Re: [VOTE] Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > > :-p We already voted him in...I nominated him a long while back...Just no > one like...bothered to count the votes and do whatever was needed to instate > him (like tell him how to subscribe) > That's very different :) -- ===

Re: [VOTE] Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

On 7/3/03 6:23 PM, "Jim Jagielski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does it make sense that someone is nominating himself > (or re-nominating himself) for membership? > :-p We already voted him in...I nominated him a long while back...Just no one like...bothered to count the votes and do whatever w

Re: [VOTE] Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

Oooh ooh does that mean we all get to stab him? Sorry I'm from a violent culture...its our way... GET USED TO IT! ;-) http://linuxintegrators.com/hl30/blog/general/?permalink=And+that%27s+a+404+ on+the+Weapons+of+Mass+Destruction.html ;-) -andy On 7/3/03 6:03 PM, "Henri Yandell" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [VOTE] Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

Does it make sense that someone is nominating himself (or re-nominating himself) for membership? -- === Jim Jagielski [|] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/ "A society that will trade a little lib

Re: [VOTE] Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

On 4/07/2003 0:08 Henri Yandell wrote: He's a multi-millionaire who we're being nice to in the hope that he'll start paying us all full time wages to work from home for Apache. Yuck. I want power as well, not money. Bo for Howard! The King is dead! -- Steven Noels

Re: [VOTE] Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

On Fri, 4 Jul 2003, Steven Noels wrote: > On 4/07/2003 0:03 Henri Yandell wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Howard for King > > +1 > > Power to Howard. (Who is that guy, BTW?) He's a multi-millionaire who we're being nice to in the hope that he'll start paying us all full time wages to work from home for

Re: [VOTE] Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

On 4/07/2003 0:03 Henri Yandell wrote: +1 Howard for King +1 Power to Howard. (Who is that guy, BTW?) -- Steven Noelshttp://outerthought.org/ Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center Read my weblog athttp://blogs.cocoondev.org/ste

Re: [VOTE] Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

+1 Howard for King On Thu, 3 Jul 2003, Andrew C. Oliver wrote: > +1 > > On 7/3/03 4:59 PM, "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did anything every happen on this? I remember ACO sending out a message, but > > I don't know if it > > every made it to a vote. I'd really like t

[VOTE] Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

+1 On 7/3/03 4:59 PM, "Howard M. Lewis Ship" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did anything every happen on this? I remember ACO sending out a message, but > I don't know if it > every made it to a vote. I'd really like to pursue this, because of my > instatiable craving for > power. > > -- > Howar

Howard Lewis Ship PMC Nomination

Did anything every happen on this? I remember ACO sending out a message, but I don't know if it every made it to a vote. I'd really like to pursue this, because of my instatiable craving for power. -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator, Tapestry: Java Web Components http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestr

RE: PMC Nomination

> And if that works for Italy, I > believe it works everywhere else... Erm, are you really suggesting that Italian politics should be the model we emulate? d. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands

Re: PMC Nomination

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 19/2/03 23:10 "Leo Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I don't think anyone expects that upon becoming a PMC member one would immediately need to gain and maintain intimate knowledge of all corners of the jakarta codebases. It is just about humanly impossible. So it is p

RE: PMC Nomination

I like to totally endorse Leo's points about the Avalon PMC, My experience with James PMC is very, very similar. James PMC is by and large the whole set of commiters who were active in discussions about the project, rather than just the code. From that POV nothing much has changed, we're a bit

Re: PMC Nomination

Pier Fumagalli wrote: > ... > Now, under Jakarta, there might be projects on which one might like to be > involved and spend time on (therefore bearing the responsibilities of > being a PMC member over _that_ particular code base), but there might be > project that one don't want to be even remot

Re: PMC Nomination

On 20/2/03 2:34 "Conor MacNeill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A bit like > saying the government is responsible for running the country. That doesn't > mean every minister will have expertise in every portfolio Ministers might not know the details, but know the overall direction and actions of a

