Re: [VOTE] Recommend 'Apache NetBeans graduation to Top Level Project' resolution to board

embers of the Apache NetBeans Project: * Anton Epple * Antonio Vieiro * Aristides Villarreal * Arunava Sinha * Ate Douma * Attila Kelemen * Bertrand Delacretaz * Bruno Flávio * Bruno Souza * Christian Lenz * Constantin Drabo * David Heffelfinger * Daniel Gruno * Dusan Balek * Eirik B

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

On 02/04/2019 16.53, Ate Douma wrote: On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote: Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

On 02/04/2019 16.41, Ross Gardler wrote: Myrle makes a good point. As a mentor (is been a long time though) I tried to cast my vote after there were at least 3 views from the community. Once I saw the ppmc catching issues I was missing, or I was simply ratifying their view, it was time to

Re: [DISCUSS] Mentors SHOULD vote on podling releases prior to asking IPMC to vote

On 02/04/2019 13.58, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 11:30 AM Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ...Maybe the PPMC and IPMC vote could run in parallel... I think the reason for having two votes is to give an opportunity for mentors to catch issues in the first one without

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans parent pom 1

-1 (binding) because the Maven groupId is using org.netbeans as prefix instead of org.apache.netbeans, and there is no need to keep using org.netbeans for this *new* artifact. I've already raised and discussed this on the Netbeans dev@ list were we agreed that it is better to cancel the vote

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.6 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

Now provided sha256 checksum checked to be correct. Hereby changing my vote back to +1 (binding) Regards, Ate On 19/11/2018 15.40, Ate Douma wrote: Sorry about overlooking this before, but as Henk P. Penning indicated release artifacts now MUST be accompanied by a SHA-256 and/or SHA-512

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

Thanks, Laszlo. sha256 checksum checked to be correct. Hereby reconfirming my previous +1 (binding) Regards, Ate On 20/11/2018 19.56, Laszlo Kishalmi wrote: SHA256 checksum has been provided. I've not removed the SHA1 ones from this staging area, but wont move them over to the final release

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.6 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

-256 checksum file is added. (see also the vote thread for Netbeans 10.0 and Bertrand's likewise comment and temporary change of vote). Ate On 18/11/2018 22.29, Ate Douma wrote: +1 binding - signature and sha1 files correct (note: .md5 no longer needed/desired) - LICENSE and NOTICE files correct

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.6 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

+1 binding - signature and sha1 files correct (note: .md5 no longer needed/desired) - LICENSE and NOTICE files correct - source dist contents matches with contents of git release-1.6 tag Regards, Ate On 18/11/2018 05.47, Jaroslav Tulach wrote: Hi. The NetBeans incubating community has just

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3] (2nd attempt)

+1 binding - signature and sha1 files correct (both source and bin distribution) - LICENSE and NOTICE files look fine (both source and bin distribution) - source dist contents matches with content of git 10.0-vc3 tag (except LICENSE/NOTICE files, as documented) - binary starts up OK (no

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 10.0 (incubating) [vote candidate 3]

On 18/11/2018 18.01, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: I believe it is at least 5 days (or an X number, not sure what the X should be officially) and with three +1 votes. Release Votes SHOULD remain open for at least 72 hours: http://apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval There is

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zipkin into the Apache Incubator

+1 binding Regards, Ate On 2018-08-27 05:14, Mick Semb Wever wrote: After a brief discussion¹ I would like to call a VOTE to accept Zipkin into the Apache Incubator. The full proposal is available on the wiki² and is pasted below in text form as well. This vote will run at least 72 hours.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

don't see how it serves any purpose and only will trigger unnecessary warnings or worries by users or checker tools. My recommendation is to get rid of those GPL license files. Regards, Ate --emi ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On 21 May 2018 3:54 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 RC1 (incubating) rc1

I'm inclined to vote positive on this RC1, overall looks great! - verified the MD5 and SHA1, and PGP signatures with the ASC files. - executed rat check (ant rat) and verified the report. - build and run the source (using JDK8), and all seems fine. However I still have two questions: a)

