On Wednesday, July 23, 2003, at 02:15 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Thank you for the comment, Robert.
TO tell the truth, my original motivation to arise this
issue was concering to the upcoming newsletter.
I published the final "Jakarta Newsletter" in early
this month and I found I made some mista
t site/mail2.html.
Thank you all who participated in this issue for the comments!
Sincerely,
-- Tetsuya ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 23:17:40 +0100
(Subject: Re: mail2.html -> mail.html)
robert burrell
jakarta came round to having two pages for mail subscriptions after having
years of regular problems with people joining the lists who had no idea
about how to behave. the pages are user unfriendly but the old solution
(ie publically and vocally humiliating posters on list) was worse (since
it
Hi Tetsuya,
What is wrong with the pages as they are? There are thousands of people who
have subscribed to the lists using the current method, and luckily there are
not too many misdirected posts.
Furthermore, a search for "jakarta mailing lists"
http://www.google.com/search?q=jakarta+mail+archiv
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 20:02:57 +0100
"Danny Angus" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was dead against this when Tetsuya first raised the issue,
> I'm still dead against this, and likely to remain so until someone
> can explain to me why it would be better than what we currently have.
1.
Current pag
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Michael Davey wrote:
> Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
>
> >No, my original intention was derived from just this simple question:
> >"Why doesn't each subprojects' left-side navi point to the *appropriate*
> >section in mail2.html?"
> >
> >
> I was dead against this when Tetsuya fir
Henri Yandell wrote:
That's all very well and good. But why do I have to read the rules to go
look at the archives?
That frustrates me every time I want to search the archives.
Remember two simple hyperlinks:
http://mail-archive.com/
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
I like the second one better
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 18:48:16 +0100
(Subject: Re: mail2.html -> mail.html)
Michael Davey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
>
> >No, my original intention was derived from just this simple question:
> >"Why doesn't each subprojects'
> I was dead against this when Tetsuya first raised the issue,
I'm still dead against this, and likely to remain so until someone can
explain to me why it would be better than what we currently have.
What we have is (as far as I'm aware) the result of responding to the
actions of people in respec
Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
No, my original intention was derived from just this simple question:
"Why doesn't each subprojects' left-side navi point to the *appropriate*
section in mail2.html?"
I was dead against this when Tetsuya first raised the issue, but I think
I am coming round to Tetsuya's
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:57:10 -0400
(Subject: Re: mail2.html -> mail.html)
"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The nice thing about the current approach is that you can't get to see
> the links w/o having to have read enough of the first page to
>
> changing it unless you have a good reason to, if it ain't broke don't fix
> it.
>
> d.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 20 July 2003 11:20
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: ma
Presently they give up reading it and email me personally.
-Andy
On 7/20/03 11:57 AM, "Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The nice thing about the current approach is that you can't get to see
> the links w/o having to have read enough of the first page to
> understand that you hav
The nice thing about the current approach is that you can't get to see
the links w/o having to have read enough of the first page to
understand that you have to click through to the next page.
Otherwise, people will just skip down until they find what they want
and then have missed what is some
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 11:33:20 -0400
"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I believe the idea is to make people read the rules first, I wouldn't
> > advise
> > changing it unless you have a good reason to, if it ain't broke don't
> > fix
> > it.
> Yes, that's what i was trying to hin
Original Message-
From: Tetsuya Kitahata [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20 July 2003 11:20
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: mail2.html -> mail.html
Hi all,
I am wondering how it might be if deleting
jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html and putting all
the contents to jakarta.apache.org/site/m
0
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: mail2.html -> mail.html
>
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am wondering how it might be if deleting
> jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html and putting all
> the contents to jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
>
> All the Apache TLPs (Top Level P
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003 06:21:13 -0400
"Geir Magnusson Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think that each subprojects can indicate the direct/appropriate
> > subscribe/unscribe section from each subprojects' pages.
> > (Now: e.g. http://jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html#tomcat
> > future: e.g. htt
On Sunday, July 20, 2003, at 06:19 AM, Tetsuya Kitahata wrote:
Hi all,
I am wondering how it might be if deleting
jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html and putting all
the contents to jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
All the Apache TLPs (Top Level Projects) do not separate
the mail list explanation
Hi all,
I am wondering how it might be if deleting
jakarta.apache.org/site/mail2.html and putting all
the contents to jakarta.apache.org/site/mail.html
All the Apache TLPs (Top Level Projects) do not separate
the mail list explanation pages like jakarta, AFAICS.
cf. http://ant.apache.org/mail.ht
20 matches
Mail list logo