Re: PMC Nomination

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 19/2/03 21:31 "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: This is not a convincing enough argument to make me change my point of view. Pier Fair enough. I think it is fair to interpret the paragraph you quoted > The PMC is responsible for the strategic direction and s

Re: PMC Nomination

On 19/2/03 23:00 "Leo Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guess what? No need for that at all! The "additional" responsibility > being on a PMC entails wasn't additional at all. Avalon is ONE project... Jakarta, I can't count them with my hands AND feet. Pier -

Re: PMC Nomination

On 19/2/03 23:10 "Leo Simons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think anyone expects that upon becoming a PMC member one would > immediately need to gain and maintain intimate knowledge of all corners > of the jakarta codebases. It is just about humanly impossible. So it is > probably a good mo

Re: PMC Nomination

On 19/2/03 21:31 "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Pier Fumagalli wrote: >> On 19/2/03 17:18 "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> The goal is to make all active committers PMC members. >> >> I think this is utterly wrong for an umbrella project like Jakarta. > > Interesting. 100%

Re: PMC Nomination

Ceki Gülcü wrote: By the way, when are the next membership nominations? Martin Poeschl wrote: > > how does someone become an ASF member? > i know, by nomination from another member .. but when does that ever > happen?? This is scheduled to coincide with members meetings which, in turn, are sc

Re: PMC Nomination

Pier Fumagalli wrote: So, unless this: The PMC is responsible for the strategic direction and success of the Jakarta Project. This governing body is expected to ensure the project's welfare and guide its overall direction. Changes to identify that individual PMC members might have oversight on

Re: PMC Nomination

Hi peeps, I am on the avalon PMC. I was a bit scared of the idea of being a PMC member at first, thinking about all the additional responsibility and all the additional things I would need to do. Guess what? No need for that at all! The "additional" responsibility being on a PMC entails wasn't

Re: PMC Nomination

Talk less. Nominate more. -Andy - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: PMC Nomination

One good first step in this direction would be to at least Cc: the pmc list on all [Vote result] messages, so all pmc should be aware of the decisions made. It is important to emphasize *result*. Not to be discouraging but you could quickly overwhelm the PMC with threads of discussion from

Re: PMC Nomination

Pier Fumagalli wrote: On 19/2/03 17:18 "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The goal is to make all active committers PMC members. I think this is utterly wrong for an umbrella project like Jakarta. Interesting. 100% of the ASF board members that I have talked to have given me exactly the

Re: PMC Nomination

At 15:41 19.02.2003 -0500, you wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Shouldn't it be that a committer has been around for a reasonable amount of time? How else would they be a committer? From the perspective of other ASF projects (e.g., HTTPD), Jakarta gives out committer-ship like candy. With HT

Re: PMC Nomination

On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 03:41 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Shouldn't it be that a committer has been around for a reasonable amount of time? How else would they be a committer? From the perspective of other ASF projects (e.g., HTTPD), Jakarta gives out committer

Re: PMC Nomination

On 19/2/03 17:18 "Sam Ruby" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeffrey Dever wrote: >> >> I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to >> the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons >> HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the time, >

Re: PMC Nomination

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: Shouldn't it be that a committer has been around for a reasonable amount of time? How else would they be a committer? From the perspective of other ASF projects (e.g., HTTPD), Jakarta gives out committer-ship like candy. With HTTPD, a track record of approximately

Re: PMC Nomination

On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 02:19 PM, Costin Manolache wrote: Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: Jeffrey Dever wrote: I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to the exclusion of active committers. I'm

Re: PMC Nomination

robert burrell donkin wrote: actively inviting new PMC members to join is something that i think should be done. in the same way that a developer receives a letter from apache (after a successful vote) inviting them to become a committer, i'd say that committers who have been voted onto the P

