Did anything every happen on this? I remember ACO sending out a message, but I don't
know if it
every made it to a vote. I'd really like to pursue this, because of my instatiable
craving for
power.
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components
+1
On 7/3/03 4:59 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anything every happen on this? I remember ACO sending out a message, but
I don't know if it
every made it to a vote. I'd really like to pursue this, because of my
instatiable craving for
power.
--
Howard M. Lewis
+1
Howard for King
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
+1
On 7/3/03 4:59 PM, Howard M. Lewis Ship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did anything every happen on this? I remember ACO sending out a message, but
I don't know if it
every made it to a vote. I'd really like to pursue
Does it make sense that someone is nominating himself
(or re-nominating himself) for membership?
--
===
Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
A society that will trade a little
Oooh ooh does that mean we all get to stab him? Sorry I'm from a violent
culture...its our way... GET USED TO IT! ;-)
http://linuxintegrators.com/hl30/blog/general/?permalink=And+that%27s+a+404+
on+the+Weapons+of+Mass+Destruction.html
;-)
-andy
On 7/3/03 6:03 PM, Henri Yandell [EMAIL
On 7/3/03 6:23 PM, Jim Jagielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it make sense that someone is nominating himself
(or re-nominating himself) for membership?
:-p We already voted him in...I nominated him a long while back...Just no
one like...bothered to count the votes and do whatever was
I like to totally endorse Leo's points about the Avalon PMC, My experience with James
PMC is very, very similar.
James PMC is by and large the whole set of commiters who were active in discussions
about the project, rather than just the code. From that POV nothing much has changed,
we're a bit
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 19/2/03 23:10 Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think anyone expects that upon becoming a PMC member one would
immediately need to gain and maintain intimate knowledge of all corners
of the jakarta codebases. It is just about humanly impossible. So it is
And if that works for Italy, I
believe it works everywhere else...
Erm, are you really suggesting that Italian politics should be the model we emulate?
d.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Unless I am mistaken, being a PMC member implies an overseing role for the
whole of jakarta,
No, not quite, IMHO. The PMC as a *whole* has an oversight role for the
whole of Jakarta but individual PMC members do not need to oversee all of
Jakarta. In fact this is the
Conor MacNeill wrote:
purely PMC role. All releases of Jakarta sub-projects must be approved by
the PMC. This isn't something that has been done in Jakarta to date,
One good first step in this direction would be to at least Cc: the pmc
list on all [Vote result] messages, so all pmc should be
Jeffrey Dever wrote:
I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to
the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons
HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the time,
including releases. HttpClient is somewhat unusual in commons as
I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases
to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for
Commons HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the
time, including releases. HttpClient is somewhat unusual in commons
as it is rather a
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Jeffrey Dever wrote:
I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases
to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for
Commons HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the
time,
--- Jeffrey Dever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members
voting on releases
to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the
release prime for
Commons HttpClient where all committers vote on
all issues all the
time, including releases.
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
The goal is to make all active committers PMC members.
Would it be quicker just to make all active committers PMC members by
default?
If the idea is that every release-manager
If the implication is that release management =
project management, I don't agree. Typically there
can only be one release manager, but it's takes lots
of people to keep a project going. Certainly every
release manager should forward themselves as PMC
nominees, but the body of qualified
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Jeffrey Dever wrote:
I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases
to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for
Commons HttpClient where all committers vote
Jeffrey Dever wrote:
I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to
the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons
It is not to the exclusion of active committers.
Http-client is part of jakarta-commons - and acording to the charter any
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 11:42 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Yesterday I received the Jakarta Monthly Newsletter. Interesting as
always,
until I got to the section on PMC nominations. There, I suddenly found my
name listed as elected to the Jakarta PMC. This came as a complete
It is not to the exclusion of active committers.
Http-client is part of jakarta-commons - and acording to the charter any
jakarta-commons committer ( which is close to all jakarta ) can vote.
As you probably know - only those who are really interested do that.
