Robert Riebisch said:
Nevertheless, I was looking for a "pixel painter"
(= bitmap> manipulation program for PCX,
GIF, PNG, or JPEG files), which is EVE not.
How about building on LXPIC ? It is already
in FreeDOS repository, so probably has no
license issues.
I know it is a viewer,
Robert Riebisch said:
>I had a look at PAINT2 and it's a real mess! :-(
>I was unsuccessful to convince makers of NeoPaint
>(NeoSoft Corporation) or Desktop Paint (Alchemy Mindworks)
> to release their products under a FOSS license.
Does any one of them still offer their DOS products
whatever
Today userbeit...@abwesend.de (Robinson West ?) said:
>Afaik there is no Linux that will run with only 8 MB of RAM.
About 1998 I did run (plod was a better description)
Red Hat 5.0 (kernel 2.0.32) in a 486 DX-50 with 4 MB
of RAM, but in text mode only. The machine and the
installation CD
Phil Reynolds asked:
> How would I configure and compile a new keyboard layout,
> if for reasons of having a non-standard one I need to?
XKEYB configuration files are text-only and well explained in
the documentation for this software. You can configure nearly
any keyboard layout using it.
.
from: Jose Antonio Senna
<jasse...@vivointernetdiscada.com.br>
While it is no longer of use in the present case, I would like to add
that I have a small (~2k) utility to write the boot sector on a floppy, and
have used it for some 4-5 years. It is quite crude, as I wrote it for
from: Jose Antonio Senna
<jasse...@vivointernetdiscada.com.br>
userbeit...@abwesend.de said:
> The PC I will install on, is a Pentium-D, has >2 GHz and >3GB RAM
Mateus Viste said:
> You have to make sure tough that both computers use the exact same
> CHS
from: Jose Antonio Senna
<jasse...@vivointernetdiscada.com.br>
<userbeit...@abwesend.de> said:
> I have an original Intel 80486 with 50 MHz that I want
> to try FreeDOS on. I still haven't found the time so far
> and my first attempt came to an early halt bec
from: Jose Antonio Senna
<jasse...@vivointernetdiscada.com.br>
On 26 july, Thomas Mueller said:
> ...(I) also have run Links with graphics
> in DOS, but that was years back.
Do you remember on what machine you did this ?
> I used Doug Kaufman's DOS port of Lynx for
&g
While it is no longer of use in the present case, I would like to add
that I have a small (~2k) utility to write the boot sector on a floppy, and
have used it for some 4-5 years. It is quite crude, as I wrote it for my use
only but, if is anyone is interested, I may attach it to an e-mail.
On 2016-01-27 Don Flowers XFDOS is the best GUI i have use.
>https://code.google.com/archive/p/
> nanox-microwindows-nxlib-fltk-for-dos/downloads
I followed this link and all I got was a blank page.
I don't know whether this is an issue with my browser
or my
On 12/22/14 Karen Lewellen klewel...@shellworld.net said:
Latest stable and development editions of lynx.
Karen
On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Thomas Dickey wrote:
The current version of lynx is 2.8.8
It's available at
http://lynx.isc.org/
ftp://lynx.isc.org/lynx2.8.8/
The last
Thomas Mueller mueller6...@twc.com said:
There are some Linux distros for older computers, and NetBSD and
FreeBSD can be installed on older computers.
But building packages or the system from source is likely to be
prohibitively slow on older machines.
But these distros do not run newer
On the matter of browsers for DOS, Lynx, which I am using now,
supports https and has done so for 10+ years. What is not
available in any DOS browser is javascript. Much of javascript
in web pages is to load and reload advertising, which I don't
miss at all. However, the (action) in many html
Yesterday, Matej Horvat matej.hor...@guest.arnes.si
said:
(And while we're at it, let's create a modern standard
for TCP/IP TSRs.)
Who are we ?
JAS
--
Download BIRT iHub F-Type - The Free Enterprise-Grade BIRT
On 12-7 dmccunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com said:
Do a ping, whois, traceroute, or nslookup on it.
They are highly useful tools, and available online
as well in addition to being local commands.