Re: PMC Nomination

Completely agree. We should see what the new PMC roles/responsibilites are before accepting PMC membership. robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 11:42 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: Yesterday I received the Jakarta Monthly Newsletter. Interesting as always, until I g

Re: PMC Nomination

It is not "to the exclusion" of active committers. Http-client is part of jakarta-commons - and acording to the charter any jakarta-commons committer ( which is close to all jakarta ) can vote. As you probably know - only those who are really interested do that. I agree that we're not yet read

Re: PMC Nomination

On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 11:42 PM, Stephen Colebourne wrote: Yesterday I received the Jakarta Monthly Newsletter. Interesting as always, until I got to the section on PMC nominations. There, I suddenly found my name listed as elected to the Jakarta PMC. This came as a complete surprise

Re: PMC Nomination

Jeffrey Dever wrote: > I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to > the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons It is not "to the exclusion" of active committers. Http-client is part of jakarta-commons - and acording to the charter any jakar

Re: PMC Nomination

Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > >> Jeffrey Dever wrote: >>> I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases >>> to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for >>> Commons HttpClient where all com

Re: PMC Nomination

If the implication is that "release management = project management", I don't agree. Typically there can only be one release manager, but it's takes lots of people to keep a project going. Certainly every release manager should forward themselves as PMC nominees, but the body of qualified candi

Re: PMC Nomination

On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > > > The goal is to make all active committers PMC members. > > Would it be quicker just to make all active committers PMC members by > default? If the idea is that every release-ma

Re: PMC Nomination

--- Jeffrey Dever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> > >> I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members > voting on releases > >> to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the > release prime for > >> Commons HttpClient where all committers vote on > all issues all the > >> time, incl

Re: PMC Nomination

On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 12:18 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: Jeffrey Dever wrote: I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the time, in

Re: PMC Nomination

I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the time, including releases. HttpClient is somewhat unusual in commons as it is rather a lar

Re: PMC Nomination

Jeffrey Dever wrote: I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the time, including releases. HttpClient is somewhat unusual in commons as

Re: PMC Nomination

I am not excited by the idea of only PMC members voting on releases to the exclusion of active committers. I'm the release prime for Commons HttpClient where all committers vote on all issues all the time, including releases. HttpClient is somewhat unusual in commons as it is rather a large

Re: PMC Nomination

Conor MacNeill wrote: > purely PMC role. All releases of Jakarta sub-projects must be approved by > the PMC. This isn't something that has been done in Jakarta to date, One good first step in this direction would be to at least Cc: the pmc list on all [Vote result] messages, so all pmc should be

Re: PMC Nomination

Stephen Colebourne wrote: Unless I am mistaken, being a PMC member implies an overseing role for the whole of jakarta, No, not quite, IMHO. The PMC as a *whole* has an oversight role for the whole of Jakarta but individual PMC members do not need to oversee all of Jakarta. In fact this is the

PMC Nomination

Yesterday I received the Jakarta Monthly Newsletter. Interesting as always, until I got to the section on PMC nominations. There, I suddenly found my name listed as elected to the Jakarta PMC. This came as a complete surprise and shock to me. When I followed the relevant link, I discovered that a

RE: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

Delagrange Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan On Fri, 1 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:16:55 -0600 > From: Morgan Delagrange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Jakarta General List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, >

Jakarta PMC Nomination Acceptance

Sorry about the delay. I accept the nomination for re-election to the PMC. I have several basic beliefs related to the subject of jakarta governance : o That Java as a platform is facing some challenges, and that open source practitioners, especially the Jakarta project, can help play a big ro

Re: Jakarta PMC nomination acceptance - Sam Ruby.

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Sam Ruby wrote: > Apparently the rules require me to accept and say a few words. Sorry Sam - but we even have to make -you- do it. Just to keep up the pretense (only once a year of course) that you are one of us mere mortals. Dw -- To unsubscribe, e-mail:

Jakarta PMC nomination acceptance - Sam Ruby.

