On 5.9.2016 10:42, Tomas Krizek wrote:
On 09/02/2016 09:05 AM, Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
On 09/02/2016 08:08 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 1.9.2016 19:37, Tomas Krizek wrote:
On 09/01/2016 03:58 PM, Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
Hi,
please find attached a patch for ipa-certupdate in CA-less
On 09/02/2016 09:05 AM, Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
On 09/02/2016 08:08 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 1.9.2016 19:37, Tomas Krizek wrote:
On 09/01/2016 03:58 PM, Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
Hi,
please find attached a patch for ipa-certupdate in CA-less deployment.
https://fedorahosted.org/fre
On 09/02/2016 08:08 AM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
On 1.9.2016 19:37, Tomas Krizek wrote:
On 09/01/2016 03:58 PM, Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
Hi,
please find attached a patch for ipa-certupdate in CA-less deployment.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6288
Flo.
The patch is malformed, but
On 1.9.2016 19:37, Tomas Krizek wrote:
On 09/01/2016 03:58 PM, Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
Hi,
please find attached a patch for ipa-certupdate in CA-less deployment.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6288
Flo.
The patch is malformed, but you can simply delete the very first
characte
On 2.9.2016 05:22, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 07:37:53PM +0200, Tomas Krizek wrote:
>> On 09/01/2016 03:58 PM, Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> please find attached a patch for ipa-certupdate in CA-less deployment.
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6288
>
On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 07:37:53PM +0200, Tomas Krizek wrote:
> On 09/01/2016 03:58 PM, Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > please find attached a patch for ipa-certupdate in CA-less deployment.
> > https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6288
> >
> > Flo.
> >
> >
> >
> The patch is m
On 09/01/2016 03:58 PM, Florence Blanc-Renaud wrote:
Hi,
please find attached a patch for ipa-certupdate in CA-less deployment.
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/6288
Flo.
The patch is malformed, but you can simply delete the very first
character to fix it.
Other than that, patch wo
On 07/14/2016 03:11 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
> On 07/14/2016 11:43 AM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>> Resending the complete patch set.
>> L.
>>
>>
>
> Thanks, ACK.
>
> --
> Milan Kubik
>
master:
* 0f9a5ce6b4c533647b8894f516e34bea8184f1b8 Tests: Tracker class for services
* dcdbbb975927a24e
On 07/14/2016 11:43 AM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/14/2016 11:25 AM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/14/2016 09:20 AM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/13/2016 04:48 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/11/2016 01:34 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/08/2016 02:24 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/01/2016
On 07/14/2016 11:25 AM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/14/2016 09:20 AM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/13/2016 04:48 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/11/2016 01:34 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/08/2016 02:24 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/01/2016 05:13 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/01/201
On 07/14/2016 09:20 AM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/13/2016 04:48 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/11/2016 01:34 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/08/2016 02:24 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/01/2016 05:13 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/01/2016 02:42 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 06/16/2016 03:
On 07/13/2016 04:48 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/11/2016 01:34 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/08/2016 02:24 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/01/2016 05:13 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/01/2016 02:42 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 06/16/2016 03:23 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
Hi,
attached are te
On 07/11/2016 01:34 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/08/2016 02:24 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/01/2016 05:13 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/01/2016 02:42 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 06/16/2016 03:23 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
Hi,
attached are tests for authentication indicators. Please note
On 07/08/2016 02:24 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 07/01/2016 05:13 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/01/2016 02:42 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 06/16/2016 03:23 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
Hi,
attached are tests for authentication indicators. Please note:
1. newly created service tracker is not exac
On 07/01/2016 05:13 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
On 07/01/2016 02:42 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 06/16/2016 03:23 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
Hi,
attached are tests for authentication indicators. Please note:
1. newly created service tracker is not exactly complete, list of
unimplemented methods i
On 07/01/2016 02:42 PM, Milan Kubík wrote:
On 06/16/2016 03:23 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
Hi,
attached are tests for authentication indicators. Please note:
1. newly created service tracker is not exactly complete, list of
unimplemented methods is in doc. These methods can be filled in when
On 06/16/2016 03:23 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
Hi,
attached are tests for authentication indicators. Please note:
1. newly created service tracker is not exactly complete, list of
unimplemented methods is in doc. These methods can be filled in when
existing declarative tests are refactored.
2
Bump for review. Thanks.
On 06/16/2016 03:23 PM, Lenka Doudova wrote:
Hi,
attached are tests for authentication indicators. Please note:
1. newly created service tracker is not exactly complete, list of
unimplemented methods is in doc. These methods can be filled in when
existing declarativ
On 04/14/2016 09:39 AM, Pavel Vomacka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The attached patch fixes this ticket:
> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/5370 .
