On 28/10/10 16:15, Craig L Russell wrote:
Sorry for the noise. A bit more information:
Caller-ID: 441962815000
UK number. appears to be the IBM UK switchboard...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 10/11/10 16:59, Patrick Hunt wrote:
This is the second incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
0.2.0-incubating.
PPMC release vote thread:
http://markmail.org/message/kdfnohhod6wdrqaz
The issues fixed for 0.2.0-incubating
On 13/11/10 04:17, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Jeremy Carroll wrote:
On 11/12/2010 11:51 AM, Paolo Castagna wrote:
Also (from the JenaProposal):
The Jena GRDDL Reader has some additional dependencies:
http://jena.sourceforge.net/grddl/license.html;
BrowserLauncher2 could be removed in favor of a
On 26/01/2011 05:30, Tom White wrote:
This is the third incubator release for Apache Whirr, version
0.3.0-incubating. We already received one binding IPMC +1 vote for the
PPMC release vote on whirr-dev, so are looking for two more.
The vote is open for 72 hours.
+1
Ship it! Steve
On 22 April 2013 15:39, Rebecca Wood silky...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am calling a VOTE for acceptance of jclouds into the Apache Incubator.
The vote will close on Monday, April 29, 2013.
[ ] +1 Accept jclouds into the Apache Incubator.
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't accept
+1 ship it (binding)
On 17 September 2013 23:29, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
We've held a vote on drill-dev to release the first milestone release.
The vote thread can be found here:
Hi,,
I want to start a proposal for incubating my Hoya work. Can I have edit
permissions for SteveLoughran?
TIA,
steve
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications such as HBase or Accumulo on YARN
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HoyaProposal
It does already work to the extent that it can bring up either application,
run different clusters of
, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications such as HBase or Accumulo on YARN
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/HoyaProposal
It does already work to the extent that it can bring up
interesting work together with other
projects.
I would be please to be mentor on Hoya.
Regards
JB
On 01/08/2014 04:08 PM, Steve Loughran wrote:
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications such as HBase or Accumulo on YARN
t...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Mmmh, if i recall correctly this has come up in the past with other
projects and it was decided against it. Could you please check with the
hadoop folks about it?
Thx
On Jan 9, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
no its
On 9 January 2014 21:55, Enis Söztutar enis@gmail.com wrote:
Proposal looks good. Let me know if you need any additional help in
mentors.
Enis
+1 -I'd really like input from the HBase and Accumulo teams as they are the
first apps we're trying to work with.
On that note, I know we've
On 10 January 2014 09:54, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
Hi Steve,
can I help during the week end ?
Regards
JB
I'm just running the post-rename tests now; functional test runner came
first...
-steve
On 01/10/2014 10:31 AM, Steve Loughran wrote:
I'm going to do
? Is there opportunity for collaboration, perhaps
cross-contributing or even converging the two projects?
-Andreas.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:57 PM, Andy Seaborne a...@apache.org wrote:
On 13/01/14 20:25, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 5:36 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz
bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Steve Loughran
ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
...What
On 15 January 2014 02:13, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
I see. So is Hoya limited to HBase and Accumulo? Or is it open for any
other type of existing application? If so, won't it have some common
abstraction that is shared by all of them? That is where I see the
similarity with
On 16 January 2014 12:41, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
@Steve I'm curious to know if also Apache Hama may leverage Hoya to be
deployed on YARN.
If you are going to make a 100% commit to running in YARN -which, if you
aren't ready yet, Hama should be able to do in
Andreas, to me, Twill is a library, a convenience library, that one
can use to write Yarn apps. Hoya aims to provide a general framework
using which one can take existing apps (HBase/Accumulo to start with),
and make them run well in a Yarn cluster, without intruding at all
into the App
On 17 January 2014 10:10, Bernd Fondermann bernd.fonderm...@gmail.comwrote:
Very informative explanation. I've got a better understanding of the
proposal now.
