Re: [VOTE] Apache StreamPipes 0.68.0 (incubating) RC1 release

+1 (binding) I checked * Signatures and Hashes * Builds Backend and Frontend * All Tests pass * Rats reports no error * No Snapshot Artifacts * Disclaimer exists * Incubating is in artefacts name Best Julian On 2021/07/21 05:19:52, Jean-Baptiste Onofre wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I quickly

Re: [DISCUSS] Hop proposal

Hey, thanks for your statement Max and thats already a great start as we coannot expect fresh podlings to know the apache way (at all?) as then there would be no point for the incubator. But knowing you and your motivation and reading your statement about the team makes me very confident that

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache IoTDB as TLP

hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the > Apache IoTDB Project: > > * Chen Wang > * Christofer Dutz > * Dawei Liu > * Gaofei Cao > * Haonan Hou > * Jialin

[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB Graduation

Hi all, as already stated some time ago [1], the Apacher IoTDB community decided that it feels ready to graduate. The maturity assesment is done [2], and the community agreed on starting the graduation process in a formal vote [3] (result see [4]). Ist important to note that all our mentors

[DISCUSS] Apache IoTDB considers graduation

Hi folks, on the IoTDB mailing list we already had a discussion about our maturity for graduation, see [1] and recently started a vote if the community wants to start the graduation process [2]. We also filled all materials necessary, see e.g. the maturity evaluation [3] and got positive

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.10.1

Hi, my vote is +1 (binding). I checked: - Downloaded staged artefacts and checked signature and hash - Incubating in name - License and Notice file are fine - README and RELEASE_NOTES are fine - No unexpected binaries in source release - Builds sucessfull on macOS 10.15.5 Great Job Team!

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.9.3

Hi, my vote is +1 (binding). I checked: - Downloaded Sources - Checked Signatures and Hashes are ok - LICENSE, RELEASE_NOTES, NOTICE and README are fine - Hive and Commons Notice seems outdated (2018, 2019) - Unzipped Archive - No unexpected Binaries - No Snapshot dependencies - Run build

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB 0.9.2

Hi, my vote is +1 (binding). I Checked: - Downloaded files and checked sig and hash - checked LIC, RELEASE_NOTES, README, NOTICE - DISCLAIMER is included - No unexpected binary files - Built according to instructions in README (some tests fail due to locale being not US) - did NOT check

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

at fzi dot de) * Philipp Zehnder (zehnder at fzi dot de) === Sponsors === ** Champion ** * Christofer Dutz (christofer.dutz at c-ware dot de) ** Mentors ** * Christofer Dutz (christofer.dutz

Re: [VOTE] Accept StreamPipes into the Apache Incubator

** Mentors ** * Christofer Dutz (christofer.dutz at c-ware dot de) * Julian Feinauer (Jfeinauer at apache dot org) * Kenneth Knowles (kenn at apache dot org) * Justin Mclean (justin at classsoftware dot com) * Jean-Baptiste Onofré (jb at nanthrax dot net) ** Spo

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

Thanks Greg, I didn't know that! Julian Am 07.11.19, 19:24 schrieb "Greg Stein" : https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INFRA/Distribution+via+the+Apple+App+Store On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:14 PM Greg Stein wrote: > An app signed by the Foundation is most

Re: [DISUCSS] Is there any neccessary to do an Apache Release if we publish an App to Apple Store?

Hi, I think this cannot be done as PMC or PPMC as it would be a "binary release" which we cannot do with the ASF policy. So I think another entity than the ASF / the PMC would need to put the App in the store, and then you are also free with regards to releases. Julian Am 07.11.19, 14:34

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

YES result: Thank you for voting! 5 binding +1 votes (PPMC): Julian Feinauer Justin Mclean Jean-Baptiste Onofré Mohammad Asif Siddiqui Furkan KAMACI no non-binding +1 votes no -1 votes Have a nice day, Anatole -- *Anat

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

Hi Justin, yes, this is a minor issue (overcompensation of the to few hashes in the last RC) but thanks for the vote! Julian Am 05.11.19, 22:56 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good -

Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.4-incubating

three +1 votes (see [6]). Hereby we already have one binding +1 vote carrying over from our PPMC vote by our mentor Julian Feinauer [7] [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits [ ] +0 [ ] -1 for fatal fla

Re: [DISCUSS] StreamPipes proposal

> * streampipes (containing backend + UI) > > * streampipes-extensions (containing modules that can be dynamically > > installed at runtime: pipeline elements and connect adapters) > > * streampipes-website (containing docs + website) > > > > ** Is

Re: Write Access to Incubator Wiki

as an important requirement to help users. > > > > ** Subversion directory ** > > (not applicable) > > > > ** Git repositories ** > > We would like to use Git for source code management and enable Github > mirroring functional

Leaving the incubator

Hi all, as already discussed before the Podling Edgent is “too dead” to be revived. The PPMC has thus voted to leave the incubator [1,2] and we will move the project to GitHub, perhaps some interest will stay. What are the next (formal) steps. Do we hold a Vote for the IPMC? Thanks! Julian

Re: [DISCUSS] TubeMQ Proposal

Hi David, thanks for the nice proposal. I think it was already introduced a bit at the ApacheCon NA so it may already be known a bit to some folks. The proposal reads quite nice and TubeMQ seems to be a really nice project and has some impressive capabilities and USPs. Although, those who know

Re: Donation of subproject for PLC4X

Thanks for jumping in Chris, yes. We never liked the name anyway but never had a better one : ) But currently we are discussing that with the community to hiopefully come up with a better one. Julian Am 07.10.19, 11:28 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" : Hi all, We have that on our

Re: Donation of subproject for PLC4X

Thanks Bertrand, I will start editing the IP Clearance Form then! Julian Am 02.10.19, 14:36 schrieb "Bertrand Delacretaz" : Hi, On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 1:59 PM Julian Feinauer wrote: > my company decided to donate our project CRUNCH [1] that has been develop

Donation of subproject for PLC4X

Hi all, my company decided to donate our project CRUNCH [1] that has been developed internally to the ASF. The idea is to integrate it as subproject into the PLC4X Project [2]. The PMC has already performed a VOTE on that task [3,4] and we also filed a Software Grant as well as CCLA and ICLAs

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Milagro (incubating) Decentralized Trust Authority v0.1.0 (alpha release)

he next release (see below). Thanks to John for his support and work helping me with the release. Best Julian Am 19.09.19, 23:01 schrieb "Julian Feinauer" : Hi, let me initially say, that the release locks pretty good and well prepared. But, unfortunately I found two issue

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache MXNet (incubating) 1.5.1.rc0

Hi Tao, Gratulations to the passed vote but a minor comment. The vote results should have the subject prefixed with [RESULT] [VOTE]... Best Julian From: Tao Lv Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2019 12:39:49 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [VOTE]

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Milagro (incubating) Decentralized Trust Authority v0.1.0 (alpha release)

Hi, let me initially say, that the release locks pretty good and well prepared. But, unfortunately I found two issues I would consider major, thus I vote -1 (binding) Remember, this is no VETO so this does not necessarily stop the release. But from my experience its easier to fix things while

Re: Incubator podling reports due today

Hi Justin, I know that Tamaya is late (we discussed that already today off-list) and I sent multiple mails to the list the last 2 days but got no response yet. They are currently in the process of doing a release we had some issues in first rc but things should be fixed soon, so I really hope

When is tamaya supposed to report next time?

