On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd zac
as he maintains mirror-dist ;p
Why the hell didn't we think of this before!? :o
The mirror-dist script *cannot* rename the upstream files for storage,
On Wed, Mar 18, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Olivier Crête tes...@gentoo.org wrote:
Feel the trend? gnome-base/gnome-panel will follow soon. Lets make this
global. Unless we decide that PolicyKit is the future and make it
compulsory).
If no one complains, I will make the changes in a couple days.
So,
On Saturday 21 March 2009 19:03:45 AllenJB wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote:
Hi all,
with the discussion about EAPI3 we have now 4 (or 7, depending on how you
count them ;) ) EAPIs available or almost available. This is getting
quite confusing.
To make our lives easier I would suggest
Peter Alfredsen loki_...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think we should start
deprecating EAPI=0 usage *now* with a repoman warning whenever a new
ebuild is committed that does not use EAPI=1 or EAPI=2. This warning
should encourage use of the newest EAPI, EAPI=2.
A general question, that just popped
Peter Alfredsen loki_...@gentoo.org said:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:41:58 +0100
Matti Bickel m...@gentoo.org wrote:
A general question, that just popped into my head when i was reading
this: if i touch a ebuild which has EAPI=0, should i bump it to
EAPI=2?
Only if you take the time to read
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thilo Bangert yazmış:
i doesnt make sense to introduce EAPI=2 into ebuilds, if we dont expect to
have en EAPI=2 capable package manager stable within a reasonable
timeframe.
2.1.6 is stable and supports EAPI2
- --
Sincerely,
Serkan KABA
Gentoo
On Saturday 21 of March 2009 21:53:16 Patrick Lauer wrote:
On Saturday 21 March 2009 21:21:47 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:37:12 +0100
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
To make our lives easier I would suggest deprecating EAPI0 and
migrating existing ebuilds
On Sunday 22 March 2009, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org
wrote:
I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd
zac as he maintains mirror-dist ;p
Why the hell didn't we think of this before!? :o
The mirror-dist
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:44:48 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org
wrote:
I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats why I CC'd
zac as he maintains mirror-dist ;p
Why the hell didn't we think of this
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
versions than ${PV}.
Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
Cheers,
Alin
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote:
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
versions than ${PV}.
Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
And multiply number and total size of files in ${FILESDIR}?
Ulrich
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote:
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
versions than ${PV}.
Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
And multiply number and total size of files
On Sunday 22 of March 2009 18:18:15 Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote:
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
versions than ${PV}.
Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
And multiply number and total size of files in
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
I quote:
In EAPIs supporting arrows, if an arrow is used, the filename used when
saving to \t{DISTDIR} shall instead be the name on the right of the
arrow. When consulting mirrors (except for those
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Mounir Lamouri
mounir.lamo...@gmail.com wrote:
Or just rename it ${PN}-bar.patch instead of ${P}-bar.patch if it is a
patch for more than one ebuild version.
But older ebuild has to be changed to make it works.
The ${PV} in the patch name is a quick
Sorry about the delay on this -- I wrote it on a computer that somehow
fails at sending email and forgot it was in drafts.
This is your friendly reminder! Same bat time (typically the 2nd 4th
Thursdays at 2000 UTC / 1600 EST), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
irc.freenode.net) !
If you
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:18:52 +0100
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote:
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even vote
on, let us know! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole Gentoo dev
list to see.
Continuing the whole EAPI 3 thing...
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:24:26 -0400
Mounir Lamouri mounir.lamo...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009, mrness wrote:
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
versions than ${PV}.
Is that
Ryan Hill wrote:
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
versions than ${PV}.
Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
Um, why?
I'm not having six identical patches with different version numbers in
FILESDIR.
Good point.
Sebastian
These herds have no members:
afterstep:
net-mail/asmail
x11-plugins/asapm
x11-plugins/asclock
x11-plugins/ascpu
x11-plugins/asmem
x11-plugins/asmon
x11-plugins/astime
x11-wm/afterstep
Upstream is willing to maintain, just needs a contact.
https://bugs.gentoo.org/180765
--
secure-tunneling:
Le 22/03/2009 19:22, Nirbheek Chauhan a écrit :
The ${PV} in the patch name is a quick indication of the age of a
patch, the gnome herd especially *encourages* this behavior.
What I used to do back when I was still bumping packages in the Gnome
Herd, I would version the patch, but I would use
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2009-03-22 23h59 UTC.
Removals:
net-mail/ezmlm 2009-03-16 19:54:26 tove
net-mail/ezmlm-idx-mysql2009-03-16 19:54:27 tove
On 3/22/09 11:47 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:50:26 +0100
Alin Năstac mrn...@gentoo.org wrote:
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
versions than ${PV}.
Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
Um, why?
I'm not having
On Saturday 21 March 2009 14:06:09 Markos Chandras wrote:
Hello folks,
Qt-creator[1] program can support perforce[2] software configuration
manager. My concern is the perforce license. According to their site[3]
there is a dual(?) license.
There is the standard commercial license[4]
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:19:26 +0100
Alin Năstac mrn...@gentoo.org wrote:
Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version
you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version
(foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me).
No. It's done this way for a reason.
--
Alin Năstac wrote:
snip
Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version
you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version
(foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me).
What exactly is your problem that you are trying to solve here? Posting
to the community to
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 8:02 AM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 11:44:48 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 2:58 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org
wrote:
I think you will encounter namespace collisions, thats
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alin Năstac wrote:
Please do not apply patches that have ${P} prefix in other ebuild
versions than ${PV}.
Is that hard to create a new patch with a proper name?
I opted to reply to your mail after reading all the other replies.
FWIW, I agree with
so from what I can see there doesn't appear to be any 'official' way
of adding new directories, updating perms and the like in baselayout.
my thought is someone who does an emerge -aveD world's system should
for the most part be reset to 'factory' defaults.
of course this leads to the problem...
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:38:16 -0700
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 22, 2009 at 05:55:38PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
secure-tunneling:
net-analyzer/mping
net-misc/corkscrew
net-misc/ghamachi
net-misc/hamachi
net-misc/openssh
net-misc/openswan
On Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:55:38 -0600
Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
These herds have no members:
...
live-cd:
app-admin/pwgen
app-arch/pbzip2
app-misc/livecd-tools
dev-python/pyparted
dev-util/catalyst
media-gfx/splash-themes-livecd
sys-apps/ddcxinfo-knoppix
sys-apps/gli
31 matches
Mail list logo
