I'll volunteer (unless someone more senior than I volunteers) to contribute
a piece on Ant's latest news and perhaps a tidbit of trivia on a periodic
basis.
Erik
- Original Message -
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Well Ted. the jokes on you...
Have a look at ActionServlet versus this coding standard. :))
(no offense to anyone, this is in jest)
Erik
p.s. I've given CheckStyle a try... its a tough one to live with as its
stringent, but perhaps this could be used during builds to spit out code
Rule #1 from The Elements of Java Style is:
Adhere to the style of the original
- Original Message -
From: robert burrell donkin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jakarta General List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jakarta Commons Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 12:49
The long-awaited event is at hand - votes are now being take for an official
Ant logo.
Please visit the online poll at: http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/logovote.html
Polls close at the end of the day this coming Friday (1 February 2002).
Disclaimers: Votes are only accepted via the online poll,
#
Erik,
Are you talking to your office documents again? :-)
Conor
-Original Message-
From: Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 April 2002 1:43 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Switching development to C#
Ummm, if you're using .NET wouldn't
I have not dug into this, but a friend of mine raves about it:
http://www.softwaretree.com/products/jdx/Jdx1.htm
Can anyone compare/contrast features between this and Torque?
Peter - how does this jive with your wish list?
Erik
- Original Message -
From: Peter Donald [EMAIL
One thing that we discusssed back in late December was setting up a Jakarta
newsletter (look for subject Jakarta Newsletter in the archives).
At that time I volunteered to provide an Ant update, as we discussed having
someone from each project provide updates. For the next month or so I'm too
Rob,
Very nice. I've been keeping this idea high on my to-do list and I'm glad
to see you finally get to it.
This is more detailed than future ones probably should be, and that would
likely be the case when other projects get incorporated anyway.
Great job, and you can count on me assisting
+1
Ship, Howard wrote:
Background
Tapestry, currently housed at the SourceForge (http://tapestry.sf.net), is component-based web application framework. Tapestry falls generally into the pull-MVC model of development.
[...]
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
This is an interesting question. I've seen books (Geary's Advanced JSP,
for example) that print the ASL in the book, and in fact I included it
my Ant book.
Comments from the general list on this? Should this be a topic for a
different list?
Erik
Original Message
Subject:
Correction, it was not Geary's book, it was J2EE Core Patterns, which
has the ASL reprinted.
Erik
Erik Hatcher wrote:
This is an interesting question. I've seen books (Geary's Advanced JSP,
for example) that print the ASL in the book, and in fact I included it
my Ant book.
Comments from
I was mostly off-line over the Thanksgiving weekend and have been caught
up with lots of other miscellaneous tasks when I did get some computer
time. I'm not going to be able to submit an Ant posting this time, sorry.
Erik
Rob Oxspring wrote:
Hello again,
We're very nearly done with
+1
Sam Ruby wrote:
Gump is now two years old. It has had contributions from over a dozen
people, about a half-dozen this month alone. There seems to be a
renewed interest in gump (some in response to a little nudging grin).
Considering all of this, what I would like to propose is that
Is there some other e-mail list where we should should discuss the
xjavadoc licensing issue? infrastructure? Or...???
Thanks,
Erik
On Tuesday, March 25, 2003, at 08:54 AM, Aslak Hellesøy wrote:
Hello,
The XDoclet project (http://xdoclet.sourceforge.net/) is considering
applying for
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 01:27 PM, robert burrell donkin wrote:
i believe that XDoclet would now have to be incubated (rather than
going straight into jakarta). i think that one of the functions of the
incubation process would be to give definite answers on these kinds of
questions.
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 12:59 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
We believe that these differences are sufficient in order to avoid
potential licensing problems with Sun.
I'm not sure I understand where the licensing problems would come from.
Are you using any code from javadoc or Sun ? Are
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 06:54 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
Ok, that's a bunch of stuff we're not allowed to do (regarding package
names), and AFAICT we (XJavaDoc) are not doing any of that.
What's your point Andy?
Someone said that you were mirroring the com.sun packages.. Is that
I followed the lead that I saw in Core J2EE Patterns book and had
Manning simply print the ASL on a single page in the back of the book.
All the code in the book was originally written by Steve and I, but
some of it was donated to Ant itself and is now under the ASL, so I
figured it was the
I'll be there, so count me in for any official or unofficial gatherings.
Erik
On Saturday, May 31, 2003, at 05:47 PM, Mark Womack - Apache wrote:
Are there any official or unofficial Jakarta/Apache activities planned
around the JavaOne conference in SF?
-Mark
In jakarta-tapestry/lib/ext lives all of the licenses of the embedded
3rd party libraries. In that directory is a LICENSE.ognl.txt which
contains the full license. I believe this is all that is needed to
satisfy the license to redistribute the binary version. I can assure
that you we
On Dec 24, 2003, at 5:47 PM, Danny Angus wrote:
In the case of most of the licences we'd be likely to consider in this
context it is usually perfectly OK to distribute Jars in a
distribution because that gives you the opportunity to comply with
licence conditions regarding distribution of their
On Jan 2, 2004, at 2:10 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
You still need mechanisms to allow the developer to override the
default
decisions checked in to the build scripts. For nearly all of the
I've checked
in jars for the convenience of developers packages I've evaluated for
use fail
to allow
On Jan 12, 2004, at 2:51 AM, Kevin A. Burton wrote:
Some of you may remember my previous post about our FeedParser
RSS/Atom parser implementation for Java.
Everything looks good on our end and we've got legal approval. They
just needed to review the licenses...
Anyway... I've blogged this and
In order to finally make an official mirrored release of Lucene 1.3, I
need jakarta-site karma so that I can update binindex and sourceindex.
Would the powers that be please grant me this?
Thanks,
Erik
-
To unsubscribe,
On Feb 2, 2004, at 1:14 PM, Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
Would the powers that be please grant me this?
Thanks,
Erik
Done.
Thank you, Craig!
Erik
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
On Mar 3, 2004, at 9:58 AM, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
[X] +1 I support this proposal (BINDING)
[ ] -1 I don't support this proposal
[ ] 0 I abstain from voting for or against this proposal
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
Yes, on the tapestry-dev list at the top of the Votes section here:
http://jakarta.apache.org/tapestry/changes.html
Are we supposed to get releases approved by the PMC?
On Mar 17, 2004, at 6:47 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Was there a vote for it?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
You're already listed here:
http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/Support
This seems like the best place to advertise yourself. Perhaps placing
something on the main Jakarta wiki would be good too?
Erik
On Apr 15, 2004, at 6:23 AM, Hans-Christian Brockmann wrote:
We would like to be listed
Count me in! I come in on the Saturday before, and leave on Wednesday.
Erik
On May 21, 2004, at 5:00 PM, Kevin Burton wrote:
It's about a 1.5 months away but I figured I would try to get a pulse
on how much interest there is in holding a JavaOne BOF.
We've contacted SUN directly and
+1
On Aug 10, 2004, at 11:58 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Suggested new bylaws are at:
http://www.osjava.org/~hen/jakarta/management.html
The aim is to identify the current reality, rather than plan out a new
set
of bylaws. I believe I've responded to the past week of comments,
sometimes by dropping
I like having a wiki page for this sort of thing - allow the community
itself to maintain such lists.
Erik
On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:27 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
Still deliberating killing the vendors page.
I suggested killing it before, one of the vendors (sorry, can't find
your email now)
On Feb 21, 2005, at 10:54 AM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
I'd suggest that we talk to the PRC about it. There are some good
things
about a vendors page. Erik makes an interesting point about the Wiki,
but
it would mean that we couldn't vet it for content to prevent grossly
misleading content.
+1 (Jakarta PMC Member)
On Apr 6, 2005, at 7:36 PM, Ian F. Darwin wrote:
As has been discussed on this list on tomcat-dev, the Tomcat people
are interested in moving up.
Attached please find a Resolution to this effect from the proposed new
Tomcat PMC to the Board.
This is a binding
Because we now have the e-mail lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] and
[EMAIL PROTECTED], I want to clarify their purpose. [EMAIL PROTECTED] is
where we discuss the Java implementation of Lucene. The [EMAIL PROTECTED]
list is for discussions that are about the Lucene top-level Apache
project that do not
On Jun 27, 2005, at 3:55 AM, Danny Angus wrote:
Web Components.
+1
It is what it says it is.
Even to those who's first language may not be English.
I apologize that I've not followed this thread carefully.
Web Components: -1
JSF and Tapestry both have components that are vastly different
On Aug 16, 2005, at 1:20 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
[+1]Apache Silk [ ]Apache Web Bricks
[-1]Apache Web Components
The word components should not be used, IMO - too much confusion
and overlap with JSF and Tapestry terminology.
Erik
What we did with Lucene was to move the hard-coded committer
maintained list of projects and products that use Lucene to the wiki.
Let the community self-maintain this sort of thing.
+1 to moving it to the Jakarta wiki.
Erik
On Feb 7, 2006, at 8:17 PM, Henri Yandell wrote:
As
37 matches
Mail list logo