I agree that we're not yet ready
Completely agree. We should see what the new PMC roles/responsibilites
are before accepting PMC membership.
robert burrell donkin wrote:
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 11:42 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote:
Yesterday I received the Jakarta Monthly Newsletter. Interesting as
always,
until I
robert burrell donkin wrote:
actively inviting new PMC members to join is something that i think
should be done.
in the same way that a developer receives a letter from apache (after a
successful vote) inviting them to become a committer, i'd say that
committers who have been voted onto the
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 02:19 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Jeffrey Dever wrote:
I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases
to the exclusion of active committers.
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Shouldn't it be that a committer has been around for a reasonable amount
of time? How else would they be a committer?
From the perspective of other ASF projects (e.g., HTTPD), Jakarta gives
out committer-ship like candy. With HTTPD, a track record of
approximately
On 19/2/03 17:18 Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeffrey Dever wrote:
I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to
the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons
HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the time,
including
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 03:41 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Shouldn't it be that a committer has been around for a reasonable
amount of time? How else would they be a committer?
From the perspective of other ASF projects (e.g., HTTPD), Jakarta
gives out
At 15:41 19.02.2003 -0500, you wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:
Shouldn't it be that a committer has been around for a reasonable amount
of time? How else would they be a committer?
From the perspective of other ASF projects (e.g., HTTPD), Jakarta gives
out committer-ship like candy. With
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 19/2/03 17:18 Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The goal is to make all active committers PMC members.
I think this is utterly wrong for an umbrella project like Jakarta.
Interesting. 100% of the ASF board members that I have talked to have
given me exactly the
One good first step in this direction would be to at least Cc: the pmc
list on all [Vote result] messages, so all pmc should be aware of
the decisions made.
It is important to emphasize *result*. Not to be discouraging but you
could quickly overwhelm the PMC with threads of discussion
Talk less. Nominate more.
-Andy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi peeps,
I am on the avalon PMC. I was a bit scared of the idea of being a PMC
member at first, thinking about all the additional responsibility and
all the additional things I would need to do.
Guess what? No need for that at all! The additional responsibility
being on a PMC entails wasn't
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
So, unless this:
The PMC is responsible for the strategic direction and success of the Jakarta
Project. This governing body is expected to ensure the project's welfare and
guide its overall direction.
Changes to identify that individual PMC members might have oversight
Ceki Gülcü wrote:
By the way, when are the next membership nominations?
Martin Poeschl wrote:
how does someone become an ASF member?
i know, by nomination from another member .. but when does that ever
happen??
This is scheduled to coincide with members meetings which, in turn, are
On 19/2/03 21:31 Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 19/2/03 17:18 Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The goal is to make all active committers PMC members.
I think this is utterly wrong for an umbrella project like Jakarta.
Interesting. 100% of the ASF board
On 19/2/03 23:00 Leo Simons [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Guess what? No need for that at all! The additional responsibility
being on a PMC entails wasn't additional at all.
Avalon is ONE project... Jakarta, I can't count them with my hands AND feet.
Pier
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
On 19/2/03 21:31 Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a convincing enough argument to make me change my point of view.
Pier
Fair enough.
I think it is fair to interpret the paragraph you quoted
The PMC is responsible for the strategic direction and
On 20/2/03 2:34 Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A bit like
saying the government is responsible for running the country. That doesn't
mean every minister will have expertise in every portfolio
Ministers might not know the details, but know the overall direction and
actions of all the
Pier Fumagalli wrote:
...
Now, under Jakarta, there might be projects on which one might like to be
involved and spend time on (therefore bearing the responsibilities of
being a PMC member over _that_ particular code base), but there might be
project that one don't want to be even remotely
Yesterday I received the Jakarta Monthly Newsletter. Interesting as always,
until I got to the section on PMC nominations. There, I suddenly found my
name listed as elected to the Jakarta PMC. This came as a complete surprise
and shock to me.