I suggest that a remark like this is added to the Hoya proposal, so this
part of the discussion becomes part of the vote on the
to address it as
it
provides a set of simple and useful tools.
For the sake of the names I think Hoya would be good (while Hyena would
not).
Just my 0.02 cents,
Tommaso
2014/1/17 Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
On 16 January 2014 12:41, Tommaso Teofili
looks nice.
5. Help migrate more distributed applications into YARN clusters - such
as Apache HAMA.
BTW, this means that HAMA can be deployed on YARN cluster using HOYA
without implement separate YARN application?
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 6:42 PM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote
to move forward with the
proposal at this point or are you still mulling over the feedback?
Thanks,
Roman.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
I'm starting to put together the incubation proposal for Hoya: a tool to
dynamically deploy applications
Hi
For people wondering what's been happening with that Hoya proposal, I've
got a successor proposal up for discussion.
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
This proposal -as well as having a different name- is a superset of the
original draft. It emphasises that making the tool
On 10 April 2014 16:28, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Steve,
Does Slider target the deployment and management of components/projects in
the Hadoop project itself? Not just the ecosystem examples mentioned in the
proposal? I don't see this mentioned in the proposal.
no.
That
On 12 April 2014 23:38, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:58 AM, Andrew Purtell apurt...@apache.org
wrote:
The reason I ask is I'm wondering how Slider differentiates from
projects
like Apache Twill or Apache Bigtop that are already existing vehicles
for
On 14 April 2014 04:43, Andreas Neumann a...@apache.org wrote:
I'd like to comment on what has been said about Twill.
Twill: handles all the AM logic for running new code packaged as a JAR
with
an executor method
The goal of Twill is much broader than to support writing new code. Its
I'd like to call a vote on accepting Slider into the incubator
https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/SliderProposal
[ ] +1 Accept Slider into the Incubator
[ ] +0 Indifferent to the acceptance of Slider
[ ] -1 Do not accept Slider because …
The vote will be open until Thursday April 24 13:00 UTC
On 24 April 2014 07:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré j...@nanthrax.net wrote:
+1 (binding)
As I said for Hoya, I'm in as a mentor if you need.
Regards
JB
thanks -I hope to be filing work against your name shortly
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the
After the week's voting, here's the results.
Binding +1s:
Arun C Murthy
Suresh Srinivas
Vinod Kumar Vavilapalli
Devaraj Das
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
Jakob Homan
Non-binding +1s:
P. Taylor Goetz
larry mccay
On and after April 25:
Binding +1s:
Mahadev Konar
Non-binding +1s:
Dilli Arumugam
On 28 April 2014 19:19, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Henry Saputra henry.sapu...@gmail.com
wrote:
Congrats and welcome to ASF incubator guys!
Indeed! Best of luck growing your community and project!
Thanks,
Roman.
thx, I'll hope to submit
+1 (binding).
Ship it!
On 2 May 2014 04:03, Suresh Marru sma...@apache.org wrote:
Please VOTE to indicate if Apache Stratos is ready to graduate as a Top
Level Project. The board resolution is included below.
[ ] +1 Graduate Apache Stratos as a TLP
[ ] +0 Don't care.
[ ] -1 Don't
The ApacheCon EU call for papers is open, and will close June 25th, end of
the day in whatever timezone is latest.
http://events.linuxfoundation.org//events/apachecon-europe/program/cfp
http://apachecon.eu
@apachecon
The conference will take place in Budapest, Hungary, November 17 - 21, 2014.
On 29 May 2014 04:56, Sumit Mohanty smoha...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Thanks Justin.
