ld like
to take over maintenance feel free to change the metadata.
The packages are:
dev-util/valgrind
net-im/pyaim-t
net-im/pyicq-t
net-im/pymsn-t
net-mail/tpop3d
net-proxy/http-replicator
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer griffo...@gentoo.o
it up and move along. It will not prevent this list from
fulfilling its purpose of being a place to discuss technical issues,
which is the most important thing if you ask me.
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 08:45:36AM +0200, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> http://seancribbs.com/tech/2007/04/18/whats-new-in-radiant-0-6/
"The server is temporarily unable to service your request due to
maintenance downtime or capacity problems. Please try again later."
--
Maurice van de
itical.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpabE1MAfeQf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ld also be pretty
good for users. It's *critical* news reporting, not slashdot.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgp16xAN8EOSI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
warns about the old format being used, I would
not consider it worthy of a news item. If the application will just fail
to start with the old format and the required changes are trivial, don't
send a news item.
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 06:35:22PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Tue, 1 May 2007 19:18:28 +0200
> Maurice van der Pot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd say, let the user decide based on the properties
>
> Too complicated. Bombarding the user with pointless alte
e figure out which options we really want
> to deliver.
I'm sorry if this counts as a solution, but I wasn't sure the list you
gave was the kind of list we need and I didn't know another way of
explaining the use of the properties I listed.
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpZvWXoOPeIK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
can't find anyone soon, I'll remove myself from metadata.xml.
net-fs, if you'd rather I replace my name with maintainer-needed, just
tell me.
Thanks,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe!
ecruiters bugs in bugzilla?
For me at least the date it was closed is the closest date I can come up
with.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpjEy2dvvzEc.p
ffon26/troubleshooter-0.0.2.tar.bz2
43f0042c802ad5ddcdf2a4db671c41c8 *troubleshooter-0.0.2.tar.bz2
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgp6K5G1VgQt2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Aug 24, 2006 at 01:58:05PM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> I've got switching my nfs installations to coda for right some
> time, and so I'd offer to maintain the package.
Actually I'm looking for a Gentoo developer to take over maintenance.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van
Hi guys,
I've been maintaining Coda, but I'm not using it anymore. I'm looking
for someone to take over maintenance. It's a low-maintenance package.
Any takers?
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.o
ources offline and you will still
have to provide your users with the sources if/when they want them.
You are responsible for providing the sources of any GPL binaries you
distribute.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator o
t of test is to get some additional
confidence that the package actually works. It doesn't mean you want to
be bothered for nothing.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4
out of the ebuilds it belongs to and
dumps it all in one file.
So we'd want this because we don't want to introduce something new in
the ebuilds?
Just getting things straight before expressing my opinion explicitly =]
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer
er the impression that we are
> not interested in their work or the package, when this is not the case.
But if a developer tells them what is wrong and to reopen the bug when
they've fixed it, it shouldn't be a problem. And that's what I've seen
in this case.
--
Maurice van
g a herd for it.
When I was composing my previous message I had something like "I don't
know rox, but" in there. I didn't mean to suggest rox was such a package.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe!
index.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml?part=1&chap=2
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpWg6NxtLd7D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
character case mismatch:
> --result-file=BACKUP_MYSQL_4.0.SQL
> cmd# cat backup_mysql_4.0.sql \
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpkS3PBz4Rg9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 10:18:58AM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> The following does not apply to that case:
> > > Stuart has asserted that in those cases the arch team
> > > should be willing to take on the support burden for that package."
Oh, never mind, it doe
d that in those cases the arch team
> > should be willing to take on the support burden for that package."
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpLVn4P
arch team should be
willing to take on the support burden for that package."
Overriding here means stabling before the maintainer does it, not
keeping it in unstable while the maintainer wants to mark it stable,
right?
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer
ve you with us, Stefaan.
Cheers,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpMQIU34GSvH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ngs properly, causing subtle bugs that users will run into
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpW5R7V5dLo5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 06:20:14PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> For anyone willing to modify it, I've taken it out of bugzilla cvs and
> put it in my dev space:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~griffon26/bzLifecycle.xml
>
> Just load it in dia and edit away.
Oh, btw, thi
For anyone willing to modify it, I've taken it out of bugzilla cvs and
put it in my dev space:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~griffon26/bzLifecycle.xml
Just load it in dia and edit away.
Please let others know in this thread if you're gonna work on it, to
prevent duplication of effort.
Mau
On Thu, Aug 18, 2005 at 09:28:47PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Bah! No I'm not, because Sven pointed out that it collides with the
> bugzilla resolution. So I'm going with CHECKED instead.
Whoah! Isn't REVIEWED the perfect keyword?
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Lin
ay to handle this :(
Alright, this is what I'll do then.
Thanks,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpgQotxs3QjY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
essor without sse. I would also have to check
the arch before requiring sse.
Is there a better way to do this?
Thanks,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4eve
Will we be able to make sure if the user emerges some app that requires
library A from an X implementation and later emerges an application that
requires library B, that A and B are taken from the same implementation?
If not, what would happen if the user later emerged the top-level xorg
ebuild?
, what does your proposal solve of the problems you see
with pkg_warn?
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpt0L7dVImnB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
eloper shortage was not as big as it is, we could probably
really do something with your proposition.
Regards,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgp412UEN8KmD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Jul 07, 2005 at 10:52:06AM -0700, Donnie Berkholz intended to write:
> size for the options above 0.05%, 0.02% and 0.01% respectively. In
> any case, nearly irrelevant to its present size.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gent
it (well, at least
one anyway).
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpX0hQAJ9QKH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
es.
> A tool to do analysis of a package/ebuild and discern the BDEPEND's I
> could see, just thought you were suggesting it be defacto on the fly
> thing :)
I'll try not to be offended ;)
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] h
cross-compiling people. By using a tool like
I described, I can see what I still need to add to the list.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpJrVByzP8he.pgp
Description: PGP signature
omatically or verify the existing bdeps.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpGC7GNwzY6q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ckage under its wing, it can reassign the bug.
Thanks,
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpvcYJ7wGYBf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, Jun 20, 2005 at 09:56:07PM +0200, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> Two new aliases will be made that bugs can be assigned to:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Used for packages that are already in the tree and that are in
> desperate need of a maintainer.
>
> [EMAIL
es that concern
them.
Regards,
Maurice.
P.S.: There will probably be another message to notify everyone when
this has been set up.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://w
o query for these bugs.
New ebuild requests are quite easily listed by querying for 'enhancement',
something with ebuild in the subject, assigned to bug-wranglers or any
combination of the above.
> Bump requests might be annoying, but i think it's still the best
> th
introduced we need to record it somewhere. I'm not sure what
would be the best place though.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpbCZCK2DXpR.pgp
Descri
. ...". It doesn't add anything, so don't
install it.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpGdzMj2P273.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jun 14, 2005 at 04:16:17PM -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
> i'm 28 years old, from a city called Beverwijk (30km west from Amsterdam,
30km, ey? I hope you're a good swimmer ;)
Anyway, welcome to the team!
Groeten,
Maurice
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EM
nt instead of
> making another resolution.
It's not just about new-ebuild bugs. Personally I'd even say it's not
about those bugs at all. [EMAIL PROTECTED] would be useful
for packages like OpenAFS: plenty of bugs, no maintainer.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Deve
On Mon, Jun 13, 2005 at 08:31:58PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Reassigning to need-maintainer@ would remove the herd-information and
> therefore I am against it.
Ok, so what about adding it to the CC then?
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ess and get a message each
time a bug is filed for a package without a maintainer, than it is to
have to wade through a list of bugs you've already seen to find a few
new ones.
You've convinced me.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt
I
> don't recall any negative points being raised.
Do you have a date or thread subject or something like that? I can't
find it in the archives. I would like to see some reasons why one or the
other is better.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMA
nothing is happening" to some bug reports.
NEEDMAINTAINER is clearly a neater solution.
*Thumbs up*
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpsNSJ5JSmNC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
keywords.
This means that I have no strong preference for any particular ordering
and I would be inclined to go for anything that has a small advantage
over the others, such as being able to find keywords at a glance.
It might even be too small an advantage to make policy out of it.
Maurice
ent projects
P.P.S.: Oh, and I cannot send this mail without mentioning that since
the beginning, when I just started using Gentoo, I've always
felt welcome... something I didn't expect to find on the
internet.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMA
what we've had it for a while
> now ?
I'd say always try to make things more logical. Besides, there are only
a few packages using the bzlib flag.
I did however find quite a few that did an unconditional --with-bzlib as
well as one (dev-util/gambas) that uses bzlib2, which I can't
ionally, when the tests are fixed,
the package will still not be using them. It would be nice if something
like package.features could become not only part of portage, but also
of the profiles.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www
omething way down on your
todo list, I would also recommend disabling the tests in the ebuild.
A bug report could be used to track these bugs, but at least it would
not bother so many people while it is still unsolved.
I'd like to know what you think of this.
Thanks,
Maurice.
--
Mau
ant it, you'll just not be forced to
have it installed anymore.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpDRmatkWefE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 04:05:16PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 15 April 2005 03:55 pm, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:38:04PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > uhh, gcc-3.3.x should certainly support -fpie and -fno-pie
> >
> >
On Fri, Apr 15, 2005 at 03:38:04PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> uhh, gcc-3.3.x should certainly support -fpie and -fno-pie
In that case, take a look at
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89179.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.
any bugs that I would get because of these
CFLAGS as invalid and suggest they use the appropriate gcc profile
instead.
Would that be reasonable?
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] h
e for tests in case gcc supports it is not enough, because
user CFLAGS are appended and CFLAGS in make.conf may contain -fpie
6) using filter-flags to get rid of -fpie in user's CFLAGS actually
adds -fno-pie and disables features referred to in 1)
What do I do now?
Why is -fno-pie being add
On Wed, Apr 13, 2005 at 10:39:16AM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
> "Ä" is actually a ligature anyway that just means "ij" in a nicer visual
> style.
You obviously haven't seen my font ;)
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] h
lled in from the system.
Thanks for the tip. It was perfectly applicable.
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgpq8aSa3HhL6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 12, 2005 at 01:52:05PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 12 April 2005 11:59 am, Maurice van der Pot wrote:
> > I have the following situation:
> > - a package (valgrind) that can be compiled with PIE and uses PIE
> > for some purpose or other if it is
sucks.
> Hi all.
Welcome fellow dutchman.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.gentoo.org
Creator of BiteMe! [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.kfk4ever.com
pgp8GRu1eKKkd.pgp
Description: PGP signature
gether.
I'm looking for a solution that preferably:
- uses (some of) make.conf's CFLAGS
- compiles with all gcc profiles and all CFLAGS (filtering some is ok)
- does not disable PIE altogether
Is there such a solution?
Maurice.
--
Maurice van der Pot
Gentoo Linux Develope
65 matches
Mail list logo
