[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS

2008-12-05 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
be it's good to use another variable to avoid > overloading of "JOBS" meaning? Agreed, easier than ending up having to parse a variable content, after all environment variables are kinda cheap. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpymSA9M4q04.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS

2008-12-04 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ENTOO_JOBS sounds good to me. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgp8ZBisU9A7b.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS

2008-12-04 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
translated to the correct > make-options for emake and which is query'able either via a variable or > a function (something like JOBS="load=0.7||max=3" maybe?). If you can come up with a good enough syntax. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgp0CultBim8Q.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS

2008-12-04 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
- if user has JOBS and MAKEOPTS, MAKEOPTS keeps the same (for -l). The result is that you can finally combine -l with parallel build on OpenOffice and other packages, with a fallback number of maximum jobs instead of using load-based decisions. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-12-02 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
port http://www.kde.org/ as its homepage is kinda pointless if you think about search, since that's not data, it's noise. Which only adds to my point. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpS3fcWfM3UH.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-12-01 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
here for UTF-8 characters, but that's going to bring us even farthest than the point. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpfg98QhGFq3.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: debug/release builds extensions/clarification proposal

2008-12-01 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
runed away; this means that using -O0 unconditionally for any package for debug is not really an option; [1] http://blog.flameeyes.eu/2008/09/02/testing-the-corner-cases -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpJ5ioEeo3pE.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-12-01 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
be able to display basic >> information without having to parse the ebuilds or the metadata cache. > > Except for the ebuilds which still use the old format (that is 100% of > the tree right now) This of course is meant as "whenever this is fully implemented" -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpfOxlYEmqMh.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-12-01 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
r than 512bytes, which means that each file in metadata cache is taking up much more than just its size in characters. All your math is thus wrong. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpcFFtmtOt8h.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
something is for me not a valid reason to avoi moving something in a more approchable place for other software. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpJevDGzJEf0.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ince we want to have something coherent, don't we? ;) -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpqrcOBdsryo.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
bute exists already and it's better to reuse the same code, isn't it? -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpJJ5dlUYEV7.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) writes: > I have a very quick proposal: why don't we move the packages' homepage > in metadata.xml (since it's usually unique for all the versions) and we > get rid of the variable for the next EAPI version? I forg

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
e around) flag tags support a restrict attribute. But I really expect that as long as the package is the same, homepage is unlikely to change with version; maybe with slot I guess, but even that is debatable and somewhat rare I think. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeye

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving HOMEPAGE out of ebuilds for the future

2008-11-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
here is not to discuss the format of metadata but rather where to have it. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpKz8EqcCHvB.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Name change s/drac/ssuominen/ for people wondering.

2008-11-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is for the people wondering who I am. And there goes for people not knowing the realnames of colleagues I guess ;) I'm glad I started calling people by first name whenever I write something :P By the way, I really hope you feel better now, and

[gentoo-dev] Re: Please avoid absolute paths in patched filenames

2008-11-17 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) writes: > Fun, I didn't really notice it was an epatch specific code that failed, > I know it fails when the paths don't add up between systems and I > thought that was it.. Okay, I guess I'll get to fix the rest toni

[gentoo-dev] Re: Please avoid absolute paths in patched filenames

2008-11-17 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
or those and fixed. Fun, I didn't really notice it was an epatch specific code that failed, I know it fails when the paths don't add up between systems and I thought that was it.. Okay, I guess I'll get to fix the rest tonight after Bones... -- Diego "Flame

[gentoo-dev] Please avoid absolute paths in patched filenames

2008-11-17 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
need to write patches. And if you have patches with the filenames like I shown above, you can change it the git way so that it becomes: --- a/foobar/foo.c +++ b/foobar/foo.c and the problem is usually solved. Thanks, -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pg

[gentoo-dev] Re: Remember: workarounds don't warrant RESO FIXED!

2008-11-16 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
fix it, not work it around forever and ever. RESO UPSTREAM is good for crashes that are left to upstream, but since Gentoo si abuilt building, build problems needs to get fixed. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpdnNkROqeW7.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Remember: workarounds don't warrant RESO FIXED!

