Most health articles on Wikipedia are about men's health. I think you will
find lots of stuff still covered by good 'ol 1911 Encyclopedia Britannica,
except for the work done by the Medical Project, which needs more
volunteers and is of course ongoing. In cases where articles get lots of
traffic,
reposting here - I read the English article and found it very interesting,
if only to remind us how far we have come on enwiki (from 15.5% to 17%)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Eduardo Testart
Date: Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 6:55 PM
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Women
Thanks for that! I have always wondered about that myself.
On Sat, Jan 7, 2017 at 5:49 AM, Risker wrote:
> Well, in fairness, Nell Arthur was never the U.S. First Lady because she
> died before her husband became president.
>
> On the other hand, anyone can remove a PROD,
It could be an interesting Wikimedia blog post to write a history of
moderationon Wikipedia projects. I'll bet that various communities have
developed in different ways because of crucial early choices in moderation
policies...
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:57 PM, Neotarf wrote:
Just. Wow.
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 5:14 PM, J Hayes wrote:
> http://www.bloomberg.com/features/2016-benjamin-wey/
>
> ___
> Gendergap mailing list
> Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
> To manage your subscription preferences,
forwarding to this list
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bob Kosovsky
Date: Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 2:00 PM
Subject: [libraries] Why GLAM Wiki:
To: Wikimedia & Libraries
Nice post on ACRL's blog about one person's change in
Interesting to compare male vs female data on Wikidata:
http://tools.wmflabs.org/wd-analyst/index.php?p=P21=Q6581097%7CQ6581072
-- Forwarded message --
From: Amir Ladsgroup
Date: Tue, Dec 8, 2015 at 6:48 PM
Subject: [Wikidata] Wikidata Analyst, a tool to
OMG Fae you are such a bad boy, but I must admit I love your dramah - Toi
Toi Toi! I would never have the guts to do what you do in a lifetime of
edits.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 12:54 AM, Fæ wrote:
> I thought it would be worth giving a head's up on this attempt to stop
> me
Interesting! I always assumed that the reason was because that though many
women work in the arts, the "gendergap" in content is larger than for any
other field. So for example, in education, many women work as teachers and
there are lots of women who write books and run schools. In hospitals,
Yes, that was an interesting Q - I was familiar with most of the material
discussed in the talk (and a lot of it has been discussed here before), but
I was surprised by the emotional response afterwards and the number of
comments/questions.
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Fæ
Hi all,
Please see this call for papers at Oxford University. Closing time for
submissions is this Sunday, conference is on 22-23 January 2016.
https://womenandthecanon.wordpress.com/call-for-papers/
Anyone interested?
Maybe WMUK could sponsor a short talk about their work resurrecting the
women
is normal and can be corrections,
crops etc. as part of general healthy and productive collegiate work.
Only a small proportion of the time is it part of a dispute on
Commons.
Fae
On 14 August 2015 at 09:11, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting idea to measure this, but I am
posting here because this shows the Dutch Wikipedia to only have 11% women
editors, which is less than the English Wikipedia. WMNL is actually happy
about this number as it shows almost double improvement from 2013 when only
6% of survey respondents identified as female.
-- Forwarded
, 2015 at 7:47 AM, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
An interesting set of questions, Lennart! Let me first explain why I am
looking for reliable sources on the Gendergap. I have been involved with
efforts to reduce the Gendergap in the Netherlands since 2011. Our big news
today is that we
Another reliable source for use in the Gendergap Wikipedia article:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/21/opinion/can-wikipedia-survive.html
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including
I wish you all the best, and thanks for your efforts!
On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:35 AM, LB lightbreath...@gmail.com wrote:
Due to off-wiki harassment, I have retired. Thank you to those of you who
have been friendly with me over the past year.
Lightbreather
recreated data though
On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 8:01 PM, Joseph Reagle joseph.2...@reagle.org
wrote:
On 04/13/2015 01:18 PM, Jane Darnell wrote:
Actually I think it would be useful to measure all existing female bios
vs all existing male bios for the proportion of those which have been
previously
Actually I think it would be useful to measure all existing female bios vs
all existing male bios for the proportion of those which have been
previously deleted and recreated. I have a theory that it is much more
difficult to create bios of females in whatever category due to the
systemic academic
.
If we create an overview, it is more likely that the missing articles and
wikidata items will be created.
