to map each binpkg into the url space
for it.
~harring
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote:
On 02/14/2010 04:36 AM, Brian Harring wrote:
This gets nasty... you're basically talking about the rpm equivalent
of EPOCH.
Not a fan of an adhoc UUID (especially since it'll become standard
via portage doing it), but a *timestamp*
-[2.1.6.11]
Quick work around that should be safe would be to
tr '[,]' ' , ' |awk '{print $3-$4}'
It is expected however that -q vs no -q will result in the atoms being
at the same index.
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 13:18 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
On Thu, 2009-05-07 at 10:00 +0300, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi.
Seems like --columns depends on -q to work:
amit0 ~ # emerge -p --color=n --columns -O -q portage
R
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 12:55 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 16 April 2009 19:05:46 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 10:50 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
There is also
On Thu, 2009-03-26 at 08:26 +0100, Markus Duft wrote:
On Wed, 2009-03-25 at 11:44 -0700, Ned Ludd wrote:
[snip]
While much of what you are talking about here mainly applies to prefix,
it looks to me from glancing over the code that you might of solved a
long standing problem
problem in the embedded world with cross compiling via
portage. 222895 If that is the case, then I owe you a beer. one about
the size of a keg.
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 19:45 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 18:49:04 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all
On Tue, 2009-03-17 at 13:27 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 17 March 2009 12:59:58 Ned Ludd wrote:
There is also a bug with atom parsing iirc on 32bit platforms. gradm was
the test case. Think we need to change from int to long.
the code is documented as having 64bit limitations
not if you are hitting it.
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-projects/portage-utils/libq/vdb_get_next_dir.c?r1=1.2r2=1.3
--
Ned Ludd so...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 17:05 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 16 March 2009 14:35:15 Ned Ludd wrote:
On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 18:34 +0200, Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
Hi all.
While working on my overlay, I stumbled on an issue where qfile refused
to acknowledge an installed file
that FEATURES='strict' is enabled per default in all
profiles. It's rather vital that things remain the way they are now.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
time for me to leave the Gentoo train.
Marius
I will always remember you as the guy who provided us with the much
needed glsa*.py (thank you again)
Take care and I wish you the best in all your future endeavors.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 15:12 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 05:23:45 -0700
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 13:01 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote:
So, what do people think about removing (some) of the special
treatment for the system and world targets
shouldnt be ignoring these sort of problems, we
should be fixing them
Seems a forced ignore would fix them. (problem solved! next bug..)
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
+FI7IQsoQCg8o6M
UW+dnXPwMe/tIje1A4RYqRs=
=9uIv
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
This should of been sent to this list also.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
---BeginMessage---
Portage-2.1 final is released,
RELEASE-NOTES[1]
NEWS[2]
BUGS-FIXED[3]
STABLIZING BUG[4]
[1]http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES?view=markup
[2]http
and they are
all tagged with the names of the portage-rpm-*.patch
http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/patch_overlay/sys-apps/portage/
You may find some of those patches inspirational to your work.
good luck.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
Marius
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
of shape in 2.1_NXX and can't really be used. Till that's
addressed 2.1(re-ping jason) in my eyes absolutely should
not even be considered for any rc status.
Other than that I'm quite pleased with many aspects of 2.1
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 14:19 -0400, solar wrote:
On Fri, 2006-04-07 at 21:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 07 April 2006 20:54, Ned Ludd wrote:
Handling of the || () in ROOT!=/ via the -K option is not in that
good of shape in 2.1_NXX and can't really be used. Till that's
and then run:
#qlist portage
btw that would be qlist -e portage.
Without the -e portage* would be matched and
thus portage-utils itself would be in the output.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
complete patch for this already. If he has not
committed it already I'm sure he will soon.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
:
QA_OVERRIDE=EXECSTACK=...
x86? ( TEXTRELS=... )
/me hates that also.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
issues on x86:
QA_EXEC_STACK_x86=some/foo
this thread was about the naming convention :P
does QA_EXEC_STACK and QA_TEXTRELS work for people ?
-mike
I'd prefer EXECSTACK as one word to follow suit with ld, but otherwise
works for me.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo
On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 23:06 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Okay, new suggestion.
Postpone the cache rewrite from above. Have only the minimal mods necessary
to
fix the PORT_LOGDIR/tee bug. Include the other two as is. That would be
2.0.54 as per the attached patch. Get that out soon and get
no grabfile.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 13:15 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2005 02:05, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:51 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2005 00:31, Ned Ludd wrote:
* post_sync action hook (.53/.54 )
* VDB prevention of single byte
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:51 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 26 November 2005 00:31, Ned Ludd wrote:
On Sat, 2005-11-26 at 00:01 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Hi all,
I don't think there's really anything else that can be done for 2.0.53 so
am thinking that we should probably
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 21:00 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:05:57 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Programs such as revdep-rebuild, verify-rdepend would be able to make
| immediate use. A little bit of a longer term goal is to see portage
| gain the ability
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 22:02 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:41:19 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 21:00 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| How will that work for packages that have a runtime dependency upon
| a text file supplied
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:10 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 17:49:50 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Yeah that's what we want, We intend to create tools that leave systems
| broken. You want to be the first tester? Please take your spin of
| things off
On Fri, 2005-11-25 at 23:53 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 18:48:41 -0500 Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What the hell are you talking about? No tools have even been
| created yet. Nobody builds tools before the framework is in place. The
| ability to make use
I'm not ready to focus on --deps= right away. As stated
it's a longer term goal and I would also prefer to discuss it at a later
time.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
.
Peter anything I'm forgetting to mention about this?
You have to subscribe to the mailing list to reply.
--
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
37 matches
Mail list logo
