Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Santiago Gala wrote:
I'm ready to give +1 to people nominated which are missing them, but I
could not find any posting telling if +1 are required, or are just to be
considered a form of moral support.
Could anybody clarify?
Personally: I do
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Santiago Gala wrote:
I'm ready to give +1 to people nominated which are missing them, but I
could not find any posting telling if +1 are required, or are just to be
considered a form of moral support.
Could anybody clarify?
Personally: I do not care much for seconding
Number 4. As little process as possible.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 9:22 AM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Nominations, +1s, ...
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Santiago Gala wrote:
I'm
On 2/12/02 4:45 PM, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Number 4. As little process as possible.
Disagree - I think requiring acceptance by the candidate is better, as then
we can't 'force' someone onto the PMC when they aren't looking :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From:
#4 plus acceptance then? I would have assumed that acceptance is
implied, but that is just me ;-)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:02 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Nominations, +1s
Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 2:02 PM
To: Jakarta General List
Subject: Re: Nominations, +1s, ...
On 2/12/02 4:45 PM, Scott Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Number 4. As little process as possible.
Disagree - I think requiring acceptance
On 2/12/02 5:34 PM, Sam Ruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The more I read this discussion, the more I realize that I showed great
wisdom in drafting the rules so that the person or persons appointed by the
board will have complete freedom in determining the appropriate mechanism.
We seem to be
