[Ganglia-developers] GB vs GiB for disk metrics and its implications

2006-11-19 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Greetings, while working on implementing disk metrics for Solaris, I found the following comment on the Linux implementation ([EMAIL PROTECTED]:1360) which looked suspicious : /* We report in GB = 1e9 bytes. */ sadly, in Solaris at least (and also in Linux, NetBSD and OpenBSD AFAIK) the

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Bugzilla and bugs

2006-12-16 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 11:06:48AM -0800, matt massie wrote: i'm happy to open subversion access to any developers on this list who are blocked waiting for someone to drop in a patch. I got this bug/patch open to implement disk metrics for Solaris :

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Bugzilla and bugs

2006-12-18 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:55:29PM +0100, Erich Focht wrote: On Monday 18 December 2006 11:28, Martin Knoblauch wrote: no objections from my side. I am using it on several clusters without any serious problems. any objections to changing the part_max_used metric to be limited to RW

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia+OpenBSD?

2006-12-27 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 12:38:00AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: I see no problem to add OpenBSD support in 3.0.5. Just go on and check it in once you are satisfied with your stuff. checked it in already in revision 697.

[Ganglia-developers] updating to a more recent libtool version for the bootstrap?

2006-12-31 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Greetings, is there any reason why for the bootstrap we are still using a 1.5.8 version of ltmain.sh that is almost 2 years old? and if that is the case, where did that came from, as i couldn't find a match from the package with that same version number from sourceware. FWIW, I'd been doing

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Correct counting of CPUs, Cores, Siblings (bz #84)

2007-01-01 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 03:12:51AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: What I now need is the output from 2.4 based configs. Only multi-core and/or HT-enabled systems actually. AFAIK in vanilla kernel 2.4 there is no way to tell between virtual and real CPUs from /proc/cpuinfo as can be seen by

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Correct counting of CPUs, Cores, Siblings (bz #84)

2007-01-01 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Dec 22, 2006 at 08:05:02AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: Hi Folks, in order to fix bz#84 for Linux. http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84 I think that the fix for this bug should actually include adding 2 more metrics, as the problem as stated isn't

[Ganglia-developers] maintenance branch for ganglia 2.5.x?

2007-01-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Greetings, There seem to be some platforms (Debian (*) and SuSE being the ones that are more relevant IMHO) that are maintaining their own forks of ganglia based on 2.5.7, while some others (Gentoo, Fedora, NetBSD, FreeBSD and Solaris being the ones that are more relevant IMHO) that are currently

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Ganglia+OpenBSD?

2007-01-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Dec 27, 2006 at 09:45:35AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: I used NetBSD as a base from my port (as it is the closest), sadly they are not that similar as to just work with the other source as you can see by the diff. Understand. Btw. you should check the use of the strings NetBSD

Re: [Ganglia-developers] libstatgrab - cross platform statistics library

2007-01-04 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Jan 04, 2007 at 10:59:01AM -0500, Vladimir Vuksan wrote: I was wondering if there may be some value in using libstatgrab in Ganglia for grabbing some of the metrics. I realize Ganglia has most (or all) of the metrics in libgrabstat but may be a wise choice for the future since

Re: [Ganglia-developers] updating to a more recent libtool version for the bootstrap?

2007-01-06 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 01:22:34AM -0800, Martin Knoblauch wrote: --- Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, I'd been doing `autoreconf --verbose --force --install` for the last days with the FC6 provided autotool packages : autoconf 2.59 automake 1.9.6

Re: [Ganglia-developers] subversion cleanup

2007-01-06 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
guys- i just went in an cleanup all the tags and branches in subversion. great work, and definitely something we needed if we are to keep also the 2.x branch for ganglia an some sanity as I mentioned before. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/Code/Svn/ganglia/tags$ ls gexec-0.2.1

Re: [Ganglia-developers] subversion cleanup

2007-01-06 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sat, Jan 06, 2007 at 07:36:29PM -0600, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: wasn't really sure either about the accuracy of the 2.5.x tags, as I'd been so far unsuccessful trying to match the 2.5.7 tag with the corresponding update version in trunk after going up and down in the versions

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia for Windows help

2007-01-07 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 04:20:37PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Install a full cygwin system (specified on their downloader app), don't use the default install or any other subset. Why?, all you really should need is the basic stuff (going by default) and add to it the compilers, make

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Correct counting of CPUs, Cores, Siblings (bz #84)

2007-01-07 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 05:23:47PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Also remember about the cygwin agent build, which also processes from cygwin's /proc. the cpu_num metric was hardcoded to return 1 until 3.0.5, so that one will change regardless, but this time it will show the right number of

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Windows versions of gmond/gmetric

2007-01-07 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 04:59:54PM -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Unfortunately it is cygwin itself (and not ganglia) that causes problems by not imlpementing all the metrics that it should in /proc. well, for Windows there is no concept of load average and therefore the load_* metrics are

Re: [Ganglia-developers] cpu count in windows (was [PROPOSAL] Building Gmond on WindowsDoc...)

2007-08-26 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
SNIP I also have a simple patch to implement cygwin cpu count that I will forward tonight. I remember a thread about this a while ago and I'm surprised that cygwin/gmetric.c/cpu_num_func() looks like the original one. Oops, my bad, I'd been using a patched version of cpu_num_func for a while

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Release notes for 3.0.5

2007-09-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 10:30:31AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: Hi guys: Ganglia 3.0.5 is ready, I have prepared the release notes here: noticed the tag in the morning and had been busy doing packages already, as I really expected another RC with the verified fixes for MacOS to use for platform

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Cygwin

2007-10-04 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 11:32:48PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: Anybody who have access to Cygwin want to test this patch and provide feedback? http://bugzilla.ganglia.info/cgi-bin/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=154 took the bug, the provided patch conflicts with the fix I proposed, tested and

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.1.0 wishlist

2007-10-04 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 10:47:41AM -0500, Jim Rowan wrote: Bernard Li wrote: Dear all: As you all know, 3.0.5 has just been released -- time to work on 3.1.0! :-) I thought I would start a wishlist for 3.1.0 where we can brainstorm for ideas to go into our next release. I would

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.1.0 wishlist

2007-10-06 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:30:39AM -0400, Richard Mohr wrote: On Fri, 2007-10-05 at 00:17 -0400, Wood, David wrote: I was under the impression that lots of people experienced disk i/o issues with gmetad. I was also under the impression that the generally accepted work around for this

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Switch off removing dead hosts after gmond and gmetad restart

2007-10-27 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 06:45:59PM +0400, Kirill Nikonorov wrote: where to look in sources to switch off removing dead hosts after Ganglia daemons restart. I need to keep the view of my cluster even with dead nodes. there is no way in the source to switch off removing dead hosts at shutdown,

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Problem in windows ganglia version

2007-10-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:58:22PM +0100, richard grevis wrote: unfortunately for you, this is a bug, and the bug lies in cygwin rather than gmond as I remember it. More than a bug, it is a limitation because for the point of view of gmond it is limited to the ammount of memory that cygwin can

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Problem in windows ganglia version

2007-10-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:20:59PM +0530, Deepak CHAUHAN wrote: Hello All, I have installed ganglia for windows 2003 server but its not showing RAM more than 2 GB and server is having 16 GB of RAM.Pls. help me in resolving the issue. Can you see if the attached patch fixes the issue?

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Moving on with Ganglia 3.1...

2007-11-05 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 04:29:21PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: -* Remove the 4T limit on ganglia metric results -* Modify all byte count metric to 8 bytes ints moving to 8 byte ints won't solve the problem, will only push it further and will make the memory utilization for gmond and disk

Re: [Ganglia-developers] multicpu.conf

2007-11-06 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 04:59:59PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: Got a quick question about multicpu.conf -- by default, this is installed with the RPM and enabled, should it be? Because apparently, the kernel which comes with CentOS 4 does not support it, as I get the following syslog message

Re: [Ganglia-developers] multicpu.conf

2007-11-07 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:45:37PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: attached a fix that was tested working in my athlon64 laptop running gentoo linux 2007.0 with and without powernow-k8. a similar fix will need to be done for the multicpu code unless changes in r815 are reverted and then we go

