J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 7 February 2015 17:25:22 CET, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
A little update on this drive for those interested. I get this now.
root@fireball / # smartctl --all /dev/sdd smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26
r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.16.3-gentoo] (local build) Copyright (C)
2002-14,
Dale wrote:
Howdy,
This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I been
using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it seems
to have issues once again.
A little update on this drive for those interested. I get this now.
root@fireball / # smartctl
On 7 February 2015 17:25:22 CET, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Dale wrote:
Howdy,
This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I
been
using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it
seems
to have issues once again.
A little update on this drive
It would be far better to use Spinrite (like I mentioned before) - to allow
a really low level access to the drive. While Spinrite is running the HDD
will not be able to automatically relocate sectors. I've been blown away
how effective this piece of software is - even when run with (apparently)
On Saturday 24 Jan 2015 18:18:36 Dale wrote:
Since I already replaced this drive, nothing lost. We did learn
something tho. Just because it claims to have fixed itself doesn't mean
it will be a long term solution. ;-)
Dale
:-) :-)
Your repeated dd action probably relocated some bad
Bob Wya wrote:
It would be far better to use Spinrite (like I mentioned before) - to
allow a really low level access to the drive. While Spinrite is
running the HDD will not be able to automatically relocate sectors.
I've been blown away how effective this piece of software is - even
when run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mick wrote:
On Saturday 24 Jan 2015 18:18:36 Dale wrote:
Since I already replaced this drive, nothing lost. We did learn
something tho. Just because it claims to have fixed itself doesn't mean
it will be a long term solution. ;-)
Dale
:-)
Nils Holland wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:29:53AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, I have dd'd the thing a few times and ran the tests again, it
still gives errors. What's odd, they seem to move around. Is there a
bug crawling around in my drive?? lol
# 1 Extended offlineCompleted:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 11:29:53AM -0600, Dale wrote:
Well, I have dd'd the thing a few times and ran the tests again, it
still gives errors. What's odd, they seem to move around. Is there a
bug crawling around in my drive?? lol
# 1 Extended offlineCompleted: read failure 40%
Dale wrote:
Howdy,
This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I been
using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it seems
to have issues once again.
SNIP
Since this is the 2nd time for this specific drive, thoughts?
By the way, I'm doing a dd
Dale,
As a double check I always like to test failing drives with Spinrite:
https://www.grc.com/sr/spinrite.htm
If that software can't recover/access any bits of the drive - it's pretty
much a toaster in my book!
Robert
On 20 January 2015 at 17:58, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Howdy,
Howdy,
This is concerning a hard drive I had issues with a while back. I been
using it to do backups with as a test if nothing else. Anyway, it seems
to have issues once again.
root@fireball / # smartctl -l selftest /dev/sdd
smartctl 6.3 2014-07-26 r3976 [x86_64-linux-3.16.3-gentoo] (local
On 01/20/2015 09:58 AM, Dale wrote:
1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate 0x000f 116 099 006Pre-fail
Always - 114620384
5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 053 051 036Pre-fail
Always - 62752
197 Current_Pending_Sector 0x0012 088 088 000Old_age
13 matches
Mail list logo