I did miss the compilation instruction in the original email. The markdown
file is at
The recent ASF mailing list changes appear to have broken some of the
reply-to's in mailing lists, going to things like
d...@slider.apache.org rather than d...@slider.incubator.apache.org
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7857
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7865
people
On 10 June 2014 16:20, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
One fundamental problem with compiled deps is that unlike source code, they
cannot be reviewed by a PMC -- so they are potential trojan horses. Maybe
it's possible to address that specific concern by compiling an ASF
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Marvin Humphrey
mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 11:14 AM, Steve Loughran
ste...@hortonworks.com
wrote:
On 10 June 2014 16:20, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com
wrote:
One fundamental problem with compiled deps
+1 binding
On 29 June 2014 01:02, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is vote for Samza's 0.7.0 release. The PPMC vote passed 6x+1 6
(Martin, Jakob, Yan, Sriram, Zhijie, Garry):
http://bit.ly/samza070releasevote
The release candidate can be downloaded from here:
+1 binding
On 1 July 2014 05:16, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
Hello folks
Tez entered incubation in February, 2013. Since then, we have made
progress towards graduation[1]. The Tez community recently voted positively
towards graduation[2] with 27 +1s.
Of the 27, there were 5 IPMC
On 7 July 2014 08:45, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 8:52 PM, Hitesh Shah hit...@apache.org wrote:
...15 binding +1s, another +1 from Abiola A Balogun ( possibly a spam
bot ) and no -1s...
you're right, spam bots don't get binding votes here ;-)
On 12 August 2014 08:52, jan i j...@apache.org wrote:
On 12 August 2014 08:53, Roman Shaposhnik ro...@shaposhnik.org wrote:
Documents are source code written in a natural language :-)
and without any tests.
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the
On 06/02/2011 03:40 PM, robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Florian Effenbergerflo...@documentfoundation.org wrote on 06/02/2011
06:39:12 AM:
This would not only be about reinventing the wheel, but also about
splitting the community, leading to disadvantages for end-users,
contributors, and
On 06/02/2011 04:31 PM, Donald Whytock wrote:
The butler did it.
yeah, the new butler, jenkins, killed the old one, hudson as hudson was
getting too noise for a staff member of the household.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 06/03/2011 03:58 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 10:24 PM,robert_w...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Corporate assignments are notorious at the ASF for disappearing
communities. Sometimes, there is momentum to keep going, often
times there is not. Communities are based on individuals.
On 06/07/2011 05:00 PM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
Have a look at http://marketing.openoffice.org/marketing_bouncer.html
Maybe a bit outdated and actually there is no release date in the
displayed time. The old load balancer (bouncer) usually failed totally
when a new version was announced,
On 06/07/2011 06:08 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
It is Oracle's intent to provide to ASF the files needed to build OOo,
taking into account licensing and ownership issues.
This includes binary artifacts such as the OOo artwork and translation
databases. I am following the discussions here closely,
and
On 06/08/2011 04:39 AM, arv...@cloudera.com wrote:
As there are no active discussions on the [PROPOSAL] thread for a few
days now, I will like to initiate the vote to accept Sqoop as an
Apache Incubator project. The proposal discussion thread and full text
of the proposal can be found at the
On 06/08/2011 05:38 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
Hi all,
Since there have been no new conversations on this Flume [PROPOSAL] thread,
I'd like to call a vote.
At the end of this mail, I've put a copy of the current proposal. Here is a
link to the document in the wiki:
On 10/06/11 17:02, Sam Ruby wrote:
*** Please change your Subject: line for any [DISCUSSION] of this [VOTE]
As the discussions on the OpenOfficeProposal threads seem to be winding
down, I would like to initiate the vote to accept OpenOffice.org as an
Apache Incubator project.
At the end of
On 14/06/11 05:26, Tom White wrote:
Hi,
I would like to propose Bigtop to be an Apache Incubator project.
Bigtop is a project for the development of packaging and tests of the
Hadoop ecosystem. The goal is to do testing at various levels
(packaging, platform, runtime, upgrade, etc...) developed
I've added more on the limitations of the current process (not
synchronised releases, not enough automated testing on multiple-host
clusters), and on a risk of the project: the upstream projects need to
care about and work on more synchronized releases.
Cloudera managed to address that
On 04/09/11 17:39, Billie J Rinaldi wrote:
Bernd,
We would divide the derived code into two categories: that which we modified only slightly (for
example to allow us to extend it) and that which we modified heavily. Now that we are able to
interact openly, we hope to supply much of that back
On 20/01/12 06:46, Eric Yang wrote:
Still missing one IPMC vote. Could someone help out?