Hi, as I’m pretty new in the tamaya project… when is tamaya scheduled for the next incubator report? From the records it seems like they missed the last time but I don’t see them on the current wiki page? Thanks! Julian

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) version 0.34.0

Congratulations! : ) Am 28.08.19, 10:15 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, It’s great to see superset finally get an offical release out. Thanks, Justin - To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Re: [VOTE] Accept DolphinScheduler(was EasyScheduler) into Apache Incubator

Hi, Your proposal looks good and the initiual PPMC already looks 'diverse'. Furthermore, it seems like you have a good mentoring team on board. One 'minor' concern is that I think it is best to use Apaches Infra for CI and Issue tracking. Which I would greatly prefer over using Github issues.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Myriad 0.4.0 (incubating) [rc1]

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes match - checked DISCLAIMER, LICENSE and NOTICE - No unexpected binary - Can compile from source on macOS Mojave Julian Am 21.08.19, 05:15 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: -

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 [RC1]

Hi, I agree with Alan that its really minor but as the signatures will change I would prefer another Vote to have this checked. If you (as Justin suggests) state your changes clearly in the thread I think everybody will easily carry over the vote from the previous thread so its just about

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Milagro (incubating) Crypto Libraries v1.0.0

Hi all, +1 (binding) I checked - Download links are valid - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for C - Checksums and PGP signatures are valid for JS - DISCLAIMER, LICENCE & NOTICE files are included - Artefacts have incubating in name - No compiled binaries are included - C Libraries build

Re: [OFFER] Offer to Mentor one or two podlings

19 at 5:42 PM John D. Ament wrote: > > Julian, > > Apache Tamaya could use help. My activity has been reduced pretty heavily as of late. > > John > > On 2019/08/13 06:21:54, Julian Feinauer wrote: > > Hi, > > > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Superset (incubating) 0.34.0 [RC1]

Hi, as it seems like the PPMC vote is already closed I'll repost my vote here... +1 (binding) I checked: - Checked out release - Verified hashes - Verified incubating in names - No binaries in release - Checked NOTICE and LICENSE.txt, README - Started superset from sources using `

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

Hello all, the vote to release Apache IoTDB (incubating) 0.8.0 RC3 has passed with 4 +1 Votes. Binding Votes: Justin McLean Christofer Dutz Kevin A. McGrail Julian Feinauer No further Votes were cast. Vote thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html

Re: Showcase your project at ApacheCON at a Podling's Shark Tank

IoTDB Podling is Interested! Julian Am 15.08.19, 15:04 schrieb "Dmytro Liaskovskyi" : DLab podling is interested DMYTRO LIASKOVSKYI Software Engineering Manager Office: +380 322 424 642 x 57729 Cell: +380 97 341 1315Email: dmytro_liaskovs...@epam.com

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

Hi Greg, I think Justins Answer refers to the WIP-Disclaimer which was recently added to the incubator Policy Page: https://incubator.apache.org/policy/incubation.html#disclaimers A Podlings releasing with the WIP Disclaimer is no ASF release, so I consider Justins response is no misdirection

[LAZY][VOTE] Release Apache IoTDB (Incubating) 0.8.0 RC3

/confluence/display/IOTDB/Validating+a+staged+Release The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. From the PPMC Vote we cary over 4 binding IPMC Votes: +1 from Justin McLean, +1 from Christofer Dutz, +1 from Kevin A. McGrail, +1 from Julian Feinauer Thus, I took the freedom to declare the Vote as Lazy

AW: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board

+1 (binding) Congratulations! Julian Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache Druid graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to the board Von: Julian Hyde An: general@incubator.apache.org Cc: +1 Good luck! It has been great mentoring you guys. On

AW: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

Hi, I fully agree with Julian here. But we should beware not to start a witch hunt about 'bad mentors' but develop an environment where one can step back as mentor if priorities change or for other reasons are no longer able to mentor. Everybody is a volunteer here so we should thank everybody

Re: [DISCUSS] Drop requirement that ASF members can join IPMC by just asking

Hi, I'm a new IPMC Member (no foundation member) and come from a PLC4X which has graduated months ago. I already started to help other Podlings a bit. And I agree with Dave in the sense that we should seek our way not in locking-out people but in finding ways to draw in more people. It was

[OFFER] Offer to Mentor one or two podlings

Hi, this goes to the IPMC as well as to podlings watching this list. I just recently became IPMC member and am currently pretty active in the IoTDB Project as “informal mentor” (started there before becoming IPMC member) together with 3 other pretty active mentors. As I received a lot of help