2008-11-16 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
quest parallel build; c) we want --as-needed to be used, not ignored. If the bug is open and comes out on searches and all the rest, then we have higher chances that someone might _fix_ it, without having to look to see if there actually is one... Thanks! -- Diego "Flameeyes&quo

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] simple-build eclass

2008-11-14 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
; RDEPEND="sys-libs/zlib" DEPEND="${RDEPEND} app-arch/unzip" SIMPLE_SOURCES='src/*.c' SIMPLE_LIBRARIES='-lz' src_compile() { append-flags -DMAGICISO_IS_SHIT simple-build_src_compile } src_install() { simple-buil

[gentoo-dev] Re: packages up for grabs

2008-11-09 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > dev-dotnet/evolution-sharp I was going to ask you about this last week, I guess I'll look into it (although it makes me feel dirty to work with .NET stuff, I've been working with worse stuff :P). -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pet

[gentoo-dev] Re: virtualx eclass

2008-10-16 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
omeone's got some input, please speak up. Kinda like good ol' kde.eclass: VIRTUALX_ONLY_TEST="yes" inherit virtualx and instead of using IUSE=X for that, IUSE=test. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgp02mjr9xxds.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New keywords for non-Gentoo Linux platforms

2008-10-10 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ter, but then again you're to the same point: an Opteron using an Intel name? I think amd64 is totally fine since it's the first commercial name it got by uh, those who introduced it, I guess, but the only thing I don't ever want to see officially is endorsing the x64 commercial spe

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects without a homepage, and valid contents of HOMEPAGE (per bug 239268)

2008-10-06 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Jeroen Roovers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/abandoned/ What about www.unmaintained-free-software.org? Possibly opening a page? -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/

[gentoo-dev] Re: sci-libs/scipy -> dev-python/scipy ?

2008-07-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
"Alec Warner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > 'epkgmove' invokes bad memories for many ;) Thanks for ruining the few hours of sleep I'll get in the next days by bringing that name up... J/K -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpr7bNm44sJj.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-irc/quassel: ChangeLog quassel-9999-r1.ebuild quassel-0.2.0_rc1.ebuild quassel-0.2.9999.ebuild

2008-07-02 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
used for the revisions in PVR, not on PV. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpDthx7fgu6m.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Suggested default LDFLAGS+="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--sort-common"

2008-06-24 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
do implement the GNU style hash). -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpmivCa8PtPJ.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: A few questions to our nominees

2008-06-14 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
witched from because of the 2.0/1.4 branches, would be 2.0 (if I ever care enough to add that, not before a beta is released for sure, and not before I can use KDE 4.1 daily, which is not something I expect to happen soonish). Just FYI. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.

[gentoo-dev] Re: glibc-2.8 / gcc-4.3 build failures

2008-06-09 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
bug.cgi?id=225459 or https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=glibc-2.8 I love aliasing :) -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgprbDcyCeB7l.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: lastrite: dev-cpp/libherdstat and app-portage/herdstat

2008-06-09 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ly. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpG5kcB0pK0f.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: lastrite: dev-cpp/libherdstat and app-portage/herdstat

2008-06-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
n my system can get that command line going just fine. I was sure of that already because I use very often egrep $something */*/*.ebuild to scan the tree for particular stuff. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpYjdQR0tGev.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: lastrite: dev-cpp/libherdstat and app-portage/herdstat

2008-06-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
"Chip Parker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Although it'll be a bit slower than a direct grep: for m in `find > /usr/portage -name metadata.xml `; do grep -Rn foo $m;done Uh no you want xargs in that case. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeye

[gentoo-dev] Re: lastrite: dev-cpp/libherdstat and app-portage/herdstat

2008-06-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
"Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.-" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The tree's small enough that grep -r gives enough performance. Even better grep */*/metadata.xml the tree is not big enough that it exceeds the maximum arguments from bash. -- Diego "Flameeyes"

Re: [gentoo-dev] Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009

2008-06-05 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
the council for two terms already. With all sincerity, your "threat" makes me want to puke: if we're being forced to write manifestos, I might just as well reject my nomination, as I find that just useless bureaucracy. And no I won't be wearing a Gentoo logo pin on my lapel. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpTH5y8bbTuP.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009

2008-06-05 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
"Łukasz Damentko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nominations for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009 are open now and will be > open for the next two weeks (until 23:59 UTC, 18/06/2008). I wish to nominate Halcy0n, Cardoe and leio. -- Diego "Flameeyes"

[gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009

2008-06-05 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > flameeyes I'm glad to accept the nomination. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpLZOrCacFcT.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Remember, please don't use upstream-provided bootstrap unless necessary

2008-06-04 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) writes: > Please refrain from using those if you can. As I was asked for an example see this commit I made today: http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-backup/boxbackup/boxbackup-0.10.ebuild?r1=1.9&r2=1.10 the origina

[gentoo-dev] Remember, please don't use upstream-provided bootstrap unless necessary

2008-06-04 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ools gets not rebuilt through maintainer mode, that will make the configure run twice, wasting users' time, and is usually evil if you are using unpack to check for the generated configure (yes it happened to me a couple of time). THANKS! -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgp2TEcsoe1ye.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: packages up for grabs

2008-06-02 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > dev-util/elfsh I'll take a look, I might have some use for this. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-30 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
er. To a very minimum this can be said to be a _clash_ between two designs. Saying that --as-needed is _broken_ because it breaks this case is _quite_ an exaggeration... -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpDGGzHF7XVV.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-30 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
be called (right) before any static method or attribute is referenced and (right) before any object of the given class is istantiated. They don't get otherwise an absolute order in which static constructors are called. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pg

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-30 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Such an order is not only changed by --as-needed usage but by any other change in the loading mechanism. It is strictly related to glibc at this point as far as I can tell. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpNOhQiIWOXd.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-30 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
e go with behaviour Y... I'm sure a lot of people wouldn't like the option I proposed above, but trust me there's a reason why I voiced that concern :) ). -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpblyTC9Kg3X.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-29 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
g on "bar", re-emerging libfoo first, and bar if the user is not using --as-needed (checking the NEEDED lines). With all due respect to everybody, the right course of action here has to be selected by people who knows how the runtime linker works, symbol collision and all the rest, as that

[gentoo-dev] Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-23 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
O > receive a _LOT_ of spam because they are so common (eg mysql@, ldap@). What about standardising on a suffix too? [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] and then all the aliases following that [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on -- Diego "Flameeyes&quo

[gentoo-dev] Re: About herds and their non-existant use

2008-05-22 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
e term had to be changed, rather than the devs corrected... -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpFE7rWRh6si.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Moving some packages around

2008-05-18 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
IX mandates vi too, and we don't have that in system. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpUtWRYxFly8.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: FRC: debtools herd creation

2008-05-16 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Yuri Vasilevski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to > create the debtools herd to associate with the packages. Just please don't add Debian-OpenSSL ;) -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flamee

[gentoo-dev] Re: Bug wrangling

2008-05-14 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
rt list we have, reporting bugs on Bugzilla product which have nothing to do with Bugzilla... -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpLxXSM4xO5z.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: LaTeX documentation

2008-05-13 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
in the ebuilds installing the fonts in pkg_* functions. I'd say not in src_* because packaging up the cache is not what one wants in almost all cases, you wouldn't want a buggy TeX version creating broken packages when you can avoid that. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://

[gentoo-dev] Re: Bug wrangling

2008-05-13 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
that happens often enough. Plus that would work fine if we had a bugzilla for ebuilds only, but would you really mix categories together with Infra, Portage, Gentoo Hosted Projects, ... ? -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpvHLX3kZ64t.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Moving some packages around

2008-05-11 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
essed properly...) Yes these are a lot of moves, sincerely I think sys-* categories are a bit bloated as they are, and I suppose we should start moving the things around rather than waiting forever ad ever.. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpmmXnU0kfAK.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
if the GNU tar does not support reading those attributes, it does handle them gracefully, warning the user of unknown extended headers, and then proceeding to unpack the data without preserving the extended attributes. So what Doug said stands perfectly and does not interest GNU tar at all. --

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Should that be USE=-cxx? The help for USE=cxx says that this builds > support for C++. It was meant as setting a cxx USE on the ebuild, I wasn't certainly meaning to disable the C++ parts with USE=cxx enabled ;) -- Diego "F

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
oo. (BTW I considered using lzma for backup compression, but I didn't get much different results from bzip2 in term of size, but took quite longer in case of compression... I still have some doubts whether lzma is worth it). -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpRSDaMmZtfS.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Automagic dependencies in gegl

2008-05-01 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
is the way. Have you looked at automagic.xml? It should help you for the task, and if it doesn't, I can see to extend it. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgp2shTJ9UczV.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Reminder: re-run autotools if you change Makefile.am/configure.ac!

