ld the ruby team add ~x86 themselves after testing on ~amd64, or are
there compelling reasons to not do this?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nyway,
> and this approach allows a double checking. Also, since this means I'll
> start committing from the leaves of the depgraph, this ensures no
> package has broken deps between commits (with the exception of circular
> deps of course).
>
> A.
>
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
o many packages in one run. The scripts are created using
templates, so in principle it should be pretty flexible. I agree, it
sucks a little, but contributions are welcome.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t; pages such as [1].
I'm not following IRC, please use bugzilla or the issue tracker
here https://github.com/tom111/tatt to report bugs.
Cheers,
Thomas
> Does anyone successfully use tatt? Are there alternatives to scripting
> this boring keywording procedure?
>
> [1] https:/
remove mentions of it from
> pages such as [1].
>
> Does anyone successfully use tatt? Are there alternatives to scripting
> this boring keywording procedure?
>
> [1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Arch_testing_guide#tatt
>
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hed.
- bump to 0.4.6: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=596680
The bump is the only open bug. Please just take it or e-mail me
(or both) if you are interested.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
merged the two packages:
https://github.com/google/googletest
The next and only thing on the agenda is to bump and unify the
two ebuilds to version 1.8.0 which was released in August.
Anyone?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e you could open bugs / contact the
maintainers of the packages that depend on gtest/gmock. As you say,
this is not really a package a distribution should ship.
Cheers,
Thomas
>
>
> br,
> Mathy
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-mathematics/topcom
sci-mathematics/gimps
sci-mathematics/xmds
sci-mathematics/Macaulay2
sci-misc/flashdot
www-apps/tt-rss
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 01/01/2017 00:00, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Dec 2016 22:54:28 +0100
> Thomas Kahle wrote:
>
>> I will retire
>
> Sorry to hear that. :(
>
>> app-text/tesseract
>
> I maintain media-libs/leptonica, which is primarily in the tree because
> of
On 01/01/2017 10:48, David Seifert wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-12-31 at 22:54 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I will retire, so here are my remaining packages. Feel free to
>> e-mail me any questions re this. sci-math is in CC because there
>> are quite a f
ic situation.
> The minimum conditions to lastrite something should be not actively
> maintained _and_ with open bugs that either compromise security or
> affect normal usage subject to the condition that it is not still used
> by users. I do not think at this point in time Gentoo devs have any mean
> to know the popularity of different packages, but that would be a must
> to take proper decision as far as retiring packages goes.
>
> -- Just a random Gentoo user.
>
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 13:11 Sat 02 Feb 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> app-emulation/vov
> app-text/rtf2html
> net-misc/directvnc
Those will be maintained by Dennis (dlan) Lan and I will proxy. I
updated metadata.xml.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description
On 13:46 Sun 03 Feb 2013, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Due matsuu lack of time the following packages are up for grabs:
> dev-cpp/gtest
I'll take this one.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
... if it is used in the ebuild?
It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
belongs in overlays. Making it main tree fit is just not
worth the effort.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
l/open
kde-misc/socket
media-libs/audiofile
media-libs/chromaprint
sci-libs/flann
sci-libs/trilinos
sys-apps/paludis
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ource code on the mirrors. The ebuild is
sci-mathematics/bertini which I'll add soon.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
Bertini(TM) version 1.4
Authors: D.J. Bates, J.D. Hauenstein, A.J. Sommese, C.W. Wampler
http:/
On 07/29/2013 02:58 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just added the license 'bertini' to the non-free group. Bertini is a
> math software distributed in source form but with restriction on
> redistribution (no fee is allowed, no modifications may be
> redisitribute
s is the business of the maintainer
> or the dev who requested stabilization.
Huh. This must be new. When I was still arch-testing, reverse deps
were checked. app-portage/tatt (which is sort of maintainer-needed now)
has support for these tests too.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
si
# Thomas Kahle (09 Oct 2013)
# Masked for removal in 30 days. Game library with
# no consumers and dead upstream. games-strategy/freeorion
# now uses a modified internal version of this and it makes
# no sense to keep the unbundled version around.
dev-games/gigi
--
Thomas Kahle
allow breakage when updating old systems
I've also dropped minimum version requirements in the past. I
wonder if there a performance hit? If every package in the tree
specified min versions of all its dependencies, would resolution
of emerge -avuDN world take longer? (It does take a couple of
minutes already on my aging laptop...)