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

only change is to make the defective artifacts provisionally releasable. On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 7:56 AM Julian Feinauer < j.feina...@pragmaticminds.de> wrote: > Hi Ted, > > but instead of questioning the Bylaws or introducing two classes

Re: Business decisions and risk (was: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases)

Hi Ted, but instead of questioning the Bylaws or introducing two classes of artifacts I would rather try to improve mentor votes as this is something we can do incubator internal. And its always better to cure the cause then the symptoms : ) Julian Am 12.08.19, 16:44 schrieb "Ted Dunning" :

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

Hi, I'm answering to this (old) thread as the new one branched up with a different topic. Personally, during my time in the first podling I learned a lot by doing Apache Releases. First, as contributor, then as PPMC and finally as RM. And this is something valuable and if a project wants to

Re: [DISCUSS] IPMC votes on releases

Hi, thanks Justin for bringing that up. I have perhaps a different perspective than many others because I was / am mostly active in several podlings and just very recently became IPMC member (no apache member). But, assuming that each podling has three active mentors, each podling should have

AW: [MENTORS] IPMC Policy change work in progress disclaimer

Hi Justin, This is such a great progress from the podlings perspective. Thank your work! Julian Von meinem Mobiltelefon gesendet Ursprüngliche Nachricht Betreff: Re: [MENTORS] IPMC Policy change work in progress disclaimer Von: Davor Bonaci An: general@incubator.apache.org

AW: [PROPOSAL] MetaObjects for Apache Incubator

Hi Carl, The project sounds interesting and as I understand it the aim is code generation from models. Is this right? It would be interesting to see the current version of the code base to get a better feeling on that. We use and want to use code generation heavily in the apache plc4x project

Re: Draft incubator report

+1, I like that formulation. On 2019/04/09 09:26:00, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 10:43 AM Julian Feinauer wrote: > > ...If its these "drive-by comments" that are annoying then I would name > > that so, e.g. "What

Re: Draft incubator report

Hi, thanks for your clarification. I can only speak for myself and I try to involve in discussions where I think I can be helpful or where I have a strong opinion (usually from the podling perspective). But, of course, I do not want to disturb things or annoy people on these lists, so I was a

Re: Draft incubator report

Hi Justin, thanks for the report. I agree with all thats listed there, but theres one passage which I dont understand or which makes me think... it is: Having a smaller IPMC was discussed, it was suggested that anyone not signed up to the private list be removed from the IPMC. This was looked

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

I agree with the point from Myrle and Ross, I dislike the idea of parallel votes. Especially in the early stages we had multiple RCs which failed in the PPMC Vote process. I would not like to have them on the general@ list, as that adds a lot of noise. Julian Am 02.04.19, 16:41 schrieb "Ross

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

Hi, I like Craigs suggestion and I'm aware of the problem with the ASF Policy if we would skip the formal IPMC Vote. On the other hand in PLC4X we had a discussion about a regular release cycle to bring new features to the users as fast as possible and decided to skip that for now, to keep the

Re: Request for Mentor

Hi Lewis, although, I cannot fulfill your requirement as a formal mentor (as I'm no IPMC member) I will join your list and will try to help you with performing the release as I've done several releases as RM in the past. Julian Am 28.03.19, 21:02 schrieb "Trevor Grant" : Looks like an

Re: [VOTE] Accept DataSketches into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) Am 15.03.19, 10:50 schrieb "Byung-Gon Chun" : +1 (binding) On Fri, Mar 15, 2019 at 6:34 PM Furkan KAMACI wrote: > +1 (binding) > > 15 Mar 2019 Cum, saat 07:08 tarihinde Kevin A. McGrail < > kmcgr...@apache.org> > şunu yazdı: >

Re: Mentors and Voting on Podling Releases

ll improve the site. I am looking to make a Podling’s status and issues easier to see and act upon. More inline. > On Mar 12, 2019, at 2:19 AM, Julian Feinauer wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just wanted to bring back a short summary of a discussion we

Mentors and Voting on Podling Releases

Hi all, I just wanted to bring back a short summary of a discussion we had with Craig Russel on a private list regarding the role of podling mentors in the release approval process. And as there are currently many thoughts and discussions going on about these topics, I thought it would be good

