Hi
I'm trying to finish an emerge world and I'm stumbling on getting opal to
compile so it can continue.
I'm running on an AMD proc with i686 arch in my make.conf file. So, the no
such instruction error message is baffleing.
It seems to die with slightly different instruction errors each
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 12. Dezember 2007 schrieb Grant:
I've noticed when adding this kind of a user in the past they are able to
look at files all around the system that I'd prefer they can't.
Why? System directories look nearly the same on any
On Thursday 13 December 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setup:
Home Lan with principle desktop machine running Gentoo.
Three other machines running WinXP that are a trio of video and sound
editing machines. And finally my wifes WinXP machine in antoher room.
All connected by Gigabit lan thru
I don't know, now that I've set up shorewall on my router it seems
like a simple matter to set it up on another machine. I should only
need to edit a few config files with very light additions.
- Grant
Understand - to be honest I have moved to shorewall on almost all my
machines for
I'd like to create a really restricted user on my laptop. I don't
want the user to be able to do much of anything but browse the web,
use skype, and maybe look at photos on a CD or something. I did this:
useradd -m -G users,audio,cdrom -s /sbin/nologin newuser
How does that look? I've
Grant написа:
I'd like to create a really restricted user on my laptop. I don't
want the user to be able to do much of anything but browse the web,
use skype, and maybe look at photos on a CD or something. I did this:
useradd -m -G users,audio,cdrom -s /sbin/nologin newuser
How does that
Hello,
I use the gentoo kernel series for my production systems.
On my gaming system, I have a 2.6.22-gentoo-r8 kernel
that works very well for gaming (bzflag). It an amd64
with 2 gig of ram.
I've tried to build a 2.6.23-getnoo-r3 kernel for gaming
and it performs very poorly with no other
I don't know, now that I've set up shorewall on my router it seems
like a simple matter to set it up on another machine. I should only
need to edit a few config files with very light additions.
- Grant
Understand - to be honest I have moved to shorewall on almost all my
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, James wrote:
# CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY is not set
betwen 2.6.22 and 2.6.23 the new scheduler was introduced. Most people (like
me) have had positive results related to gaming. But maybe bzflag is stupidly
coded?
Nonetheless you should try 'voluntary'
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setup:
Home Lan with principle desktop machine running Gentoo.
Three other machines running WinXP that are a trio of video and sound
editing machines. And finally my wifes WinXP machine in antoher room.
All connected by Gigabit lan thru a netgear FVP318
CONFIG_HZ_100=y
# CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
CONFIG_HZ=100
Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second.
This means that the CPU doesn't have to spend as much time switching
between processes. However it also means
071214 Shawn Haggett wrote:
CONFIG_HZ_100=y
# CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
CONFIG_HZ=100
Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second.
ie the CPU doesn't have to spend as much time switching between processes,
but
Philip Webb wrote:
I don't play games, but I've long had my desktop box using HZ_1000
it has always been very responsive (now Intel Core 2 Duo, 2.6.23-r3).
That's certainly the first thing to try.
I use 100 Hz on an old P3 desktop/server. It's not a high traffic
server, but it does my
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Philip Webb wrote:
071214 Shawn Haggett wrote:
CONFIG_HZ_100=y
# CONFIG_HZ_250 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_300 is not set
# CONFIG_HZ_1000 is not set
CONFIG_HZ=100
Smaller numbers here actually mean less clock interrupts per second.
ie the CPU doesn't
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:50:58 -0500
Billy Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also look for entries where is says eth0 has entered promiscuous
mode
- that's a sure fire sign you've been hacked.. unless you're running
a virtual machine with a bridge, or your own packet sniffer/traffic
monitor
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007 10:44:35 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm going
to try 2006.1 and Knoppix.
- Grant
You don't use minimals, grant? I'm surprised. I would never put a
liveCD in a computer if I could avoid it, myself.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
I'm going
to try 2006.1 and Knoppix.
- Grant
You don't use minimals, grant? I'm surprised. I would never put a
liveCD in a computer if I could avoid it, myself.
What do you mean?
