Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-pkix-3281update-04

Pete, I'll expand the acronym and fix the spelling during AUTH48. spt McCann Peter-A001034 wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-avt-app-rtp-keepalive-05.txt

-app-rtp-keepalive-05.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 19 May 2009 IETF LC End Date: 02 June 2009 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: This draft has serious issues, described in the review, and needs to be rethought. NOTE: If I'm off base on the BCP track comment, then I'd change my

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-smime-3278bis-07.txt

Miguel, Thanks for the review. Responses inline. spt Miguel A. Garcia wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from

[Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-09.txt

-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-09.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-05-29 IETF LC End Date: 2009-06-09 IESG Telechat date: (not known) Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Nits/editorial comments: Abstract: Spell out 1st

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Review of draft-ietf-geopriv-l7-lcp-ps-09.txt

There's a list of abbreviations you don't have to spell out (http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-style-guide/abbrev.expansion.txt) that I didn't know about so don't bother spelling out (the one's with the *s (thanks Spencer)): SIP, DSL, DHCP, LAN, IP, DNS, ATM. spt Sean Turner wrote: I have been

[Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pce-inter-layer-frwk-10.txt

-inter-layer-frwk-10.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-06-09 IETF LC End Date: 2009-06-16 IESG Telechat date: (not known) Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication (informational with no RFC 2119 requirements terminology), but has nits that should be fixed before publication

[Gen-art] Gen-Art Review of draft-ietf-sipcore-subnot-etags-02.txt

-sipcore-subnot-etags-02.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-06-21 IETF LC End Date: 2009-06-23 IESG Telechat date: 2009-07-02 Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. spt ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-ietf-ipsecme-ikev2-redirect-11.txt

-ipsecme-ikev2-redirect-11.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-06-21 IETF LC End Date: 2009-06-30 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as a Proposed Standard. Nits: Section 5 (last para) and Section 6 (1st para): Should Informational (x3) be all upper case

[Gen-art] Gen-Art review of draft-solinas-rfc4753bis-00.txt

-rfc4753bis-00.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-07-28 IETF LC End Date: 2009-08-06 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Information RFC.* * I did not verify the math. spt ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art

Re: [Gen-art] Lunch on Thursday

Where is the lunch? spt Mary Barnes wrote: HI all, I was not successful in finding a place other than the Clarion restaurant for lunch. I ate there on Monday and while the kitchen doesn't open till noon, they were just able to get us out of there by 1pm and for the food was quite good in

[Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-alto-problem-statement-02.txt

-problem-statement-02.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2008-08-02 IETF LC End Date: 2009-08-04 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Informational RFC. The one question in my mind is whether this should proceed now or remain a living document

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-turner-clearancesponsor-attribute-01.txt

Joel, Thanks for your timely review. spt Joel M. Halpern wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-pkix-authorityclearanceconstraints-02.txt

Francis Dupont wrote: In your previous mail you wrote: Minor issues: - IMHO a transition paragraph is needed at the end of the Introduction in order to introduce technical dependencies: * clearance attribute is in fact from 3281bis (this is obvious when one reads

Re: [Gen-art] review: draft-turner-clearancesponsor-attribute-01.txt

of the extra work necessary to claim that the attribute could be included in an LDAP directory (i.e., the schema, the transfer syntax, etc.) so we're targeting this attribute at certificates. Yours, Joel Sean Turner wrote: Joel, Thanks for your timely review. spt Joel M. Halpern wrote: I have been

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-turner-deviceowner-attribute-01

Peter, Thanks for the review. Responses inline. spt McCann Peter-A001034 wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html

[Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-segmented-pw-13.txt

-segmented-pw-13.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-08-31 IETF LC End Date: 2009-09-02 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Nits: http://www.ietf.org/id-info/checklist.html indicates

[Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-mip4-generic-notification-message

-generic-notification-message-09.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-09-07 IETF LC End Date: 2009-09-08 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. I have to admit that following along in section 4.3

[Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-eai-downgraded-display

-eai-downgraded-display-02 Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-09-21 IETF LC End Date: 2009-09-23 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Experimental RFC. Comments: None. spt ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art

[Gen-art] GEN-Art review of draft-ietf-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown

-ccamp-mpls-graceful-shutdown Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-10-01 IETF LC End Date: 2009-10-05 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This document is ready for publication as an Information RFC. Comments: None. spt ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art