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.1 [RC1]

Hello all, The vote for releasing Apache PLC4X 0.3.1-RC1 (incubating) is closed, now. Vote result: 5 (+1 binding) (cdutz, gtrasuk, jmclean, bodewig, lresende) 0 (0 binding) 0 (-1 binding) And no non-binding votes. Thank you everyone for taking the time to review the release and help us. I

[VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.1 [RC1]

Hello all, This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.1. The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.1. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator release.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Training into the Apache Incubator

+1 (non-binding) I really liked the idea from the start and probably will find some time to contribute! Julian Am 13.02.19, 15:18 schrieb "Kevin A. McGrail" : +1 Binding. I'll also try again to get Udacity, Udemy, Coursera, Pluralsight involved now that this is going to a formal

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 [RC2]

Hello all, The vote for releasing Apache PLC4X 0.3.0-RC2 (incubating) is closed, now. Vote result: 3 (+1 binding) (Stefan Bodewig, Justin McLean, Christofer Dutz) 0 ( 0 binding) 0 (-1 binding) No non-binding votes. Thank you everyone for taking the time to review the release and help us. I

Re: Request for write access for wiki

Indeed, strange, but nonetheless, thank you Justin! Am 03.02.19, 12:02 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, > I request write access tot he incubator wiki to submit the Report for Edgent. > My username is “jfeinauer”. Looks like you already have permission. Thanks,

Request for write access for wiki

Hi all, I request write access tot he incubator wiki to submit the Report for Edgent. My username is “jfeinauer”. Thanks! Julian

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 [RC2]

Hi Justin, thanks for your remark. I had some issues initially but the key got found by cdutz and others. I'll try to publish the key again to the server. Julian Am 03.02.19, 10:26 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, While you key is in the KEY file it looks like you KEY is not

[VOTE] Release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) 0.3.0 [RC2]

Hello all, This is a call for vote to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.0. The Apache PLC4X community has voted on and approved a proposal to release Apache PLC4X (Incubating) version 0.3.0. We now kindly request the Incubator PMC members review and vote on this incubator

Re: Write Access to incubator Wiki

Thank you Justin! Am 03.01.19, 10:54 schrieb "Justin Mclean" : Hi, > could I get write access to the incubator Wiki to update the Podling reports for the next time? Done and enjoy! Justin -

Write Access to incubator Wiki

Hi, could I get write access to the incubator Wiki to update the Podling reports for the next time? Username is jfeinauer Thanks! Julian

Re: Establishing an ASF project for training

Hey Lars, hi Rich, I really like the idea! We, from time to time, also do trainings and workshops with Apache projects and it would really help to have a better basis. And I agree for you that you don’t get payed for *having* slides but for the show as well as for the insights you get from a

Re: Hello World / CRUNCH Framework

lking. Julian > On Dec 14, 2018, at 2:11 AM, Julian Feinauer wrote: > > Hi all, > > I just joined the incubator ML and wanted to present myself and possibly also start a discussion about a software project we developed in the past. &g

Re: Hello World / CRUNCH Framework

ramework would help facilitate that then we might be able to get community buy-in for adopting. My other collaboration point is it would be cool if it could be used with the newly incubating IoTDB once that has all of its source available. - Brian On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 5:59 AM

Re: Hello World / CRUNCH Framework

t then we might be able to get community buy-in for adopting. My other collaboration point is it would be cool if it could be used with the newly incubating IoTDB once that has all of its source available. - Brian On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 5:59 AM Julian Feinauer <

Re: Hello World / CRUNCH Framework

Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen ____ From: Julian Feinauer Sent: Friday, December 14, 2018 11:11:40 AM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Hello World / CRUNCH Framework Hi all, I j

Hello World / CRUNCH Framework

Hi all, I just joined the incubator ML and wanted to present myself and possibly also start a discussion about a software project we developed in the past. But first things first. My name is Julian Feinauer and I come from Germany where I run two “start-up” companies where we work a lot