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] python modules .pyc files

2007-11-09 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Nov 08, 2007 at 09:20:26AM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: Anybody else have comments on this? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python Carlo - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through

Re: [Ganglia-developers] lightweight alert tool/ enhancement

2007-11-09 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:41:50AM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: On 11/9/07, Khazret Sapenov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to get an email notification on some event like cpu load spike beyond certain threshold or low disk space. I know there's already Nagios that might do it, but

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] python modules .py{c,o}

2007-11-09 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 02:55:16PM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote: Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/9/07, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Python If it's okay with you, I will follow the instructions in the wiki docs

Re: [Ganglia-developers] OpenBSD tweaks

2007-11-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 09:56:14AM -0500, Jesse Becker wrote: I've been trying to build the trunk version of Ganglia on an OpenBSD 4.1 box recently, and it isn't for the faint of heart. sadly true, building trunk isn't that easy if you are not using Fedora, indeed I didn't even though that

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Static ganglia builds (was OpenBSD tweaks)

2007-11-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 10:26:57AM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: In this case, static builds (with the updated dependencies from the tarball) should be able to take advantage of the new features? No, you need to be linked with a dynamically loaded apr and had dlopen support to be able to do that

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Static ganglia builds (was OpenBSD tweaks)

2007-11-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 11:17:16AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote: The reason why I am making that suggestion is because if somebody wants a static version then they should just continue using 3.0.5. They will also need the bugfixes we are getting into 3.1.x, and since we said we won't maintain

[Ganglia-developers] release packaging and maintenance releases for 3.0.x

2007-12-30 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Greetings, while preparing a bootstrap environment which could be used to generate maintenance releases for the 3.0.x branch noticed we'd been using different versions for autotools that the ones detailed in README.SVNusers (which match the ones used by 2.5.7), as shown by the following table :

Re: [Ganglia-developers] release packaging and maintenance releases for 3.0.x

2008-01-03 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Jan 02, 2008 at 10:34:37PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: On 12/31/07, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: while preparing a bootstrap environment which could be used to generate maintenance releases for the 3.0.x branch noticed we'd been using different versions

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia automatic snapshots (was Re: [Ganglia-general] Ganglia rrdtool problem?)

2008-01-10 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 09:48:15AM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: Hi Carlo: (moved to ganglia-developers) On 1/10/08, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: can we make a newer snapshot, or even better an automatic snapshot per commit (we don't have a commit for day, so

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Click-to-enlarge patch

2008-01-15 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 09:08:03PM -0500, Jesse Becker wrote: This is a re-post of a patch I sent back in December (originally based on someone else's code). Committed revision 921, thanks Carlo - This SF.net email is

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Click-to-enlarge patch

2008-01-18 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:48:11AM -0500, Jesse Becker wrote: On Jan 17, 2008 12:44 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon svn diff -c-921 | patch -p0 svn merge -c810 This actually reverted three lines too many, and broke the enlarging of optional graphs. Which shouldn't be the case

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia issue with RRDTool 1.3 beta3

2008-02-04 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 01:02:03PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: BTW, anything that can be done on the Fedora 8 side? Would it be possible to downgrade rrdtool...? the web frontend used to look for rrdtool in the gmetad root tree by default as shown in the comment in web/conf.php for the RRDTOOL

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Memory leak in gmond

2008-02-08 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Jan 22, 2008 at 04:17:07PM +0530, Kumar Vaibhav wrote: I am using ganglia-3.0.5 on a woodcrest processor cluster. and I see that after running for weeks the memory consumption of the gmond process is something about 400 MB. did you check what was the size 1 hour after all gmond

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.7 release

2008-02-13 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:57:25PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: Guys: I plan to check-in the following patch and release 3.0.7: can we use the same exact code already committed in trunk (including spaces and other details) so that there are no unnecessary divergences in the maintenance branch?

