Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo.
A sad day for Gentoo :-(
May the Force be with you!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Benedikt Böhm wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based
> on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary
> packages.
>
> Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to
> USE_EXPAND.
> I h
> On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Alexis Ballier wrote:
>> I would be strongly in favour of adding also the tex-base virtual.
> +1
> [...]
> If nobody is against it, feel free to commit this (with or without
> cstetex, as you wish, I'll kill references to it before removing it
> anyway); or I'll do it
Seemant,
On Nov 24, 2007 6:39 PM, Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been
> meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little
> bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer consider
> myself an
On Saturday 24 November 2007 20:42:01 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
> 2007-11-24 19:51:23 Benedikt Böhm napisał(a):
> > the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules
> > based on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially
> > for binary pac
On 12:39 Sat 24 Nov , Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been
> meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little
> bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer consider
> myself an official Gentoo developer.
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:10:58 +0100
Thilo Bangert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the idea is really great
>
> [...]
>
> now this needs to be [...] made mandatory for all ebuilds.
Uh, what?
Why? If the idea is that great, then why does it need to be mandatory?
Kind regards,
JeR
--
[EMAIL P
2007-11-24 19:51:23 Benedikt Böhm napisał(a):
> the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based
> on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary
> packages.
>
> Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to
> USE_EX
On 17:47 Sat 24 Nov , Justin Bronder (jsbronder) wrote:
> 1.1 sys-cluster/torque/files/torque-conf.d-2.2.1
>
> file :
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/sys-cluster/torque/files/torque-conf.d-2.2.1?rev=1.1&view=markup
> plain:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewc
Hi all,
the current behaviour of the apache ebuild -- chosing built-in modules based
on /etc/apache2/apache-builtin-mods -- is very aweful, especially for binary
packages.
Therefore, i would like to add APACHE2_MODULES and APACHE2_MPMS to USE_EXPAND.
I have already converted the ebuild in my l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> Dear Gentoo Devs and Users,
>
> The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been
> meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little
> bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no lo
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> Dear Gentoo Devs and Users,
>
> The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been
> meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little
> bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer consider
> myself an official Gentoo devel
you will be missed by many and myself. wish you well on your next venture.
Fernando A.K.A likewhoa
On Nov 24, 2007 5:39 PM, Seemant Kulleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear Gentoo Devs and Users,
>
> The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been
> meaning to do it for many m
Dear Gentoo Devs and Users,
The time has finally come for me to resign from Gentoo. I've been
meaning to do it for many months now, but the logistics took a little
bit of time. Effective Monday, Nov. 26, I will no longer consider
myself an official Gentoo developer. Before then I will make comm
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 10:19:55 -0500
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
> > Is the feature ready to be used? Is there any kind of documentation
> > (aside of DTD)? It will replace use.desc?
> >
> Well the first question you answered yourself. You linked to a post I
Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
Hi all:
I've read on the planet the recently included support to document USE
flags in metadata. Seems like it was an idea from flameeyes and cardoe,
discussed on the planet [1][2] and performed by -infra (bug #199788).
While planet is a good medium to share ideas and ge
CRAN (like CPAN, Gems etc for GNU R) has a rather interesting way of
specifying licenses:
License: GPL-2
License: GPL (>= 2) | BSD
License: LGPL (>= 2.0, < 3) | Eclipse Public License
Is this something worth pinching for a future EAPI? If we go with the
postfix [] form for ranged deps
> While planet is a good medium to share ideas and get contributors,
> seems to me like we need a more official way to discuss this kind of
> 'global' ideas before make them real. Or at least drop a note on
> -dev-announce explaining the new feature and telling devs and users
> this is now official
Hi all:
I've read on the planet the recently included support to document USE
flags in metadata. Seems like it was an idea from flameeyes and cardoe,
discussed on the planet [1][2] and performed by -infra (bug #199788).
While planet is a good medium to share ideas and get contributors, seems to
m
19 matches
Mail list logo
