Re: [gentoo-dev] beep-media-player removal: 04/03/2006

2006-02-23 Thread Mart Raudsepp
-0.10/xine probably SVG for skins soon if not already, etc). As a conclusion, if you used BMP for your lightweight player, you probably want audacious, if you don't want to try a more different thing. Hope this clears things up. -- With regards, Mart Raudsepp Project manager of wxMUD - http

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk2 use flag must die

2006-04-02 Thread Mart Raudsepp
at least a week ago... but I'm living in a utopian land. -- With regards, Mart Raudsepp Project manager of wxMUD - http://wxmud.sourceforge.net/ Developer of wxWidgets- http://www.wxwidgets.org/ GTK+ port maintainer of OMGUI - http://www.omgui.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing

Re: [gentoo-dev] gtk2 use flag must die

2006-04-02 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 00:53 +0200, foser wrote: On Mon, 2006-04-03 at 00:43 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: Delaying GNOME-2.14 for non-GNOME packages using gtk2 USE flag is mildly funny to me, too. These two things are not related, 2.14 is not delayed whatsoever. Jakub's call was just to get

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Remove your modular X unmask

2006-04-20 Thread Mart Raudsepp
on xorg.fd.org wiki. A couple more RCs, and release in about a month if all goes well? -- With regards, Mart Raudsepp Project manager of wxMUD - http://wxmud.sourceforge.net/ Developer of wxWidgets- http://www.wxwidgets.org/ GTK+ port maintainer of OMGUI - http://www.omgui.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] New Developer: Mart Raudseep (leio)

2006-08-08 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 21:22 +0100, Luis Medinas wrote: Wow nice addiction to our team. I am pondering which addiction do you mean here :/ Congrats Mart and keep up with good work. Thanks! -- Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays

2009-02-26 Thread Mart Raudsepp
a new thread when wanting to discuss about that. Note that I'm on devaway for up to a week from this moment, just getting an actual discussion going on this topic meanwhile as promised at council meeting. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org

[gentoo-dev] How to speed up maintenance and other Gentoo work?

2009-03-03 Thread Mart Raudsepp
intentionally left out my own ideas at start to keep everyone's mind open to various approaches to this. Please share your thoughts and ideas as a reply here, on my matching blog post as comments or via private e-mail! -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repository stacking and complementary overlays

2009-03-17 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Mon, 2009-03-02 at 16:48 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:41:23 +0200 Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: So here the reverting of a masking in gentoo-x86 is quite intentional and currently desired. This is fundamentally broken as a concept. Adding an overlay

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-08 Thread Mart Raudsepp
time and double-check on maintainers if they really did their job right. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-04-08 Thread Mart Raudsepp
. In separate threads: * Slot operator support * dohard being deprecated Did I miss anything? I'm not even sure anymore where to find a list of items that is current for what's on the table for EAPI-3 right now... -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-04-08 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 04:51 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: In separate threads: .. * dohard being deprecated Actually bug #235642 has been fixed by now, and therefore this seems simple enough. The main reasoning for deprecation (and banning) of dohard() was that bug as far as I understood

[gentoo-dev] EAPI-3 draft: slot operator support

2009-04-08 Thread Mart Raudsepp
to cover some of the above with new syntax? Perhaps some forward thinking is sensible here to not end up with having to deprecate the := and :* syntax soon after its introduction. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI-3 draft: slot operator support

2009-04-09 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On N, 2009-04-09 at 11:30 +0200, Tiziano Müller wrote: Am Donnerstag, den 09.04.2009, 05:25 +0300 schrieb Mart Raudsepp: Hello, This thread is for any discussion about the slot operator support item in EAPI-3 draft. The premise is good what := and :* allow for, but I'm concerned

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ideas for a (fast) EAPI=3

2009-04-09 Thread Mart Raudsepp
). that's a bit complicated with not having texlive installed anywhere yet... -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 3 PMS Draft

2009-04-09 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On N, 2009-04-09 at 15:37 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 09 Apr 2009 04:12:02 +0300 Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: It is quite irresponsible to enable that by default for the FULL user base, given the state of the tree in regards to it Which is why we are not talking about