>
> It adds radio button to choose whether you want to preserve or delete
> user when performing delete action from details page.
>
> --
> Pavel^3 Vomack
On 09.05.2016 10:02, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 7.5.2016 08:44, Abhijeet Kasurde wrote:
Hi All,
Please review this patch.
ACK, I've verified that CalledProcessError signature in Python 2.7 and in the
duplicate code is the same.
Pushed to master: 51db9380cfc862993e1909602d2726e851f463b4
--
Mana
On 7.5.2016 08:44, Abhijeet Kasurde wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please review this patch.
ACK, I've verified that CalledProcessError signature in Python 2.7 and in the
duplicate code is the same.
--
Petr^2 Spacek
--
Manage your subscription for the Freeipa-devel mailing list:
https://www.redhat.com/
Dne 23.7.2015 v 11:06 Christian Heimes napsal(a):
On 2015-07-23 10:54, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Hi,
Dne 23.7.2015 v 10:43 Christian Heimes napsal(a):
This patch removes the dependency on M2Crypto in favor for cryptography.
Cryptography is more strict about the key size and doesn't support
non-stand
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Christian Heimes wrote:
On 2015-07-23 11:06, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Christian Heimes wrote:
This patch removes the dependency on M2Crypto in favor for cryptography.
Cryptography is more strict about the key size and doesn't support
non-standard key si
On 2015-07-23 11:06, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Christian Heimes wrote:
>> This patch removes the dependency on M2Crypto in favor for cryptography.
>> Cryptography is more strict about the key size and doesn't support
>> non-standard key sizes:
>>
> from M2Crypto import RC4
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Christian Heimes wrote:
This patch removes the dependency on M2Crypto in favor for cryptography.
Cryptography is more strict about the key size and doesn't support
non-standard key sizes:
from M2Crypto import RC4
from ipaserver.dcerpc import arcfour_encrypt
RC4.RC4(b'key').
On 2015-07-23 10:54, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Dne 23.7.2015 v 10:43 Christian Heimes napsal(a):
>> This patch removes the dependency on M2Crypto in favor for cryptography.
>> Cryptography is more strict about the key size and doesn't support
>> non-standard key sizes:
>>
> from M2Crypto i
On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Christian Heimes wrote:
This patch removes the dependency on M2Crypto in favor for cryptography.
Cryptography is more strict about the key size and doesn't support
non-standard key sizes:
from M2Crypto import RC4
from ipaserver.dcerpc import arcfour_encrypt
RC4.RC4(b'key').
Hi,
Dne 23.7.2015 v 10:43 Christian Heimes napsal(a):
This patch removes the dependency on M2Crypto in favor for cryptography.
Cryptography is more strict about the key size and doesn't support
non-standard key sizes:
from M2Crypto import RC4
from ipaserver.dcerpc import arcfour_encrypt
RC4.RC
On 06/29/2015 01:50 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
> On 06/29/2015 12:47 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>> On 17/06/15 11:05, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>>>
>>> On 06/17/2015 10:35 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/17/2015 09:25 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
> Hi,
> thanks for review, see answers inline.
On 06/29/2015 12:47 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 17/06/15 11:05, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/17/2015 10:35 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/17/2015 09:25 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
thanks for review, see answers inline.
On 06/16/2015 05:17 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/16/2015 11:41 AM,
On 17/06/15 11:05, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
On 06/17/2015 10:35 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/17/2015 09:25 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
thanks for review, see answers inline.
On 06/16/2015 05:17 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/16/2015 11:41 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
this patch adresses i
On 06/17/2015 10:35 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/17/2015 09:25 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
thanks for review, see answers inline.
On 06/16/2015 05:17 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/16/2015 11:41 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
this patch adresses issues in checking existing segments for one
On 06/17/2015 09:25 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
thanks for review, see answers inline.
On 06/16/2015 05:17 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/16/2015 11:41 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
this patch adresses issues in checking existing segments for one
directional segments and correctly handles the
Hi,
thanks for review, see answers inline.