Re: [VOTE] Resolution to graduate Apache FreeMarker to TLP

+1 Regards, Ate On 2018-02-19 11:45, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Hi all, The FreeMarker community has discussed [1] and voted [2] positively on graduating to a top level project (TLP). The resolution for the graduation has been proposed and discussed in this list [3]. Information about

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache NetBeans 9.0 Beta (incubating) rc2

On 2018-01-22 12:36, John D. Ament wrote: I'm inclined to vote -1 at this point as well.. I want confirm that the list of issues Justin raised have been entered in your backlog. To me, the minimum amount of work that has to be done to convert to a +1 is: - Remove the binary zip files from

Re: [Vote] Release of Apache NetBeans (incubating) 9.0 Alpha [RC2]

+1, carrying over my mentor and binding vote from the netbeans dev list vote thread Ate On 2017-11-21 14:46, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: The release hash is:

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5.1 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

+1 (binding) Ate On 2017-11-14 20:47, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 (binding) over here as well again. LieGrue,strub On Tuesday, 14 November 2017, 10:47:50 GMT+1, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 10:27 PM, Jaroslav Tulach

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.5 of NetBeans HTML/Java API

+1 (binding) One improvement to consider for the next release is appending the license for Knockout (MIT) to the embedded LICENSE in the build ko4j jar artifact, as is required for distributing this artifact. And another is maybe generating a more explicit artifact name for ko4j. Thanks, Ate

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Streams project from Incubator

e.org> * Robert Baker Douglas <rdoug...@apache.org> * Ate Douma<a...@apache.org> * Ryan Edward Ebanks <reba...@apache.org> * Matt Franklin<mfrank...@apache.org> * Joey Frazee <jfra...@apache.org> * Trevor Grant

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4-incubating

Steve, I have a few additional notes below. As a separate note: can you check your mail reply quote/indent settings? Sometimes your replies (like below) are not using any, which makes it very difficult to distinguish your reply from the original message. Thanks, Ate On 2016-11-10 21:27,

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.4.0 incubating

Thanks for catching this Justin! I just checked and this same issue was also present in the Streams 0.3-incubating release, so we overlooked it the previous time as well. We'll fix these and then come back with a new release candidate. Ate On 2016-11-02 04:21, jus...@classsoftware.com wrote:

Streams podling back to monthly reporting schedule [Was: Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor]

s, Ate [1] http://incubator.apache.org/clutch.html John On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: On 2016-09-25 12:25, Ate Douma wrote: I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams. I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal p

Re: NetBeans next steps

On 2016-10-03 19:22, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all Heve sameone requested the ML at infra? I didn't find a issue for it. Bertrand already did, directly (see this thread first email from Bertrand). As I understand it, it doesn't require a JIRA issue. FYI: I'm busy otherwise until tomorrow.

Re: Netbeans expectations (Was: Re: ASF doing too much? (Was: Re: TAC))

On 2016-09-28 00:50, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: Sorry, Bertrand, not Ate, though I feel they're in sync. In this case, you felt right :-) Syncing with the mentors would have been appreciated, but I also see no harm done in Roman's trying to help out. Thanks Roman! Ate Gj On Wednesday,

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

need to all be comfortable with cutting bait on it. I agree, and I think it is a good suggestion to switch back to a 3 monthly reporting schedule to keep the IPMC in the loop on progress (or lack thereof). Ate John On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:57 PM Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: On 2016

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

On 2016-09-25 12:25, Ate Douma wrote: I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams. I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting needed before I make this so? Without further feedback I'm going to assume lazy consensus and will add Suneel

Re: [VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

This vote will run for at least 72 hours. Please VOTE as follows [] +1 Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator [] +0 Abstain. [] -1 Do not accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator because ... +1 (binding) Ate - To