- Grant
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Sat, 08 Dec 2007 15:51:31 +0100
Norman Rieß [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Relson schrieb:
Hello Norman,
I, too, have one of their controllers (identified by lspci as RAID
bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. PCI0680 Ultra ATA-133 Host
Controller (rev 02). It works ... kind of
On Tue, 11 Dec 2007 08:22:45 +
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Given that systems like e.g. Ubuntu server do not even have a
firewall running would make you think so. The fact that while on the
road you only stay connected for short periods of time would improve
your chances too. However,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 15:58:02 -0800
Grant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't know, now that I've set up shorewall on my router it seems
like a simple matter to set it up on another machine. I should only
need to edit a few config files with very light additions.
- Grant
Either way you go, I
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 00:16:10 -0300
Norberto Bensa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
I'm sorry for this very off-topic post but my MSI-P965 Platinum have
wreck it's first PCI-e slot and so did my NVidia 7900GS (I don't
know which one died first but I'm pretty sure both are dead)
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is Anticipatory. What is the
newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
Regards,
Jason Carson
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Thursday 13 December 2007, Dan Farrell wrote:
On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:50:58 -0500
Billy Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
also look for entries where is says eth0 has entered promiscuous
mode
- that's a sure fire sign you've been hacked.. unless you're running
a virtual machine with a
On Dec 13, 2007 3:27 PM, Jason Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Greetings,
Where in the kernel config (make menuconfig) do I find the choice for
schedulers. The one I am currently using is Anticipatory. What is the
newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
Regards,
Jason Carson
--
[EMAIL
071213 Jason Carson wrote:
Where in 'make menuconfig' do I find the choice for schedulers.
The one I am currently using is Anticipatory.
What is the newest and latest scheduler for 2.6.23?
Try '/sched', which will get you started lead you to
'Enable block layer - IO Schedulers - whatever you
I'm trying to get my Broadcom 4311 b/g card to work with the native
kernel driver (bcm43xx) and b43-fwcutter but it's does not work. I
placed the extracted firmware code in /lib/firmware and dmesg states
that it failed to load the module. Has anyone gotten this card to work
and how? Any link
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
which scheduler is better for a server. Should I stay with
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
which
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am using an IDE disk so
which scheduler is better for a server.
On Dec 13, 2007 3:57 PM, Jason Carson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which says...
The article is very old, take a look at this, newer one:
http://www.redhat.com/magazine/008jun05/features/schedulers/
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 13:09 -0600, Dan Farrell wrote:
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 13:41:06 -0500
I don't run iptables on my laptops. Instead, I choose to run only a
few secure services and then proceed to not worry about it.
hmmm - another target.
Firewalls can be viewed as a waste of time on
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server, not a desktop system but am
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for desktop systems
and IDE disks
... I have a server,
On Freitag, 14. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Donnerstag, 13. Dezember 2007, Joshua Doll wrote:
Jason Carson wrote:
I was reading this article (http://lwn.net/Articles/114770/) which
says...
AS (Anticipatory Scheduler) still seems to be better for
I am presently having problems compiling suspend2 kernel 2.6.22.
It compiles with genkernel, but if I try to use make and customise a special
kernel, it will not find my hard drive. The error message reports that the
ide-cdrom on hda is the only drive present.
The computer is a Toshiba
Hemmann, Volker Armin volker.armin.hemmann at tu-clausthal.de writes:
I have the best results with 300Hz. With 1000Hz the kernel wastes to much
time
context switching. Compiling is slower, gaming FPS lower ...
OK, I have read all that was posted and I'm experimenting with new kernels.
On 13 Dec 2007, at 20:53, Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote:
I'm trying to get my Broadcom 4311 b/g card to work with the native
kernel driver (bcm43xx) and b43-fwcutter but it's does not work. I
placed the extracted firmware code in /lib/firmware and dmesg
states that it failed to load
On Thu, 13 Dec 2007, Jeff Cranmer wrote:
I am presently having problems compiling suspend2 kernel 2.6.22.
It compiles with genkernel, but if I try to use make and customise a special
kernel, it will not find my hard drive. The error message reports that the
ide-cdrom on hda is the only
Mick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would I likely be opening my lan up for some christmas shopping by
having a gentoo guest on a WinXP host running as a DMZ machine?
It would be pretty barebones with a IPTABLE setup for logging and
tagging or whatever I get interested in doing with the traffic.
39 matches
Mail list logo
