Re: Gump3 Presentation

2005-10-30 Thread Cliff Schmidt
On 10/28/05, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Leo Simons wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:49:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really, Leo? I thought LGPL is ok and GPL not. Ok - usually I try not to rely on non-ASF-licensed code. ONE license is the best (over a couple

Re: Gump3 Presentation

2005-10-28 Thread Leo Simons
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:34:32AM +0200, Thomas wrote: Sorry haven't had much time lately. The school has started and it takes alot of my time at the moment. I have converted it back to 1.4.2 so thats done. Where's the code? What we have in SVN is 1.5 still... Also I'll make some scripts

Re: Gump3 Presentation

2005-10-28 Thread Leo Simons
On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:49:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really, Leo? I thought LGPL is ok and GPL not. Ok - usually I try not to rely on non-ASF-licensed code. ONE license is the best (over a couple of). Heh. Don't ask me for authoritive details. Talk to Cliff Schmidt (our VP

Re: Gump3 Presentation

2005-10-28 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Leo Simons wrote: On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 11:49:35AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really, Leo? I thought LGPL is ok and GPL not. Ok - usually I try not to rely on non-ASF-licensed code. ONE license is the best (over a couple of). Heh. Don't ask me for authoritive details. Talk to Cliff

Re: Gump3 Presentation

2005-10-27 Thread Leo Simons
Okay, I looked at this today, tried to get things to compile and hit many of the same problems as Stefano outlined. - some jars seem to be missing - docs in general, are missing, so I can't quite figure out what is happening where - its java 5 (ugh) - it still uses hibernate -

Re: Gump3 Presentation

2005-10-27 Thread Thomas
Hi All ! Sorry haven't had much time lately. The school has started and it takes alot of my time at the moment. I have converted it back to 1.4.2 so thats done. Also I know that there isn't much comment nor is the documentation any good. Also the code needs some refactoring. Hopefully I'll make

Re: Gump3 Presentation

2005-09-02 Thread Thomas
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Thomas wrote: Hi ! I have now uploaded a working compy of the Gump3 pressentation. The webapplication is far from done. But it would be nice with some feedback. The code is a bit of a mess so refactoring is indeed needed. Mostly I would

Re: Gump3 Presentation

2005-09-01 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Thomas wrote: Hi ! I have now uploaded a working compy of the Gump3 pressentation. The webapplication is far from done. But it would be nice with some feedback. The code is a bit of a mess so refactoring is indeed needed. Mostly I would like idees on what functionality you would like to se in

Re: Gump3 Presentation

2005-09-01 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: Thomas wrote: Hi ! I have now uploaded a working compy of the Gump3 pressentation. The webapplication is far from done. But it would be nice with some feedback. The code is a bit of a mess so refactoring is indeed needed. Mostly I would like idees on what

Re: Gump3 presentation

2005-07-26 Thread Leo Simons
On 26-07-2005 12:00, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi ! Hi thomas! (this is a quick reply, I have limited connectivity atm) I also have one question regarding the database. The causes table lists the cause of a stalled package. The same information could be found by listing the

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-19 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Thomas wrote: Leo Simons wrote: On 18-07-2005 15:33, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I don't get around this cocoon problems I have I'll start a new presentation application (not dyngump) with J2EE and Struts. I'll chuck in 2 cents: I don't want J2EE. Servlets+Struts+other stuff

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-18 Thread Thomas
Hi Stefano! I have taken a look at cocoon but find it kind of dificult to keep the things apart. I can't say that I get it all but from what I have red and understand the sql code is in the xml document with the content. Logic can be implemented in alot of different ways, java-script, xslt, and a

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-18 Thread Leo Simons
On 18-07-2005 15:33, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I don't get around this cocoon problems I have I'll start a new presentation application (not dyngump) with J2EE and Struts. I'll chuck in 2 cents: I don't want J2EE. Servlets+Struts+other stuff like velocity is potentially nice, but

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-18 Thread Thomas
Leo Simons wrote: On 18-07-2005 15:33, Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If I don't get around this cocoon problems I have I'll start a new presentation application (not dyngump) with J2EE and Struts. I'll chuck in 2 cents: I don't want J2EE. Servlets+Struts+other stuff like velocity is

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-06 Thread David Crossley
Leo Simons wrote: Thomas wrote: More I have taken a look at the dynaGump but can't get it to woork the application is missing a Catalogmanager.properties. I've copied one from the samples of the cocoon source but don't know if I need configure it in anny special way. That has got to

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-05 Thread Leo Simons
Thomas wrote: So I'm setingup Gump and I think I'm done... The problem now is to setup some configuration that will generate good data... a litle help with that would be nice... just something that gives me different stuff that can be applied to different use-cases. There is now code to

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-05 Thread Thomas
Leo Simons wrote: Thomas wrote: Hi every one ! Hi Thomas! More I have taken a look at the dynaGump but can't get it to woork the application is missing a Catalogmanager.properties. I've copied one from the samples of the cocoon source but don't know if I need configure it in anny

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-05 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
Thomas wrote: Stefano Some questions for you about cocoon. Sure. I have just poked around abit but what I find mostly is look at the examples. That is a good way to learn if you know some basic stuff. Yep, agreed. How dose the structure of the application looklike where to put files and

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-04 Thread Thomas
Hi every one ! So I'm setingup Gump and I think I'm done... The problem now is to setup some configuration that will generate good data... a litle help with that would be nice... just something that gives me different stuff that can be applied to different use-cases. More I have taken a look at

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-04 Thread Thomas
Hi every one ! So I'm setingup Gump and I think I'm done... The problem now is to setup some configuration that will generate good data... a litle help with that would be nice... just something that gives me different stuff that can be applied to different use-cases. More I have taken a look at

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-04 Thread Leo Simons
Thomas wrote: Hi every one ! Hi Thomas! More I have taken a look at the dynaGump but can't get it to woork the application is missing a Catalogmanager.properties. I've copied one from the samples of the cocoon source but don't know if I need configure it in anny special way. That has got

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On Thu, 30 Jun 2005, Adam R. B. Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: To my knowledge here are the best known candiates (plus some others I've heard discussed.) - Java JSP/Struts. - Cocoon (Stefano has spent significant time on this, he feels it is worth evaluating.) - mod_python (Leo has

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-01 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Jun 30, 2005, at 7:24 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: To my knowledge here are the best known candiates (plus some others I've heard discussed.) - Java JSP/Struts. - Cocoon (Stefano has spent significant time on this, he feels it is worth evaluating.) - mod_python (Leo has spent some

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-01 Thread Thomas
Some input from me about what I think of what technoligy to use. This is just my opinion and of corse I'm willing to learn something new if thats what you think would work the best. On Jun 30, 2005, at 7:24 PM, Adam R. B. Jack wrote: To my knowledge here are the best known candiates (plus

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-01 Thread Leo Simons
Adam R. B. Jack wrote: Folks, please feel free to chip in your comments/reservations and perspectives on all of these to help Thomas decide. I suggest trying dynagump first. If it turns out that Thomas isn't able to get productive using dynagump, that's a sign that dynagump isn't a good idea

Re: Gump3 Presentation -- choice of technology

2005-07-01 Thread Stefano Mazzocchi
[your clock is screwed ;-)] Thomas wrote: Some input from me about what I think of what technoligy to use. This is just my opinion and of corse I'm willing to learn something new if thats what you think would work the best. I think what works best for you works best for us. On Jun 30, 2005,