[VOTE] Accept NetBeans into the Apache Incubator

a Services) 4. Gui Chulin (translation) 5. Yi Zhao (translation) 6. Liyuan Li (translation) 7. CunHui Lin (translation) 8. Lei Cao (translation) == Sponsors == === Champion === * Bertrand Delacretaz === Mentors === * Bertrand Delacretaz * Emmanuel Lécharny * Ate Douma * Mark Strub

Re: Git release candidate tagging policy? [was: Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating]

e incubator guidelines yet. Ate LieGrue, strub On Monday, 26 September 2016, 22:09, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: Hi Mark, On 2016-09-26 17:22, Mark Struberg wrote: Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days of playing with GIT. It is used e.g. in the fol

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On 2016-09-27 18:12, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ...I think for a lot of (NetBeans) folks lurking in these threads, it will be useful to know what voting means, who can vote, what 'binding votes' are,

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

+1 Ate On 2016-09-27 14:23, Mark Struberg wrote: +1 LieGrue, strub On Tuesday, 27 September 2016, 14:11, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 2:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote: Sooo does anyone feel that this needs to

Git release candidate tagging policy? [was: Re: [VOTE] Apache BatchEE 0.4-incubating]

Hi Mark, On 2016-09-26 17:22, Mark Struberg wrote: Stian, this is established practice in the ASF since the very early days of playing with GIT. It is used e.g. in the following TLPs: TomEE DeltaSpike Johnzon CouchDB Maven and many, many more! It also got discussed on members, infra and even

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

the process for assigning Suneel as mentor, can we assume lazy consensus and just 'make it so' in a few days, if nobody objects? Thanks, Ate On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams. I can'

Re: Preliminary NetBeans cost findings

On 2016-09-25 17:45, Ross Gardler wrote: You seem to have taken my comment as an indication that I have concerns one way or the other. That is not the case. What I'm saying is that to make a case for extra budget there needs to be solid justification that a move to ASF will help the

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On 2016-09-25 17:20, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 1:03 PM, Ate Douma wrote: and not all committers are required to commit :-) That is interesting. Can you explain more about that? What I meant to say is that at the ASF we also value and honour merit based on things

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On 2016-09-25 12:15, Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-09-25 05:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list. Hi GeertJan, I've gone through this whole thread again and IMO

Re: Request to join Apache Streams (Incubating) as Mentor

I'm happy to add and have Suneel join me as mentor for Apache Streams. I can't find anything about this: Is there any formal process or voting needed before I make this so? Ate On 2016-09-23 19:51, Suneel Marthi wrote: -

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On 2016-09-25 05:22, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: It really is impossible for us to follow all the (in many cases contradictory) advice we have been given re the initial contributors list. Hi GeertJan, I've gone through this whole thread again and IMO there really isn't so much contradictory

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

On 2016-09-19 17:07, Ate Douma wrote: As was pointed out to me by the John Arment on general@, the process for retiring a podling is a bit more elaborate, and with different consequences compared to a TLP retirement (see incubator retierement guide link below). The most notable difference

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

munity has happened. Thanks! Benjamin -- http://bigbluehat.com/ http://linkedin.com/in/benjaminyoung *From: *apache <mailto:sblack...@apache.org> *Sent: *Friday, September 23, 2016 4:15 PM *To: *Ate Douma <mailto:a...@douma.nu>; d...@streams.incubator.apache.org <mailto:d...@str

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

...@streams.incubator.apache.org Kind regards, Ate Steve Blackmon sblack...@apache.org On September 19, 2016 at 10:25:16 AM, Ate Douma (a...@douma.nu <mailto:a...@douma.nu>) wrote: On 2016-09-19 17:09, Suneel Marthi wrote: > I am sorry to be reading this, but I was at Steve Blackmon's

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

to postpone/cancel the retirement VOTE for now. I suggest to head over to d...@streams.incubator.apache.org, let us know what you can and will do for the project, and see how that works out. Regards, Ate On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 4:58 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: On 2016-09-19 16:3

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

On 2016-09-19 16:33, Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-09-19 15:44, John D. Ament wrote: Ate, Please also note the instructions from the incubator's retirement guide. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html Right. Thanks for pointing this out John. I've never before had to handle

Re: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 6:37 AM Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: FYI, I've started below vote to retire Apache Streams, after I first initiated a [discuss] thread more than a week ago, which resulted in zero feedback. Ate (Streams mentor) Forwarded Message Subject:

Fwd: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

+0200 From: Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> To: d...@streams.incubator.apache.org <d...@streams.incubator.apache.org> As a final follow up on the earlier [discuss] thread, lets formally vote on retiring Apache Streams and move it to the attic. The process is described at http://atti

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On 2016-09-15 14:15, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi Incubator PMC, On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ... https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/NetBeansProposal ... At this point I ask anyone with concerns or questions that haven't been

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On 2016-09-14 21:49, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: I can't wait for that to happen! In the meantime, can we call NetBeans by its real name: NetBeans, with an uppercase N and an uppercase B? Shall we all start maintaining that, i.e., using the correct name, which is NetBeans or, better yet, Apache

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On 2016-09-14 21:43, Ate Douma wrote: On 2016-09-14 17:14, David Nalley wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga <geertjan.wiele...@googlemail.com> wrote: ...ther

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache NetBeans Incubator Proposal

On 2016-09-14 17:14, David Nalley wrote: On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: Hi, On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote: ...there is no code on plugins.netbeans.org at all. No one can donate

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Graduate AsterixDB from the Incubator

(2016-01-16), and Michael Blow (2016-03-28) have been added as committers and PPMC members AsterixDB's community passed a supporting vote with 26 +1 votes (3 of those were from the podling's mentors Chris Mattmann, Henry Saputra, and Ate Douma) and no 0 or -1 votes [2]. The proposed board resolution

Must name and copyright of bundled (other) ASF artifacts be attributed in NOTICE file?

I'm helping out the AsterixDB podling assembling a first release with bundled binaries, and one of the advises I've given is that: For bundled ASF artifacts you need to merge (at least) their name and copyright year statement, to be compliant with ASL 2.0, section 4.d [1] However Justin

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Incubator PMC report for November 2015 * Ready to graduate - AsterixDB While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is not yet considering graduation so I think it shouldn't be listed as such. Ate (AsterixDB mentor)

Re: Draft report November 2015 -- please review

On 2015-11-10 23:59, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 12:22 PM, Ate Douma <a...@douma.nu> wrote: On 2015-11-09 18:12, Marvin Humphrey wrote: Incubator PMC report for November 2015 * Ready to graduate - AsterixDB While IMO AsterixDB is doing great, it is n

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Apache AsterixDB Hyracks 0.2.16-incubating (RC3)

so feedback would be much appreciated. The vote to release on the development list passed: https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-asterixdb-dev/201509.mbox/%3ccan_yf5xzo8qv_yk-p41m+tppv_y2dynehc_keujwxpem_1l...@mail.gmail.com%3E with result Binding +1s: Murtadha Hubail Till Westm

Re: [VOTE] Accept Freemarker into Apache Incubator

On 2015-06-19 09:15, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: Following the discussion in the thread [1], I would like to call a VOTE to accept Freemarker as a new Apache Incubator project. The proposal is available on the wiki at [2] and is also attached to this mail. The VOTE is open for at least the next

Re: [VOTE] Accept Groovy into the Apache Incubator

On 2015-03-19 07:55, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Following the discussion earlier in the thread: http://s.apache.org/KWE I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Groovy as a new incubator project. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/GroovyProposal and is also

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache AsterixDB in to the Incubator

+1 (binding) Very interesting. And if you still like or need another mentor, I'd be willing to help out. Ate On 2015-02-20 06:38, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) wrote: Hi Everyone, OK, discussion has died down on this thread. I was originally suggesting that the pTLP option may be best for this

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Streams 0.1-incubating

-1 (binding) Besides the findings already reported by Justin Mclean in addition I noticed: - binary artifacts, including the -sources and -javadoc jars, do not contain the required DISCLAIMER file alongside the NOTICE and LICENSE files I also encountered build test failures. For the next