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.7 release

2008-02-13 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 05:00:56AM -0600, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 04:57:25PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: Guys: I plan to check-in the following patch and release 3.0.7: can we use the same exact code already committed in trunk (including spaces and other

[Ganglia-developers] htmlentities to print the graph command when debugging under 3.0.6?

2008-02-13 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Greetings, while looking at a diff between the 3.0.x branch and trunk for the web frontend noticed the following snippet (htmlentities is missing in 3.0.x) : @@ -331,7 +330,7 @@ header (Pragma: no-cache); // HTTP/1.0 if ($debug) { header (Content-type:

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.7 release

2008-02-13 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 10:44:50AM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: So what's the latest? Can I check in my original patch to the branch? the original patch should work (if the spaces/tab is correct for the changes to get_context.php just like it was done in revision 964). Anything else needs to

Re: [Ganglia-developers] 3.0.7 release

2008-02-19 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Feb 19, 2008 at 08:31:22PM +0100, Ulf Lange wrote: Hi, I don' t want to get on your nerves, but can somebody checkin the patches from Micheal(bugid 146)? I tried to merge Michael metrics changes into the current implementation in trunk, but it would be far easier if they will be

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gmond Spoof memory leak fix

2008-02-23 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 12:18:41PM -0800, Bernard Li wrote: On 2/20/08, Martin Knoblauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just committed the fix for the spoofing leak from Martin Hicks. Can you run a [final] snapshot for 3.0.7? I have something brewing to fix the petabyte/sec spikes that

Re: [Ganglia-developers] svn woes for ganglia repository

2008-02-23 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 01:13:44PM -0500, Jesse Becker wrote: On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:07 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: anyone knows what happened here? It's probably a sever-side issue. I can duplicate the problem, and there are a number of people having

[Ganglia-developers] [RFC 05/14] libmetrics: AIX: cpu speed metric by Michael Perzl

2008-02-24 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Use a local perfstat_cpu_total_t instead of the global cpu_total_buffer. Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- trunk/monitor-core/libmetrics/aix/metrics.c | 10 +- 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/trunk/monitor-core/libmetrics/aix

[Ganglia-developers] [RFC 06/14] libmetrics: AIX: machine_type metric by Michael Perzl

2008-02-24 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
add error checking and a local struct instead of the cpu_total_buffer global using unknown in case of failure to avoid overflow and for consistency with other platforms Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- trunk/monitor-core/libmetrics/aix/metrics.c |9

[Ganglia-developers] [RFC 09/14] libmetrics: AIX: os release metric by Michael Perz

2008-02-25 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- trunk/monitor-core/libmetrics/aix/metrics.c | 90 +++--- 1 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-) diff --git a/trunk/monitor-core/libmetrics/aix/metrics.c b/trunk/monitor-core/libmetrics/aix/metrics.c index

[Ganglia-developers] [RFC 12/14] libmetrics: AIX: boottime metric by Michael Perzl

2008-02-25 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
merge fixes into one single function for boottime and creates a global a global boottime is needed for previous patches so this might need to me moved up. Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- trunk/monitor-core/libmetrics/aix/metrics.c | 32

[Ganglia-developers] [RFC 14/14] libmetrics: AIX: style and formatting

2008-02-25 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
The biggest of all patches, but the less likely to generate any problems It could be skipped, but then the series will have 13 patches, and you know what they say about that number and it makes the code nicer to read and easier to extend. Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL

Re: [Ganglia-developers] gmond Spoof memory leak fix

2008-02-25 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 10:56:33AM -0600, Martin Hicks wrote: Ah okay. I don't see those warnings. Thanks for the update. Committed revision 1003. Carlo - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia 3.1 wish list...