Apparently the rules require me to accept and say a few words. My first exposure to open source was when I wanted to integrate PHP with Tomcat. I found PHP to be well designed and with a very active community with hundreds of active committers. Soon after I got started, I was shocked to find pe

RE: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

To: Jakarta General List > Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache > > > > After some thinking, I'm going to accept the nomination, even > > if I don't quite believe jakarta needs 'management', 'committee' or > > any other function

Re: PMC Nomination - Morgan Delagrange

Hi all, Well, I shouldn't buck the trend; here is some info about me. I've been a Jakarta committer for approximately 13 months, 2 weeks. I started out on Taglibs, where I contributed a couple of taglibs to round out the "scope" taglibs: session, application, request and application. Soon aft

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

> After some thinking, I'm going to accept the nomination, even > if I don't quite believe jakarta needs 'management', 'committee' or > any other function besides 'jakarta commiter'. Lol. Sellout ! You're joining the establishment now ! ;-) I think I'll vote for you :) Remy -- To unsubscribe,

RE: PMC Nomination - Paulo Gaspar

Ok, now that I understand better how a PMC nomination works, it looks like I have to say something about me besides just saying that I accept - which I do. I work on software development for almost 15 years and I only started using Apache software less than 2 years ago. I got addicted very fast

RE: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 7:37 AM >To: Jakarta General List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache > > >After some thinking, I'm going to accept the nomination, even >if I don't quite believ

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:49, Bill Barker wrote: > - Original Message - > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:36

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

- Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 10:36 PM Subject: Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache > After s

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

After some thinking, I'm going to accept the nomination, even if I don't quite believe jakarta needs 'management', 'committee' or any other function besides 'jakarta commiter'. My Apache background: I've used Apache, linux, java servlets since the beginning ( or close enough ). I've learned tha

RE: PMC Nomination (Bodewig and MacNeill)

On Thu, 2002-02-07 at 11:50, Conor MacNeill wrote: > I spell colour with a "u", licence with a "c" unless it is a verb and I like > Christmas at the beach. On ya mate! Bojan -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

RE: PMC Nomination (Bodewig and MacNeill)

I accept Magesh's nomination. Thanks to Magesh and Gier for their nomination and +1. Background I became involved with Apache through Tomcat in late 99, contributing some patches, bug fixes, etc. I had some problems building Tomcat with Ant, so I focussed on fixing it and that began a long journ

Re: PMC Nomination - Ted Husted

Assuming there is a sufficient number of willing candidates to fill the seven slots, I would respectfully decline my nomination, so as to ensure someone else the chance to serve. It's been my experience that the best way to build community is to not only participate yourself, but also to give ot

Re: Are 3 votes necessary for the PMC nomination? [was: Re: To jvoteor not to jvote]

Without digging, it seems to me that in the early discussions we decided that the acceptance of the nomination by the candidate counted as the "magic third vote". Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: > > On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > > > So, what was the answer to the question below?

Re: Are 3 votes necessary for the PMC nomination? [was: Re: To jvoteor not to jvote]

On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > So, what was the answer to the question below? If we really do need two +1s > for a nomination, then I have some campaigning to do! (Unless someone else > wants to go ahead and +1 me, if only to shut me up. ;) At this point the rules posted for

Re: Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

>On Wed, 06 Feb 2002 09:29:39 -0800 Micael Padraig Og mac Grene <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote. >McClanahan ROCKS! > +1 >At 12:32 PM 2/6/02 -0500, you wrote: >>Craig McClanahan wrote: >> > >> > At Apache, I got involved in the Apache JServ project before there was a >> > Jakarta (along with other lon

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

McClanahan ROCKS! At 12:32 PM 2/6/02 -0500, you wrote: >Craig McClanahan wrote: > > > > At Apache, I got involved in the Apache JServ project before there was a > > Jakarta (along with other long timers like Jon, Pier, and Stefano), and >at > > the ApacheCon just after the Tomcat source code was