2008-04-21 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
er than having users complain that $foo doesn't build at the next autoconf bump. Or right now considering the amount of packages that fails with autoconf 2.62. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpCG22ilYd0X.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: keyring

2008-04-20 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
as I did in origin. (I admit I didn't check if Remi renamed it or not, but he asked, so...). -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgp9gQ8NFvmG8.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Removing .la files...

2008-04-19 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Petteri Räty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You would have to fix the vdb too. Which is the tricky part, and the reason why I didn't instruct anybody to do the sed on my ChangeLogs.p -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Removing .la files...

2008-04-19 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
> distribution-wide or not at all. Can't be done distribution-wide, as stuff would break way worse than this for sure (stuff is not going to link, or will fail at runtime). You _have_ to do it on a case-by-case basis. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpA75CPKwsyT.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: Help offered - Portage tree

2008-03-13 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
thing to me than looking at behaviour. [and I didn't even want to write to this topic] -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpLV5Q12WHWy.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Renaming the caps USE flag to libcap

2008-03-07 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Uhm, good point. What about fscaps for the other case then? Or filecaps? -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Renaming the caps USE flag to libcap

2008-03-06 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
be a SoC project... -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Proposal for (next year's probably) SoC

2008-03-05 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
[1] http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=FFmpeg_Summer_Of_Code_2008 -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgplbNnqPp88m.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: One request for the next SoC: non already-devs students

2008-03-02 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) writes: > In the past two years we had quite a few applications from students that > were already full-fledged Gentoo developers. I sincerely would like that > this year we put as a rule that Gentoo developers cannot partecipate in

[gentoo-dev] Re: One request for the next SoC: non already-devs students

2008-03-02 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
s Gentoo students. And that is why I'm bringing up the point on Gentoo ground. If this works, I'd take this time to add this as an official point for the next council meeting. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpa5jjojYtSp.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: One request for the next SoC: non already-devs students

2008-03-02 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
hly expenses, and I still struggle to find money to buy a new box. It might be an added incentive to get experience in Free Software rather than as a third-grade programmer helper in a small software company with most of the stable programmers taking weeks off for the summer, but for sure c

[gentoo-dev] One request for the next SoC: non already-devs students

2008-03-02 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
is already a Gentoo developer, for sure. So to be clear, I'm not trying to look down to anybody, I don't even want to stop people from being paid for their work. I just wish that we can focus this opportunity to improve the Gentoo project as a whole. -- Diego "Flameeyes" P

[gentoo-dev] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Google Summer of Code 2008 is on!]

2008-02-25 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm willing to help if help is wanted. I already offer myself as a mentor if we get accepted. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpEQEI74mHlp.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] net-misc/zsync destiny?

2008-02-25 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ib anytime soon. Any reason why it isn't simply lastrited unless someone wants to maintain it? Treecleaners? -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo commit in xml/htdocs/proj/en/base/pam: upgrade-0.99.xml

2008-02-24 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
On Sunday 24 February 2008, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Why did you take the version on the document backwards? Because I mistyped it. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Keyword amd64 -> x86_64

2008-02-21 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
name. Beside, does it really changes stuff for anybody beside Intel fanboys? -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ pgpJcqFsPOsVT.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] global useflags

2008-02-15 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
just found css odd for the same reason as others.) Because DeCSS and libdvdcss are not the same thing. It's like calling "acrobat" the pdf USE flag: yeah Acrobat produces and read PDF, but it's not Acrobat you're enabling. libdvdcss uses part of the code of DeCSS to do its wor

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] global useflags

2008-02-14 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
, when the alternative is to actually give back sanity to the flag naming. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] global useflags

2008-02-14 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ot; USE flag before ;) So +1 from me for css -> dvdcss renaming. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] global useflags

2008-02-13 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ode highlighting Uh? I don't really want to look what does make that an option worth an USE flag... > cvs: Enable CVS (Concurrent Versions System) support Maybe "integration" rather than "support", if it's always integration that is enabled... -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ pgp5fohpgFJfm.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set

2008-01-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Don't suppose you have a url for their reasoning? https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151758 -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set

2008-01-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ges are on > system set. QA team already rejected such a proposal. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set

