On Sunday 10 May 2009 04:23:25 Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
1. It was a paludis bug, of course paludis --info came in handy (are
you trying to jest? ;p)
It's most likely not a Paludis bug; do you really think that no-one's ever
tried to compile Qt4 on amd64 with Paludis until now? I'm guessing a
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 11:22:12PM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Hi folks,
--info' is asked for in a bug report, post *that*. There are many
examples of what should be included out here, so if you can't or won't
use emerge, then you'll have to copy the information manually.
Remarking that
On Sun, May 10, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Thomas Anderson gentoofa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Folks, I'd like to direct your attention to bug #269067. In this case,
had the bugwrangler(yngwin) asked for paludis --info the bug could have
been RESO INVALID without it getting to me. I wouldn't have wasted ~30
В Срд, 08/04/2009 в 16:36 +0200, Jeroen Roovers пишет:
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:11:02 +0400
Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote:
В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 22:41 +0200, Timothy Redaelli пишет:
i think it's better to develop an emerge --info package
It already exists. But regretfully it does not
Just an idea without knowing all the details:
Could
- --emerge-info and --emerge-info-verbose
options be added to paludis or
- a converter script be written to convert
paludis output to feel like emerge output
to solves this issue? Would that technically
be possible? Is paludis
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:21:37 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
Just an idea without knowing all the details:
Could
- --emerge-info and --emerge-info-verbose
options be added to paludis or
- a converter script be written to convert
paludis output to feel like
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Taking any of it out would be
removing things that are required to determine the cause of a bug.
I doubt that's true in most cases: The information needed to
finding the bug is a (possibly small) subset of the whole.
I don't see how additionally providing a stripped
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 23:50:07 +0200
Sebastian Pipping webmas...@hartwork.org wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Taking any of it out would be
removing things that are required to determine the cause of a bug.
I doubt that's true in most cases: The information needed to
finding the bug is a
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
This isn't a usability request. Making the use paludis --info cat/pkg
text stand out more was a usability request, and I was happy to make
that change. This is a few noxious trolls whining in an attempt to cause
trouble.
For those who have concerns with the paludis
On Mon, 06 Apr 2009 12:11:02 +0400
Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org wrote:
В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 22:41 +0200, Timothy Redaelli пишет:
i think it's better to develop an emerge --info package
It already exists. But regretfully it does not provide useful output
even about the package's USE flags
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Volkov wrote:
В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 22:41 +0200, Timothy Redaelli пишет:
i think it's better to develop an emerge --info package
It already exists. But regretfully it does not provide useful output
even about the package's USE flags so I
В Вск, 05/04/2009 в 22:41 +0200, Timothy Redaelli пишет:
i think it's better to develop an emerge --info package
It already exists. But regretfully it does not provide useful output
even about the package's USE flags so I suspect it was implemented for
different purposes.
--
Peter.
On Monday 06 April 2009 05:29:01 Andrew D Kirch wrote:
cut
I think it's best as a general rule to NEVER _EVER_ under any
circumstances emulate paludis.
I think that everyone may have a good idea, also Microsoft (TM).
I only take the idea. I don't care about who has it ;)
I think that it's better
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
I reject the premise that war should always be prevented. I am however
concerned that criticism where criticism is due is flame baiting.
The original post did not contain any constructive criticism of paludis
at all. It simply stated that under no circumstances should
On Saturday 04 April 2009 18:12:09 Thilo Bangert wrote:
'guess'. Like how you have to guess what use flags are really being
used for the package in question, because it doesn't tell you?
i'd like to ask the developers of package managers to standardize this.
having packagmanager --info be
Timothy Redaelli wrote:
On Saturday 04 April 2009 18:12:09 Thilo Bangert wrote:
'guess'. Like how you have to guess what use flags are really being
used for the package in question, because it doesn't tell you?
i'd like to ask the developers of package managers to standardize this.
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
I think it's best as a general rule to NEVER _EVER_ under any
circumstances emulate paludis.
While I'm not personally a fan of paludis, it doesn't help anyone to post crap
like that to any mailing list. Please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
--
Andrew Gaffney
Andrew Gaffney wrote:
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
I think it's best as a general rule to NEVER _EVER_ under any
circumstances emulate paludis.
While I'm not personally a fan of paludis, it doesn't help anyone to post crap
like that to any mailing list. Please take it elsewhere. Thanks.
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote:
Why is it inappropriate to discuss the poor UI, and implementation of
software we use especially in open source? Maybe if we're closed to
valid argument against poor methodology we can fail like everyone else
who
Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Andrew D Kirch trel...@trelane.net wrote:
Why is it inappropriate to discuss the poor UI, and implementation of
software we use especially in open source? Maybe if we're closed to
valid argument against poor methodology we can fail
Paludis --info does not work for me. Plz2fix.
In particular, have a look at
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=262277#c4
Where both emerge --info and paludis --info is posted. Sometimes, more
is less.
While it may be useful to post all the information about the
package-manager for *you*,
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009 15:17:30 +0200
Peter Alfredsen loki_...@gentoo.org wrote:
While it may be useful to post all the information about the
package-manager for *you*, it's not helping us (bug-wranglers) any. We
need one screenfull of text that concisely shows us the state of your
system.
There
'guess'. Like how you have to guess what use flags are really being
used for the package in question, because it doesn't tell you?
i'd like to ask the developers of package managers to standardize this.
having packagmanager --info be the same no matter who you like best is
incredibly usefull.
Thilo Bangert bang...@gentoo.org wrote:
'guess'. Like how you have to guess what use flags are really being
used for the package in question, because it doesn't tell you?
i'd like to ask the developers of package managers to standardize this.
having packagmanager --info be the same no
On Wednesday 18 of February 2009 23:22:12 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
In short, `paludis --info' is not a replacement, and when `emerge
--info' is asked for in a bug report, post *that*.
Hi Jeroen.
If you ask me to post a emerge --info you will get very, but very outdated
info. Not much useful. Keep
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:35:00 +0100
Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wednesday 18 of February 2009 23:22:12 Jeroen Roovers wrote:
In short, `paludis --info' is not a replacement, and when `emerge
--info' is asked for in a bug report, post *that*.
Hi Jeroen.
If you ask me to post
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:22:12 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Paludis users often seem to think that `paludis --info' and `emerge
--info' are interchangeable, whereas a quick inspection reveals to
even the most casual user that the former only intends to inform about
paludis' own
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:55:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
...which is why you ask for 'paludis --info pkg', not 'paludis
--info'.
Spread the word!
jer
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:55:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
Heck, Paludis even tells you this if you run --info without a spec:
No packages were specified on the command line, so detailed
information is not available (Paludis can display detailed
information
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:03:24 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:55:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
...which is why you ask for 'paludis --info pkg', not 'paludis
--info'.
Spread the word!
On Wed, 2009-02-18 at 23:24 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:03:24 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 22:55:06 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
...which is why you ask for 'paludis --info pkg', not 'paludis
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:39:28 +0100
Stelian Ionescu stelian.ionescu-z...@poste.it wrote:
could the output of paludis --info be made a little less verbose by
eliminating repository information - perhaps except then one
containing the package's ebuild
That's useful information, so no.
and info
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:24:25 +
Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://git.pioto.org/gitweb/paludis.git?a=commitdiff;h=86dc61e
Thanks. I hope it helps.
jer
33 matches
Mail list logo