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

Craig McClanahan wrote: > > At Apache, I got involved in the Apache JServ project before there was a > Jakarta (along with other long timers like Jon, Pier, and Stefano), and at > the ApacheCon just after the Tomcat source code was finally handed over to > Apache, told James Duncan Davidson in fro

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

L PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan > > I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC. > I accept nomination for re-election to the PMC. You can find out more about me on the Struts "Who We Are" pag

Re: PMC Nomination - Morgan Delagrange

+1 for Morgan Delagrange without reservation or hesitation :o) Morgan's work in the Taglibs and Commons subprojects has been outstanding and selfless. "Waldhoff, Rodney" wrote: > > I would like to nominate Morgan Delagrange for the PMC. He's a founding > member of and an active participant i

Are 3 votes necessary for the PMC nomination? [was: Re: To jvote or not to jvote]

Clanahan > > Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote". > > > > - Costin Manolache > > Only the nomination and one vote went to "jvote". > > > > Have fun, > > Paulo Gaspar > > > > > > > -Origina

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

+1 We should call Costin Professor since he's a terrific example of patience and excellence, a very consensual man and a real OSS and ASF spirit defensor jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC. > > Costin has a

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

+1 We should call Costin Professor since he's a terrific example of patience and excellence, a very consensual man and a real OSS and ASF spirit defensor jean-frederic clere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote : > I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC. > > Costin has a

RE: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

+1 Saludos , Ignacio J. Ortega > -Mensaje original- > De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En > nombre de jean-frederic clere > Enviado el: lunes 4 de febrero de 2002 18:59 > Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Asunto: PMC Nominati

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

Another legend. +1 by all means. Bojan On Tue, 2002-02-05 at 04:59, jean-frederic clere wrote: > I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC. > > Costin has a wide area knowledge of ASF projects (Apr, httpd 1.3/2.0, > tomcat3.x/4.0, Ant...). > He has been contributing to T

Re: PMC Nomination - Morgan Delagrange

I accept this nomination, which was originally sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Thanks Rod! - Original Message - From: "Waldhoff, Rodney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Jakarta General List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, February

Re: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

On 2/4/02 12:59 PM, "jean-frederic clere" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC. > > Costin has a wide area knowledge of ASF projects (Apr, httpd 1.3/2.0, > tomcat3.x/4.0, Ant...). > He has been contributing to Tomcat since the very first

RE: PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

I second that nomination. Have fun, Paulo Gaspar > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > Behalf Of jean-frederic clere > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 6:59 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PM

PMC Nomination - Costin Manolache

I would like to nominate Costin Manolache for election to the PMC. Costin has a wide area knowledge of ASF projects (Apr, httpd 1.3/2.0, tomcat3.x/4.0, Ant...). He has been contributing to Tomcat since the very first versions. He has the patience of a good teacher and the spirit of a real "hacke

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

Hello Morgan, +1 Saturday, February 02, 2002, 1:16:55 AM, you wrote: MD> I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC. MD> Craig works on a lot more projects than I do (than _most_ people do), so I MD> cannot give a complete rundown of his accomplishments. I can say, h

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

I'll second that, glad to see your not departing from jakarta altogether. /colin - Original Message - From: "Paulo Gaspar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jakarta General List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 10:23 PM Subject: RE: Jakart

RE: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

Hola Santiago! > -Mensaje original- > De: Santiago Gala [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > P.S.: (This holds for any Apache Committer coming to Madrid. I feel > quite isolated here). Hey, perhaps there are no Apache Committers in Madrid, but there are surely lots of Apache users! :) Un salud

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > on 2/3/02 2:00 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did you guys check out codecon - http://www.codecon.org > > > > It is going to be held at the DNA Lounge (and I will be speaking a