I have a copy of ping, and know whois as a site
(whois.net), but are the other commands
Miguel Garza garz...@gmail.com wrote:
...Honestly, seems to be easier to run stuff in a
DOS window in XP than booting straight to DOS...
and Dennis McCunney dennis.mccun...@gmail.com replied:
It's not really a DOS window. Run a 16 bit DOS program,
and Windows spawns NTVDM to provide an
On March 2 Karen Lewellen klewel...@shellworld.net
asked about a DOS port of elinks.
My question is: What advantage(s) links/elinks
have over lynx (I ask just about their DOS ports,
not versions for other OS'es)?
I did not yet find any, on the contrary, lynx has
had https/ssl capability for
Ricardus Vincente wizardofg...@gmail.com said:
While I understand that FreeDOS is a modern DOS not meant just for
older hardware, I thought that one of the purposes for FreeDOS was to
make older hardware relevant again. From the looks of it, I can't see
any reasonable way to get FreeDOS working
Christian Masloch said:
Don't read Dissecting DOS though.
Why not?
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers
Karen Llewelen wrote:
I use links as well, but on a shell service which is has compiled it with
spider monkey to increase the java script friendly nature.
Not under DOS, it seems.
Weren't you who did post very similar questions on this
list in February 2010 ? I would like to know how did
cordat...@aol.com said:
WATTCP will access one and only one config file.
First it looks at the environment variable WATTCP.CFG
which represents a directory (not a file name!)
if this environment variable does not exist it uses
the current directory. It looks first for the file name
On March 14 Jim Collins wrote:
I don't think the wattcp.cfg file is a problem, at least
judging by the error messages I have been getting (even
though I did copy wattcp.cfg into the directory where the
lynxbat.bat file is located)
an error I get often is:
Configuration file
In reply to my suggestions, Jim Collins wrote:
set HOME=.
set wattcp.cfg=%HOME%
set wattcp_cfg=.\
with an underdash, not a dot.
I edited lynxbat.bat to have the underscore with no luck
Did you try
set HOME=.\
set wattcp_cfg=%HOME%
I am not sure whether . only shall work,
or
James Collins said:
I looked at lynxbat.bat and the batch files says:
set HOME=.
set wattcp.cfg=%HOME%
so is the batch file expecting to find wattcp.cfg
in the current directory?
It is telling lynx to search for wattcp.cfg in the
current working directory. Note that (at least for
the version
I said
Is XCDROM expected to write ?
Robert Riebisch answered:
No.
So, another question: Is there any CD-RW driver for DOS ? (That is,
one that reads and writes). BTW, Is there any such DVD driver ?
Regards
JAS
-
This
Is XCDROM expected to write ? I am experimenting with a CD-RW drive
in my computer and XCDROM does install correctly and allow reading
(with shsucdx) but issues an I/O error in writing to device
when cdmake tries to write to a CD-R in the drive.
My computer has an ISA bus and so, neither UDMA
Eric Auer said:
PS: Another nice way to connect custom made hardware is to use the printer
port. Luckily that stays available longer than the USB lobby wants ;-).
The USB lobby does not worry about the printer port for they did already
succeed in discontinuing all peripherals that used to
Ray Davison said:
Can you point me to an unrar utility that will work with DOS or OS\2. I
have tried several and gotten nowhere. I can see the directory but
cannot read or extract any of it.
Try this:
ftp://ftp.elf.stuba.sk/pub/pc/pack/unrar343.zip
JAS
Alain M. escreveu:
What would I use for sending emails (with attachement file)
I use (including for this message) TCPMAIL, a DOS program
I found at http://www.users.globalnet.co.uk/~jchap/tvde.htm
Attachments are OK, but you must mime-encode and attach them yourself.
It has no automation at
On Sun, 12 Feb 2006, dima wrote:
Long time I used dosppp and lsppp while had real IP the address.
Recently ISP has placed the users behind NAT and now users have grey IP
addresses. The problem since then has begun - dilal-up connection is
established, ping - is present, but TCP connection
Jeremy said:
(At least this is what I generally see it referring to)
Network Address Translation, commonly seen in home/small office type
broadband router/switches [e.g. Linksys, Dlink, Netgear, Belkin
products], it allows multiple (usually private) IP address to masquerade
as a single
As everybody probably knows by now, EMM386 works with the 386-optimized
freedos kernel. I am currently using it with kwc38616 build of 20 September.