2008-01-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
conf and perl might not be wanted on the resulting filesystem. The first goal is a prerequisite if we want to move to other stuff like a true multilib-handling package manager (we don't want to force down the users' throats multiple copies of autoconf, considering it's a script, do we?) or p

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Reducing the size of the system package set

2008-01-07 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
slimmed down system. I could try, but it would be a waste of time if we then decide not to go this route, and that's _a lot_ of time that would go to waste, so I'd rather first see what the other devs think, before going to do the actual tests. -- Diego "Flameeye

[gentoo-dev] Re: Projects and subproject status

2008-01-07 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
I don't know exactly what's left, but you can easily see what I'm doing on the blog :P -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ pgpYdZPjU9Epq.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-fonts/mikachan-font

2007-02-17 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
nts media-fonts/mikachan-font-ttc TrueType Collection this way you can have fine grained selection of fonts to install. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... pgp4Rpyq2lIaZ.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-16 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
soon this year, but for once I agree almost entirely with you. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... pgpUWJ8gda9JI.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-16 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
.net/ [3] http://boost.org/more/boost_soc_06_overview.html [4] http://www.adiumx.com/blog/2006/10/google-summer-of-code-2006-roundup.php [5] http://www.netbsd.org/Foundation/press/soc2006-summary.html [6] http://gallery.menalto.com/summer_of_code/2006/wrapup -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameey

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-16 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
out.html -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... pgphnNh7HHtkr.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Google Summer of Code 2007

2007-02-16 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
led as "students" four Gentoo developers, and only one of the remaining ten students was converted into a dev. Added to the little improvements done by the projects, maybe we could have spared a few more slots for the organizations that have achieved more. [1] http://www.gentoo.org/pro

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
He's not going to waste someone else's time, and as he said there will be compatibility with current configuration files, I don't think there's any downside to users. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... pgpg13D9POXYc.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ll not appear in the next few months either. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... pgpyccEJxAMJ3.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] A major change coming in the rox packages

2007-02-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
On Thursday 08 February 2007, Thomas Rösner wrote: > AFAIR App Dirs provide internal arch distinction, so why not just put it > in /usr/share/rox? /usr/share is not a good place for any kind of executable. /usr/lib is more suitable for the purpose. -- Diego "Flameeyes"

Re: [gentoo-dev] New network config for baselayout-ng

2007-02-08 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
r my boxes :) /me points to the @enterprise.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org message-id ;) -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... pgp6jVcUcQ9oH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Network configuration and bash

2007-02-06 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
ne of the most common formats available: ini-like :) [1] http://www.nongnu.org/confuse/ -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... pgpYWPdBzIKuX.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-sound/poc

2007-02-05 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
t's a streamer - can't really tell what else beside a streaming software it can be, as upstream is, well, unreachable - bossogg and/or icecast will probably cover it. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for ruby-gnome (1) packages

2007-02-05 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
On Saturday 03 February 2007, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > dev-ruby/ruby-gtk Following this, I'll be masking and removing www-client/gorua and www-client/ci because they depend on it. For who needs an alternative to these, ochusha is probably a good idea, although

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for February

2007-02-04 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
On Monday 05 February 2007, Ryan Hill wrote: > Reply-to and SPF docs?  Isn't this the third month now? I might be counting wrong, as last time I wasn't there, but it might be the fourth, counting the original one. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeye

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for www-client/khttrack

2007-02-03 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
Alright, I start to feel like an undertaker, another package to remove. This one is in the tree since 2003, no more releases, the source tarball 404's and it's currently using an obsolete admindir with broken arts handling. Masked for removal in 30 days. -- Diego "Flameeyes&

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-portage/kentoo

2007-02-03 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
As per summary: unfetchable, homepage 404ing, and pretty old, likely not working with current Portage system. Removal on March 4th. -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE,

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for ruby-gnome (1) packages

2007-02-03 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
-ruby/ruby-gdkpixbuf dev-ruby/ruby-libart -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/ Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, ALSA, PAM, KDE, CJK, Ruby ... pgpR6PolRoPDH.pgp Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-admin/kcmgrunlevel

2007-02-03 Thread Diego &#x27;Flameeyes7; Pettenò
As per summary; unfetchable, it's probably incompatible with current baselayout, as it was developed in 2004, and the version number suggests an alpha/beta version. If nobody wants to take over maintainership, it will be removed in 30 days. -- Diego "Flameeyes"

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >