On 3/13/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Jakarta Commons isn't a TLP but considering the
commons.apache.org space is vacant how about addins a blurb about the
Jakarta Commons.
You'd have to sell this idea across the ASF, not just at Jakarta, and you'll
likely get more than
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 19:13 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Reposted (edited) from original commons proposal.
Currently this proposal has general, though not unanimous, support.
A vote thread may follow this thread if the mood remains positive.
i'm a little unsure whether this will turn out
I'll give it a shot.
A link from commons.apache.org to Jakarta Commons, XML Commons and WS
Commons seems pretty fair.
Hen
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, Martin Cooper wrote:
On 3/13/06, Sandy McArthur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know Jakarta Commons isn't a TLP but considering the
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 19:49 +0100, Ortwin Glück wrote:
Sandy McArthur wrote:
As a programmer looking for useful code to help me with uploaded
files, I'm going to look in something named Jakarta *Web* Components
first. When I see Jakarta HTTP Components I think of interacting with
the
Board report done - now I can irritate you all on these threads again :)
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 19:13 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Reposted (edited) from original commons proposal.
Currently this proposal has general, though not unanimous,
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 15:29 -0500, Henri Yandell wrote:
Board report done - now I can irritate you all on these threads again :)
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006, robert burrell donkin wrote:
snip
- each component provides an extension to the JavaSE
- code judged by would it be out of place in the
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 16:53 +0100, Martin van den Bemt wrote:
Just zap alexandria (we just zapped the mailinglist too). We can look at it
as being promoted to TLP
anyway (gump).
ORO and Regexp ar kind of finished I thought, we should mark it stable or
something like that.
Don't know
On Mon, 2006-03-13 at 19:18 -0500, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
In terms of finding homes, I wonder if we should have a root directory under
which we have inactive codebases. One problem would be that no PMC would be
responsible. Or we could create a sort of reverse incubator: a curatorship,
where
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 20:23 +, robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 19:13 +, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Reposted (edited) from original commons proposal.
Currently this proposal has general, though not unanimous, support.
A vote thread may follow this thread if the mood
On 3/14/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just considering proposing exactly this!
The issues about groupings, subprojects, etc. are completely irrelevant
it seems to me. A community is the set of people subscribed to emails
about a particular project, no more and no less.
On 3/14/06, Thomas Dudziak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/14/06, Simon Kitching [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was just considering proposing exactly this!
The issues about groupings, subprojects, etc. are completely irrelevant
it seems to me. A community is the set of people subscribed to
On 3/14/06, Thomas Dudziak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a forum frontend would be even better for users, at least for
non-power-users.
You mean like Nabble? (http://www.nabble.com)
I like Simon's proposal. I know I need something that better allows
me to manage the number of lists I'm
On 3/14/06, J Aaron Farr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You mean like Nabble? (http://www.nabble.com)
Though I recently migrated my project (Floyd) to OpenQA, I don't
exactly know my way around there yet. But I think they are using Jive
(http://www.jivesoftware.com/).
cheers,
Tom
i like the idea of tagging emails better: a single list with cool
server
side filtering and metrics. we don't have the technology for this
yet so
i'm willing to see the mailing lists split so long as people would be
willing to consider coming back if it every arrives...
I was just
robert burrell donkin wrote:
i think that's one of the advantages of flattening karma and voting: .
we need to separate the formal legal structure (karma, voting) from the
community (developers hanging out) from the ontological (communicating
that the components are).
from an ontological
On 3/14/06, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...regarding the forums - na. What does that help?
Judging from myself, users don't like to have to subscribe to mailing
lists, especially when they don't need the list on a daily basis. E.g.
I would hate to get every question and answer in
On 15.03.2006, at 10:10, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/14/06, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...regarding the forums - na. What does that help?
Judging from myself, users don't like to have to subscribe to mailing
lists, especially when they don't need the list on a daily basis.
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Torsten Curdt wrote:
On 15.03.2006, at 10:10, Thomas Dudziak wrote:
On 3/14/06, Torsten Curdt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...regarding the forums - na. What does that help?
Judging from myself, users don't like to have to subscribe to mailing
lists, especially
Henri Yandell wrote:
A joke turns into something serious ...but I am all with you guys.
As I said: the more I think about it - the more I like the idea!
You've got my +1 :)
But is that what you mean? (+1 is active not passive)
This all sounds like a nice idea, and could potentially solve
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
A joke turns into something serious ...but I am all with you guys.
As I said: the more I think about it - the more I like the idea!
You've got my +1 :)
But is that what you mean? (+1 is active not passive)
It is what I
Hey... I know what this could be called... Alexandria
Henri Yandell wrote:
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Henri Yandell wrote:
A joke turns into something serious ...but I am all with you guys.
As I said: the more I think about it - the more I like the idea!
You've
21 matches
Mail list logo