Re: [VOTE] Accept Zeppelin into the Apache Incubator

+1 (binding) On 2014-12-19 06:29, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Following the discussion earlier: http://s.apache.org/kTp I would like to call a VOTE for accepting Zeppelin as a new Incubator project. The proposal is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ZeppelinProposal and is

Re: [VOTE] Graduation of Apache Flink

+1 (binding) Ate On 2014-12-09 12:49, Kostas Tzoumas wrote: Hi everyone, The Flink community voted on its Dev list to graduate, The vote passed with 27 +1s (including 12 +1s from the PPMC) and 0 -1s. Here is the vote thread in the Dev list:

Re: September report

On 08-09-14 06:57, Roman Shaposhnik wrote: Hi! it looks like September report is almost done, except the following podlings: * Streams [ ](streams) Matt Franklin [ ](streams) Ate Douma [ ](streams) Craig McClanahan If there's any chance the above mentors can

Re: [VOTE] Usergrid BaaS Stack for Apache Incubator (revised proposal)

+1 (binding) Ate On 09/30/2013 09:27 PM, Dave wrote: I would like to call for a new vote on Usergrid, a multi-tenant Backend-as-a-Service stack for web mobile applications based on RESTful APIs, as an Apache Incubator podling. The original proposal has been revised to name Dave Johnson as

Re: [VOTE] Accept Stratos proposal as an incubating project

On Jun 14, 2013 11:50 PM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: I would like to invite the IPMC vote to accept the Stratos proposal [1]. I want to clarify that this vote is for the Stratos project to enter the incubator as a standard podling under the existing incubation policy. The

Re: Looking for a Champion

On 06/05/2013 04:12 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: +1 @Marcel Any links for the draft proposal so people can assess if they can help or not ? He is asking for help (Champion) to create such a draft :) On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 4:07 PM, Marcel Offermans marcel.offerm...@luminis.nl wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache BeanShell in the Incubator

+1 (binding) Regards, Ate On 05/24/2013 09:23 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: Dear ASF members, We would like to propose BeanShell for the incubator. The proposal draft is available at: https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/BeanShellProposal, follows below the proposal Open is open for at least 72h

Re: Ripple, Streams, Onami, HDT need to fix your metadata

I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too. Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to trigger that, if even needed? Thanks, Ate On 03/05/2013 08:15 AM, David Crossley wrote: Ripple, Streams, Onami, Hadoop Development Tools ... Those projects would

Re: Ripple, Streams, Onami, HDT need to fix your metadata

On 03/05/2013 01:47 PM, David Crossley wrote: Ate Douma wrote: I've removed the monthly schedule for Streams too. Not sure how about updating the site though, can't find instruction how to trigger that, if even needed? After making source changes, then i just go to https://cms.apache.org

Re: [PROPOSAL] Apache Steams Project

== Initial Committers == * Matt Franklin (mfranklin at apache dot org) - Apache Member * Craig McClanahan (craigmcc at apache dot org) - Apache Member * James Snell (jmsnell at apache dot org?) - Apache Committer * Ate Douma (ate at apache dot org) - Apache Member * Ryan Baxter (rbaxter

Re: [VOTE] Accept Apache Streams as an Incubator Project

dot org) - Apache Member * Craig McClanahan (craigmcc at apache dot org) - Apache Member * James Snell (jmsnell at apache dot org?) - Apache Committer * Ate Douma (ate at apache dot org) - Apache Member * Ryan Baxter (rbaxter at apache dot org) - Apache Committer * Jason Letourneau

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Wookie podling from the incubator

of the Apache Wookie Project; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Wookie Project: * Scott Wilsonscot...@apache.org * Ate Douma a...@apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Airavata from the incubator

; and be it further RESOLVED, that the persons listed immediately below be and hereby are appointed to serve as the initial members of the Apache Airavata Project: Aleksander Slominski as...@apache.org Ate Douma a...@apache.org Chathura