2008-02-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:37:29PM +, Stu Teasdale wrote: Not 100% true but I am having to keep 3.0 releases out of debian for now for a variety of reasons. I think the worst of the licence problems are cured in current HEAD, but confirmation that I've not missed anything would be

Re: [Ganglia-developers] patch for gmond to chop domain name

2008-03-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 01:34:35PM -0600, Michael Sternberg wrote: Here's a simple patch for gmond/gmond.c to chop domain names off the ganglia web interface why not doing the change in the web interface then? Carlo -

[Ganglia-developers] enable-static-build for 3.1.0

2008-03-03 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Greetings, after removing expat from srclib, I'd seen the following problems with the current implementation of --enable-static-build : 1) needed for bootstrap, otherwise the package generated will have an empty srclib (this is most likely a bug and not documented in README.svnusers) 2) makes

Re: [Ganglia-developers] enable-static-build for 3.1.0

2008-03-03 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:16:10AM -0700, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 3/3/2008 at 1:14 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this means IMHO that supporting static builds without srclib won't be possible (specially considering that apr

Re: [Ganglia-developers] got error while compiling with --disable-static

2008-03-07 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sat, Mar 08, 2008 at 10:21:01AM +0800, Cherife Li wrote: make[4]: *** No rule to make target `../../lib/.libs/libganglia.a', needed by `test-metrics'. Stop. make[4]: Leaving directory `/root/ganglia-3.0.7/libmetrics/tests' make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Removing APR from srclib and SVN repository...

2008-03-12 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:09:22AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: I know when we discussed this at the meeting a couple of weeks ago, the consensus was to leave libconfuse in the repository. I mentioned a week ago, also, after removing expat from srclib, that leaving confuse in the repository

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Removing APR from srclib and SVNrepository...

2008-03-12 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 02:20:45PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: I think I am going to see some more clarification on this. --enable-static doesn't seem to fit exactly with what we want to do. According to the automake docs (http://sourceware.org/autobook/autobook/autobook_85.html),

[Ganglia-developers] [PATCH] srclib: remove libconfuse dependency for enable-static-build

2008-03-13 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
(and optionally installed) libconfuse static library (the default) using --with-libconfuse. Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- trunk/monitor-core/README.WIN |2 +- trunk/monitor-core/configure.in| 38 +--- trunk

[Ganglia-developers] [PATCH] srclib: remove libapr dependency for enable-static-build

2008-03-13 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
that cygwin won't be able to generate working binaries for ganglia because of DSO linking problems in cygwin as reported in : http://www.mail-archive.com/ganglia-developers@lists.sourceforge.net/msg03375.html Signed-off-by: Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- trunk/monitor-core

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [PATCH] srclib: remove libapr dependency forenable-static-build

2008-03-13 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:39:48AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: I think I have everything working now using your patches. got a fair number of conflicts when merging them back with the most interesting ones being : 1) I rearranged some of the values for GCFLAGS/GLDADD/GLDFLAGS out of the if

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Time to create the 3.1.x stable branch...

2008-03-14 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:42:05PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: I think that with the removal of the srclib directory from the SVN trunk repository, we have completed everything that we thought needed to be done before creating the 3.1.x stable branch. Agree (sorta), as I was expecting

[Ganglia-developers] Backward compatible type changes in 3.1 ( was Time to create the 3.1.x stable branch...)

2008-03-14 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 09:04:54AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: I haven't used 3.1 yet but I see memory changes to float. That is good. However, old 3.0 gmonds could still be reporting integers. Are you sure that gmetad can successfully get one correct total from two data types? this as

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Time to create the 3.1.x stable branch...

2008-03-15 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sat, Mar 15, 2008 at 04:08:25PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ./bootstrap ./configure --with-gmetad make dist-gzip After I run the command, I get a tarball and a lot of cruft in the checkout directory. Even after I deleted

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Cannot build r1063 on CentOS 4

2008-03-16 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 10:04:09PM -0500, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 05:33:14PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: On 3/14/08, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Got the following error w/ make: make[4]: Entering directory `/root/code/ganglia/libmetrics/tests

Re: [Ganglia-developers] OpenBSD build failure on r1067

2008-03-16 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 12:18:05PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: Now that srclib/ has been yanked, I tried building a clean copy of trunk on my OpenBSD box, and hit a few snags. First, running ./bootstrap fails: haven't tried bootstrap ('cause bootstrapping only works well in linux anyway) but

Re: [Ganglia-developers] OpenBSD build failure on r1067

2008-03-16 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 06:27:00PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: So then the build process for trunk is basically broken for non-Linux systems? it always was; before it used to work reliably only in fedora or centos AFAIK which is what we had been using to do bootstraps and releases for all the

Re: [Ganglia-developers] OpenBSD build failure on r1067

2008-03-17 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 09:16:01PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 8:26 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Mar 16, 2008 at 06:27:00PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: So then the build process for trunk is basically broken for non-Linux

[Ganglia-developers] migration path for 3.1.x

2008-03-17 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 03:39:05PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: In other words, the 3.1.x gmetad and frontend is able to acquire data from a 3.0.x cluster and a 3.0.x gmetad and frontend is able to acquire data from 3.1.x cluster. So the cluster by cluster migration from 3.0.x to 3.1.x should

[Ganglia-developers] RFC: enabling python modules by default

2008-03-18 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
Greetings, is there any good reason why building the python module wrapper is not enabled by default?, there will always of course the option of disabling it using --disable-python at configure time but will had the following advantages compared to the current situation : 1) make dist* will

Re: [Ganglia-developers] RFC: enabling python modules by default

2008-03-18 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 07:04:10PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: On 3/18/08, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is there any good reason why building the python module wrapper is not enabled by default?, there will always of course the option of disabling it using

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Time to create the3.1.xstable branch...

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 12:11:44PM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: Well, the patch I attached to bug#128 *does* convert all ints to floats when doing sums, but it has not yet been applied to trunk as of 1078. Part of it committed in revision 1083 Maybe you need me to enter a new bug for

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-svn] SF.net SVN: ganglia: [1085]trunk/monitor-core/gmond/modules/python/README

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 09:11:28AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: Carlo, Params is actually a valid configuration directive. There are two ways to pass in parameters into a gmond module. One way is to use a raw string with the Params directive (mod_python uses this for the module path

Re: [Ganglia-developers] tarball missing lib/scoreboard.h

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 04:58:10PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: On 3/19/08, Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Should I add scoreboard.h to EXTRA_DIST?? This, however, does not install scoreboard.h to /usr/include which the RPM spec expects to -- please advise. Committed revision 1092

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia SMF Manifests

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 01:35:26PM -0400, Jesse Becker wrote: Guess I need to remove my copy of cool-stuff then. `svn update` should take care of that What about creating a contrib directory? This is common in many different projects, and frequently used for files such as this. I've yet

Re: [Ganglia-developers] GANGLIA_NANO_VERSION in tarball

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 05:29:50PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: In configure.in, the way to determine GANGLIA_NANO_VERSION is to run svnversion. This works in the SVN checkout, but would fail when tried to be executed from the tarball (instead of the SVN revision, you get exported). or you get a

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Time to createthe3.1.xstable branch...

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 03:09:01PM -0500, James Richardson wrote: I am I correct to interpret this thread as a stable v3.1 branch will be available any day now? yes, with some alpha packages released for testing once we iron up all build issues (hopefully this week or next) and in preparation

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia SMF Manifests

2008-03-19 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Mar 19, 2008 at 11:55:51AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: they can't be committed as-is either because the assumptions made are configurable and users will expect that they match (regardless of how many notes about not being supported are added) but will be useful if ever make is

Re: [Ganglia-developers] bug#128: combine integers and floats into one double sum

2008-03-20 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:26:36AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: Without this, folks would have to upgrade all gmonds to 3.1 simultaneously or they would get incorrect totals. I haven't yet validated this by testing the setup, but from my understanding of the code, you should be able to

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Problem with the module configuration directives...

2008-03-20 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 10:26:31AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: 1. Remove the pymodule configuration directive +1 2. Add an optional type name to a module section to designate the interface type. module { } - #No designation, the default is C module Python {} - #Python type module

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Problem with themodule configurationdirectives...

2008-03-20 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:35:44PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: I just checked in the changes to remove the pymodule section directive and to introduce the language directive. great I am still working on the documentation for the directive change and how to write modules in C and python.

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Problemwith themodule configurationdirectives...

2008-03-23 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 08:38:20AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: Isn't that what a no-arch devel package should be doing? Maybe I am missing what you are really talking about. a gmond C module needs to include gm_mmn.h (for the MAGIC) and metric.h (for the mmodule_struct), but both are gmond

Re: [Ganglia-developers] GANGLIA_NANO_VERSION in tarball

2008-03-24 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 02:25:36PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: This has the added option of allowing the person doing the snapshot release to add additional tags to the SVN version (eg. GANGLIA_NANO_VERSION = 1090-perlmodules) the ganglia version is used for the version for libganglia and

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-27 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:07:49AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: If we remove the conditional the lock should silently fail and so we would get the same result. This would make the code a bit simpler and I'm OK with that. Committed revision 1138. But it looks like the only way it can

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Ganglia man pages

2008-03-28 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 01:07:53PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: I actually like the format better as it tells the exact Ganglia version number: the man pages generated with help2man also include the version number but were post edited to remove that, as they are meant to be generic enough to be

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Commit bugfix for bz #76 into 3.0.X

2008-03-28 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:58:53PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: Hi guys: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 11:32 AM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 08:07:49AM -0700, Witham, Timothy D wrote: If we remove the conditional the lock should silently fail

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Trunk 32-bit build broken...

2008-03-28 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 03:57:40PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: I new there was something that I was missing when I checked in the header file changes. It appears that I broke the 32-bit builds. I am trying to get the problem fixed and it has to do with adding -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE to the

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Trunk 32-bit build broken...

2008-03-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 11:44:44PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: The problem is the typedef of g_val_t. Both libmetrics and the metric modules need this typedef. Before the commits, the metric modules had to include libmetrics.h to get this typedef. This would have required libmetrics.h

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Trunk 32-bit build broken...

2008-03-29 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 05:29:15PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 3/29/2008 at 2:43 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: g_val_t is a public interface of libganglia and libganglia is used by the modules so it should be IMHO moved

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Trunk 32-bit build broken...

2008-03-30 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 10:56:31AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 3/29/2008 at 11:31 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMHO, even if libganglia uses apr internally having it also to require apr headers might not be a good idea

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Trunk 32-bit build broken...

2008-03-31 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:31:46PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: I have checked in the code that removes APR from all of the public header files except for gm_metric.h which is needed by the modules. Everything else should be APR-free. This includes libmetrics, gmetric, gmetad, gstat and

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Trunk 32-bit build broken...

2008-04-01 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 04:44:26PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: Carlo, it looks like r1179 broke configure for me: http://ganglia.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/ganglia/trunk/monitor-core/configure.in?r1=1179r2=1178pathrev=1179 This results in passing -L with no arguments: Committed revision

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Time to create the 3.1.x stable branch...

2008-04-01 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:45:58PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 3/18/2008 at 1:58 AM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:12:38PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: I just submitted the patches to remove the APR 1.2

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Trunk 32-bit build broken...

2008-04-01 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 08:32:49AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 3/31/2008 at 9:48 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 06:31:46PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: I have checked in the code that removes APR from all

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Top level config/ dir in SVN tree

2008-04-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 03:24:48PM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: Since r1066, Carlo has deleted all the files inside the top level config/ directory -- is there a point to keep this directory then? Since it is auto-generated during bootstrap, I suggest we remove it. Deleting config Deleting

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Trunk 32-bit build broken...

2008-04-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 10:08:04AM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 4/1/2008 at 10:28 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ok, but then if the application also has a need to access the metric data (like gmond) then we will end up including

Re: [Ganglia-developers] Trunk 32-bit build broken...

2008-04-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 03:25:23PM -0600, Brad Nicholes wrote: On 4/2/2008 at 12:27 PM, in message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bernard Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 7:28 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1064carenas if test -f $libaprpath

Re: [Ganglia-developers] [Ganglia-general] Time to create the 3.1.x stable branch...

2008-04-02 Thread Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon
On Wed, Apr 02, 2008 at 11:18:53AM -0700, Bernard Li wrote: Hi Carlo: On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Carlo Marcelo Arenas Belon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: there is also the little inconvenience with the building of snapshots which will need to be addressed since we are planning

  1   2   3   4   5   >