Stability with Lynx also improved . It seems that in this respect the
classification of EMM386 shall now be useable.
A problem that appeared with
Eric wrote:
PPS: Acrobat/DOS can do PDF 1.1-almost1.2? Indeed old. But most current
are 1.4 / 1.5? I do not think so. My up-to-1.3 acroread/Linux displays
all files so far. Probably some companies thinking it is new so everybody
must use it to force all others to use it as well, without thinking
Aitor Santamaria wrote:
One book I read (I think Dissecting DOS) was considering the MBR as
part of the OS itself.
I think Dissecting DOS it is not. It explains the MBR but says it is
something independent form the O/S.
JAS
---
SF.Net
It did appear yesterday on this list:
sure whether Win98's COMMAND.COM can be configured to default to insert
mode instead of overwrite.
I do not have the MS-DOS version which comes with Win98, but MS-DOS 5 can
be so configured by using
DOSKEY /INSERT
or
DOSKEY /OVERWRITE
BTW, I would
Jim Hall wrote:
Does Jack's version have any extra benefits over Jason's original?
AFAIK,only smaller executable and resident sizes.
Sounds like there isn't a difference in functionality or bugs between
Jason's and Jack's SHSUCDX. That may be the deciding factor here.
I did not yet find
Eric Auer wrote:
Finally, HIMEM versus FD*XMS*: This is simple, HIMEM is better and
only HIMEM supports EMS/XMS memory pool sharing (as does e.g. MS
HIMEM, it is only that FD*XMS* saves a bit of space by not having
the support).
Other than support for memory pool sharing, what are the advantages
Eric Auer said:
We dropped LYNX when it became outdated. A LINKS port would be nice.
Two questions:
1) Why,exactly,is Lynx outdated (in comparison with other DOS browsers) ?
2) What is LINKS ?
Thanks for the atention
JAS
---
SF email
Does anybody know of a Flash player for DOS ?
I ask because many websites now have just an .SWF animation as their
home page and so are impenetrable to DOS browsers.
Regards
JAS
---
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read
MDGNU-ish type stuff suffers from the we despise everything related to
MDMicrosoft and Not Invented Here syndromes, and its relationship with DOS
MDis often uneasy. That said, DJGPP has never given me a problem when
MDtesting recent EMM386 versions.
I never compiled anything using DJGPP,but
I have been using Tee to display and save output of a SMTP/POP client
named TCPMAIL. One example of command line is:
C:\!NET\TCPMAIL.EXE /q /d [EMAIL PROTECTED] |C:\UTLS\TEE .\MAIL.LST
and noticed that it truncates the file (that is,some lines - perhaps 10 - that
appear last on screen are
Would anybody provide a link to the FreeDOS tee utility ?
There is no file by that name in ibiblio.org directory
Regards
JAS
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases.
I noticed another behavior difference between DRDOS and FreeDOS:
If,in a batchfile there is the line:
IF %1==XYZ GOTO LABEL
and no argument is passed in command line when calling the batch file,
Then DRDOS acts as if the comparison failed (that is,does not goto LABEL
with above line,but goto
Michael Devore wrote:
You wouldn't happen to be using SHARE would you? I found and fixed a bug
in SHARE having to do with read-only files mid-late 2004. Earlier SHARE
versions than that can fail.
No,I never used SHARE while testing Pictview.
JAS
I merged in this message feedback I got from people at fd-user list
about my comment that Pictview does not work under Freedos.
EAHi Jas, Arkady, the described problem (on freedos-user) sounds like
EAthe findfirst/findnext has the wrong treatment for attribute selection
EAversus disk label
Concerning COPY command in FreeCOM (noticed in latest versions;may do so or not
in former versions):
If one issues copy filename.ext d: and filename.ext does not exist in
current directory but already exists in destination directory, FreeCOM responds
with D:\FILENAME.EXT Already exists.Overwrite?
46 matches
Mail list logo