[Gen-art] GEN-Art review of draft-ietf-dhc-relay-id-suboption-07

-relay-id-suboption-07 Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-10-06 IETF LC End Date: 2009-10-16 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is on the right track but has open issues, described in the review Major #1 It's not clear to me whether both relay identifier types MUST be supported

Re: [Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-03.txt

Marc Petit-Huguenin wrote: Hi Sean, Thanks for the review. See my comments below. Sean Turner wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please

[Gen-art] GEN-ART review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-meth-05.txt

-bmwg-ipsec-meth-05.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-10-17 IETF LC End Date: N/A IESG Telechat date: 2009-10-22 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication Comments: The NITS tool is complaining about 16 unused references

[Gen-art] GEN-Art re-review of draft-ietf-avt-app-rtp-keepalive-06.txt

-keepalive-06.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 15 November 2009 IETF LC End Date: 02 June 2009 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: This document is ready for publication. All of my comments on the -05 draft were addressed in the -06 draft. spt

[Gen-art] GEN-Art re-review of draft-ietf-behave-turn-uri-04.txt

-uri-04.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-11-15 IETF LC End Date: 2009-10-29 IESG Telechat date: N/A Summary: This draft is ready for publication. This version addresses all of the comments I made on version -03. spt ___ Gen-art mailing list

[Gen-art] GEN-Art re-review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-meth

-bmwg-ipsec-meth-06.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-11-15 IETF LC End Date: N/A IESG Telechat date: 2009-10-22 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. None of my comments on draft -05 were addressed in draft -06

[Gen-art] GEN-Art review of draft-lha-gssapi-delegate-policy-04.txt

-gssapi-delegate-policy-04.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2009-11-15 IETF LC End Date: 2009-12-08 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication Comments: This draft is basically ready for publication

Re: [Gen-art] GEN-Art re-review of draft-ietf-bmwg-ipsec-meth

comment process, is there a way for me to tell that all folks who are supposed to comment have commented? If I missed an email somewhere or needed to look at status somewhere, sincere apologies. - merike On Nov 15, 2009, at 5:51 AM, Al Morton wrote: At 08:08 AM 11/15/2009, Sean Turner wrote

Re: [Gen-art] Telechat review of draft-turner-deviceowner-attribute-02

Drat! I'll fix this. spt McCann Peter-A001034 wrote: All my comments were addressed, but I think a new typo was introduced. The old draft correctly used the term digram to refer to a sequence of two letters (as in a country code). The latest revision changed this to diagram, which I think is

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-giralt-schac-ns-02

resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document: draft-giralt-schac-ns-02 Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2010-01-03 IETF LC End Date: 2010-01-01* IESG Telechat date: unknown * I apologize for missing the LC end date. Summary: This draft is on the right

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-fecframe-dvb-al-fec

-fecframe-dvb-al-fec-04.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2010-01-08 IETF LC End Date: 2009-12-14 IESG Telechat date: unknown Summary: This draft is ready for publication as an Informational Standard. spt ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https

[Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-jabley-sink-arpa-02

-sink-arpa-02.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 13 January 2010 IETF LC End Date: 18 January 2010 IESG Telechat date: 21 January 2010 Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. During IETF LC, Olafur noted there was a TODO list

Re: [Gen-art] Gen Art LC review of: draft-turner-ecprivatekey-02.txt

“misauthenticate” would be most specific, given that “authenticate” is used all the time, but I don’t recall ever seeing “misauthenticate”. Best regards, Dan *From:* Avshalom Houri [mailto:avsha...@il.ibm.com] *Sent:* Thursday, January 14, 2010 9:41 AM *To:* Sean Turner *Cc:* Dan Brown; General

[Gen-art] GEN-Art re-review of draft-ietf-avt-app-rtp-keepalive-07

-keepalive-07.txt Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 11 February 2010 IETF LC End Date: 02 June 2009 IESG Telechat date: 18 February 2010 Summary: This document is still ready for publication. spt ___ Gen-art mailing list Gen-art@ietf.org https

[Gen-art] Gen Art review of: draft-ietf-mediactrl-sip-control-framework

-mediactrl-sip-control-framework Reviewer: Sean Turner Review Date: 2010-03-16 IETF LC End Date: 2010-02-11 IESG Telechat date: (not known) Summary: This draft is basically ready for publication, but has nits that should be fixed before publication. Sec 4.1: r/The SDP should/The SDP SHOULD Sec 4.1: r