+1
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
[X ] +1 Hama graduation
Binding.
-Steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
On 4 May 2012 16:34, Alan Gates ga...@hortonworks.com wrote:
* In that case there might still be a role for BigTop to provide a
central repository for such easily consumable upstream releases. This
would be somewhat similar to the discussions that took place a few
years ago about whether
On 23 May 2012 19:35, Josh Wills jwi...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hey Jakob,
This was a tough one-- you know that I've been talking about Crunch
w/Joe Adler for a few weeks now, and I personally am really looking
forward to working with you guys. That said, the team did feel
strongly about
On 24 May 2012 07:44, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
To me that seems like it raises a barrier to entry -- but then,
there are numerous projects around the ASF who are not hurting for
contributors and who use JIRA for *everything* -- starting with Hadoop and
Lucene.
I first
On 24 May 2012 06:15, Benson Margulies bimargul...@gmail.com wrote:
I've met other groups of people who like a JIRA centric view
of the world. I suspect that if they did a bunch of other good things
called out below, you or others would find the JIRA business
digestible. Also, on the other
On 23 May 2012 19:45, Josh Wills jwi...@cloudera.com wrote:
I would like to call a vote for accepting Apache Crunch for
incubation in the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available
below. We ask the Incubator PMC to sponsor it, with phunt as
Champion, and phunt, tomwhite, and acmurthy
On 25 May 2012 20:00, Josh Wills jwi...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi Steve,
Thank you for your thoughtful comments. Replies inlined below.
1. He's using it at work, so represents the end users.
A super-majority of the initial committers are also end users. I use
Crunch on my own projects
On 26 May 2012 21:50, Marvin Humphrey mar...@rectangular.com wrote:
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Steve Loughran
steve.lough...@gmail.com wrote:
It is becoming a bit of a SPOF, isn't it?
What has changed about our JIRA instance is both its size and its
increasing
integration
On 27 May 2012 00:43, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote:
arvind - 116 commits - Cloudera
prasadm - 22 commits - Cloudera
brock - 16 commits - Cloudera
esammer - 4 commits - Cloudera
jarcec - 1 commit - AVG Technologies
juhanic - 1 commit -
On 27 May 2012 01:15, Ralph Goers ralph.go...@dslextreme.com wrote:
What would happen if all the Cloudera people were to suddenly vanish from
the project (this could easily happen if Cloudera were purchased by a
larger company who had different goals). As it stands today I don't
believe the
On 31 May 2012 07:18, Seungyoung Kim wolky...@gmail.com wrote:
XML and JSON format is another one which are used wided, but little bit
too complecated and heavy from application's stand point of view.
I'd agree with this critique of XML, but not JSON. Easy to yacc-up a
parser, a fair number
On 10 August 2012 16:12, Alejandro Abdelnur t...@cloudera.com wrote:
This is a call for vote to graduate Oozie podling from Apache Incubator.
Oozie entered the Incubator in July of 2011. Since then it has added
two new committers and made two significant releases following the ASF
policies
+1, binding
On 6 November 2012 16:57, Adam Berry ambe...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Hello,
This proposal has been open for discussion for a a few weeks, so now
submitting for a vote for this project to be accepted into the incubator.
Cheers,
Adam Berry
On 28 February 2013 18:11, Hyunsik Choi hyun...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'd like to call a VOTE for acceptance of Tajo into the Apache incubator.
The vote will close on Mar 7 at 6:00 PM (PST).
[X] +1 Accept Tajo into the Apache incubator
[] +0 Don't care.
[] -1 Don't accept Tajo into
On 27 February 2013 18:53, Andrei Savu savu.and...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Benson -
Thanks for your feedback! It's too early to decide if there is an overlap
between communities. Provisionr solves a different problem being focused on
semi-automated workflows (e.g. with Rundeck) and cloud
Xavier Hanin wrote:
Hi,
As discussed recently on this mailing list [1], I would like to start a
community vote to decide if the Ivy community feels ready to graduate as a
subproject of Ant.