Romaine
Op dinsdag 31 maart 2015 heeft Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com het
volgende geschreven:
Lennart,
You have every reason to be proud and I honestly don't know why, I can
only
effort and
feedback.
Make a great day,
Max Klein ‽ http://notconfusing.com/
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Max,
Hmm, interesting proposal! I am not sure whether it can be very useful as
it reads now. I have thought a lot about this and have looked
Fae,
Interesting, thanks! I will try to go see it.
Jane
On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Fæ fae...@gmail.com wrote:
If you get a chance to see this film/documentary I can recommend it,
interesting and funny. The film (funded via Kickstarter) had its
European premier this week at BFI Flare,
Kerry,
Thanks for that effort and I totally agree. Dyed-in-the-wool Wikipedians
quickly develop a blind eye for other ways of approaching the topic of an
edit-a-thon and it is the fresh perspective of the attendees that keeps us
up-to-date and challenges the workflows we currently keep in place.
Hi everyone, I have been checking how we are doing on closing the gendergap
on biographies of women artists for a while. Part of the problem is
collecting the data, and Wikidata is a great help. Unfortunately there are
still lots of women artists with Wikidata items without any statements at
all,
Yes and all of those numbers are just about the English Wikipedia. The
Dutch Wikipedia has only 6% of its editors who identify as female
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:15 PM, Su-Laine Brodsky sulai...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I too am uncomfortable with the under 20% message. I would say
Rosie,
I just updated the Women artists project on the English Wikipedia and
included lists of redlinks from last year's Art and Feminism edit-a-thon,
along with a list of redlinks from Wikidata. One of the lists is of artists
active in San Francisco (from the rkd - ULAN will give more results I
Yes, very good story! Nice work
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
http://dailyuw.com/archive/2015/02/16/news/feminists-aim-fix-wikipedia-gender-gap#.VONoci58uSo
Feminists aim to fix the Wikipedia gender gap
Good story about Amanda and Monika's
In 2013 the Dutch Wikimedia chapter hired an external party to conduct a
survey and the results (translated to English) are here:
https://nl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Bestand:Motivaction_report_translation_v02.pdf
The study was split into two parts; one on the contributors and one on the
users, aka
Hi everyone,
Please help me create lists and categories on the English Wikipedia that
may inspire people to write articles on their own native Wikipedia during
the challenge:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminism/Challenge
Such lists and categories can be used as resources
Well Jonathan, thanks for doing that! I am not an administrator, so I
couldn't do those things you mentioned, but I often think that in some
cases I wish I could do more than just thank the person. I know however
that I was very suspicious of anyone posting on my talk page in the
beginning, so I
Siko,
Thanks! I too am very curious what our outcomes will be 78 March. From my
experience this will be next to zero for new editors, but it could be quite
a lot for experienced editors. I took a look at the edit-a-thon toolkit but
we won't be requesting any funding and I don't understand how to
Thanks! I was told we are using some tools internally to track specific
edit-a-thon outcomes - is this what you mean? We want to track more than
just edit-a-thon outcomes though
On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 1:51 PM, Lennart Guldbrandsson
l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com wrote:
Very cool! Good luck to
Hmm. I stopped editing the Dutch Wikipedia because it just wasn't any fun
anymore. I would never say I experienced barriers to entry or that there
were barriers to continued participation. It is more that there was a
continuous vacuum of silence that made participation feel like I was on an
island
- choose to ignore women even when they are disagreeing with them
or, in their eyes, acting outrageous, then that observation would not hold.
CM
On 12/30/2014 10:21 AM, Jane Darnell wrote:
Hmm. I stopped editing the Dutch Wikipedia because it just wasn't any fun
anymore. I would never say I
- as where Jane was
editing - choose to ignore women even when they are disagreeing with them
or, in their eyes, acting outrageous, then that observation would not hold.
CM
On 12/30/2014 10:21 AM, Jane Darnell wrote:
Hmm. I stopped editing the Dutch Wikipedia because it just wasn't any fun
totally!
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 8:04 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Wikidata is the bommbbb!!
:)
On Tue, Dec 30, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry to read that, Sarah. But maybe you just need a new project! I must
admit I make way more
According to this report Obama only took questions from women in his
end-of-year press conference. Anyone know what the story is behind this? I
find it notable that he omitted questions from major networks - are there
no women reporters for major networks? I spend a lot of time on the
gendergap in
For the record: the percentage of female editors on the Dutch Wikipedia is
only 6%. In the Netherlands, edit-a-thons seem to be useless in terms of
recruitment vehicles and many long-term Wikipedians seem to have a
long-tail interest that they tend to spend most of their time editing.
The eternal
Hi Sandra,
I don't think there have been any in the past unless you count my
discussions with Els Kloek about the 1001 vrouwen project. She is not a
technical person and couldn't help me with the metadata but loves Wikipedia
and arranged for me to meet up with the Biografischportaal website
I was thinking the same thing - who knows, maybe she really poked around
Wikipedia while writing the piece and you may even have a convert on your
hands! (one can always hope)
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Christine Meyer christinewme...@gmail.com
wrote:
Thanks Sarah. I'm actually
Natalia,
I agree - that is definitely significant news, so thanks for sharing! I
noticed while collecting some slides for a Gendergap lounge I will be
manning this Saturday that though there is an article in most language
wikis for the Wikipedia monument, there is no link to it from the Gendergap
Hello,
I am preparing some slides for the Dutch Wikiconference this Saturday and
wanted to share some interesting data on female artists. This year I have
been working on various museum collections of paintings, while continuing
to work on painter biographies. I am a big user of the Dutch RKD
Well I suppose it would be more technically accurate if 1 of 4, not 2 of 4
were women
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 11:34 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
wrote:
WOOHOo!
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Natalia antyte...@gmail.com wrote:
I have just recived an e-mail from the organizers
Sarah,
I'm glad to see you being more active, and I appreciate all the work you
have done and your recent work on Wikidata.
I hope the media viewer and other wiki-snafus don't get you down!
Jane
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 8:44 PM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I've
I totally agree, and no offense to the people who have contributed to help
pages, but I find them very unhelpful and sometimes downright wrong.
Sent from my iPad
On Jul 31, 2014, at 4:55 AM, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
I Still stand by hand holding...personal out weighs what we
Lennart,
That's too bad. One of the biggest causes of the gendergap is the lack of
reliable sources to move new articles through the Wikipedia recent changes
page patrol on any given project. The academic bias inherent in
women-related subjects (and I mean anything from knitting patterns to
health
editors dislike and wouldn't use these features, that doesn't mean it
could potentially have a major impact on converting novice and shy
editors.
By the way, is there any plan to formally reach out to the teacher and
student?
-mvolz
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com
resources on how to support students
navigating these waters -- if they exist.
I've been lurking on this list for a while and haven't posted before, but I
hope these thoughts are helpful.
Megan
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Marielle,
Good point and I
This is to inform you that one of the contributors to this list who
spent a lot of time working on the Gendergap issue and ways to solve
it, has died in a rock-climbing accident.
http://femtechnet.newschool.edu/blog/adrianne-wadewitz/
___
Gendergap
All I know is what is reported on her Wikipedia userpage
2014-04-11 18:32 GMT+02:00, Daniel and Elizabeth Case danc...@frontiernet.net:
Subject: [Gendergap] Blogger and Wikipedian Adrianne Wadewitz died
whilerock-climbing
This is to inform you that one of the contributors to this list who
spent
That is nice, and includes a nice plug for the IEG grant process as well!
2014-04-01 19:28 GMT+02:00, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com:
Nice work Netha and Emily!
-Sarah
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Netha Hussain
nethahuss...@gmail.comwrote:
Dear all,
Here is a blog post
I was just talking about this yesterday - In the Dutch Wikipedia,
gender-neutral language is used for occupations and during the
ArtFeminism edit-a-thon we remarked on how difficult it is to track
down female artists if the lead sentence is gender neutral. This is
compounded by the fact that the
very funny, thx for posting!
2014/1/11, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/01/09/fashion/Wikipedia-Judith-Newman.html?_r=1
FYI
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
It's an interesting discussion on that move request page. I noticed
the Wikibump for the Bradley Manning page peaked at 173,000 views on
22 August and went down to less that 3,000 per day a week later. I
think the current situation (today I see an article named Bradley
Manning, and an article
http://nl.wikimedia.org/wiki/Bestand:Motivaction_report_translation_v02.pdf
See page 26, headed by the understatement The large majority of
members and contributors are male
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
wrote:
Wow, that's an amazing list! I wish all artists had lists like that.
Ryan Kaldari
On 5/18/13 9:35 AM, Jane Darnell wrote:
Good luck with the AfC backlog Sarah - it depresses me to just think
about that.
Here in Haarlem we are celebrating the 100 year anniversary of the
Frans
are actually used in
sister projects, no idea, but I suspect it's less than 50%
On May 23, 2013, at 11:27 PM, Joseph Reagle wrote:
On 05/23/2013 02:58 PM, Jane Darnell wrote:
How strange that people take the trouble to upload those!
I've been wondering about this myself. Why do people port collections
Yes, I totally agree with the beer spitting part, and also wish you lots of
luck and patience with your adminship!
Most people don't realize that of the 15 million files on Commons, 99% of the
ones *not* linked into a sister project are pretty well unfindable unless
you happen to google the
Good luck with the AfC backlog Sarah - it depresses me to just think
about that.
Here in Haarlem we are celebrating the 100 year anniversary of the
Frans Hals Museum. There are copies of Frans Hals paintings placed
strategically around town to show what the museum has to offer. One of
the men who
true that it's an
impressive PR stunt though - check the stats pn the Jolie article and
the BRCA1 article, which links to the lawsuit in the lead.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_for_Molecular_Pathology_v._Myriad_Genetics
2013/5/15, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com:
It would be nice
stuff... I wouldn't
trust their analysis much :/
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 11:50 PM, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm, there seems to be much more behind this scary story about Jolie:
http://www.naturalnews.com/040365_Angelina_Jolie_gene_patents_Supreme_Court_decision.html#ixzz2TVCldugn
It would be nice if someone could make an analysis of the presence
depth (treatment, protocol, prevention) of articles on breast cancer
vs prostate cancer on Wiki(p/m)edia, as both are becoming about the
same threat in terms of live expectancy after diagnosis. We could work
from there on a to-do
For what it's worth, I added my comments to your page on Meta
2013/5/9, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com:
Yay! Erik replied. Seriously, I was beginning to think no one from the
Foundation read this mailing list anymore aside from me and Kaldari (and we
read it as volunteers!). See
As more people have noticed on this list since this incident, the
problem is not with sexism, but with the way categories are managed on
Wikipedia. For example the German painter Caspar David Friedrich, who
many would argue is in a category all his own, is in both categories
German romantic
Well I for one feel the category system is broken, though as I have
delved deeper into it I realize it was probably never working to begin
with. Sexism is as good as any other reason to do something about it,
and if we gain one or two more outraged female editors, then I think
we'll be the better
Did anyone see this? A popular blogger on Science (with more than 4
million followers) is a woman. The woman herself, Elise Andrew, had no
idea it was a secret, and she was outed when she announced her
twitter account featuring a picture of herself. Apparently the bias
occurred because of the
WP:NOTNEWS.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:52 AM, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com
mailto:jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Did anyone see this? A popular blogger on Science (with more than 4
million followers) is a woman. The woman herself, Elise Andrew,
had no
idea it was a secret, and she
Thanks for posting, that is an interesting talk. Of course, picking up the
6% women problem is a good thing, but it's quite sad to see that the
homogenous bias in the room was not only overwhelmingly male, but also
white American young male, i.e. fewer black or asian or older people than
women...
I saw the notice on enwp and filled it out, but still see the notice in
other projects (meta, nlwp, wiki source), so just keep on clicking on other
projects and you can pick up where you left off
Jane
2012/11/2 Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com
Yeah I only saw it on Wikidata and did it
Very funny to read those delete and keep reasons, thanks!
2012/10/23 Pete Forsyth petefors...@gmail.com
Amusingly enough…I did a Wikipedia presentation Thursday at the Open
Education conference, and as I often do, asked for a suggestion of a
current issue. Binders full of women was the topic
Hi all,
Actually, I would also love to write a book with no rigor, so I sympathize with
the idea. Sorry I missed this. As one of the two female board members of the
Dutch Wikimedia organization I feel compelled to contribute to this page.
Unfortunately I am not sure when I will have time. I
History. There is also Projekt kvinnor on the Swedish Wikipedia which has a
similar scope. I'm not aware of any foreign language WikiProjects devoted
specifically to Women's History, but it sounds like a great idea to spread
around.
Ryan Kaldari
On 12/27/11 7:50 AM, Jane Darnell
71 matches
Mail list logo