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-05

Roni, Thanks for your review. Comments inline. spt Roni Even wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please wait for direction from your

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-turner-asymmetrickeyformat-05

we wouldn't have collisions. The earlier versions of the ID had tbd as place holders until I officially got them registered. spt Thanks Roni Even -Original Message- From: Sean Turner [mailto:turn...@ieca.com] Sent: Sunday, April 18, 2010 8:37 PM To: Roni Even Cc: 'General Area Review

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-turner-application-pkcs10-media-type-04.txt

Miguel A. Garcia wrote: I have been selected as the General Area Review Team (Gen-ART) reviewer for this draft (for background on Gen-ART, please see http://www.alvestrand.no/ietf/gen/art/gen-art-FAQ.html). Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-hoffman-tls-master-secret-input-01

Dorothy Gellert wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-moriarty-post-inch-rid-11

I did too. spt Peter Saint-Andre wrote: Thanks, I've cleared. On 7/6/10 11:06 AM, moriarty_kathl...@emc.com wrote: Hello, I posted a new version that should resolve all outstanding comments. Please let me know if any further changes are suggested/required.

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review for draft-turner-md2-to-historic-05

Kathleen, Thanks for the review. I'll fix these up in the next version. spt On 11/9/2010 11:42 PM, kathleen.moria...@emc.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq.

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-turner-md5-seccon-update-07.txt

Francis, Thanks for your review. Responses inline. spt On 12/10/10 4:45 AM, Francis Dupont wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art Lc review of draft-turner-sha0-sha1-seccon-02

On 12/19/10 9:19 AM, Elwyn Davies wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments you may receive. Document:

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-gellens-mime-bucket-bis-06.txt

Pete, I thought we'd settled on updated the ones that are already published so that implementers will more easily be able to find the parameter. spt On 7/28/11 4:44 PM, David Singer wrote: Gentlemen thank you for your review and comments; a new version (-07) has been uploaded, in response

Re: [Gen-art] [OAUTH-WG] Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-18.txt

On issue 2, Russ has already entered his ballot on the base spec so I'll pick this one up. spt On 4/10/12 8:25 PM, Mike Jones wrote: Hi Alexey, About your issue 1: The OAuth Core spec, where scope is primarily defined, includes the sentence The [scope] strings are defined by the

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind

Sam, I'm happy with your suggestions: do a post-telechat update if there are no other pre-telechat comments. If you get other comments, then feel free to fire off an update if you have time before the telechat. spt On 4/12/12 10:36 AM, Sam Hartman wrote: Thanks for the review. There are a

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

On 3/25/13 10:21 PM, Stefan Santesson wrote: Hi David, Nits: idnits 2.12.15 said: -- The document seems to lack a disclaimer for pre-RFC5378 work, but may have content which was first submitted before 10 November 2008. If you have contacted all the original authors and they are

Re: [Gen-art] [pkix] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

Piyush, (David's on the to: line because the text in question showed up as a result of the gen-art review and it's now in -16) I've been following this thread trying to figure out what if anything needs to be changed to address your concerns in -17. (Note the thread forked later, but I'm

Re: [Gen-art] [pkix] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-pkix-rfc2560bis-15

that the meaning of revoked be clear about what it now means. I've not seen anything that would make me want to throw this draft back to the WG to revisit that consensus. spt -Piyush -Original Message- From: Sean Turner [mailto:turn...@ieca.com] Sent: Monday, April 08, 2013 1:23 PM To: Piyush

Re: [Gen-art] review of draft-moriarty-pkcs12v1-1-03.txt

My other thought here is that we know complexity is bad ;) The specific concern about that command is specific to openssl ad though widely deployed doesn’t really belong in this draft. spt On Jan 21, 2014, at 16:38, Moriarty, Kathleen kathleen.moria...@emc.com wrote: Hi Jari, Since this

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-art LC review of draft-ietf-tls-encrypt-then-mac-02

On Jun 15, 2014, at 09:23, Elwyn Davies elw...@dial.pipex.com wrote: I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, please see the FAQ at http://wiki.tools.ietf.org/area/gen/trac/wiki/GenArtfaq. Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-tls-chacha20-poly1305-04 - resend