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

on 2/3/02 2:00 PM, "Kevin A. Burton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Did you guys check out codecon - http://www.codecon.org > > It is going to be held at the DNA Lounge (and I will be speaking about > Reptile)... Yea, that sounds like a fun event... > hm... how long before Jon hosts an ApacheCon

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Scott Stevens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > on 2/1/02 3:46 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Another famous OSS guy did that also (http://www.jwz.org/). > > Are you guys starting a trend ? :) > > Funny you should mention jwz

RE: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

Cool! That was what I understood but the tone of some remarks left me wondering. Have fun, Paulo > -Original Message- > From: Jon Scott Stevens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 8:42 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Jakarta PMC Nominat

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

Just to be clear, I'm not leaving Jakarta entirely, you will still have to put up with my bullshit every now and then...I'm just not going to participate in the PMC politics any longer... -jon -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

Jon Scott Stevens wrote: >Hey all, > >I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC nomination >and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election. > >I have been involved with Java Apache/Jakarta since Sept 1996 and I think >that it

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

Shit. You'll be sourly missed. I guess we could not expect you to be the ugly duckling for ever. Best of luck with your new project. No doubt you'll do well. At 12:19 01.02.2002 -0800, you wrote: >Hey all, > >I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakart

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

good luck jon! you'll be missed... - robert On Friday, February 1, 2002, at 08:19 PM, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > Hey all, > > I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC > nomination > and do not want to be included in the voting for the next

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

on 2/1/02 3:46 PM, "Remy Maucherat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another famous OSS guy did that also (http://www.jwz.org/). > Are you guys starting a trend ? :) Funny you should mention jwz. His club is right down the street from mine (http://www.dnalounge.com/). We are on the same block in SF

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

> Hey all, > > I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC nomination > and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election. > > I have been involved with Java Apache/Jakarta since Sept 1996 and I think > that it is time for me to move

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

The man is an absolute legend. I second that nomination! Bojan On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 09:16, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC. > > Craig works on a lot more projects than I do (than _most_ people do), so I > cannot give a complete ru

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

accept my Jakarta PMC nomination > and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election. > > I have been involved with Java Apache/Jakarta since Sept 1996 and I think > that it is time for me to move on from being politically responsible for > this group. Honestly, I&

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

+1 On Fri, 2002-02-01 at 17:16, Morgan Delagrange wrote: > I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC. > > Craig works on a lot more projects than I do (than _most_ people do), so I > cannot give a complete rundown of his accomplishments. I can say, however, > that his

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

Sorry to see you go. Thanks for all your help, which many times meant simplifying things for me (read: Velocity rocks!). Bojan On Sat, 2002-02-02 at 07:19, Jon Scott Stevens wrote: > Hey all, > > I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC nomination > a

RE: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

February 01, 2002 9:19 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection > > > Hey all, > > I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC > nomination > and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election.

RE: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

+1 to Craig! > -Original Message- > From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:17 PM > To: General Jakarta > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan > > > I would like to nominate Craig Mc

Re: Jakarta PMC Nomination - Rejection

Thanks, Jon. You are a legend. At 12:19 PM 2/1/02 -0800, you wrote: >Hey all, > >I just wanted to say that I'm not going to accept my Jakarta PMC nomination >and do not want to be included in the voting for the next election. > >I have been involved with Java Apache/Jaka

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

a General List" >Delivered-To: mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] >From: "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "General Jakarta" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Subject: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan >Date: Fri,

Re: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

On 2/1/02 5:16 PM, "Morgan Delagrange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to nominate Craig McClanahan for re-election to the PMC. > > Craig works on a lot more projects than I do (than _most_ people do), so I > cannot give a complete rundown of his accomplishments. I can say, however, >

RE: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan

+1. Craig is good, sometimes too good :) Scott > -Original Message- > From: Morgan Delagrange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 2:17 PM > To: General Jakarta > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: PMC Nomination - Craig McClanahan >

  1   2   >