The graduation guide [2] can be used as a basis to collect information about
what is usually necessary
Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Dims wrote:
Niclas Hedhman asked:
Do we have any examples where corporate backing has been withdrawn, and
how
the project was affected, whether inside or outside ASF?
TSIK - Verisign folks lost interest, community did not form, project
shelved.
Plus Kabuki,
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, Stefan Bodewig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should Ivy be allowed to graduate as an Ant Subproject?
[X] Yes
[ ] No
+1
-steve
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Monday 08 October 2007 18:37, Steve Loughran wrote:
Any Java stack that does SOAP or REST should be using
HttpClient
That seems to indicate that it should be a TLP in its own right.
you want that, you get my support.
Besides WS, we have;
- Maven do the http
On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 21:56:19 +0100, Jochen Wiedmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 05:36 PM 11/22/2004 +, Steve Loughran wrote:
5. I dont know what the globus dev process is. Really. Are they
already in the gump? are the binaries in the Maven repository? What is
their test process? Do
+1 (binding)
On 23 October 2014 01:30, Tomer Shiran tshi...@apache.org wrote:
I had the wrong link in here as well as non-Apache emails. Here's the
correct information.
Correct link to PPMC vote:
the code inside is all org.htrace; changing that would be painful for both
the developers and the current users
who owns htrace.org?
On 3 November 2014 19:27, Roman Shaposhnik r...@apache.org wrote:
Hi!
Thanks for the positive feedback and volunteering. I think the
more mentors the merrier
[ ] +1 accept Lens in the Incubator
[ ] ±0
[ ] -1 because...
think you meant HTrace and not lens. Accordingly
+1, binding
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is
+1 binding
On 18 November 2014 19:43, Josh Elser josh.el...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
The Apache Slider project has voted to release 0.60.0-incubating. The team
voted to release these artifacts with 6 +1's and nothing else. 2 of the 6
votes were from IPMC members.
Vote thread:
+1 (binding).
ship it!
On 2 December 2014 at 22:32, Jakob Homan jgho...@gmail.com wrote:
This is a call for a vote on a release of Apache Samza 0.8.0
(incubating). This is the second Incubator release from the podling
and was voted on by the PPMC (result thread: http://s.apache.org/4gb,
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote for releasing slider-0.61.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release, with the same actual source as the previous
slider-0.60.0-incubating release. We've done this for downstream projects;
once the release process is successfully reworked we'll use it in
I'm still looking for more votes here.
Here's my own:
+1 (binding)
On 3 February 2015 at 15:25:43, Steve Loughran
(ste...@hortonworks.commailto:ste...@hortonworks.com) wrote:
Hi all,
This is to call for a vote for releasing slider-0.61.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release
+1 for the proposal: I've a lot of respect for the team...I met some of
them at a workshop in Germany a few years back along with the (then)
Stratosphere project.
I'm would volunteer as a mentor except I'm fairly overcommitted with other
things (like the slider incubating project). If it does
After a quick email exchange with our mentors, I'm going to publish the
0.61.0-incubating release as voted through, with the 0.7x release process to
begin shortly —the latter to address all licensing inconsistencies in .py
dependencies.
Announcement to follow.
-Steve
passes with 4 +1 votes from IPMC.
