Andrew Savchenko posted on Sun, 29 Mar 2015 21:04:52 +0300 as excerpted:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:52:38 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 29.03.2015 19:39, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:41:33 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
So I would like to propose that
* support for
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 07:49:32PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:28 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:11:34AM +0200, Matthias Maier wrote:
Thoughts?
One point in favor of the current practice (installing add-on files
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
from the tree, for the week ending 2015-03-29 23:59 UTC.
Removals:
dev-python/py-freebsd 2015-03-24 01:24:48 idella4
dev-python/cherryflow 2015-03-24 02:46:31 idella4
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 1:12 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
qt is a pretty significant package to have break with multilib, and
trying to
Title: FFmpeg default
Author: Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-04-01
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: virtual/ffmpeg
Since the choice between ffmpeg and libav has been made more
explicit, there has been a lot of discussion about what the
Dnia 2015-03-30, o godz. 00:07:16
Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
Title: FFmpeg default
Author: Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2015-04-01
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: virtual/ffmpeg
Since the choice between ffmpeg
On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu napisał(a):
Am 17.03.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Michał Górny:
However, some
users may prefer setting ABI_X86 globally to enable 32-bit libraries
in all packages that support building them. This
Dnia 2015-03-27, o godz. 15:33:15
Hanno Böck ha...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
I think defaulting the net to HTTPS is a big step for more security and
I think Gentoo should join the trend here.
While I don't mind this entirely, we need to make sure to get things
right. For example, I'm quite
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 11:57:12
James Le Cuirot ch...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:13:32 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-jna-20140508-r1
Why do we need to keep app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-jna-20140508-r1 to
simply end up
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:14:43
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a):
On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu napisał(a):
Am 17.03.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Michał Górny:
However, some
users may prefer setting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2015, 17:51:04 schrieb William Hubbs:
I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the
tree.
[...]
The other method is shown by dev-vcs/hub at least, and maybe several
other packages -- e.g.
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 14:22:56
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Am Donnerstag, 26. März 2015, 17:51:04 schrieb William Hubbs:
I'm seeing at least two ways of handling zsh completion files in the
tree.
[...]
On 29/03/15 19:24, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:14:43
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a):
On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32
René Neumann li...@necoro.eu napisał(a):
Am 17.03.2015 um 16:33 schrieb Michał Górny:
However,
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:59:19
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a):
On 29/03/15 19:24, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:14:43
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a):
On 17/03/15 18:29, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-17, o godz. 16:55:32
René
Despite of all you're talking about is right from paranoid point of view, I'd,
anyway, say DO NOT DO THAT, because you propose to revoke the right of
choice from the users.
It is user's decision, which protocol to use to fetch the sources. Although,
you're, of course, free to make layman to
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:28:22 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
If this is not the case, and */* abi_x86_32 in package.use really does
something different, then this is implemented in a way too confusing for
people and should be considered a bug :-/
Yes, USE support in make.conf is a big pile of
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 20:35:27
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:28:22 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
If this is not the case, and */* abi_x86_32 in package.use really does
something different, then this is implemented in a way too confusing for
Doesn't git:// uses SSH wich is secure? I think that was on github.
git+ssh:// — does. git:// — does not. It is just git-daemon listening on
separate port and serving plaintext, readonly (by default) access.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
GitHub does not support git:// but only secure protocols (HTTPS, SSH),
GitHub DO (!) support git://
$ git clone git://github.com/msva/mva-overlay.git
Cloning into 'mva-overlay'...
remote: Counting objects: 10435, done.
remote: Compressing objects: 100% (41/41), done.
remote: Total 10435 (delta
(crossposting to -dev since this is fairly high-impact)
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 30/03/15 03:43, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
I also have dev-qt/qtcore-4.8.5-r2 and some other qt packages installed
but I had no problems with that.
I'm on
On 29/03/15 21:00, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
*/* long list of 433 flags
Yeah, just noticed that I can't split the lines.