On 06/16/2015 05:17 PM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 06/16/2015 11:41 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
this patch adresses issues in checking existing segments for one
directional segments and correctly handles the merging of segments,
so that all agreements wi
On 06/16/2015 11:41 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
this patch adresses issues in checking existing segments for one
directional segments and correctly handles the merging of segments, so
that all agreements will be removed when the merged segment is deleted
This is looking good to me with few c
Dne 3.6.2015 v 17:44 Martin Basti napsal(a):
On 03/06/15 15:21, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:55:47PM +0200, Milan Kubik wrote:
On 06/03/2015 01:17 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 02/06/15 16:03, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 2.6.2015 v 12:36 Martin Basti napsal(a):
On 02/06/15 11:4
On 02/06/15 16:56, Petr Vobornik wrote:
On 05/27/2015 03:53 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
schema change is needed ('usercertificate' attribute is already
multi-value). The revoke-previous-cert behaviour of host-mod and
user-mod ha
On 03/06/15 15:21, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:55:47PM +0200, Milan Kubik wrote:
On 06/03/2015 01:17 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 02/06/15 16:03, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 2.6.2015 v 12:36 Martin Basti napsal(a):
On 02/06/15 11:42, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 201
On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 01:55:47PM +0200, Milan Kubik wrote:
> On 06/03/2015 01:17 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
> >On 02/06/15 16:03, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> >>Dne 2.6.2015 v 12:36 Martin Basti napsal(a):
> >>>On 02/06/15 11:42, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:50:45PM +0200, Martin
On 06/03/2015 01:17 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 02/06/15 16:03, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 2.6.2015 v 12:36 Martin Basti napsal(a):
On 02/06/15 11:42, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:50:45PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
On 01/06/15 06:40, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
New version of pat
On 02/06/15 16:03, Jan Cholasta wrote:
Dne 2.6.2015 v 12:36 Martin Basti napsal(a):
On 02/06/15 11:42, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:50:45PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
On 01/06/15 06:40, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
New version of patch; ``{host,service}-show --out=FILE`` now wr
On 05/27/2015 03:53 PM, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
schema change is needed ('usercertificate' attribute is already
multi-value). The revoke-previous-cert behaviour of host-mod and
user-mod has been removed but revocation behaviour o
Dne 2.6.2015 v 12:36 Martin Basti napsal(a):
On 02/06/15 11:42, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:50:45PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
On 01/06/15 06:40, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
New version of patch; ``{host,service}-show --out=FILE`` now writes
all certs to FILE. Rebased on late
On 02/06/15 11:42, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:50:45PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
On 01/06/15 06:40, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
New version of patch; ``{host,service}-show --out=FILE`` now writes
all certs to FILE. Rebased on latest master.
Thanks,
Fraser
On Thu, May 28, 20
On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:50:45PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 01/06/15 06:40, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> >New version of patch; ``{host,service}-show --out=FILE`` now writes
> >all certs to FILE. Rebased on latest master.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Fraser
> >
> >On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:18:04PM +1000,
On 01/06/15 06:40, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
New version of patch; ``{host,service}-show --out=FILE`` now writes
all certs to FILE. Rebased on latest master.
Thanks,
Fraser
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:18:04PM +1000, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
Updated patch attached. Notably restores/adds revocation
New version of patch; ``{host,service}-show --out=FILE`` now writes
all certs to FILE. Rebased on latest master.
Thanks,
Fraser
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:18:04PM +1000, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> Updated patch attached. Notably restores/adds revocation behaviour
> to host-mod and service-mod.
>
On 28.5.2015 15:43, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 02:29 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
>> On 28.5.2015 12:06, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 11:17 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 28/05/15 10:46, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> O
On Thu, 2015-05-28 at 15:43 +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 02:29 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > On 28.5.2015 12:06, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >>> On 05/28/2015 11:17 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 28/05/15 10:46, Martin Ko
On 05/28/2015 02:29 PM, Petr Spacek wrote:
> On 28.5.2015 12:06, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
>> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>>> On 05/28/2015 11:17 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 28/05/15 10:46, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/27/2015 06:12 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 28/05/15 14:29, Petr Spacek wrote:
On 28.5.2015 12:06, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/28/2015 11:17 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 28/05/15 10:46, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2015 06:12 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27/05/15 15:53, Fra
On 28.5.2015 12:06, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 05/28/2015 11:17 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
>>> On 28/05/15 10:46, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2015 06:12 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
>
Updated patch attached. Notably restores/adds revocation behaviour
to host-mod and service-mod.
Thanks,
Fraser
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:12:50PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> >This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
> >schem
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:52:25AM +0200, Martin Kosek wrote:
> On 05/28/2015 11:17 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
> > On 28/05/15 10:46, Martin Kosek wrote:
> >> On 05/27/2015 06:12 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
> >>> On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> This patch adds supports for multiple user /
On 28/05/15 11:17, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:40:22AM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
On 28/05/15 10:13, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:12:50PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
This patch adds supports for multiple user
On 05/28/2015 11:17 AM, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 28/05/15 10:46, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 05/27/2015 06:12 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
>>> On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
schema change is needed ('usercertificate'
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 10:40:22AM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 28/05/15 10:13, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> >On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:12:50PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
> >>On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> >>>This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
> >>>sche
On 28/05/15 10:46, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 05/27/2015 06:12 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
schema change is needed ('usercertificate' attribute is already
multi-value). The revoke-previous-cer
On 05/27/2015 06:12 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
>> This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
>> schema change is needed ('usercertificate' attribute is already
>> multi-value). The revoke-previous-cert behaviour of host-mod and
>> u
On 28/05/15 10:13, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:12:50PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
schema change is needed ('usercertificate' attribute is already
multi-value). Th
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:12:50PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> >This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
> >schema change is needed ('usercertificate' attribute is already
> >multi-value). The revoke-previous-cert behaviour of
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 06:12:50PM +0200, Martin Basti wrote:
> On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
> >This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
> >schema change is needed ('usercertificate' attribute is already
> >multi-value). The revoke-previous-cert behaviour of
On 27/05/15 15:53, Fraser Tweedale wrote:
This patch adds supports for multiple user / host certificates. No
schema change is needed ('usercertificate' attribute is already
multi-value). The revoke-previous-cert behaviour of host-mod and
user-mod has been removed but revocation behaviour of -de
Dne 28.4.2015 v 15:03 Martin Basti napsal(a):
On 27/04/15 10:54, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 04/24/2015 04:15 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 20/04/15 12:59, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 04/17/2015 03:56 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/05/2015 01:11 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org
On 27/04/15 10:54, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 04/24/2015 04:15 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 20/04/15 12:59, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 04/17/2015 03:56 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/05/2015 01:11 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4900
___
On 04/24/2015 04:15 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
On 20/04/15 12:59, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 04/17/2015 03:56 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/05/2015 01:11 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4900
___
Freeipa-devel mail
On 20/04/15 12:59, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 04/17/2015 03:56 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/05/2015 01:11 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4900
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www
On 04/17/2015 03:56 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
On 03/05/2015 01:11 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4900
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
On 03/05/2015 01:11 PM, Martin Babinsky wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4900
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
Nobody to review this?
--
Martin^3 Babinsky
On 09/10/2014 03:18 PM, Jan Cholasta wrote:
> Dne 10.9.2014 v 13:15 David Kupka napsal(a):
>> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4529
>
> ACK.
>
Pushed to master, ipa-4-1, ipa-4-0.
Martin
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
h
Dne 10.9.2014 v 13:15 David Kupka napsal(a):
https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/4529
ACK.
--
Jan Cholasta
___
Freeipa-devel mailing list
Freeipa-devel@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/freeipa-devel
On 10/18/2013 05:00 PM, Martin Basti wrote:
> Patch attached.
>
> Ticket:
> https://fedorahosted.org/freeipa/ticket/3243
>
I did not test the patch, just looked at the code and I have few comments:
1) Please put the ipalib/cli.py change to a sepparate change, we may want to
backport it separate
On 10/01/2012 03:38 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
> On 09/26/2012 04:12 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
>> On 09/26/2012 03:23 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>>> On 09/25/2012 12:37 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
On adding new user, host-add tries to make it a member of default
user group. This, however,
On 09/26/2012 04:12 PM, Martin Kosek wrote:
On 09/26/2012 03:23 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
On 09/25/2012 12:37 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
On adding new user, host-add tries to make it a member of default
user group. This, however, can raise AlreadyGroupMember when the
user is already member of thi
On 09/26/2012 03:23 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
> On 09/25/2012 12:37 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On adding new user, host-add tries to make it a member of default
>> user group. This, however, can raise AlreadyGroupMember when the
>> user is already member of this group due to automember rule o
On 09/25/2012 12:37 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
On adding new user, host-add tries to make it a member of default
user group. This, however, can raise AlreadyGroupMember when the
user is already member of this group due to automember rule or
default group configured. This patch makes sure Already
On 09/25/2012 12:37 PM, Tomas Babej wrote:
Hi,
On adding new user, host-add tries to make it a member of default
user group. This, however, can raise AlreadyGroupMember when the
user is already member of this group due to automember rule or
default group configured. This patch makes sure Already
On 04/18/2012 12:38 AM, Dmitri Pal wrote:
On 04/17/2012 01:13 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 04/17/2012 06:46 PM, John Dennis wrote:
Thank you for the explanation Petr, it's very much appreciated.
I do have a problem with this patch and I'm inclined to NAK it, but I'm
open to discussion. Here's m
On 04/17/2012 01:13 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On 04/17/2012 06:46 PM, John Dennis wrote:
>> Thank you for the explanation Petr, it's very much appreciated.
>>
>> I do have a problem with this patch and I'm inclined to NAK it, but I'm
>> open to discussion. Here's my thoughts, if I've made mistakes
On 04/17/2012 06:46 PM, John Dennis wrote:
Thank you for the explanation Petr, it's very much appreciated.
I do have a problem with this patch and I'm inclined to NAK it, but I'm
open to discussion. Here's my thoughts, if I've made mistakes in my
reasoning please point them out.
The fundamental
Thank you for the explanation Petr, it's very much appreciated.
I do have a problem with this patch and I'm inclined to NAK it, but I'm
open to discussion. Here's my thoughts, if I've made mistakes in my
reasoning please point them out.
The fundamental problem is many of our command line util
On 04/17/2012 04:12 PM, John Dennis wrote:
There have been so many versions of the patch and various comments
attached to it I'm afraid I'm still trying to wrap my head around what
the actual problem is we're trying to solve, until I have that
understanding I can't evaluate the proposed solution.
There have been so many versions of the patch and various comments
attached to it I'm afraid I'm still trying to wrap my head around what
the actual problem is we're trying to solve, until I have that
understanding I can't evaluate the proposed solution.
Could you please state simply what the
On 04/17/2012 12:12 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/16/2012 04:15 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/16/2012 01:31 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/13/2012 06:25 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
When the utility sets logging to console, the extra
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/16/2012 04:15 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/16/2012 01:31 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/13/2012 06:25 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
When the utility sets logging to console, the extra log message gets
printed out there. I agree th
On 04/16/2012 04:15 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/16/2012 01:31 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/13/2012 06:25 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
When the utility sets logging to console, the extra log message gets
printed out there. I agree this isn't optimal.
At
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/16/2012 01:31 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/13/2012 06:25 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
When the utility sets logging to console, the extra log message gets
printed out there. I agree this isn't optimal.
Attached patch removes the console log handler be
On 04/16/2012 01:31 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/13/2012 06:25 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
When the utility sets logging to console, the extra log message gets
printed out there. I agree this isn't optimal.
Attached patch removes the console log handler before logging the
res
John Dennis wrote:
On 04/13/2012 06:25 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
When the utility sets logging to console, the extra log message gets
printed out there. I agree this isn't optimal.
Attached patch removes the console log handler before logging the
result.
I read through log_manager, and found t
On 04/13/2012 06:25 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
When the utility sets logging to console, the extra log message gets
printed out there. I agree this isn't optimal.
Attached patch removes the console log handler before logging the result.
I read through log_manager, and found that I can do this mo
On 04/12/2012 01:30 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 04/10/2012 10:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/30/2012 11:00 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 05:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Some minor compliant
On 03/30/2012 06:21 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
Updated patch: only log if logging has been configured (detected by
looking at the root logger's handlers), and changed the message to “The
ipa-server-install command has succeeded/failed”.
Actually the log_manager has an attribute called configure_s
On 04/10/2012 10:41 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/30/2012 11:00 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 05:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Some minor compliants.
Ideally, there would be a routine that s
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/30/2012 11:00 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 05:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Some minor compliants.
Ideally, there would be a routine that sets up the logging and handles
command-line arg
On 03/30/2012 11:00 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 05:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Some minor compliants.
Ideally, there would be a routine that sets up the logging and handles
command-line arguments in some uniform
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 05:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Some minor compliants.
Ideally, there would be a routine that sets up the logging and handles
command-line arguments in some uniform way (which is also needed before
logging setup
On 03/26/2012 05:35 PM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/26/2012 04:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Some minor compliants.
Ideally, there would be a routine that sets up the logging and handles
command-line arguments in some uniform way (which is also needed before
logging setup to detect ipa-server-
On 03/26/2012 04:54 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Some minor compliants.
Ideally, there would be a routine that sets up the logging and handles
command-line arguments in some uniform way (which is also needed before
logging setup to detect ipa-server-install --uninstall).
The original patch did
Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/15/2012 11:30 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/01/2012 11:45 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/29/2012 07:46 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:51 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/22/2012 10:41 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
This fixes ht
On 03/15/2012 11:30 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 03/01/2012 11:45 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/29/2012 07:46 PM, Rob Crittenden wrote:
Martin Kosek wrote:
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:51 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote:
On 02/22/2012 10:41 AM, Petr Viktorin wrote:
This fixes https://fedorahosted.org
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