When I followed the relevant link, I discovered that a
Ok, now that I understand better how a PMC nomination works,
it looks like I have to say something about me besides just
saying that I accept - which I do.
I work on software development for almost 15 years and I
only started using Apache software less than 2 years ago. I
got addicted very fast
After some thinking, I'm going to accept the nomination, even
if I don't quite believe jakarta needs 'management', 'committee' or
any other function besides 'jakarta commiter'.
Lol. Sellout !
You're joining the establishment now !
;-)
I think I'll vote for you :)
Remy
--
To unsubscribe,
List
Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache
After some thinking, I'm going to accept the nomination, even
if I don't quite believe jakarta needs 'management', 'committee' or
any other function besides 'jakarta commiter'.
Lol. Sellout !
You're joining the establishment now
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Sam Ruby wrote:
Apparently the rules require me to accept and say a few words.
Sorry Sam - but we even have to make -you- do it. Just to keep up the
pretense (only once a year of course) that you are one of us mere mortals.
Dw
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
Sorry about the delay.
I accept the nomination for re-election to the PMC. I have several basic
beliefs related to the subject of jakarta governance :
o That Java as a platform is facing some challenges, and that open source
practitioners, especially the Jakarta project, can help play a big
Delagrange
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:16:55 -0600
From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL
On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:16:55 -0600
From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: General Jakarta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PMC
On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:29:39 -0800 Micael Padraig Og mac Grene
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote.
McClanahan ROCKS!
+1
At 12:32 PM 2/6/02 -0500, you wrote:
Craig McClanahan wrote:
At Apache, I got involved in the Apache JServ project before there was
a
Jakarta (along with other long timers like
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
So, what was the answer to the question below? If we really do need two +1s
for a nomination, then I have some campaigning to do! (Unless someone else
wants to go ahead and +1 me, if only to shut me up. ;)
At this point the rules posted for
Assuming there is a sufficient number of willing candidates to fill the
seven slots, I would respectfully decline my nomination, so as to ensure
someone else the chance to serve.
It's been my experience that the best way to build community is to not
only participate yourself, but also to give
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache
After some thinking, I'm going to accept the nomination, even
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:49, Bill Barker wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache
After some
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: To jvote or not to jvote
On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Paulo Gaspar wrote:
From the PMC nomination postings, some are going to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and some not.
Why? What are the rules?
See below. We'll debug the message
Hola Santiago!
-Mensaje original-
De: Santiago Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
P.S.: (This holds for any Apache Committer coming to Madrid. I feel
quite isolated here).
Hey, perhaps there are no Apache Committers in Madrid, but there are surely
lots of Apache users! :)
Un saludo,
Hello Morgan,
+1
Saturday, February 02, 2002, 1:16:55 AM, you wrote:
MD I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC.
MD Craig works on a lot more projects than I do (than _most_ people do), so I
MD cannot give a complete rundown of his accomplishments. I can say,
I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC.
Costin has a wide area knowledge of ASF projects (Apr, httpd 1.3/2.0,
tomcat3.x/4.0, Ant...).
He has been contributing to Tomcat since the very first versions.
He has the patience of a good teacher and the spirit of a real
I second that nomination.
Have fun,
Paulo Gaspar
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of jean-frederic clere
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 6:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache
On 2/4/02 12:59 PM, jean-frederic clere
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC.
Costin has a wide area knowledge of ASF projects (Apr, httpd 1.3/2.0,
tomcat3.x/4.0, Ant...).
He has been contributing to Tomcat since the very first
I accept this nomination, which was originally sent to the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Thanks Rod!
- Original Message -
From: Waldhoff, Rodney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Jakarta General List' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:15 AM
Subject: PMC Nomination - Morgan
Another legend. +1 by all means.
Bojan
On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 04:59, jean-frederic clere wrote:
I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC.
Costin has a wide area knowledge of ASF projects (Apr, httpd 1.3/2.0,
tomcat3.x/4.0, Ant...).
