Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Call review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-algs-16

Thanks for your review, Meral! Jari On 15 Dec 2016, at 02:11, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair.

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-justfont-toplevel-05

Dale: Thank you very much spotting these issues. And Chris, happy to see that the fix is already on the way! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-6lo-dect-ule-08

Many thanks for the in-depth review, Robert. Authors — are there any comments or updates to the document based on Robert’s feedback? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Last Call Review of draft-ietf-manet-dlep-25

Matt, Many thanks for this. Authors, did you have any responses on Matt’s comments? Also, Matt, I had one question for you: > > * The IANA registries this document establishes are not defined. > One can deduce the required information and its format, but there > is no guidance on review

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

On 01 Dec 2016, at 22:01, Dino Farinacci wrote: > There is no other text in the email. So can’t be sure what you are saying. > I’m guessing you are fine with the proposed text? yes, the one that you proposed signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

That would work for me. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-bbf-bbf-urn-02

Thanks for the review & the edits. jari On 24 Nov 2016, at 02:24, Joel Halpern wrote: > The new version addresses my concerns and is ready for publication as an > informational RFC. > > Yours, > Joel M. Halpern > > On 10/14/16 4:51 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: >> I am

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-siprec-callflows-07

Thank you very much for your review, Dan. Authors, have you taken a look at Dan’s comments? Jari On 25 Nov 2016, at 14:16, Dan Romascanu wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-6lo-privacy-considerations-04

Paul: thank you for the review! Jari On 28 Nov 2016, at 20:09, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-diffserv-intercon-12

Thanks for the review and fixes! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-pim-join-attributes-for-lisp-05

Lucy, Many thanks for your review. Dino, Stig, does this discussion lead you to consider adding some clarifications to the document? I am not going to require those (just posted a no-obj for the document on today’s telechat), but wanted to give you an opportunity to consider that. Jari

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-taps-transports-11

Thanks for the review, Robert. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-leiba-3967upd-downref-00

Thanks again for your reviews on this and other documents, Peter! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-behave-ipfix-nat-logging-11

Thanks much for your review, Paul! Do the authors have any comments? Paul’s review comments should be addressed. I think that at least the Section 5.6 question is something that you must address. Jari On 28 Nov 2016, at 19:06, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > I am the assigned

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-kitten-pkinit-freshness-07

Many thanks for your review, Russ, and for thinking about this space and what issues there might be. I too am concerned about the issue that Russ Housley raised: bad practices in creating the freshness tokens creates a security issue. If this cannot be handled in the way that Russ initially

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review: draft-ietf-kitten-rfc6112bis-03

Thanks for your review, Robert, and thanks everyone for addressing the earlier comments. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-dnsop-resolver-priming-09

Thanks for your review, Joel! Jari On 31 Oct 2016, at 00:47, Joel M. Halpern wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-straw-b2bua-rtcp-15

Many thanks for your excellent review, Russ. I plan to watch the resolution of the Discusses related to the unclear SHOULD NOT. (It certainly would have been a Discuss from me if a Discuss wasn’t already raised.) At this point I do not plan to block on the document class, but looking forward

Re: [Gen-art] Complete Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-6lo-6lobac-06

Thanks for your review, Orit. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-adid-urn-01

Many thanks for the review, Brian. And you have good comments/questions. What say the authors? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] GEN-ART LC review of draft-ietf-6man-default-iids-16

Thanks again for your review, Roni. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-holmberg-dispatch-received-realm-08.txt

Many thanks for the review, Francis. And thank you Christer for addressing the editorial question marks. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Telechat Review of draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09

Thanks for the review, Matt! authors, please note the comments! Jari On 03 Nov 2016, at 04:21, Matt Miller wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the

Re: [Gen-art] IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-harkins-salted-eap-pwd-07

Thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-10

Thanks for the review! Authors, did you note the comments? Jari On 26 Oct 2016, at 02:29, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-httpauth-mutual-algo-06

Thanks for your review, Orit! On 02 Nov 2016, at 21:47, Orit Levin wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please treat these comments

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-murchison-nntp-compress-05.txt

Many thanks for your review once again, Francis! Much appreciated. (NNTP? Long time no hear, but glad to see this doc! :-) ) Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-stir-passport-09

Thank you for this review, Roni. Authors, did you notice Roni’s comment on IANA & RFC 7515 & security considerations? I also don’t see a change in the -10 version about this. (But many thanks also to the working group and the authors for completing this important document.) Jari