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-rite so seldom that I forgot that they go to dev-announce.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ime until 'emerge -avUDN world' comes back with a
proposal has grown to several minutes where it was few seconds
when I started with Gentoo.
There has been a lot of effort to make revdep-rebuild unessecary,
but now that it is mostly implemented, I don't know if it was
worth t
On 11/13/2013 03:30 PM, Duncan wrote:
> Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:37:51 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>>> On 11/13/2013 12:39 PM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:28:02 +00
binaries in stages and media."
>
>> For the time being, it will be listed as a top-level project.
>> (There were some ideas that Licenses could be a subproject of
>> another TLP, but so far this hasn't worked out.)
>
>> Ulrich
>
>
> It should be
etc/conf.d/, e.g.
net-firewall/shorewall6/files/4.5.18-r1/shorewall6.systemd:EnvironmentFile=/etc/shorewall6
net-firewall/shorewall6/files/4.5.19/shorewall6.systemd:EnvironmentFile=/etc/conf.d/shorewall6
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Descriptio
user can be informed with einfo but needs to do it herself
c) This is a bug in webapp-config
c) seems strange to me, but a user has reported this in bug
496788 and it was closed as a duplicate implying c).
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description
On 04/04/14 15:34, Matthew Summers wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> www-apps/tt-rss is configured through a file config.php sitting
>> in its install directory. At the moment the file is overwritten
>> when upgr
n turn would be necessary before moving them to the
main tree.
From what I can tell it has nothing to do with bugzilla
vs. github. For me personally bugzilla + a git tree (which is
the situation we have for overlays anyway) is fine.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
On 09.06.2014 23:45, hasufell wrote:
> Thomas Kahle:
>> then they stay in the overlay
>> because people feel it is not worth the effort to fix the QA
>> issues which in turn would be necessary before moving them to the
>> main tree.
>>
>
> Probably because n
both packages anyway. Maybe an einfo is sufficient to
inform the user it?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 21/07/14 21:03, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 13:23:46 +0900
> Thomas Kahle wrote:
>
>> the OCR software tesseract has many different plugins for
>> language packs used for OCR for different languages. The ebuild
>> uses the LINGUAS variable to pass t
Hi,
On 21/07/14 21:42, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-07-21, o godz. 13:23:46
> Thomas Kahle napisał(a):
>
>> the OCR software tesseract has many different plugins for
>> language packs used for OCR for different languages. The ebuild
>> uses the LINGUAS variable
in the industry. Is Mozilla getting anything
useful out of their automatic crash reports?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ntation that has already addressed many of
> the concerns that your proposal would need to address from the ground
> up.
Absolutely!
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ed with -f, because I think repoman is wrong. Any opinions?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 08/11/14 20:49, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> it seems to be a quasi-standard in the tree to use REQUIRED_USE
> if the tests of some package need USE flags. However, repoman
> complains:
>
> REQUIRED_USE.syntax 1
>media-libs/leptonica/leptonica-1.71-r1.ebuild: REQU
nager version is installed."
>
> What do you think? :/
I think ewarn is fine. NM seems not widespread enough to inform
everybody about this.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
i'm not sure if this is the right place for my question, if not, please
tell me the right one.
I'm trying to write an ebuild for a math software called polymake. It
uses a non-autotools, makefile and perl based configuration mechanism.
This t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi again
Thanks for your comments, I will try dev-help next time.
I will submit (fully automated version) to bugzilla tonight if it works
on all the machines i find here...
- -tom
Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i'm not sure if thi
> use.local.desc is automatically generated from metadata.xml files, so
> it's the same thing
And this will soon be properly documented:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309963
--
Thomas Kahle
The fundamental theorem of algebra is open source. Like any other
mathemati
On 03/19/2010 02:06 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 18 March 2010 09:17:43 Thomas Kahle wrote:
>>> use.local.desc is automatically generated from metadata.xml files, so
>>> it's the same thing
>>
>> And this will soon be properly documented:
>> h
gt; how to successfully guide people towards Gentoo development.
I recently was introduced to x86 arch testing by fauli. I thought I
could also help bug wrangling. Currently I am waiting for my extended
bugzilla rights http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=309967 .
Regards
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.
-
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
pgpuCj6SdfCFU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 19:44 Fri 22 Oct , Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Thomas Kahle (tomka)" :
> > tomka 10/10/22 15:11:40
> >
> > Added:metadata.xml pdfsandwich-0.0.2.ebuild
> > ChangeLog Log:
> > new ebuild: app-text/pdfs
use a copy of the license to be installed in a file
# location compliant with the license,
The nauty license *does* restrict the cost of redistribution. So what
is it? An EULA?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
pgp35TjfOhoTP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
can build fat binaries ?
If yes,
-) How to name the USE flag?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpdXEPAZkc8R.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 00:30 Mon 15 Nov , Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 14/11/2010 alle 22.03 +0100, Thomas Kahle ha scritto:
> > I have a package (sci-libs/mpir) whose configure supports building of
> > fat binaries with both x86 and amd64 assembler in the binary.
>
>
y start.
If I do normal build tests first and then find they have been in vain
when running repoman, then I wasted cycles for the build tests. I'm
unsure if this would apply to your original example, though.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpLzMX8YZxDF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
the dep chain.
Seems like out of pm's control?
Has this been discussed on gentoo-dev earlier? Being new to devhood,
I'm looking for references.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpuOxOCFcPfe.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ys.
Cheers,
Thomas
> Many open bugs that could use fixing, upstream is slow to make new
> releases. The person responsible for wicd, gets the following list:
>
> x11-misc/ktsuss
> dev-python/python-iwscan
> dev-python/python-wpactrl
> net-misc/wicd
>
> -Jeremy
>
--
y from my
side.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpzhyIDyYiqb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
be a topic, would you consider a
github.eclass useful at some point?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpp51NeteucW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
signed dev to highlight it's still a relevant issue
> to them, or even to supply a solution against the current tree.
>
> It could be an ongoing policy, in which case, users who care about
> them can keep bugs alive simply by posting useful updates to the bug,
> de
Hi,
it says here http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml#doc_chap2 that
the validity should be <6 month. What is the protocol when the expiry
date is approaching?
-) Extend expiry date and upload again?
-) Create new key (and sign with ?? ) ?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
h
st" from the line above. I've been
> running with the developer profile and -digest in /etc/make.conf, and
> everything is working fine.
+1.
I disabled it on the first day and never had any issues.
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpuNQH4hhG5G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
ortage/gatt
>
> V-Li
>
> --
> Christian Faulhammer, Gentoo Lisp project
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/lisp/>, #gentoo-lisp on FreeNode
>
> http://gentoo.faulhammer.org/>
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpsrlwpN4Sr5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
DHP7f9UaBR4WO8vDvXHHceHkJ8ovHxofm6l1UQ6DsqUh
> oPKLTk2D9tD3fZPf0oVYyZWgFdbdx/glz8VRDqzQylhWhyDB/VuetTCEf0IEl61f
> BiBQ7Z4wka5TsmBNDIla3xJosZQOfwVvry4javxSRvCbYZntdpEeSsKDTSb4tjt0
> 5dI/evC3sool0oUAuxxOE+sX4a8fpl5qAvIIjXFZhOCDrPaWBQe50VxNMNGOTmu2
> 8sSgz6GmoFFMcizPGxP6PKEzFh4rDmT724ZUZ1tj0vARcyQcpq0jLnBIQFWhq/vh
> 7aFArhK+xBA6EIrSm3UUkcBGP+rUVmDo1vs6vl4FeZDY2/epvQGPHR+NLZVliHTE
> M9jrwnJuGSFPVjtriYVmTExkRTH/dDYZd5adkOASSvptpH6/5z056r6g4eBpoqmv
> Ttutf3QCSGFXseHLFZLq
> =3hVB
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpC0ugi50VNa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
nally try to be agnostic. I do
security bugs first, and then work on the oldest bug.
> Then the developer can quickly process the list of bugs, and decide what
> he's going to test. And then we can have tools for batch-testing,
> batch-committing, and so on. Some of them already exist
an eye on them
myself.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpjdhtkQeDU8.pgp
Description: PGP signature
st of the time, but fails sometimes. I
don't know how to trigger the behaviour.
Any ideas?
Cheers
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
pgpVZ4fOZrfgR.pgp
Description: PGP signature
mehow retained after the removal. Then you can get a fully
working package while fixing only one bug.
Searching through mailing list archives with automatted removal mails
would be my hack, what would be yours?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
heir turnout rates, that'd be great.
> Apart from that, I like the entire project, and am curious about its
> results.
+1
It has come up several times that getting usage statistics would
motivate developers.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 12:48 Wed 24 Aug 2011, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 08/24/11 12:31, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On 18:16 Tue 23 Aug 2011, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> >> there is one important aspect of your program that really needs to be
> >> documented (
e'd find a way).)
Sorry, but NO. If you want you can make a big noise message that asks
users to install the cron-job but opt-out is not an option here.
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
welcome Pawel's tools and will shamelessly immitate it's best
features.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
so I wrote tatt. I
assume that at some point people will find tatt too complicated and
write yaatt (yet another ... ). In principle, this is what Pawel is
doing. I think an ecosystem of different arch testing tools is really
useful.
Let's have a page in our docs where everybody can expla
iners do
> > not get to choose "no one has asked for it and no one in the tree is
> > using it thus my ebuild isnt going to". -mike
>
> Where is that policy? AFAIK the policy was to 'follow upstream'
Really? For scientific libraries this means 'static onl
in this case all
the bugs need to be considered and we don't stable version 6, 7, ... in
a timely manner.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
ing they'll remove the
version number too. They'll push the security fixes (and just whatever
they think enhances your browsing experience) directly to your computer.
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Hi,
upstream looks dead and there's a security bug open
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381115
This package can be repaced by gksu or kdesu. Two
rdeps are net-misc/wicd, which I'm maintining and
app-portage/portato which I bugged.
# Thomas Kahle (25 Sep 2011)
# Masked for
oduced, thank you. I
> always had sys-apps/hal and sys-apps/dbus in /etc/portage/package.mask
> and my system continued to work just fine, thank you. Given the great
> HAL fiasco, the fact that HAL has been incorporated into udev is yet one
> more reason for dropping udev .
https://
On 19:54 Tue 13 Dec 2011, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> # Ulrich Mueller (13 Dec 2011)
> # SLOTs 21 and 22 of app-editors/emacs, corresponding to
> # GNU Emacs versions 21.4 and 22.3. These versions were
> # released in February 2005 and September 2008, respectively.
> # Please upgrade to app-editors/em
Hi,
I suggest that emerge could signal its various failures via return
codes. That would be useful in automated archtesting:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=400705
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 21:04 Wed 25 Jan 2012, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote:
> On 1/25/12 10:23 AM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> > I suggest that emerge could signal its various failures via return
> > codes. That would be useful in automated archtesting:
> >
> > https://bugs.gentoo.org/s
esting), and is a
> lack of time checking manually what is the list of stable packages.
Can be done easily with some eix scripting. app-portage/tatt has this
implemented too.
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
cted and most TLS
> implementations).
This is spreading FUD.
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Given our games maintenance rules this seems wrong. Shouldn't games
bugs be wrangled based on metadata like other bugs?
I understand that changing this behaviour would create a lot of useless
bugwrangling work... so maybe there is a different solution?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http:/
rocess that is able to start
pinentry-curses and type the passphrase. Keychain is one option
for that. git --signed is not.
The only thing that is diffent from your setup is that I use zsh.
Looking at the scripts created by keychain this should be fine,
though.
If somebody knows how to configure pinentry curses correctly (in
particular with respect to screen/multiplexing and long running
sessions, that would be a great help (and wiki addition).
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
80 matches
Mail list logo
