On Mon, 2005-12-19 at 21:23 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 19 Dec 2005 22:17:56 +0100 Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I've only tried svn with the cvs2svn script.
| Importing with history took ~8h on a 500Mhz box (which surprised me
| because I had heard it takes days). Doing
On Sun, 2005-12-18 at 09:57 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
You are encouraged to reply to this thread
saying I agree with ciaranm
that repository IDs should not be allowed to contain spaces.
No problem at all there (smile): spaces in names are A Bad Thing for Unix,
as they conflict with the
Hi all,
I was wondering if there are any sane ways to optimize the performance
of a Gentoo system.
Overoptimization (the well known -O9 -fomgomg CFLAGS etc.) tends to
make things unstable, which is of course not what we want. The easy
way out would be buying faster hardware, but that is usually
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 14:43 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
having more than one disk or a lot of memory add very interesting
addition, read raid 0 (stripe) or tmpfs for working data that does'nt
need a backup fex: $PORTIR, /var/tmp ...
tmpfs has miserable performance when larger than RAM iirc -
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:54 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 10:48:01 +0100 Henrik Brix Andersen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| A friend of mine just alerted me to the fact, that I am featured in
| this weeks Gentoo Weekly News. Odd, I thought, noone had asked me
| anything
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 12:14 +, kang wrote:
Now people can also use NCSA Mosaic. It's valid as long as you can run
it. But a browser with vulns, unsupported by the vendor, with a broken
CSS, I think you do not have to support it. Well of course, if you like
it just do it ;)
Hmmm.. I think
On Mon, 2005-10-03 at 19:39 +0200, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Mon, 3 Oct 2005 23:15:37 +0900 Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Does it seem like it is time for RESTRICT=interactive. Such ebuilds
| would refuse to emerge if stdout is not a tty. If only there was
On Sun, 2005-09-18 at 17:10 -0500, Albert Hopkins wrote:
I have a different solution that should, no doubt, satisfy both sides:
We fork Gentoo. Create a new distro, called GenOne.
That has been done, it has become sentient and applied for developer
status.
You can reach it at [EMAIL
On Fri, 2005-09-16 at 22:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
There is a difference between using package.mask and ~arch for
ebuilds. The use of ~arch denotes an ebuild requires testing. The use
of package.mask denotes that the application or library itself is
deemed unstable.
| Second: a)
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 17:01 +0300, Ivan Yosifov wrote:
On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:52 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
are running vesafb-tng and have =1GB RAM then try
turning off vesafb-tng
Why ?
Because of known bugs I'd guess?
--
Stand still, and let the rest of the universe move
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 21:04 +0200, Thierry Carrez wrote:
Added by Grant Goodyear :
glep40: Standardizing arch keywording across all archs
Added by Brian Harring :
glep33: Eclass Restructure/Redesign
glep37: Virtuals Deprecation
I'd like to see the following items added:
glep 15: script
On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 15:53 -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
Patrick Lauer wrote: [Mon Sep 12 2005, 03:08:53PM CDT]
I'd like to see the following items added:
glep 15: script repository (working prototype has existed for some time)
I'm not quite sure what you're adding. GLEP 15 was approved
On Mon, 2005-08-29 at 11:59 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
As I understood it, they were implemented to reduce the amount of work
necessary in maintaining them. As it was back then, it required changes
to an extremely large number of profiles every time a change was made to
the default USE
On Sat, 2005-08-20 at 19:42 -0400, Nathan L. Adams wrote:
[snip]
What I see with Gentoo is this 'cathedral' being built where only those
folks who have been 'approved' or 'blessed' as being l33t enough are
allowed to review the code and actually cause a positive change when
some bug is found.
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 18:13 -0300, Herbert Fischer wrote:
I see that the USE flags list is very big today but I don't know if
it's growing too fast. So, I may think that someday Gentoo will need
some mechanism to facilitate USE flags configuration.
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 01:13 -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
What I want is emerge busybox uclibc vanilla-sources nano. Should
unpack only the 3 first packages, show me busybox menuconfig, uclibc
menuconfig and vanilla-sources menuconfig and only then perform the rest
of the installation as usual
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 06:13 +0100, twofourtysix wrote:
Mostly, I was hoping that all those people who seem more than happy to
advocate something with *words* would be prepared to back them up with
*actions*. I think it's a shame that Gentoo is prepared to encourage
people to pester their
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 01:41 +0900, Chris White wrote:
I just saw a bug report flow by for app-admin/mbr and looked for maintainers.
I found this:
ChangeLog: 1 manson, 1 woodchip
from jeeves. Now, I think those people are retired, or I need to get out
more (or both). So what to do with
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 11:13 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten wrote:
On Thursday 16 June 2005 10:53, Patrick Lauer wrote:
Maybe someone with some scripting skillz could create a list of all
orphaned packages?
(no metadata.xml, no active maintainer, ...)
I've learned with first-person
On Tue, 2005-06-14 at 20:24 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 11:49:28 +0900
Chris White [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
on a minor note, I was thinking of maybe a somewhat small comprehensive list
of major problems and ways to solve them. I know we do have bugzilla, but
bugzilla
Hi all,
the last global status update was in January when most top-level
projects posted a short overview of their progress and their rough
roadmap to the -dev mailinglist. I'd like to ask all top-level projects
(and all subprojects that want to) to present a short overview of what
happened since
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 16:22 +0100, Paul Waring wrote:
On 6/8/05, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Polls are open for the metastructure reform vote. All Gentoo developers
are
eligible to vote.
Any particular reason why Gentoo users are not allowed to have a say?
Because, if
On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 08:59 -0700, Jim Northrup wrote:
might I suggest not kicking #gentoo-dev visitors who ask for voice to
speak to the devs without a 'rtfm go get a gentoo job' smokescreen ?
I hope this was only a misunderstanding / miscommunication.
#g-dev is already quite crowded and not a
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 23:58 +0100, Stroller wrote:
On May 11, 2005, at 8:10 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* Unique ID strings for packages, zynot style. Messy as hell though,
DEPEND=foo/bar {12379812AD7382164BD87678652438FC65E43A2} doesn't have
the same kind of ring to it...
Maybe I'm
401 - 424 of 424 matches
Mail list logo