He has been contributing to
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En
nombre de jean-frederic clere
Enviado el: lunes 4 de febrero de 2002 18:59
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache
I would
+1
We should call Costin Professor since he's a terrific example
of patience and excellence, a very consensual man and a real
OSS and ASF spirit defensor
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC.
Costin has a
+1
We should call Costin Professor since he's a terrific example
of patience and excellence, a very consensual man and a real
OSS and ASF spirit defensor
jean-frederic clere [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote :
I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC.
Costin has a
Just to be clear, I'm not leaving Jakarta entirely, you will still have to
put up with my bullshit every now and then...I'm just not going to
participate in the PMC politics any longer...
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL
Cool!
That was what I understood but the tone of some remarks left me wondering.
Have fun,
Paulo
-Original Message-
From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 8:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection
on 2/3/02 2:00 PM, Kevin A. Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you guys check out codecon - http://www.codecon.org
It is going to be held at the DNA Lounge (and I will be speaking about
Reptile)...
Yea, that sounds like a fun event...
hm... how long before Jon hosts an ApacheCon ??? ;)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
on 2/3/02 2:00 PM, Kevin A. Burton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you guys check out codecon - http://www.codecon.org
It is going to be held at the DNA Lounge (and I will be speaking about
Shit. You'll be sourly missed. I guess we could not expect you to be
the ugly duckling for ever.
Best of luck with your new project. No doubt you'll do well.
At 12:19 01.02.2002 -0800, you wrote:
Hey all,
I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC nomination
and do
Hey all,
I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC nomination
and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election.
I have been involved with Java Apache/Jakarta since Sept 1996 and I think
that it is time for me to move on from being politically responsible
Hello Jon,
That said, I recently signed a 10 year lease on a prime event space in
downtown San Francisco and I am moving towards spending more time being a
big time night club owner than working on Jakarta.
Way to go ;)
You know, last summer I was reading the jokes archive and found this
Hello,
Sorry, it was meant as a private message - hit the wrong key :(
Hello Jon,
That said, I recently signed a 10 year lease on a prime event space in
downtown San Francisco and I am moving towards spending more time being a
big time night club owner than working on Jakarta.
Way
I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC.
Craig works on a lot more projects than I do (than _most_ people do), so I
cannot give a complete rundown of his accomplishments. I can say, however,
that his excellent and informed contributions to Commons, to Taglibs, and
On Sat, 2 Feb 2002 07:19, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Hey all,
I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC nomination
and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election.
I have been involved with Java Apache/Jakarta since Sept 1996 and I think
+1. Craig is good, sometimes too good :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:17 PM
To: General Jakarta
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan
I would like to nominate Craig
On 2/1/02 5:16 PM, Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC.
Craig works on a lot more projects than I do (than _most_ people do), so I
cannot give a complete rundown of his accomplishments. I can say, however,
that
PROTECTED]
From: Morgan Delagrange [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: General Jakarta [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:16:55 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced
Thanks, Jon. You are a legend.
At 12:19 PM 2/1/02 -0800, you wrote:
Hey all,
I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC nomination
and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election.
I have been involved with Java Apache/Jakarta since Sept 1996 and I
, 2002 9:19 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection
Hey all,
I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC
nomination
and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election.
I have been involved with Java Apache/Jakarta since Sept
Sorry to see you go. Thanks for all your help, which many times meant
simplifying things for me (read: Velocity rocks!).
Bojan
On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 07:19, Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Hey all,
I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC nomination
and do not want
+1
On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 17:16, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC.
Craig works on a lot more projects than I do (than _most_ people do), so I
cannot give a complete rundown of his accomplishments. I can say, however,
that his
So long, and thanks for all the fish =:0)
-- Ted Husted, Husted dot Com, Fairport NY USA.
-- Java Web Development with Struts.
-- Tel +1 585 737-3463.
-- Web http://www.husted.com/struts/
Jon Scott Stevens wrote:
Hey all,
I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC
The man is an absolute legend. I second that nomination!
Bojan
On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 09:16, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC.