> On Apr 07, 2016, at 09:40, Roni Even wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. For background on Gen-ART, > please see the FAQ at > . > > Please resolve these comments along with any other

Re: [Gen-art] Review of draft-ietf-sidr-bgpsec-pki-profiles-18

Dale, Thanks for the review. Responses inline. And, assuming Steve agrees I’ll submit a version that incorporates these and other changes before the IESG does its eval. spt > On Dec 13, 2016, at 16:45, Dale Worley wrote: > > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready

Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART Last Call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-overview-18

> On Mar 16, 2017, at 20:43, Meral Shirazipour > wrote: > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area Review > Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed by the IESG for the > IETF Chair. Please treat these comments

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

> On Feb 27, 2018, at 11:21, Russ Housley wrote: > > >>> Minor issues: >>> >>> I think convention is to list the documents being updated in the Abstract, >>> but >>> cannot find any formal guidance. >> >> You’re right that is the convention, but it’s not required.

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

> On Feb 20, 2018, at 14:50, Stewart Bryant wrote: > > Reviewer: Stewart Bryant > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

> On Feb 27, 2018, at 09:55, Salz, Rich wrote: > > >> I thought we had always been clear that it was "not marked as >> recommended", i.e., "we make no comment about its status". > > That was my understanding to. The choices are "recommended" or "no comment” Yes, but we

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

> On Feb 27, 2018, at 09:51, Benjamin Kaduk <bka...@akamai.com> wrote: > > On 02/27/2018 08:11 AM, Sean Turner wrote: >> There are two states for the Recommended column: YES and NO. I can go >> either way on whether >> marked as not recommended = NO >> n

Re: [Gen-art] [TLS] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-tls-iana-registry-updates-04

> On Feb 27, 2018, at 09:55, Sean Turner <s...@sn3rd.com> wrote: > > > >> On Feb 27, 2018, at 09:51, Benjamin Kaduk <bka...@akamai.com> wrote: >> >> On 02/27/2018 08:11 AM, Sean Turner wrote: >>> There are two states for the Recomm

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-rtcweb-security-arch-18

I generated PR for these: https://github.com/rtcweb-wg/security-arch/pull/85 > On Feb 9, 2019, at 13:50, Russ Housley wrote: > > Reviewer: Russ Housley > Review result: Almost Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00

> On Feb 20, 2020, at 21:03, Dale R. Worley wrote: > > Sean Turner writes: >>>> From the discussion it appears that id-ecDH and id-ecMQV are "key >>> agreement algorithms" and that, as such, they should not be used with >>> keyEncipher

Re: [Gen-art] draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-01

> On Mar 3, 2020, at 16:09, Alissa Cooper wrote: > > Dale, thanks for your reviews. Sean, thanks for your responses. I entered a > No Objection ballot. If Dale’s questions can be clarified for non-expert > readers, I think that would be good. > > Alissa > > >> On Mar 1, 2020, at 11:00 PM,

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-5480-ku-clarifications-00

Dale, Hi! And, thanks for your review comments in-line. spt > On Feb 18, 2020, at 22:07, Dale Worley via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02

> On Mar 27, 2022, at 13:49, Joel Halpern via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Joel Halpern > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team (Gen-ART) reviews all IETF documents being processed > by the IESG for the

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02

>> be a need to reference a given version. But, then again, we need to make >> sure that updating the version does not break anything. >> >> Regards, >> >> Christer >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> From: Gen-

Re: [Gen-art] [Last-Call] Genart last call review of draft-uberti-rtcweb-rfc8829bis-02

bump > On Apr 26, 2022, at 21:39, Sean Turner wrote: > > Hi! I would really love to give our AD a revised version of this I-D soon. > >> On Apr 17, 2022, at 12:37, Christer Holmberg >> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >>> I feel very stron

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku-04

Dale, Thanks for the review. Version -05 should address these: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku/ https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku-04=draft-ietf-lamps-documentsigning-eku-05=--html spt > On Aug 7, 2022, at 15:45, Dale

Re: [Gen-art] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-wish-whip-09

Dale, Hi! Just a heads up that Sergio is out on PTO until early September. spt > On Aug 8, 2023, at 11:45, Dale Worley via Datatracker > wrote: > > Reviewer: Dale Worley > Review result: Ready with Issues > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review Team