Re: [gentoo-dev] PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready

2009-04-20 Thread Mart Raudsepp
to unpack --if-compressed. That seems backwards. Still a bit unsure about the default non-argument case choice. * RDEPEND-DEPEND yes * DIE-ON-FAILURE whatever * NONFATAL whatever -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio

Re: [gentoo-dev] ECONF-OPTIONS (Was: PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready)

2009-04-23 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:17 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:11:15 +0300 Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: * ECONF-OPTIONS query --disable-dependency-tracking has other implications than it being allowed to be passed to ./configure or not - such as dependency

Re: [gentoo-dev] SLOT-OPERATOR-DEPS (Was: PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready)

2009-04-23 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Tue, 2009-04-21 at 16:03 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 05:11:15 +0300 Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: * SLOT-OPERATOR-DEPS An outstanding problem to me as a package maintainer is the lack of means to know which slot the PM actually picked for the package

Re: [gentoo-dev] ECONF-OPTIONS (Was: PMS EAPI 3 more or less ready)

2009-04-23 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 13:58 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 10:56:56 +0300 Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: If a parallel install is overwriting things on / whilst a package is compiling, things are already horribly broken regardless of this switch. PMS explicitly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for April 23

2009-04-23 Thread Mart Raudsepp
kind of an uninformed majority vote or concensus. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Project summaries

2009-05-10 Thread Mart Raudsepp
from expat 1.95 to 2.0 was a walk in the park compared to this. An important difference to note here is that expat case (sorry) was hit by everyone, but xcb problem will be hit only by people who have enabled USE=xcb on certain packages or globally, and that is not the default. -- Mart Raudsepp

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-05-13 Thread Mart Raudsepp
packages of quality easily available to the user base until other projects and developers are able to take over. Discuss! :) Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-05-14 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Wed, 2009-05-13 at 20:47 -0500, Jeremy Olexa wrote: Mart Raudsepp wrote: Hello, Hey, I have had this project in my mind for a while, so it's about time to get it out there, as to see if feedback finds it a good one - and if that is so, if there are people who want to make it happen

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-05-14 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On N, 2009-05-14 at 14:02 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote: On Thursday 14 May 2009 03:32:12 Mart Raudsepp wrote: Hello, I have had this project in my mind for a while, so it's about time to [..] I think there is no need for this project. Developers can always browse bugzilla and pick

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-05-19 Thread Mart Raudsepp
of this directly applies to the subject at hand, because while we're talking new versions of packages already in-tree here, the subject at hand is packages that aren't in-tree in any form yet. Sorry, still felt like replying with my view on Gentoo vs dist-upgraded distros :) -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-05-19 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Thu, 2009-05-14 at 19:24 +0100, Roy Bamford wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 2009.05.14 01:32, Mart Raudsepp wrote: Hello, [snip] Project maintainer-wanted = Abstract: There are currently quite some package requests (over

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-05-19 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Sun, 2009-05-17 at 12:08 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: On Thu, 14 May 2009 03:32:12 +0300 Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: Project maintainer-wanted = Abstract: There are currently quite some package requests (over 3000) languishing on bugzilla waiting

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-05-19 Thread Mart Raudsepp
of time to QA then they essentially have become a maintainer and the package is no-longer maintainer-wanted. The maintainer-wanted team would effectively aggregate those people together, so that the end result would be better quality, quicker response times and so on. -- Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Gentoo Support Everywhere

2009-05-19 Thread Mart Raudsepp
when they get the chance? Like it or not, LQ is the first place where a newcomer goes. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-06-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On K, 2009-05-20 at 11:36 -0400, Richard Freeman wrote: Mart Raudsepp wrote: The maintainer-wanted team owns that foo package then, which is why having a different mail alias than the existing one for new package requests that aren't in gentoo tree yet would be a good idea. Ok, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-06-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On N, 2009-05-28 at 11:55 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: В Чтв, 14/05/2009 в 03:32 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет: Project maintainer-wanted = Mart, I think that it's good idea to create such project but with a different goals. I think currently maintainer-wanted alias

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Project proposal -- maintainer-wanted

2009-06-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On K, 2009-05-20 at 00:55 +, Duncan wrote: Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org posted 1242777068.30374.30.ca...@localhost, excerpted below, on Wed, 20 May 2009 02:51:08 +0300: It is about getting popular packages (based on various metrics) into the official tree for easy access

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flags (network, 3dnowext, static-libs, mtp)

2009-06-03 Thread Mart Raudsepp
currently are? So that everyone won't need to look up by themselves or guess the global description. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flags (network, 3dnowext, static-libs, mtp)

2009-06-04 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On K, 2009-06-03 at 21:02 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: Mart Raudsepp wrote: On K, 2009-06-03 at 02:13 +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote: USE network is used by 9 ebuilds, and one is using USE networking which can be converted, that'd be 10. USE network Enable networking support USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2009/2010 - Nominations are now open

2009-06-14 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On E, 2009-06-01 at 10:48 +0200, Patrick Lauer wrote: People I nominate: * leio / mraudsepp, because he's done a really good job protecting the distro's interests I accept -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 25

2009-06-22 Thread Mart Raudsepp
and don't need to be looked up with what is actually meant when they are being referred to in short names. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council Reminder for June 25

2009-06-24 Thread Mart Raudsepp
is the preliminary meeting agenda. I acknowledge that agenda, or something. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2009 Council Elections

2009-06-29 Thread Mart Raudsepp
, never count on common sense. Elected people rarely have any. If they do during the election, it disappears after taking their position. I think the vast majority of people here have seen that over the years. My $0.02 worth. Dale :-) :-) Regards, Ferris -- Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding a warning to description of global flag profile.

2009-07-26 Thread Mart Raudsepp
this is a call for testing that, as combinatory CFLAGS enabling -fomit-frame-pointer is your reasoning here. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] New 10.0 profiles are in repository

2009-08-06 Thread Mart Raudsepp
don't get the correct and desired things enabled for their desktop environment of choice. So for the 3 prefix-linux profiles that's using 2008.0 now, you can feel safe and simply change the parents to point at 10.0. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http

[gentoo-dev] News Item: GNOME 2.26 upgrade

2009-10-05 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Hello, See attached news item for consideration. Suggestions on how to improve it, including the text section, very welcome. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio Title: Upgrade to GNOME 2.26 Author: Gentoo Gnome Team gn

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GNOME 2.26 upgrade

2009-10-06 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On T, 2009-10-06 at 02:11 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote: Hello, See attached news item for consideration. Suggestions on how to improve it, including the text section, very welcome. Attached is a tweaked version with wording fixes from dabbott and author as me instead of team, as I understood

Re: [gentoo-dev] News Item: GNOME 2.26 upgrade

2009-10-06 Thread Mart Raudsepp
to look for a metadata/news with my setup, so I can't verify on my end everything is working right to proceed with this.. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Improve policy of stabilizations

2009-11-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
of quicker stabilization of package I maintain myself I try to state in the STABLEREQ bug why the quicker stabilization. Is it stated in any documentation that 30 days is a policy? -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio

Re: [gentoo-dev] About udev-145: new features / extras and kernel requirements

2009-11-09 Thread Mart Raudsepp
considered harmful? On some non-desktop systems perhaps, yes. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] URGENT: exotic arches need Qt 4.5.3 stabilization

2009-11-09 Thread Mart Raudsepp
not checking issues with it by default. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve circular deps

2010-03-03 Thread Mart Raudsepp
poppler-cairo probably instead), poppler-qt3, poppler-qt4 and poppler-utils. I don't believe we should selectively cripple one GUI toolkit with not having proper printing support out of the box on a desktop profile, while others do, just because maintainers are lazy. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Remove cups from default profile to solve circular deps

2010-03-04 Thread Mart Raudsepp
requirement by cups. It doesn't need poppler-glib, so utils and bindings being a separate package, as it always was before, would nicely solve it. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

[gentoo-dev] Reorganizing handling of target specific profiles (Was: Split desktop profile patches news item for review)

2010-03-08 Thread Mart Raudsepp
) Profit. Obviously I doubt to have time to work on it personally. I hope the guys pushing for adding even more subprofiles can pick up this idea and implement it, if discussion gives consensus this is a good way forward. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-11 Thread Mart Raudsepp
Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go! I suggest reading my comments... -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-12 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:20 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp l...@gentoo.org wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote: Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go! I suggest reading my comments... Unless I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-13 Thread Mart Raudsepp
of globally. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split desktop profile patches news item for review

2010-03-13 Thread Mart Raudsepp
other guys already did though. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Reorganizing handling of target specific profiles (Was: Split desktop profile patches news item for review)

2010-03-13 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Sat, 2010-03-13 at 13:16 -0800, Brian Harring wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 11:40:00PM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote: mån 2010-03-08 klockan 19:13 +0200 skrev Mart Raudsepp: Instead I think we should be improving eselect profile to support multiple inheriting /etc/make.profile

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should we disable RESOLVED LATER from bugzilla?

2010-04-04 Thread Mart Raudsepp
is unable to set more than 30 or so days into the future. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: introspection

2010-06-25 Thread Mart Raudsepp
always install them, they are just not that big compared to the include files that get always installed too. But embedded guys can easily delete all of /usr/include, but typelibs (containing the introspection data) may be necessary at runtime. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy for late/slow stabilizations

2010-06-28 Thread Mart Raudsepp
comparison) -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://blogs.gentoo.org/leio

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-python/pygobject: ChangeLog pygobject-2.14.0.ebuild

2007-09-27 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On N, 2007-09-27 at 17:08 +0100, Steve Long wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 13:15 Wed 26 Sep , Mart Raudsepp (leio) wrote: mv ${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py \ ${D}/usr/$(get_libdir)/python${PYVER}/site-packages/pygtk.py-2.0 mv ${D}/usr/$(get_libdir

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-text/gnome-doc-utils: ChangeLog gnome-doc-utils-0.12.0.ebuild

2007-10-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On P, 2007-09-30 at 22:33 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: On 02:42 Mon 01 Oct , Mart Raudsepp (leio) wrote: 1.1 app-text/gnome-doc-utils/gnome-doc-utils-0.12.0.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-text/gnome-doc-utils/gnome-doc-utils

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer : Mike Pagano (mpagano)

2007-10-04 Thread Mart Raudsepp
of stories that start with when I was your age? Or... My first computer had 4K RAM... Damn, mine had 48K Welcome Mike! -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [gentoo-dev] new old eclass - wxwidgets.eclass

2007-10-06 Thread Mart Raudsepp
off my hands before I get sunk into work. Many many thanks for pushing wxGTK forwards while I'm occupied with work, gnome stuff... and procrastinating -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] lame use flag, local to global

2007-10-10 Thread Mart Raudsepp
/mp4live Any reason to not use something like mp3enc flag instead at that point? mp3 USE flag is already global, and appears to mean mp3 decoding, so how about a general mp3 encoding USE flag? I guess merging decoding and encoding behind the same USE flag might be an option too. -- Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Global useflag for enabling visibility support

2007-11-05 Thread Mart Raudsepp
smoothed out, I guess). I have just added a local visibility flag for paludis and that's also my candidate for the global one, but better names are welcome. Why not enable it by default and unconditionally (other than GCC version being used supporting it) in this specific case? -- Mart Raudsepp

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gnupg-2 stable plans

2007-12-12 Thread Mart Raudsepp
that perfectly fits their needs? If yes, why not slot it as is designed? Regards, Mart Raudsepp -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] I want to steal your tools

2008-02-03 Thread Mart Raudsepp
blue sky ideas how to improve something like this to a lot more packages, including all hosted on GNOME mirrors and available from gnomefiles.org lists (we have parse-able data available from them) and more, but nothing has materialized as of yet. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] missing quotes in eclasses

2008-02-13 Thread Mart Raudsepp
-sapi-r2, php5-sapi-r3, tla, webapp-apache, xfree Missing from that list is kernel and gst-plugins. wxlib also. Do I need to be adding deprecation notice somewhere? I didn't see anything in some of the listed above eclasses -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-gfx/inkscape: ChangeLog inkscape-0.46-r1.ebuild

2008-03-16 Thread Mart Raudsepp
bar COPYING baz dodoc ${DOCS} Well, this DOCS deal is coming through gnome2.eclass, and that's how all of the packages using that eclass are supposed to install DOCS. I suppose we could also add a QA warning into the eclass for COPYING? -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2008-05-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: language bindings as separate packages

2008-05-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
is the perfect solution in my opinion, given unlimited maintainer time and such. In real world that might be too hard to maintain if upstream doesn't go along, but not in all cases (depends on how much time the maintainer has, how complex the build system is, etc). -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer

[gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-07 Thread Mart Raudsepp
consider using the upstream provided .tar.gz tarballs instead and not roll patchsets in .lzma just cause you can. coreutils and linux-headers come to my mind out of system packages right now. I'm sure more dragons await me. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: lzma tarball usage

2008-05-08 Thread Mart Raudsepp
against in overlays and time wastes continuously in the future. Oh and net-tools has not distributed anything in .tar.lzma, so this has nothing to do with following upstream in any shape or form in this case. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Eclass for gnome-python* split

2008-05-25 Thread Mart Raudsepp
) that used it as was expected from python_mod_optimize is now broken for ROOT != / by installing them into ${ROOT}/${ROOT}/ ? -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?

2008-05-30 Thread Mart Raudsepp
of benefits to gain from it. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?)

2008-05-30 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On R, 2008-05-30 at 22:37 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sat, 31 May 2008 00:31:22 +0300 Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On R, 2008-05-30 at 20:20 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Fri, 30 May 2008 21:13:32 +0200 Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Talk to the upstream

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for June

2008-06-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
an update, it gives the impression nothing has been done, which I don't want to believe. I'd appreciate an update - not necessarily as part of the council agenda, but perhaps just per mail, with any discussions if any is necessary during the meeting. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Nominations open for the Gentoo Council 2008/2009

2008-06-16 Thread Mart Raudsepp
. Thanks, I accept. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Patching of Makefile.in and configure (eautoreconf calls)

2008-06-30 Thread Mart Raudsepp
it by patching the Makefile.in or configure that you forgot to patch when you patched Makefile.am or configure.{in,ac}. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Installation of static libraries, USE=static-libs proposal

2008-06-30 Thread Mart Raudsepp
effort, so I haven't put much effort into putting it into writing. But maybe someone interested wants to chat on IRC on the topic. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected

2008-07-25 Thread Mart Raudsepp
or not... Maybe this gives some ideas to someone to write a proper QA script, or point us all to an already existing almighty script or tool that does just that. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev]  Re: [RFC] New policy: LDFLAGS should be respected

2008-07-27 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On P, 2008-07-27 at 18:20 +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote: 2008-07-26 02:56:24 Mart Raudsepp napisał(a): On L, 2008-07-26 at 03:39 +0300, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: Fortunately, the majority of ebuilds/packages are honoring LDFLAGS. Of course it's kinda difficult

Re: [gentoo-dev] Usages of CVS $Header$ keyword in ebuilds - use cases wanted

2008-08-26 Thread Mart Raudsepp
). Q: Are there any other use-cases you have and actively use? No. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Questions about stabilization requests

2008-09-07 Thread Mart Raudsepp
/make.conf or any other place. FEATURES=test is the thing that can be modified for this. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing is not a valid reason to package.mask

2008-10-03 Thread Mart Raudsepp
, the reason could be modified to tell things broke and what the tracking bug is, or unmasked if it works fine with other packages. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing doc use flag on gtk-doc packages to gtk-doc-rebuild or something else

2008-10-05 Thread Mart Raudsepp
that, especially with recent versions of gtk-doc, but some do want it. Use INSTALL_MASK if you don't want developer API docs is the current stance. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing doc use flag on gtk-doc packages to gtk-doc-rebuild or something else

2008-10-07 Thread Mart Raudsepp
approach as a start would also mean touching many GNOME packages (build-depends on gtk-doc if eautoreconf is involved), and I'd rather not risk that at the moment. It would also heavily disrupts the moving of the new version ebuilds from overlay to portage tree. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI 2 is brokened :(

2008-10-10 Thread Mart Raudsepp
is fixed (which I read are already fixed). I can not understand why this is dragged on. It was a bug, it is fixed. The sky is not falling and EAPI-2 is not broken - there was a bug in the implementation that is fixed. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Installation of static libraries, USE=static-libs proposal

2008-10-21 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Sun, 2008-07-20 at 15:40 +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: В Втр, 01/07/2008 в 05:05 +0300, Mart Raudsepp пишет: Over a year or two ago, it was communicated that it supposedly a policy that USE=static Well, I don't have web-reference at hand now, but there was a thread in gentoo-dev

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
believe the primary reason is for release LiveCD's. They ship with evolution-exchange, and that requires evolution/evolution-data-server to be built with USE=kerberos They don't do /etc/portage business, so it's a global USE flag to get things like GRP packages to work right. Regards, -- Mart

Re: [gentoo-dev] kerberos USE flag

2008-10-31 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 19:22 -0500, Andrew Gaffney wrote: Mart Raudsepp wrote: On Fri, 2008-10-31 at 15:50 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote: Michael Hammer wrote: * Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] [081031 15:53]: If no one opposes, I say we redact this USE flag asap. ++ I was also wondering

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Adding lxde-base category

2008-11-01 Thread Mart Raudsepp
categorized themselves like GNOME has. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal for how to handle stable ebuilds

2008-11-10 Thread Mart Raudsepp
packages, or I'm just allowed to remove it but should really apply a common sense as usual and you don't want to go into details in this document? -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-12 Thread Mart Raudsepp
seriously, and mostly just go by DT_NEEDED entries in ELF files on ELF systems instead of all of the listed ones in .la ones, as even if a solution for upstream libtool is figured out, we'd still have old installed .la files around that include indirect libraries. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-12 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On K, 2008-11-12 at 15:40 +0100, Peter Alfredsen wrote: On Wednesday 12 November 2008, Mart Raudsepp wrote: I heavily object to having any such function introduced or used or equivalent .la removals conducted without a good rationale and explanation of why this is the approach taken. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Please review: function epunt_la_files for eutils.eclass

2008-11-14 Thread Mart Raudsepp
that shared library, so the toolchain can not safely discard anything, even if you just have one application using some big library, but only using a small subset of its functionality. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please avoid absolute paths in patched filenames

2008-11-17 Thread Mart Raudsepp
. Could you please expand on what the actual problem is for reference, having never seen them fail myself or hear any fail for others? -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libxml2: libxml2-2.7.2-r1.ebuild

2008-12-07 Thread Mart Raudsepp
On P, 2008-12-07 at 12:03 +, Mike Frysinger (vapier) wrote: vapier 08/12/07 12:03:34 Modified: libxml2-2.7.2-r1.ebuild ChangeLog entires are mandatory without any exceptions for stabilizations. Don't touch packages I co-maintain without a ChangeLog entry if it's not a

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-libs/libIDL: libIDL-0.8.10.ebuild

2008-12-07 Thread Mart Raudsepp
~x86-fbsd +KEYWORDS=alpha amd64 arm hppa ia64 ~mips ppc ppc64 sh sparc x86 ~x86-fbsd IUSE= RDEPEND==dev-libs/glib-2.4 -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag: gzip-dict

2008-12-19 Thread Mart Raudsepp
is more likely to be quicker. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] new categories: (was: Last Rites: games-puzzle/ksudoku)

2009-02-02 Thread Mart Raudsepp
in their suitable category (glchess is a cool board game, etc).. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[gentoo-dev] Category tags on packages (was: new categories:)

2009-02-02 Thread Mart Raudsepp
, can keep using it. Developers also deal with categories, but that's easy enough to keep going as is. Less radical, less controversial, better viability to actually get done. -- Mart Raudsepp Gentoo Developer Mail: l...@gentoo.org Weblog: http://planet.gentoo.org/developers/leio signature.asc

  1   2   3   4   >