!
When I try to use any of the DOS utils included with dosemu (specially
EXITEMU) with M$-DOS 3.31 or DR DOS 3.41 I got the following message:
ERROR: inte6: unknown builtin:
With M$-DOS 3.30 I symply got a critical error prompt about being
unable to access C: unit.
(xdosemu Ctrl+Alt+Pgdwn works
I'm reading through some of my older books (partly in my quest for
information about MS DOS internals and partly curiosity), and there are
some references to look at the win 3.x ddk. As this is no longer
available directly (as best I can tell it cost money at the time, so I'm
pretty sure I
Hi! Very nice topic :-)
Beta 9 Enhanced Release distro as a FreeDOS 1.0 pre-release distro.
I would rather call it a FreeDOS 1.0 technology preview 1, because
there are some known missing features but MOST aspects ARE 1.0-worthy.
For one, this would mean that it would get tested more
Hi,
Blair Campbell escribió:
Hi. I just thought that I'd start a topic before I left for two weeks
about a FreeDOS 1.0 release. It has been suggested that I release my
Beta 9 Enhanced Release distro as a FreeDOS 1.0 pre-release distro.
For one, this would mean that it would get tested more
Hi Aitor...
I'm sorry, but my own opinion is NO. First of all, there are features
about MEM, AtapiCDD and why not, DISPLAY that should be finished...
I would suggest to drop ATAPICDD from that list.
But worst of all, the large number of bugs already existing. I doubt
that naming it 1.0
Hi Eric,
Sorry, I'm SO lazy to read all this...
I just skip to the things pointing to me.
Eric Auer escribió:
Hi! Very nice topic :-)
I know you like it, but we have discussed this once and once again...
For KEYB, Aitor's TODO lists memory tuning, PC-XT support, Japanese
API (?), beeping
Hi Aitor...
So Eric will confirm if /M is already implemented...
Jason did some testing and, contrary to my assumptions, found
no useful improvement by adding some local buffers. Plus we
have a dedicated cd-rom cache which works better anyway, so I
would call the /M thing in SHSUCDX a
Hi,
Eric Auer escribió:
Hi Aitor...
I'm sorry, but my own opinion is NO. First of all, there are features
about MEM, AtapiCDD and why not, DISPLAY that should be finished...
I would suggest to drop ATAPICDD from that list.
And how is that you suggest it NOW and not THEN?
But worst of
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2005 13:50:02 -0500
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
From: Michael Devore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Freedos-devel] TCC2WAT available
Reply-To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
[...]
You can't be serious. Do you cringe when [...]
I don't cringe, just snicker
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2005 03:39:04 +0200 (MEST)
From: Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Freedos-devel] re: FreeDOS 1.0
Reply-To: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
[...]
MEM: who was working on that? progress?
This is described in the 1.0 TODO wiki,
At 10:05 PM 10/16/2005 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
EMM386 HIMEM cpu-checking: The effort / gain ratio speaks for
making EMM386 / HIMEM foolproof in terms of CPU checking, yes.
Detection should be reactivated when the next release of EMM386 and HIMEM
use the modified UPX compression tool.
At 01:41 PM 10/17/2005 +1000, David O'Shea wrote:
You can't be serious. Do you cringe when [...]
I don't cringe, just snicker :) I wasn't in fact serious, hence the
smileys, which I think are normally not used when folks are expressing
moral outrage :)
It was difficult to tell. Perhaps
14 matches
Mail list logo