Craig works on a lot more projects than I do (than _most_ people do), so I
cannot give a complete
Hey all,
I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC
nomination
and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election.
I have been involved with Java Apache/Jakarta since Sept 1996 and I think
that it is time for me to move on from being politically
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002, Conor MacNeill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I would like to nominate Diane Holt for the PMC.
I second that.
Stefan
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Conor MacNeill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I would like to nominate Diane Holt for the PMC. Diane is a
[..]
I second that too.
Stephane
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/31/02 8:27 AM, Stefano Mazzocchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to nominate
- Jon Stevens
- Sam Ruby
I second both. Stefano, you beat me to it. I was putting together a longer
list :)
geir
for the upcoming PMC elections.
The reason is simple: nobody else has done more
second.
On Thu, 2002-01-31 at 08:27, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
I would like to nominate
- Jon Stevens
- Sam Ruby
for the upcoming PMC elections.
The reason is simple: nobody else has done more for jakarta.
Sure, they have diametrically different styles and attitudes, but this
the
I would like to nominate Ted Husted for re-election to the PMC.
Ted has a strong (and active) committment to documentation, probably the
most often neglected component of any project. He also was a driving force
in the Commons project; it's unlikely that the Commons would have been so
I would like to nominate Scott Sanders (myself) for the PMC election.
Who I am:
I am a developer with 10 years of experience. I got my first taste of
Open Source Software with JServ 0.9, and helped (albeit very little)
with Jserv as a lurker/non-committer. I use/have used Apache products
+1
On Thu, 31 Jan 2002 11:14:36 -0800 Jon Scott Stevens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote.
on 2002.1.31 10:36 AM, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would like to nominate Scott Sanders (myself) for the PMC election.
1
-jon
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Scott Sanders wrote:
I would like to nominate Scott Sanders (myself) for the PMC election.
Jon, Sam, and Stefano are my open source 'idols'.
I *love* it!
A self nomination that was crafted in such a way to guarantee the necessary
seconds.
I'll be glad to do my part:
+1
- Sam Ruby
--
+1
Saludos ,
Ignacio J. Ortega
-Mensaje original-
De: Stefano Mazzocchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Enviado el: jueves 31 de enero de 2002 14:28
Para: Apache Jakarta
Asunto: PMC Nomination
I would like to nominate
- Jon Stevens
- Sam Ruby
for the upcoming PMC
Paulo is an individual who uses a rather large portion of the code that we
have been producing. He has experienced first hand the pains that are
inflicted on the consumers of our software when decisions are made based on
the rampant subproject rivalry that continues to exist. Throughout it all
HUGE +1. He has the biggest mouth I have heard in a long time, and an
excellent outsiders viewpoint.
Scott Sanders
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 12:56 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: PMC Nomination - Paulo
:) I know. I was referring to the size of Paulo's as-of-yet
contribution to what Jakarta can become :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Sam Ruby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 1:05 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: RE: PMC Nomination - Paulo Gaspar
You mean that you accept? (You need to accept or decline)
-Original Message-
From: Paulo Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: RE: PMC Nomination - Paulo Gaspar
Now I am speechless!
(Never happened before
, 2002 10:41 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: RE: PMC Nomination - Paulo Gaspar
You mean that you accept? (You need to accept or decline)
-Original Message-
From: Paulo Gaspar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 2:01 PM
To: Jakarta General List
That he is a good coder, we don't have to discuss, I guess!
Don't forget prolific!
+1
- Paul
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 1/31/02 4:16 PM, Gerhard Froehlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wanna nominate Donald äääh Peter ;). Peter is a PMC member
in the moment!
I second the nomination of Peter Donald.
--
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
System and Software
Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I nominate Ceki Gulku to be a candidate for the PMC election.
Ceki is the force of nature behind log4j, a member of the ASF, until
recently a member of the PMC, and one who I find is generally clear thinking
and fair when it comes to open source
1 - 100 of 104 matches
Mail list logo
