I say
that Howard Lewis Ship is a skilled coder and community builder and if he
wants to give it a try with HiveMind, while the topic bores me personally,
I'll give him my support. If he does want to collaborate with the
Avalonites (Avaloners?) then he should be encouraged to do so; however,
Sounds like the basic problem is lack of community.
Getting community involves publicity and time. Publicity involves web
presence and a release.
Unless the rest of the turbine community are highly interested in JCS, I'd
suggest that joining Commons is the best way for you to gain community.
I agree to Henri JCS could need more publicity! I have implemented a
transactional cache for the Jakarta Slide project as the only Apache
caching thing I have found at that time was
http://db.apache.org/ojb/objectcache.html
which simply was not powerful enough.
Even tought ojb caching took
Andrew C. Oliver wrote in haste:
I say
that Howard Lewis Ship is a skilled coder and community builder and if he
wants to give it a try with HiveMind, while the topic bores me personally,
I'll give him my support. If he does want to collaborate with the
Avalonites (Avaloners?) then he should be
Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Perhaps you missed that part of my message.
No - I didn't miss anything.
What you could do is try to add some rationalization around your
arguments instead of making negative assertions about a project
you are not involved with and are not interested in.
The rest of
- Original Message -
From: Andrew C. Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2003 7:35 PM
Subject: Re: [POLL] Future Of Turbine-JCS
On 11/30/03 6:57 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
What do the
I prefer to see Hivemind established as a community (as far
as I know Howard
is the only member of the community ATM) before exploring
as you say. I see
no reason to deprive Howard of the opportunity to establish
Hivemind and
build a community.
That's what is, in fact, surprising
Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
Now information
http://jakarta.apache.org/turbine/jcs/index.html
tells me too little. Can someone explain: does it support any type of
transactions or could it easily be augmented to?
Hope this is not too much OT and thanks in advance,
I think JCS is getting extra
On 12/1/03 2:02 AM, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
End of discussion.
Excellent.
--
Andrew C. Oliver
http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI
http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
For Java and Excel, Got POI?
The
On 12/1/03 2:47 AM, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought you ended our discussion? Okay I guess not. My point continues
to be that I don't think Howard should be forced and that if HiveMind builds
a community, it is perfectly welcome here regardless of cooperation with
Avalon.
I personally would like to use HiveMind for Struts, just like commons
resources, beautils, validator, etc, were spun out of Struts so it
could be shared, and placed in Commons or Commons Saundbox (a safe place
to play).
HiveMind AFAIK was a Tapestry Component, but could/should be used by
rdonkin 2003/12/01 12:37:43
Modified:docs/site agreement.html roles.html
xdocs/site agreement.xml roles.xml
Log:
Replaced text of Contributors License Agreement with link to main ASF site. This
kind of information is best maintained in one place.
rdonkin 2003/12/01 13:31:49
Modified:docs/site newbie.html roles.html
xdocs/site newbie.xml
Log:
Added more information about ASF email accounts and also a short section on web site
maintenance.
Revision ChangesPath
1.42 +99 -1
On 1 Dec 2003, at 05:11, Scott Eade wrote:
snip
Without knowing too much, should perhaps JCS to db top level and
JCS to db commons also be considered options?
definitely :)
Of the available options below I have selected jakarta commons more by
excluding the other options than because of some
On 1 Dec 2003, at 09:57, Oliver Zeigermann wrote:
I agree to Henri JCS could need more publicity!
luckily enough it's apache newsletter time!
i know from personal experience that writing up something for the
newsletter really does generate interest. JCS sounds like something
that people would
I'm sure JCS would be much more widely used if we got out a release.
Right now, the major impediment is that users have to build it
themselves. If we had a release, more sample applications and further
For a long time I hoped a release could be avoided until after the
JCache JSR was at least in
[ ] leave it within turbine
[3] move it to apache commons
[2] move it to jakarta commons
[ ] move it to incubator
[1] something else (please specify)...
I think the ideal place for JCS is the DB Top Level Project. Second
choice, Jakarta Commons, and
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote:
[I like Turbineers. :-) ]
I am one of them, and I did some discussion about JCS @ ApacheCon with
Martin Poeschl (who seems to do the odd fix to JCS because he uses it in
Torque), another Turbineer. We basically were came to the same
18 matches
Mail list logo
