-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2010 04:09 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> Breaking the thread intentionally to bring back focus.
>>
>> With Adam's recent input, I've modified the grammar to what I hope will
>> be it's final form.
>>
>> The complete gramm
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2010 04:09 PM, Endi Sukma Dewata wrote:
> On 11/19/2010 2:56 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> So we loose the possibility of saying: the last friday of the month ?
>>
>> It's not impossible, it can still be done with this schema, though it's
>
Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> Breaking the thread intentionally to bring back focus.
>>
>> With Adam's recent input, I've modified the grammar to what I hope will
>> be it's final form.
>>
>> The complete grammar is available at
>> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/HBAC_Gram
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Breaking the thread intentionally to bring back focus.
>
> With Adam's recent input, I've modified the grammar to what I hope will
> be it's final form.
>
> The complete grammar is available at
> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/HBAC_Grammar
>
> The differences from my
On 11/19/2010 2:56 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
So we loose the possibility of saying: the last friday of the month ?
It's not impossible, it can still be done with this schema, though it's
somewhat more complicated.
You'd need to set it up as separate rules for each particular month.
How ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2010 03:55 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:31:30 -0500
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Breaking the thread intentionally to bring back focus.
>>
>> With Adam's recent inpu
On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 15:31:30 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Breaking the thread intentionally to bring back focus.
>
> With Adam's recent input, I've modified the grammar to what I hope
> will be it's final form.
>
> The complete grammar is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Breaking the thread intentionally to bring back focus.
With Adam's recent input, I've modified the grammar to what I hope will
be it's final form.
The complete grammar is available at
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/HBAC_Grammar
The differences f
On 11/19/2010 06:33 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2010 06:16 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 11/18/2010 05:27 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 11/18/2010 04:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/19/2010 07:49 AM, Sumit Bose wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:27:13PM -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> Adam Young wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2010 04:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2010 09:55 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>>
>> Steve can you s
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 05:27:13PM -0500, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Adam Young wrote:
> > On 11/18/2010 04:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 11/18/2010 09:55 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> >
> > >>> Steve can you summarize where we are and what we agreed to,
> > please, and
> > >>> identify the questions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2010 06:16 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Adam Young wrote:
>> On 11/18/2010 05:27 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>> Adam Young wrote:
>>>
On 11/18/2010 04:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/18/2010 09:55 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 05:27 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>> Adam Young wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/18/2010 04:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>> On 11/18/2010 09:55 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> Steve can you summarize where we are and what we agreed to,
>>
>>> please,
On 11/18/2010 05:27 PM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Adam Young wrote:
On 11/18/2010 04:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On 11/18/2010 09:55 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Steve can you summarize where we are and what we agreed to,
please, and
identify the questions that we need to an
Adam Young wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 04:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 09:55 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
>
> >>> Steve can you summarize where we are and what we agreed to,
> please, and
> >>> identify the questions that we need to answer.
> >>>
>
> Simo, Adam and I had a long discus
On 11/18/2010 04:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2010 09:55 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
Steve can you summarize where we are and what we agreed to, please, and
identify the questions that we need to answer.
Simo, Adam and I had a long
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2010 09:55 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
> Steve can you summarize where we are and what we agreed to, please, and
> identify the questions that we need to answer.
Simo, Adam and I had a long discussion on IRC regarding the time rules
today (complet
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 09:31 AM, Adam Young wrote:
> > On 11/18/2010 07:09 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On 11/17/2010 04:51 PM, Adam Young wrote:
>
> On 11/17/2010 04:31 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:07:24 -0500
> > Stephen Gallagher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/18/2010 09:31 AM, Adam Young wrote:
> On 11/18/2010 07:09 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 04:51 PM, Adam Young wrote:
>
On 11/17/2010 04:31 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:07:24 -0500
> Stephe
On 11/18/2010 07:09 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2010 04:51 PM, Adam Young wrote:
On 11/17/2010 04:31 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:07:24 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This will require two changes to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/17/2010 04:51 PM, Adam Young wrote:
> On 11/17/2010 04:31 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:07:24 -0500
>> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This will require two changes to the HBAC schema. First of all, we
>>> plan to drop th
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:51:12 -0500
Adam Young wrote:
> Since we are so close to deadline on this, I suspect we should go
> with something as straightforward as this, and expand it post release.
Expanding post release would be an ABI change, not feasible.
Remember that *clients* need to interpret
On 11/17/2010 04:31 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:07:24 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This will require two changes to the HBAC schema. First of all, we
plan to drop the week-of-the-month concept entirely and replace it
with septet-of-the-month. This is being done to elimin
On 11/17/2010 04:31 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:07:24 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
This will require two changes to the HBAC schema. First of all, we
plan to drop the week-of-the-month concept entirely and replace it
with septet-of-the-month. This is being done to elimin
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 16:07:24 -0500
Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> This will require two changes to the HBAC schema. First of all, we
> plan to drop the week-of-the-month concept entirely and replace it
> with septet-of-the-month. This is being done to eliminate the
> ambiguity entirely. Secondly, we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
During a discussion today about how to represent the HBAC grammar in the
FreeIPA GUI, it became apparent that there was a limitation in the
grammar. Specifically, it's not possible to describe in a non-ambiguous
way "The first Wednesday of the month".
26 matches
Mail list logo