Jean-Baptiste Onofré +1 (binding)
Jakob Homan +1 (binding)
Steve Loughran +1 (binding)
Billie Rinaldi +1 (binding)
-Steve
On 9 February 2015 at 14:02:49, Justin Mclean
(jus...@classsoftware.commailto:jus...@classsoftware.com) wrote:
HI,
Would it be OK if we addressed all of the issues in that release? You've
identified them, which will make checking them easy. And as we plan to get
that out by the end of
On 8 February 2015 at 22:57:05, Justin Mclean
(justinmcl...@me.commailto:justinmcl...@me.com) wrote:
Hi,
Sorry but it's -1 binding from me. Willing to change my vote if other incubator
members think these issues are OK for this release and/or corrective action is
taken for the next
On 9 February 2015 at 16:58:44, Marvin Humphrey
(mar...@rectangular.commailto:mar...@rectangular.com) wrote:
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 5:31 AM, Steve Loughran ste...@hortonworks.com wrote:
On 8 February 2015 at 22:57:05, Justin Mclean
(justinmcl...@me.commailto:justinmcl...@me.com) wrote
On 14 Mar 2015, at 00:13, Jochen Theodorou blackd...@gmx.org wrote:
Am 13.03.2015 22:38, schrieb Stephen Connolly:
(Disclosure Ben works for my employers, so I have slightly more ability to
bend his ear. As a result I got him to agree to do two full exports from
JIRA, one to let us test
On 13 Mar 2015, at 20:48, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Well, Cédric raised the point about the release versioning schema during
incubation. I agree with him, that it would be strange to release Groovy
2.4.2 as Groovy 2.4.2-incubating. Do we need to talk about this?
It'll cause
On 11 Mar 2015, at 13:43, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.0-incubating.
This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which is a
text file used for -ve testing.
Summary of fixes:
would be good to get hold of groovy.codehaus.org. I was unable to find out
anything about using lists yesterday...
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
On 23 Mar 2015, at 16:40, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a call for a vote for releasing Apache Slider 0.70.1-incubating.
This is a source+binary release with one .tar file (appdef_1.tar), which is a
text file used for -ve testing.
The following 2 issues were
On 15 May 2015, at 01:42, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
Seems OK but +0 until LICENSE issue explained/resolved.
I checked:
- File contains “incubating”
- Signatures and hashes correct
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE may some issues
- NOTICE correct
- all source has
On 14 May 2015, at 09:44, Justin Mclean justinmcl...@me.com wrote:
Hi,
Staged artifacts:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheslider-1006/org/apache/slider
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheslider-1006/org/apache/slider
It’s not
neo4j is just a remote app in this context, right? So there'll be no classpath
contamination?
in which case, I don't see why there'd be any worry about pulling in to the
test/release process. I think having neo4j maintain the artifact makes sense
from a maintenance/release process, tinkerpop
On 12 May 2015, at 22:08, Gour Saha gs...@hortonworks.com wrote:
This vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thank You,
The Apache Slider Team
+1 (binding)
as stated in the slider list: downloaded source, built and
On 16 Apr 2015, at 09:32, Seetharam Venkatesh venkat...@innerzeal.com wrote:
@David, I have uploaded the source tar ball for your review at
http://people.apache.org/~venkatesh/atlas/ while I work on making the
repository public.
Thanks!
venkatesh
-how about creating your own
On 13 Apr 2015, at 06:39, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it is common to take a quick look at code coming in. In
particular, a glance to see whether there is any hygiene around licensing
is an important question. Many projects in the world at large have no good
record
+1 binding.
The process I used for verifying this were covered in the slider -dev release
post, but essentially
Stage 1: verify POM dependencies
-checked out dependency checker at
https://github.com/steveloughran/slider-dependency-check
-updated slider dependency to 0.81.1-incubating
-mvn
+1 (binding)
> On 28 Oct 2015, at 20:26, Konstantin Boudnik wrote:
>
> Following discussions [1] about its current status, the Groovy community
> has voted [2] to graduate from the Incubator. The vote passed [3] with 12 +1s
> total, 5 are binding:
>
>Guillaume Laforge
>
This is an interesting topic, and one that is broader than just Apache Sentry
(incubating). Even so, I want to praise Joe Brockmeier for raising it, and the
comments -especially those from Greg Stein and Rich Bowen and Marvin Humphrey
for making me think more about this.
* In any project with
> On 11 Nov 2015, at 09:38, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Steve,
>
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Steve Loughran <ste...@hortonworks.com>
> wrote:
>> ...is JIRA-first development conducive to developing a community?.
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo