For web browsing, I would recommend Tiny Core Linux + either Opera or
Firefox. No packet driver needed, and you can actually launch it from
DOS thanks to LOADLIN. It can run wine too.
http://tinycorelinux.com
On Sat, Jun 20, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Japheth wrote:
>>> Internet Exporer 5 and earlier, maybe
>> Internet Exporer 5 and earlier, maybe 6.
>
> Hardest-core CRAP, please don't pull it out if it's grave.
Using IE 5 instead of Arachne is a good idea. It has support for the MS
version of JavaScript (JScript) and runs even on Windows 3.11 standard mode.
This makes it render a lot of web sites
> I haven't gotten the positive response I had hoped for trying
yeah :-(
> to drum up some interest in a Windows 9x replacement.
NO thanks. :-(
> Some have talked about possibly enhacing HX extender
Very good idea.
> and cloning Windows 3.x first, which makes a lot of sense.
NO.
> Maybe it
On Fri, 2009-06-19 at 10:29 +0200, Bernd Blaauw wrote:
> Michael Robinson schreef:
> > I haven't gotten the positive response I had hoped for trying
> > to drum up some interest in a Windows 9x replacement. Some
> > have talked about possibly enhacing HX extender and cloning
> > Windows 3.x fi
My reply is not meant as an angry rant at all, but I would like to see this
topic go somewhere more productive.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 5:30 PM, Michael Robinson
wrote:
> I haven't gotten the positive response I had hoped for trying
> to drum up some interest in a Windows 9x replacement.
That's
-
From: Michael Robinson [mailto:plu...@robinson-west.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 5:31 PM
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Freedos-user] What do you need from Windows world...
I haven't gotten the positive response I had hoped for trying
to drum up some interest in a Wi
Hi,
> Blake Stone Aliens of Gold requires the MS-DOS 6.22 or the Windows 9x
> version. It can run on top of Windows 9x.
>
> Wolfenstein 3D has the same problem because it's probably based on the
> same underlying engine. It starts under Freedos, but none of the keys
> work.
I just tried BS and
Hi Michael,
yes using HX for some Windows programs can make sense but...
> Maybe dos based Windows is dead. So what to do those of
> us who like some program or need some program that requires
> a dos based version of Microsoft Windows?
They probably use Wine in Linux ;-) Sorry for this thre
On Friday 19 June 2009 00:30 (CEST), Michael Robinson wrote:
> I haven't gotten the positive response I had hoped for trying
> to drum up some interest in a Windows 9x replacement.
Simple - that's far beyond the scope of the FreeDOS project. Personally, I
would lose any interst in FreeDOS, if
Michael Robinson schreef:
> I haven't gotten the positive response I had hoped for trying
> to drum up some interest in a Windows 9x replacement. Some
> have talked about possibly enhacing HX extender and cloning
> Windows 3.x first, which makes a lot of sense.
>
Some have only talked that i
I haven't gotten the positive response I had hoped for trying
to drum up some interest in a Windows 9x replacement. Some
have talked about possibly enhacing HX extender and cloning
Windows 3.x first, which makes a lot of sense.
Maybe it doesn't make sense to replace dos based Windows.
Maybe
11 matches
Mail list logo