Re: [VOTE] Apache Airavata 0.4-Incubating RC1

Hi Suresh, I looked at the two issues raised and IMO these do not pose as blockers for this release, so +1 from me on this release candidate (binding and Mentor) More feedback below. Regards, Ate On 08/01/2012 03:46 PM, Suresh Marru wrote: Hi All, The VOTE is called for a lazy consensus

Re: [PROPOSAL] Allura Proposal

Dave should mail his incubator wiki id here and request being added to the wiki ContributersGroup [1]. Once added to this page (by an incubator wiki admin) Dave can add/edit wiki pages himself. Ate [1] http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ContributorsGroup On 06/19/2012 11:28 AM, Ross Gardler

Re: [VOTE] Apache Airavata 0.3-Incubating RC3

+1 (binding, as well as a late Airavata PPMC Mentor vote) Ate On 06/18/2012 12:27 AM, Suresh Marru wrote: Apache Airavata (Incubating) is pleased to call for a vote on the following Apache Airavata 0.3-incubating release candidate artifacts. We are requesting at least one additional IPMC

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airavata 0.2-Incubating RC5

and LICENSE files in their src/main/resources folders, but AFAIK these are not or no longer used/bundled in the build artifact. Possibly outdated/leftover? IMO none of the above really are release blockers, so my overall impression: awesome work guys! Regards, Ate On 04/24/2012 05:28 PM, Ate Douma

Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Airavata 0.2-Incubating RC5

I haven't seen anyone respond to this yet and I'm in a tight spot myself to make time for it. I'll try to free up some by tomorrow though, please accept my apologies for the delay. Ate On 04/22/2012 06:40 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Sorry to cross post here, but I think we need to

Re: [VOTE][IPMC] Graduate RAT as Apache Creadur Project

On 03/11/2012 08:42 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: -8--- [ ] +1 Recommend The Apache Creadur Proposal To The Board (below) [ ] +0 [ ] -0 [ ] -1 Do not graduate Rat podling --

[RESULT][VOTE] Graduate Apache Rave as TLP

After 72+ hours this vote has passed with the following tally of 13 votes in total, including +11 binding IPMC member votes: +1: Ross Gardler* Chris Mattmann* Arje Cahn Hadrian Zbarcea* Ate Douma* Alex Karasulu* Jukka Zitting* Alan D. Cabrera* Jean-Baptiste Onofré* Niall Pemberton* Henry

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, Alex Karasuluakaras...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: ... They remain. Keeping them is the right thing for our community and product. That is our determination, and is

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On 02/29/2012 03:52 PM, Ate Douma wrote: On 02/29/2012 02:45 PM, Greg Stein wrote: On Feb 29, 2012 8:07 AM, Alex Karasuluakaras...@apache.org wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: ... They remain. Keeping them is the right thing for our community

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Apache Rave as TLP

+1 (binding) On 02/27/2012 01:26 PM, Ate Douma wrote: Hi IPMCers and Incubator community, Apache Rave entered the Incubator almost 1 year ago on March 1st 2011. Since then Rave provided 7 incubator releases, added 3 more committers/PPMC members, and shows a steady growth of community

Re: [VOTE] Graduate Sqoop podling from Apache Incubator

On 02/28/2012 01:46 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Hi... 1st of all, and I speaking about myself here, I believe this is partially my fault cause I am one of the mentors of Sqoop and I should have spotted such thing before moving the vote to general@ I totally agree with Alex, more

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.8-incubating

additional IPMC member vote, as we have received 2 binding IPMC +1 votes during the release voting on rave-dev - VOTE: http://s.apache.org/U8G RESULT: http://s.apache.org/Fcv IPMC member votes from the rave-dev list: Ate Douma: +1 Ross Gardler: +1 Release notes: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator

Re: [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

+1 (binding) Ate On 02/09/2012 04:16 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (388J) wrote: Hi Folks, OK there has been enough discussion here. It's time to VOTE for a new IPMC chair and it looks like the remaining folks (including me) that were in the running have aligned beyond the following nominee: Jukka

Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Jukka Zitting for IPMC Chair (was Re: NOMINATIONS for Incubator PMC Chair)

On 02/09/2012 05:54 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote: On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Jim Jagielskij...@jagunet.com wrote: ...I suggest that this VOTE be withdrawn, and a true election, with all candidates be done... Agreed - I think Chris assumed there was only one candidate, but it's just an

Re: [VOTE] Apache BVal as a TLP

+1, good luck! Ate On 02/08/2012 03:39 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote: Hi... It has been discussed, since a while, about the graduation of Apache BVal, whether to graduate to a TLP or Subproject and whether it is time or not, [1], [2] and [3]. In the past few weeks there has been a

Re: Licence headers in template files

On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote: On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me at this page), but the release FAQ [1] makes it sound like you need the header, if you assume your templates

Re: Licence headers in template files

On 02/06/2012 03:30 PM, ant elder wrote: On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Ate Doumaa...@douma.nu wrote: On 02/06/2012 02:44 PM, ant elder wrote: On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. mfrank...@mitre.orgwrote: I am sure you know this (especially since you first pointed me

Re: Licence headers in template files

On 02/06/2012 03:40 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote: Hi, [legal-discuss@?] On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.com wrote: Would it be acceptable for these files to *not* have licence headers in them? Going further, you may want to explicitly declare that downstream

Re: Licence headers in template files

On 02/06/2012 07:18 PM, Ross Gardler wrote: Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. On Feb 6, 2012 5:26 PM, Greg Steingst...@gmail.com wrote: On Feb 6, 2012 11:41 AM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: ... Perhaps the answer to Why is a licensing header necessary?

Re: Earned autonomy

On 02/06/2012 01:41 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote: On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 01:26:47PM -0600, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote: It might be worthwhile to require 3 ASF members on the initial release, 2 on the next, 1 on the following and then trust the committee to follow the established precedent. +1

Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)

On 02/03/2012 06:47 PM, Karl Wright wrote: +1 on this. Work the bugs out before everyone transitions. +1 on that Ate Karl On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jukka Zittingjukka.zitt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, [Forking a new thread thread to make this easier to track.] On Fri, Feb 3, 2012

Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?)

On 02/03/2012 08:35 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: -Original Message- From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 2:13 PM To: general@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Evolution instead of a revolution (Was: Time to vote the chair?) On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at

Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

On 01/30/2012 10:17 AM, Ross Gardler wrote: On 30 January 2012 09:11, Bertrand Delacretazbdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 9:16 PM, Benson Marguliesbimargul...@gmail.com wrote: ...2) Fixed election schedule: On some schedule (e.g. annually), nominations are opened,

Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: There's always the perennial chat here and there about rotating the PMC chair on a regular basis. It's my understanding that other PMCs have adopted this policy and are quite happy with it. It's also

Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

On 01/29/2012 03:15 PM, Ate Douma wrote: On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: On 01/29/2012 02:15 AM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote: There's always the perennial chat here and there about rotating the PMC chair on a regular basis. It's my understanding that other PMCs have adopted this policy

Re: [DISCUSSION] Regular rotation PMC chair

On 01/29/2012 09:37 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: On Jan 29, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Alan D. Cabreral...@toolazydogs.com wrote: On Jan 29, 2012, at 6:18 AM, Ate Douma wrote: FTR: as should be clear from my above response, I disagree

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.7-incubating

On 01/23/2012 10:30 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: On 1/23/12 3:29 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 January 2012 15:17, Franklin, Matthew B.mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: This is the sixth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being versioned as 0.7-incubating. We are

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Rave 0.7-incubating

On 01/23/2012 10:56 PM, Ate Douma wrote: On 01/23/2012 10:30 PM, Franklin, Matthew B. wrote: On 1/23/12 3:29 PM, sebbseb...@gmail.com wrote: On 23 January 2012 15:17, Franklin, Matthew B.mfrank...@mitre.org wrote: This is the sixth incubator release for Apache Rave, with the artifacts being

  1   2   >