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-stir-certificates-10

Thank you for this, Ralph. And thank you authors for completing this important document! I have balloted no-objection for this draft on tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-netconf-yang-patch-12

Thank you! Jari On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:38, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these

Re: [Gen-art] IESG Evaluation review of draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13

Ralph, all: many thanks for the review & changes! Jari On 02 Nov 2016, at 03:06, Ralph Droms wrote: > (Correcting revision number of reviewed document) > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for draft-ietf-stox-7248bis-13. > > The General Area Review Team (Gen-ART)

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-l2tpext-keyed-ipv6-tunnel-07

Thanks for the review, Paul. I expect to see a document change to address the issues. Jari On 01 Nov 2016, at 15:44, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) wrote: > Thanks for the review, Paul! > > Authors, > > Please find some comments inline. > > Carlos, as shepherd. > >> On

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-routing-cfg-24

Thanks, all. I’m balloting no-objection. Jari On 01 Nov 2016, at 03:54, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > This didn't have a chance to be updated before the cutoff, > so technically it's still "Ready with Issues", but I am > completely happy with Lada's proposed changes.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-weis-gdoi-iec62351-9-08

Thanks for the review! Jari On 27 Oct 2016, at 15:11, Vijay K.Gurbani wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on > Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at > . > > Please

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-app-07

Thanks for the review, Dan! Jari On 17 Oct 2016, at 03:51, Zhangxian (Xian) wrote: > Dan, > > Thank you for the review. Happy to see no changes needed, J. > > Regards, > Xian > > 发件人: Dan Romascanu [mailto:droma...@gmail.com] > 发送时间: 2016年10月16日 17:22 > 收件人:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review for draft-ietf-mmusic-sdp-mux-attributes-14

Dan, Suhas, Thanks for the reviews and updates Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-roll-routing-dispatch-03.txt

Many thanks for your review, Francis! Authors, do make a note of Francis’ comments. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-lisp-lcaf-17

Peter, Thanks for the review and the summary. And thanks Dino for addressing most of the issues. I have raised some of the few remaining issues in my IESG review. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Telechat review of draft-ietf-avtcore-5761-update-05

Elwyn, Christer — many thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [IPsec] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-safecurves-04

Orit & Yoav, thanks much for the review and edits. I have balloted no-obj for this document for the tonight’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review for draft-ietf-lisp-crypto-09

Many thanks for your review, Pete. I have balloted no-objection for this document in today’s IESG telechat. Authors, please note Pete’s editorial suggestion. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric-09

Thanks Brian and Acee. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] IESG telechat Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-17

Thanks for the review, Dale. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-rfc5405bis

chat, now in version -18. > > Are you off by a week? The datatracker indicates an October 13 telechat date. > > Thanks, --David > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Jari Arkko [mailto:jari.ar...@piuha.net] >> Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 10:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cose-msg-18

Many thanks for your review, Meral! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-pals-rfc4447bis-05.txt

Thanks for you review, Ralph! I have balloted no-obj for this document for today’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Generate review of draft-ietf-tsvwg-gre-in-udp-encap-16

Thanks for the review, Jouni! I see that the newer versions have corrected at least some of the issues discussed here; didn’t check all but it seems fine enough now for me to ballot no-objection. Which I have done. Jari On 19 Aug 2016, at 19:19, Jouni Korhonen wrote:

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-ipsecme-ddos-protection-09

Many thanks for the review, Lucy! Authors, do take note of the comments. Jari On 24 Sep 2016, at 00:28, Lucy yong wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-tictoc-multi-path-synchronization-05

Thank you, Joel. Balloted no-obj. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-core-http-mapping-13.txt

Big thanks, Francis. I have balloted no-obj. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-softwire-unified-cpe-04

Paul & Med: Thanks for the reviews & fixes. Looks like the changes are in the newest version. Jari On 23 Aug 2016, at 17:55, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > Med, > > Thanks. Those changes seem fine. > > Paul > > On 8/23/16 3:47 AM, mohamed.boucad...@orange.com wrote: >>

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mptcp-experience-06

Thank you very much for the excellent review. I do believe the “standardised” needs to change. Authors, do you have comments on the rest? Jari On 06 Sep 2016, at 19:18, Dan Romascanu wrote: > Summary: Ready with issues > > A very useful and well written document, which

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-dnsop-nxdomain-cut-03

Meral, many thanks for your review. Again! Stephane, thanks for observing these comments and taking them into account. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mc-pon-04

Thanks for your reviews again, Roni! I have marked this document as “no objection” for me on tonights telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5206-bis-12

I think the wording as it is on -13 is fine. I.e., RFC number but no reference. I wouldn’t necessarily use RFC numbers even in general in abstract, but “This RFC replaces RFC .” I think is fine and appropriate. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-hardy-pdf-mime-02

Many thanks for the review, Dan. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-seantek-ldap-pkcs9-06

thanks for the review! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Telechat Review of draft-ietf-httpauth-extension-08

Matt: Many thanks for your detailed review. Much appreciated. Authors, can you take these notes into account? Jari On 01 Sep 2016, at 05:15, Matt Miller wrote: > * There is at least a couple of mentions of the > "Authentication-Info" header, but no reference to RFC 7615 in

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-mibs-obsolete-01

Jouni, Bill, Thanks for the review and updates. I posted no-objection for this draft. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-ice-dualstack-fairness-03

Thanks for the reviews & fixes! Jari On 04 Aug 2016, at 17:57, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > Hi, > Many thanks. > > Best, > Meral > > From: Pal Martinsen (palmarti) [mailto:palma...@cisco.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2016 11:55 PM > To: Meral Shirazipour

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-server-discovery-08

Ralph, Tiru — thanks for the updates and the review. I’ve looked at the change draft and I think it is fine now. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tram-turn-mobility-03

Pete, Tiru, Thanks for the reviews & updates. Much appreciated. I have balloted no objection for this document. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-avtext-rid-06

Russ, Many thanks for your reviews, including this one. I plan to ballot no-objection for this draft. Some further comments inline: > Summary: Ready > > Major Concerns: None > > Minor Concerns: > > I think it would be useful to move the last paragraph in Section 3.3 > into a Privacy

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-avtcore-rfc5764-mux-fixes-10

Thanks for the review again, Joel! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review: draft-ietf-dnsop-maintain-ds-03

Robert — thanks for the review (again)! And thanks everyone for a document that to me seems quite useful and necessary. I do have a similar concern as Robert did, however, in making sure that the change to 7344 is properly highlighted. Joel, did you have a plan on how to make that happen? I

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-ietf-nfsv4-scsi-layout-06.txt

Many thanks for the review, Joel! Jari On 26 Aug 2016, at 03:55, Joel Halpern wrote: > This document is still ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. > > (I think I even see why the reference in section 3.3 is point to 2.1.) > > Yours, > Joel > > On 7/5/16 6:26

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-multi-domain-fs-reqs-09

Brian, Andy, thanks for the reviews and changes and new versions. I plan to ballot “no objection” for this document on Thursday. That being said, I do note the BCP/PS question, and my own opinion is that BCP would have equal strength, and if it were up to me, I’d pick that category. However,

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-mpls-entropy-lsp-ping-04

Thanks for your detailed, review, Peter. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [radext] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-radext-datatypes-04.txt

Thanks for the review, Dan! And Alan for edits. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-kitten-aes-cts-hmac-sha2-10

Thanks for your review, Vijay. And you have some good questions… to which I have not seen answers. Authors? Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Combined Gen-art and secdir LC review: draft-ietf-manet-smc-sec-threats-05

Many thanks for your review, Robert. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] GEN-Art LC review of draft-ietf-jose-cfrg-curves-05

Thanks for your review, Roni! Authors, did you observe the editorial suggestions? Jari ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-sipcore-dns-dual-stack

Ron, Dale — thanks for the review & edit. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-bess-ir-04

Folks, I don’t know what to do with this draft. I’ve read the draft, prompted by Paul’s review. While I can understand most of what it says, I have to say it is a very difficult read. Probably due to the large complex system that it is a part of. But, I’ve been thoroughly unable to convince

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-isis-remaining-lifetime-02

Thanks, all. Jari On 08 Aug 2016, at 19:40, Christer Holmberg wrote: > That should work :) > > Thanks! > > Regards, > > Christer > > From: Les Ginsberg (ginsberg) [mailto:ginsb...@cisco.com] > Sent: 08 August 2016 20:39 > To: Christer Holmberg

Re: [Gen-art] [Isis-wg] IETF Last Call Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-isis-rfc4971bis-01

Dale, Les, thanks for the reviews and fixes. Much appreciated. I have balloted no-obj for this doc for tomorrow’s IESG telechat. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Telechat Review of draft-sweet-rfc2910bis-08

Thanks for your review, Matt! I agree with the MD5 issue that you raise below. Stephen Farrell has raised this issue in his Discuss, and otherwise I would have. Your suggested text may be a way to fix Stephens Discuss, however. So authors please take note. The other issues from your review

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-holmberg-dispatch-rfc7315-updates

Thanks, both of you. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-02

Thanks for the review, Russ! Jari On 28 Jul 2016, at 23:01, Russ Housley wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the IETF Chair. Please wait for

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-ietf-dhc-topo-conf-0

Thanks! On 29 Jul 2016, at 01:26, Joel Halpern wrote: > Version -09 of this document is still ready for publication as an > Informational RFC. > > Yours, > Joel M. Halpern > > On 5/13/16 4:18 AM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-sweet-rfc2911bis-09

Thanks for the review, Russ & thanks Michael for taking it into account. I trust that these changes will find their way into the document, and have balloted No Objection. Jari On 26 Jul 2016, at 23:54, Michael Sweet wrote: > Russ, > > Thank you for reviewing this

Re: [Gen-art] Review: draft-pd-dispatch-msrp-websocket-13

Thanks! On 29 Jul 2016, at 01:28, Joel Halpern wrote: > Version -13 of this document is still ready for publication as a Proposed > Standard > Yours, > Joel > > On 6/16/16 5:24 PM, Joel M. Halpern wrote: >> I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-mmusic-mux-exclusive-08.txt

Thanks for the review, Francis! And edits, Christer! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-10

Thanks again, Peter. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-trill-irb-13.txt

d +1-508-333-2270 (cell) > 155 Beaver Street, Milford, MA 01757 USA > d3e...@gmail.com > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 1:02 PM, Jari Arkko <jari.ar...@piuha.net> wrote: >> Francis, Donald, thank you for the review & updates. >> >> Jari >> signatur

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-pal-eidr-urn-2016-01

Thanks, Vijay and all. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Genart LC (and likely telechat) review : draft-ietf-trill-tree-selection-04

Thanks Robert & Donald. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art LC review of draft-ietf-pals-mpls-tp-pw-over-bidir-lsp-08

Thanks for the review, Roni. Looks like the suggested edits are OK, at least from my perspective. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-trill-ia-appsubtlv

Thank you Paul for the in-depth review, and for the discussion, and thank you Donald for the edits. At this point I think I’m ready to say “no-objection” for this document in tonight’s IESG telechat. Jari On 07 Jul 2016, at 01:02, Paul Kyzivat wrote: > On 7/6/16 5:18

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-trill-channel-tunnel-09

Thanks Peter & Donald! jari On 06 Jul 2016, at 04:10, Peter Yee wrote: > Draft -10 has just been published and it addresses my concerns. So: > > Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. [Ready] > > -Peter signature.asc

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5205-bis-09

Jouni & all: Thanks! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] [Hipsec] Review: draft-ietf-hip-rfc5204-bis-06

Returning to this topic after a long time, as the document is on tonight’s IESG telechat agenda. Thanks for the review, Joel. And thanks Julien for reacting to the comments. I see that -07 includes the discussed changes. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc5203-bis-09.txt

Francis: thank you for the review! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat Review of draft-ietf-hip-rfc6253-bis-09

Thanks, all. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-cdni-metadata-18

Thanks, all. I have given the “no objection” vote for this document in tonight’s IESG call. Jari On 28 Jun 2016, at 19:44, Meral Shirazipour wrote: > Hi, > Thank you for considering the comments. > > Best, > Meral > > From: Kevin Ma J > Sent: Tuesday, June

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART telechat review of draft-ietf-alto-deployments-15

Thanks much, Brian! Authors, do note Brian’s comments. Jari On 24 Jun 2016, at 05:48, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-mile-implementreport-09

Thanks! On 10 Jun 2016, at 15:08, Christer Holmberg wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > > > Document: >

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-forces-interfelfb-05

> Summary: Ready Thanks, all! Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-calext-extensions-03 (was: RE: Assignments for the 2016-06-30 Telechat)

Thanks, all! Jari On 29 Jun 2016, at 17:07, Romascanu, Dan (Dan) wrote: > Perfect timing. My only pending issue is addressed. From the Gen-ART point pf > view this document is Ready. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Dan > > >> -Original Message- >> From: Cyrus Daboo

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-trill-irb-13.txt

Francis, Donald, thank you for the review & updates. Jari signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/gen-art

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >