On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:08:36 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Benedikt
Sorry for my long response times.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
i thought about this, but i'd really like to see things like
qmail-spp and the gentoo qmail
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:20:43PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
Well, i think the unpack stuff could be handled in the ebuild, but i'd
still like to keep dospp, so ebuilds like vpopmail can install
spp-plugins in a standardized way..
dospp is fine. Well, maybe rename it to doqmail-spp to make
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 14:23:52 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 01:20:43PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
- I don't like the custom tarball. How do you want to build and
redistribute it without depending on a single person? Its
sources need to
On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 04:51:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
Yep. Maybe it is also a good idea to make a stand-alone ebuild for the
qmail-spp plugins in the tarball i have collected, cleaned up and
tested so far, so we do not need to handle that in the qmail ebuilds..?
That's a great idea.
Hello Benedikt
Sorry for my long response times.
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 09:58:17PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
i thought about this, but i'd really like to see things like qmail-spp
and the gentoo qmail tarball be handled by the eclass, on the other
hand i agree that unpacking netqmail or
On Fri, 27 Jul 2007 13:08:36 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- If I remember correctly, elog shouldn't be used for empty lines like
in qmail_supervise_config_notice. Use echo instead for them.
You remember incorrectly (though I don't think I ever said anything
about it).
On Mon, 23 Jul 2007 21:55:16 +0200
Benedikt Boehm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:17:46 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
qmail_base_install should be split in smaller functions, maybe
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 23:17:46 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
qmail_base_install should be split in smaller functions, maybe
with callbacks (if possible in bash).
There is now qmail_mini_install (called by
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:52:02 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Benedikt
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can
be reused by other qmail variants as well.
Okay, I looked
Hello Benedikt
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can be
reused by other qmail variants as well.
Okay, I looked through it and found some things which need
reconsideration. I agree that user creation
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:52:02 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Benedikt
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can
be reused by other qmail variants as well.
Okay, I looked
On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 10:05:23PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
qmail_base_install should be split in smaller functions, maybe with
callbacks (if possible in bash).
There is now qmail_mini_install (called by every qmail ebuild) and
qmail_{full,man,sendmail}_install for the rest of a full
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:07:28AM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
As it seems, you do not have the time and/or interest to cleanup the
qmail mess, but don't want anyone to touch (net)qmail ebuilds either, i
have put the updated ebuilds for qmail and friends into my overlay. [1]
You interpret
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:19:08 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 15, 2007 at 03:07:28AM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
As it seems, you do not have the time and/or interest to cleanup the
qmail mess, but don't want anyone to touch (net)qmail ebuilds
either, i have
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 05:37:16PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
We are all required to subscribe to this mailing list... Should be easy
enough to spot the thread.
You know, sometimes I get tired of all the flames and pointless
discussions and mark all mails as read. If something should be read by
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:05:51PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
Actually i am qmail maintainer and also been in the qmail herd for
quite some time...
No, actually you're in the qmail herd and maintainer of the
net-mail/qmail-ldap package. This doesn't make you a netqmail (the
package I care
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it currently.
Okay, my status there was outdated. We were at least discussing it at
some point in history.
And as the netqmail ebuild maintainer, I want the ebuild to be
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 11:22:47AM -0400, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the
maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me.
Erm? This was completely uncalled for, I'd say?!
To Jakub: It was. Sending such things to a public list is
On Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:02:00 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
qmail-ldap will not be removed for sure, since i maintain it
currently.
Okay, my status there was outdated. We were at least discussing it at
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
due to massive code duplication in netqmail, qmail-ldap, qmail-mysql,
mini-qmail and other 3-rd party applications for qmail i have started
to move functionality into a first qmail.eclass draft.
I already proposed moving the prime
Michael Hanselmann napsal(a):
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
due to massive code duplication in netqmail, qmail-ldap, qmail-mysql,
mini-qmail and other 3-rd party applications for qmail i have started
to move functionality into a first qmail.eclass draft.
And
Michael Hanselmann kirjoitti:
It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the
maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me.
We are all required to subscribe to this mailing list... Should be easy
enough to spot the thread.
Regards,
Petteri
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:53 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Michael Hanselmann napsal(a):
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
It seems like you aren't interested in communication with the
maintainer, otherwise you would've CC'ed me.
Erm? This was completely uncalled
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 14:34:26 +0200
Michael Hanselmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
due to massive code duplication in netqmail, qmail-ldap,
qmail-mysql, mini-qmail and other 3-rd party applications for qmail
i have started to move
On Fri, 13 Jul 2007 11:22:47 -0400
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 14:53 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Michael Hanselmann napsal(a):
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
It seems like you aren't interested in communication with
25 matches
Mail list logo