I then tried to define an array of USE flags in make.conf:
GLOBAL_USE_FLAGS=( ... )
so that I can then use that array in package.use, but for some reason
make.conf
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 21:31:49
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a):
On 29/03/15 21:00, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
*/* long list of 433 flags
Yeah, just noticed that I can't split the lines.
I then tried to define an array of USE flags in make.conf:
GLOBAL_USE_FLAGS=( ...
Hi!
For the current Gentoo Git setup I found these methods working for
accessing a repository, betagarden in this case:
git://anongit.gentoo.org/proj/betagarden.git
(git://git.gentoo.org/proj/betagarden.git)
(git://git.overlays.gentoo.org/proj/betagarden.git)
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 18:50:17
Hanno Böck ha...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:46:05 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
While I don't mind this entirely, we need to make sure to get things
right. For example, I'm quite unhappy being unable to use Forums or
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 20:35:27 +0300
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org wrote:
The proposal above is an absolute madness, especially for global
USE flags.
Why users should deal with dozens (if not hundreds useless */*)?
The syntax for package.use allows multiple flags per line, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/29/2015 06:41 PM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Hi!
...
* Why do we serve Git over git:// and http:// if those are
vulnerable to man-in-the-middle attacks (before having waterproof
GPG protection for whole repositories in place)?
They would not do online banking over http, right? Why would they run
code with root privileges from http?
1) Actually, they will :(
2) Because they can't review what bank received via insecure channel, while
they can review what they're themselves received via http/git.
--
Best regards,
Hi there!
I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160).
Since then valgrind did no longer work for 32bit programs because
-march=native did choose instructions that valgrind does not support
in 32bit mode (even ld.so was unusable).
After some research I put this into
Ben de Groot wrote:
Title: FFmpeg default
Posted: 2015-04-01
Bad date for such news.
//Peter
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:23:51 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Xperia X10 Mini, with ancient Android 2.1.
bugs.gentoo.org works, though it complains about hostname mismatch (I
guess it doesn't handle wildcard certs or sth).
Not exactly, it can't handle servers with more than one
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:41:33 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
So I would like to propose that
* support for Git access through https:// is activated,
* Git access through http:// and git:// is deactivated, and
Some people have https blocked. http:// and git:// must be
available read-only.
On 29.03.2015 19:39, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:41:33 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
So I would like to propose that
* support for Git access through https:// is activated,
* Git access through http:// and git:// is deactivated, and
Some people have https blocked.
On 29/03/15 20:28, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 19:59:19
Nikos Chantziaras rea...@gmail.com napisał(a):
According to emerge --info, ABI_X86 seems to append, not override. In
make.conf:
ABI_X86=32
Then:
$ emerge --info | grep -i abi_x86
You get:
ABI_X86=32 64
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:41:33 +0200
Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi!
For the current Gentoo Git setup I found these methods working for
accessing a repository, betagarden in this case:
git://anongit.gentoo.org/proj/betagarden.git
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:52:38 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 29.03.2015 19:39, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:41:33 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
So I would like to propose that
* support for Git access through https:// is activated,
* Git access through http://
On 29.03.2015 19:56, Diamond wrote:
Doesn't git:// uses SSH wich is secure? I think that was on github.
git:// is the git protocol [1] with absolutely no authentication and
no encryption.
GitHub does not support git:// but only secure protocols (HTTPS, SSH),
see [2].
Best,
Sebastian
[1]
pedantOpenPGP (GPG is just one implementation)/pedant, but indeed,
that is what the gentoo-keys project is about. There is experimental
support for OpenPGP verification in portage already using gkeys.
Currently the focus is on getting developer's keys up to GLEP63 specs,
i currently see 36
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Sebastian Pipping sp...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 29.03.2015 19:39, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:41:33 +0200 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
So I would like to propose that
* support for Git access through https:// is activated,
* Git access through
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 16:46:05 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
While I don't mind this entirely, we need to make sure to get things
right. For example, I'm quite unhappy being unable to use Forums or
sources.g.o from my phone because of some SSL issues…
Can you be more specific on
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:43:51 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-03-29, o godz. 20:35:27
Andrew Savchenko birc...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 19:28:22 +0200 Michał Górny wrote:
If this is not the case, and */* abi_x86_32 in package.use really
does
something
El sáb, 28-03-2015 a las 23:03 +0100, Michał Górny escribió:
# Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org (14 Sep 2014)
# on behalf of gx86-multilib project multi...@gentoo.org
# Mask emul-linux-x86 packages along with unported old versions
# of reverse dependencies for removal in 60 days, bug #544876.
#
El sáb, 28-03-2015 a las 17:20 +0100, Magnus Granberg escribió:
Hi
As some of you may know, I have been working on code for a tinderbox with
frontend support. I think its time to move it to a offcial project.
The Proof-Of-Concept (poc) is almost ready, but it still have alot of the
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 12:13:32 +0200
Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote:
app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-jna-20140508-r1
Why do we need to keep app-emulation/emul-linux-x86-jna-20140508-r1 to
simply end up rdepending on
=virtual/libffi-3.0.13-r1[abi_x86_32(-)] ? Also, no package in the
tree
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 23:35:54 +0600
Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov m...@mva.name wrote:
Despite of all you're talking about is right from paranoid point of
view, I'd, anyway, say DO NOT DO THAT, because you propose to
revoke the right of choice from the users.
A right of choice from the user only
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi there!
I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160).
Since then valgrind did no longer work for 32bit programs because
-march=native did choose instructions that valgrind does not
On 29.03.2015 20:58, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Hi there!
I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160).
Since then valgrind did no longer work for 32bit programs because
-march=native did choose instructions that valgrind does not support
in 32bit mode (even
On 03/29/15 15:07, Matt Turner wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi there!
I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160).
Since then valgrind did no longer work for 32bit programs because
-march=native did choose
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 29.03.2015 20:58, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
Hi there!
I updated my ~amd64 system recently to new hardware (Intel Core i3-4160).
Since then valgrind did no longer work for 32bit programs because
-march=native did
All,
I want to start a discussion about our add-on files practice and try to
improve it.
I agree it is reasonable to install bash completions
unconditionally, because bash is part of the base requirement for
Gentoo. However, I do not agree that we should continue installing
add-on files for
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
I think we really need to either stabilize 4.8.6, or backport
qtchooser/multilib/etc to the current stable version.
Backporting is not an option. The introduction of multilib support in
qt4 required extensive changes to the
On Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:49:50 +0200
Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Michał, as already discussed with Pacho [1], emul-linux-x86-jna can
just go away entirely. Nothing requires it and it doesn't make any
sense without emul-linux-x86-java though I note that isn't in the
list either; I
Thoughts?
One point in favor of the current practice (installing add-on files
unconditionally) is the fact that you can basically do it for free - you
neither have to depend on additional packages, nor is the presence of
the add-on files a penalty in download time or storage.
Further, a lot of
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Davide Pesavento p...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 8:23 PM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
qt is a pretty significant package to have break with multilib, and
trying to run qt-5 on a stable system is already a nightmare with the
qtchooser
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:11:34AM +0200, Matthias Maier wrote:
Thoughts?
One point in favor of the current practice (installing add-on files
unconditionally) is the fact that you can basically do it for free - you
neither have to depend on additional packages, nor is the presence of
the
On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 7:28 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:11:34AM +0200, Matthias Maier wrote:
Thoughts?
One point in favor of the current practice (installing add-on files
unconditionally) is the fact that you can basically do it for free - you
Next round:
* Recipe for handling \.(php|php5|phtml|phps)\. manually added
* AddType (with similar problems) mentioned, too
* Typo momment fixed
(* Internel revision bump to 3, will be committed as revision 1)
(* Date bumped to today)
(* Links renumbered due to new link [2])
56 matches
Mail list logo
