On Wednesday, 6 December 2023 18:47:43 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> On 06/12/2023 14:56, Peter Humphreey wrote:
> > The idea is that you may want to install another system later, which may
> > want to install its own code in /efi. By all means shrink it if you think
> > that's unlikely and you need the
On Thursday, 7 December 2023 11:45:20 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 December 2023 18:47:43 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> > On 06/12/2023 14:56, Peter Humphreey wrote:
> > > The idea is that you may want to install another system later, which may
> > > want to install its own code in /efi.
On Wednesday, 6 December 2023 18:47:43 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> On 06/12/2023 14:56, Peter Humphreey wrote:
> > The idea is that you may want to install another system later, which may
> > want to install its own code in /efi. By all means shrink it if you think
> > that's unlikely and you need the
On 06/12/2023 14:56, Peter Humphreey wrote:
The idea is that you may want to install another system later, which may want
to install its own code in /efi. By all means shrink it if you think that's
unlikely and you need the space. Gparted on SysRescCD is ideal for this.
I had the opposite
On Wednesday, 6 December 2023 14:27:21 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 12/6/23 04:31, Michael wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 23:53:23 GMT Peter Humphreey wrote:
> >> On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 19:35:11 GMT Michael wrote:
> >>> Your boot partition is /dev/nvme0n1p1 and its
On 12/6/23 04:31, Michael wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 23:53:23 GMT Peter Humphreey wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 19:35:11 GMT Michael wrote:
Your boot partition is /dev/nvme0n1p1 and its mountpoint is /boot. You
must create this partition with the appropriate EFI System type (in
On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 23:53:23 GMT Peter Humphreey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 19:35:11 GMT Michael wrote:
> > Your boot partition is /dev/nvme0n1p1 and its mountpoint is /boot. You
> > must create this partition with the appropriate EFI System type (in gdisk
> > use EF00).
> >
>
On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 19:35:11 GMT Michael wrote:
> Your boot partition is /dev/nvme0n1p1 and its mountpoint is /boot. You must
> create this partition with the appropriate EFI System type (in gdisk use
> EF00).
>
> The /efi directory must be at the top of the /boot partition filesystem,
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2023, 21:07:00 CET schrieb the...@sys-concept.com:
> On 12/5/23 12:35, Michael wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 18:11:14 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> >> On 12/5/23 10:16, Cara Salter wrote:
> >>> On 12/5/23 12:05, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> It has
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2023, 20:35:11 CET schrieb Michael:
> On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 18:11:14 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > On 12/5/23 10:16, Cara Salter wrote:
> > > On 12/5/23 12:05, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > >> It has been some time since I installed Gentoo.
> > >> After
On 12/5/23 12:35, Michael wrote:
On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 18:11:14 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
On 12/5/23 10:16, Cara Salter wrote:
On 12/5/23 12:05, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
It has been some time since I installed Gentoo.
After partitioning, and installing the system after
On Tuesday, 5 December 2023 18:11:14 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 12/5/23 10:16, Cara Salter wrote:
> > On 12/5/23 12:05, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> >> It has been some time since I installed Gentoo.
> >> After partitioning, and installing the system after reboot I get kernel
> >>
On 12/5/23 11:11, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
On 12/5/23 10:16, Cara Salter wrote:
On 12/5/23 12:05, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
It has been some time since I installed Gentoo.
After partitioning, and installing the system after reboot I get kernel
selection from grub and hitting enter,
I
On 12/5/23 10:16, Cara Salter wrote:
On 12/5/23 12:05, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
It has been some time since I installed Gentoo.
After partitioning, and installing the system after reboot I get kernel
selection from grub and hitting enter,
I don't see any text scrolling on the screen, and
Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2023, 18:05:56 CET schrieb the...@sys-concept.com:
> It has been some time since I installed Gentoo.
> After partitioning, and installing the system after reboot I get kernel
> selection from grub and hitting enter, I don't see any text scrolling on
> the screen, and I
On 12/5/23 12:05, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
It has been some time since I installed Gentoo.
After partitioning, and installing the system after reboot I get kernel
selection from grub and hitting enter,
I don't see any text scrolling on the screen, and I don't see the login
screen.
I
On Monday, 18 January 2021 07:44:33 GMT bobwxc wrote:
> > I think that might have been the case, I run emerge second time and it
> > compiled just fine. Maybe I will switch to "rust-bin", thanks for
> > suggestion. Why do we need it, is it part of "system-bootstrap"?
> Rust is a computer
在 2021/1/18 上午1:48, the...@sys-concept.com 写道:
On 1/17/21 4:18 AM, Michael wrote:
On Sunday, 17 January 2021 11:04:17 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2021 20:59:17 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
Reinstalling Gentoo on one box (I wiped the root partition, so it is a
clean
On 1/17/21 4:18 AM, Michael wrote:
> On Sunday, 17 January 2021 11:04:17 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 16 January 2021 20:59:17 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> Reinstalling Gentoo on one box (I wiped the root partition, so it is a
>>> clean install) and I'm getting this error
>>
在 2021/1/17 下午7:18, Michael 写道:
On Sunday, 17 January 2021 11:04:17 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 16 January 2021 20:59:17 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
Reinstalling Gentoo on one box (I wiped the root partition, so it is a
clean install) and I'm getting this error
--->8
Have
On Sunday, 17 January 2021 11:04:17 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday, 16 January 2021 20:59:17 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > Reinstalling Gentoo on one box (I wiped the root partition, so it is a
> > clean install) and I'm getting this error
>
> --->8
>
> Have you thought of using
On Saturday, 16 January 2021 20:59:17 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Reinstalling Gentoo on one box (I wiped the root partition, so it is a clean
> install) and I'm getting this error
--->8
Have you thought of using rust-bin instead of rust? "emerge -1 rust-bin" It
saves prodigious amounts
Hi Dale,
lets have a break. I lose the thread and driving nearer the ditch than
the track. I think the main things were said. All following would only
drift away.
Sorry for the noise.
--
floyd
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Floyd Anderson wrote:
>> That’s why Gentoo is often regarded as the freedom of choice.
> This includes the freedom to shoot yourself in the foot.
>
> I suggest that new users consider going with the defaults except when
> they
Floyd Anderson wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Feb 05:05:56 -0600
> Dale wrote:
>> The point of my post was not for a specific flag. I just picked a
>> flag that has been around for a long time and pretty much everyone
>> recognizes what it is for.
>>
>> […]
>>
>> I might add, there
On Sun, 05 Feb 12:00:15 -0500
Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Floyd Anderson wrote:
That’s why Gentoo is often regarded as the freedom of choice.
This includes the freedom to shoot yourself in the foot.
He, nice allegory. Oh, and yes
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 12:07:10 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> I'll be honest and admit that I probably should give my own USE flags
> another look. Most of them probably pre-date the existance of USE
> defaults when a lot more tweaking tended to be needed to get things
> working right.
I recently
On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 09:53:42 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Thank you all, yes good advice. I have removed most of the entries from
> the "USE=" what is left (and I'm not even sure I need them).
>
> USE="-qt4 -kde -gnome -arts -berkdb -acl X gtk alsa cups apache2 ssl
> udev tiff png usb
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:53 AM, wrote:
>
> Thank you all, yes good advice. I have removed most of the entries from
> the "USE=" what is left (and I'm not even sure I need them).
This is a good way to get started. Get your system working, then
start playing with it. At
On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Floyd Anderson wrote:
>
> That’s why Gentoo is often regarded as the freedom of choice.
This includes the freedom to shoot yourself in the foot.
I suggest that new users consider going with the defaults except when
they have a reason not to.
On 02/05/2017 02:23 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Saturday, February 4, 2017 11:36:56 PM CET the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
> (longer reply)
>
>>
>> I change in make.conf to:
>> USE="bindist"
>>
>> and I was able to install basic system correctly, network is working and I
>> can proceed with
On Sun, 05 Feb 05:05:56 -0600
Dale wrote:
The point of my post was not for a specific flag. I just picked a flag
that has been around for a long time and pretty much everyone
recognizes what it is for.
[…]
I might add, there are flags that we can't change. Those are
Floyd Anderson wrote:
> On Sun, 05 Feb 01:44:30 -0600
> Dale wrote:
>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>>
>>> I change in make.conf to:
>>> USE="bindist"
>>>
>>> and I was able to install basic system correctly, network is working
>>> and I can proceed with castomazation but
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 23:36:56 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> my next question: What is the correct way to configure "USE=" in
> make.conf?
>
> When I use a below: (copied from my other systems):
>
> USE="-qt4 -kde -gnome -arts -berkdb -acl X gtk alsa cups apache2 ssl
> foomaticdb truetype
On Sun, 05 Feb 01:44:30 -0600
Dale wrote:
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I change in make.conf to:
USE="bindist"
and I was able to install basic system correctly, network is working and I can
proceed with castomazation but
my next question: What is the correct way to
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 05 Feb 2017 01:44:30 Dale wrote:
>
>> Ask anyone, I'm different on the way I do USE flags, or I feel that
>> way. If I have a flag that I want enabled/disabled on basically
>> everything that uses that flag, it goes in make.conf. If I have a USE
>> flag that I
Mick wrote:
> On Sunday 05 Feb 2017 01:44:30 Dale wrote:
>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> I change in make.conf to:
>>> USE="bindist"
>>>
>>> and I was able to install basic system correctly, network is working and I
>>> can proceed with castomazation but my next question: What is the correct
On Saturday, February 4, 2017 11:28:37 PM CET Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/02/2017 17:56, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 17:32:53 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Modern kernels DO get nervous if they have no swap at all - it's used
> >> internally. So make a small amount of swap to
On Saturday, February 4, 2017 11:36:56 PM CET the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
(longer reply)
>
> I change in make.conf to:
> USE="bindist"
>
> and I was able to install basic system correctly, network is working and I
> can proceed with castomazation but my next question: What is the correct
>
On Sunday 05 Feb 2017 01:44:30 Dale wrote:
> Ask anyone, I'm different on the way I do USE flags, or I feel that
> way. If I have a flag that I want enabled/disabled on basically
> everything that uses that flag, it goes in make.conf. If I have a USE
> flag that I may need for just a few
On Sunday 05 Feb 2017 01:44:30 Dale wrote:
> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> > I change in make.conf to:
> > USE="bindist"
> >
> > and I was able to install basic system correctly, network is working and I
> > can proceed with castomazation but my next question: What is the correct
> > way to
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
> I change in make.conf to:
> USE="bindist"
>
> and I was able to install basic system correctly, network is working and I
> can proceed with castomazation but
> my next question: What is the correct way to configure "USE=" in make.conf?
>
> When I use a below:
On February 5, 2017 7:36:56 AM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>On 02/04/2017 12:20 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On February 4, 2017 7:31:41 PM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com
>wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/04/2017 04:28 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:22:45 -0700,
On 02/04/2017 12:20 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On February 4, 2017 7:31:41 PM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>
>> On 02/04/2017 04:28 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:22:45 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>>
emerge --sync gives me error:
On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 23:28:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 04/02/2017 17:56, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 17:32:53 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> Modern kernels DO get nervous if they have no swap at all - it's used
> >> internally. So make a small amount of swap to make the kernel
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
> You might be correct, I'm reinstalling from fresh today so I'll put SWAP
> back. Question, how much swap should I allocate? Isn't the unwritten
> rule RAM * 2 so 32GB of swap partition? or RAM * 1.5
>
> --
> Thelma
>
>
This is like asking what brand of hard
On 05/02/17 00:12, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>>
>> Size of swap is the classic cargo-cult question,
>
> ++
>
>>
>> Modern kernels DO get nervous if they have no swap at all - it's used
>> internally. So make a small
On 04/02/2017 17:56, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 17:32:53 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> Modern kernels DO get nervous if they have no swap at all - it's used
>> internally. So make a small amount of swap to make the kernel happy, say
>> 64M or so. Yes, megs.
>>
>> And if your
On 04/02/2017 18:12, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
>>
>> Size of swap is the classic cargo-cult question,
>
> ++
>
>>
>> Modern kernels DO get nervous if they have no swap at all - it's used
>> internally. So make a small
On February 4, 2017 7:31:41 PM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>On 02/04/2017 04:28 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:22:45 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>
>>> emerge --sync gives me error:
>>> "/etc/portage/make.conf", line 11: Invalid variable name
>>>
On 02/04/2017 04:28 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:22:45 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> emerge --sync gives me error:
>> "/etc/portage/make.conf", line 11: Invalid variable name
>> '-Wl,--hash-style'
>>
>> Line 11 in make.conf:
>> USE="-qt4 -hal -arts -berkdb -acl X
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 10:32 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> Size of swap is the classic cargo-cult question,
++
>
> Modern kernels DO get nervous if they have no swap at all - it's used
> internally. So make a small amount of swap to make the kernel happy, say
> 64M or
On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 17:32:53 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Modern kernels DO get nervous if they have no swap at all - it's used
> internally. So make a small amount of swap to make the kernel happy, say
> 64M or so. Yes, megs.
>
> And if your machine sleeps to disk you will need swap large enough
On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 08:18:50AM -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote
> Question, how much swap should I allocate? Isn't the unwritten
> rule RAM * 2 so 32GB of swap partition? or RAM * 1.5
As others have pointed out, that's probably too much in today's
scenarios. One minimum... if you ever
On 04/02/2017 17:18, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 02/04/2017 01:20 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>> On February 4, 2017 8:22:45 AM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I've not install Gentoo for some time and
On 02/04/2017 04:28 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:22:45 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>
>> emerge --sync gives me error:
>> "/etc/portage/make.conf", line 11: Invalid variable name
>> '-Wl,--hash-style'
>>
>> Line 11 in make.conf:
>> USE="-qt4 -hal -arts -berkdb -acl X
On Saturday, February 4, 2017 8:18:50 AM CET the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> You might be correct, I'm reinstalling from fresh today so I'll put SWAP
> back. Question, how much swap should I allocate? Isn't the unwritten
> rule RAM * 2 so 32GB of swap partition? or RAM * 1.5
I wouldn't do that
On 02/04/2017 01:20 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On February 4, 2017 8:22:45 AM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
It is Solid State Disk 1TB
On 02/04/2017 01:33 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
[snip]
>> [snip]
>>
>> This is my make.conf
>> # These settings were set by the catalyst build script that
>> automatically
>> # built this stage.
>> # Please consult /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example for a more
>> # detailed example.
>>
>>
Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 10:25:14 Mick wrote:
>> On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 03:43:16 Dale wrote:
>>> J. Roeleveld wrote:
Please sanitize your make.conf file.
I am seeing some lines ending with $.
Not all lines have the closing quotes.
Your global USE flags
On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:22:45 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> emerge --sync gives me error:
> "/etc/portage/make.conf", line 11: Invalid variable name
> '-Wl,--hash-style'
>
> Line 11 in make.conf:
> USE="-qt4 -hal -arts -berkdb -acl X gtk dvd alsa cdr cups apache2 ssl
> foomaticdb truetype
On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 10:25:14 Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 03:43:16 Dale wrote:
> > J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > Please sanitize your make.conf file.
> > > I am seeing some lines ending with $.
> > > Not all lines have the closing quotes.
> > >
> > > Your global USE flags contain some
On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 03:43:16 Dale wrote:
> J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > Please sanitize your make.conf file.
> > I am seeing some lines ending with $.
> > Not all lines have the closing quotes.
> >
> > Your global USE flags contain some that no longer exist (Dale's favourite
> > "hal" being one of
J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> Please sanitize your make.conf file.
> I am seeing some lines ending with $.
> Not all lines have the closing quotes.
>
> Your global USE flags contain some that no longer exist (Dale's favourite
> "hal" being one of them :) )
>
> Also, I have 32GB ram in my desktop and I
>Thelma, you may be too tired or rushing through this exercise to pay
>enough
>attention to important details. Perhaps you need to take a break and
>revisit
>it afresh later?
This is one of the best advise ever :)
Never do an installation when tired or in a hurry.
--
Joost
--
Sent from
On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 01:24:05 the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 02/04/2017 12:48 AM, Dale wrote:
> > the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> >> On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
> >>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
>
>
On February 4, 2017 9:24:05 AM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>On 02/04/2017 12:48 AM, Dale wrote:
>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
>
>
On 02/04/2017 01:20 AM, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On February 4, 2017 8:22:45 AM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
It is Solid State Disk 1TB
On 02/04/2017 12:48 AM, Dale wrote:
> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
It is Solid State Disk 1TB
I'm using Minimal CD (Bootable USB)
On February 4, 2017 8:22:45 AM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
>>>
>>> It is Solid State Disk 1TB
>>> I'm using Minimal CD (Bootable USB)
>>> Created
On Saturday 04 Feb 2017 01:12:43 the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 02/04/2017 12:48 AM, Dale wrote:
> > the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> >> On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
> >>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
>
>
On 02/04/2017 12:48 AM, Dale wrote:
> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
>>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
It is Solid State Disk 1TB
I'm using Minimal CD (Bootable USB)
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
>> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>>> I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
>>>
>>> It is Solid State Disk 1TB
>>> I'm using Minimal CD (Bootable USB)
>>> Created three partition (I did not create SWAP as I
On 02/03/2017 11:19 PM, Dale wrote:
> the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
>> I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
>>
>> It is Solid State Disk 1TB
>> I'm using Minimal CD (Bootable USB)
>> Created three partition (I did not create SWAP as I have 16GB or RAM)
>> I used "fdisk"
the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> I've not install Gentoo for some time and have some questions.
>
> It is Solid State Disk 1TB
> I'm using Minimal CD (Bootable USB)
> Created three partition (I did not create SWAP as I have 16GB or RAM)
> I used "fdisk" and follow the instruction from:
>
On 05. sep. 2014 04:44, Daniel Frey wrote:
It is possible to boot in EFI mode off of a USB, as I used a Mint ISO
to boot from in EFI mode. I would presume the USB needs to have the
FAT partition that EFI requires. Dan
Sounds good. Having /boot on a stick makes it easy to have whatever I
might
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a new SSD 480GB drive and I'm trying to partition it. It was some
time before I went through this so I found this information:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/SSD
But they omitted the Boot partition.
Device
Hi,
At Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:30:32 -0600, Joseph wrote:
But they omitted the Boot partition.
Device Start End Size Type
/dev/sda1 2048 6143 2M BIOS boot partition
/dev/sda2 6144 4200447 2G Linux swap
/dev/sda3 4200448
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:30:32 -0600, Joseph wrote:
I have a new SSD 480GB drive and I'm trying to partition it. It was
some time before I went through this so I found this information:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/SSD
But they omitted the Boot partition.
Device Start End
On Thursday, September 04, 2014 09:01:41 AM Christian Kruse wrote:
Hi,
At Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:30:32 -0600, Joseph wrote:
But they omitted the Boot partition.
Device Start End Size Type
/dev/sda1 2048 6143 2M BIOS boot partition
/dev/sda2
On 09/04/14 09:53, Alexander Kapshuk wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 7:30 AM, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a new SSD 480GB drive and I'm trying to partition it. It was some
time before I went through this so I found this information:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/SSD
But they omitted
On 09/04/14 08:25, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, 3 Sep 2014 22:30:32 -0600, Joseph wrote:
I have a new SSD 480GB drive and I'm trying to partition it. It was
some time before I went through this so I found this information:
http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/SSD
But they omitted the Boot partition.
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 07:05:28 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Disk /dev/sda: 2.7 TiB, 3000592982016 bytes, 5860533168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096 bytes
Disklabel type: gpt
Disk
On 09/04/14 14:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 07:05:28 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Disk /dev/sda: 2.7 TiB, 3000592982016 bytes, 5860533168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 4096
On 4 September 2014 15:54:17 CEST, Joseph syscon...@gmail.com wrote:
On 09/04/14 14:29, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 07:05:28 -0600, Joseph wrote:
Disk /dev/sda: 2.7 TiB, 3000592982016 bytes, 5860533168 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical):
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:29 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
My BIOS boot partition is 1MB not 1GB. My /boot partition is 1GB to allow
room for a couple of System Rescue CD ISO images.
There are a few types of boot partitions these days.
One is used when booting GPT from legacy
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
When booting from EFI you need a GPT boot partition (FAT - ugh) that
actually contains the image that gets booted, so it needs to have room
for at least a couple of kernels/initramfs - so that will be larger.
If you're
On Thu, 4 Sep 2014 07:54:17 -0600, Joseph wrote:
No, it's type is BIOS boot partition, it's a completely different
type of partition and not used by your Linux installation at all, it's
purely there for the BIOS.
Thank you for explanation.
Is your /home on root partition? I've notice
On 04. sep. 2014 16:52, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
When booting from EFI you need a GPT boot partition (FAT - ugh) that
actually contains the image that gets booted, so it needs to have room
for at least a couple of kernels/initramfs - so
On 04/09/2014 22:05, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
On 04. sep. 2014 16:52, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
When booting from EFI you need a GPT boot partition (FAT - ugh) that
actually contains the image that gets booted, so it needs to have room
On 09/04/2014 01:05 PM, Håkon Alstadheim wrote:
On 04. sep. 2014 16:52, Tom H wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
When booting from EFI you need a GPT boot partition (FAT - ugh) that
actually contains the image that gets booted, so it needs to have room
Hi Paul,
Thanks. So to be on safe side, he should partitioned the SSD using the
latest fdisk (booting from sysrescuecd?) and it will automatically
align to 1MB, right?
Don't know if it is hijacking, but it is not an RHEL list, and
top-posting can get an angry mob started. :)
Sorry about
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 2:51 AM, J.Marcos Sitorus gkj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks. So to be on safe side, he should partitioned the SSD using the
latest fdisk (booting from sysrescuecd?) and it will automatically
align to 1MB, right?
Yes, I think util-linux 2.17 or higher will support
On Aug 16, 2012 2:57 PM, J.Marcos Sitorus gkj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
Thanks. So to be on safe side, he should partitioned the SSD using the
latest fdisk (booting from sysrescuecd?) and it will automatically
align to 1MB, right?
Don't know if it is hijacking, but it is not an RHEL
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:33 PM, J.Marcos Sitorus gkj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, after quick read about ssd, I have a couple of question:
1. My friend have new server with a ssd installed. He plan to RHEL 5.7
(I don't know why he choose this) on it. On redhat website, it say
something like
On Wednesday 15 Aug 2012 17:42:02 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 9:33 PM, J.Marcos Sitorus gkj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys, after quick read about ssd, I have a couple of question:
1. My friend have new server with a ssd installed. He plan to RHEL 5.7
(I don't know why he
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 3:48 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that current versions of fdisk also provide a 1M boundary, or is it
4M? Someone more up to speed on this can comment.
I think basically everything* except for cfdisk defaults to 1M boundary now.
* everything
On Wed, 15 Aug 2012 16:14:50 -0500, Paul Hartman wrote:
I think that current versions of fdisk also provide a 1M boundary, or
is it 4M? Someone more up to speed on this can comment.
I think basically everything* except for cfdisk defaults to 1M boundary
now.
* everything meaning
Hi guys, after quick read about ssd, I have a couple of question:
1. My friend have new server with a ssd installed. He plan to RHEL 5.7
(I don't know why he choose this) on it. On redhat website, it say
something like this:
However, if the device does not export topology information, Red Hat
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012 14:11:37 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
I have one of those. But I decided to stick with traditional DOS
partitioning style and grub instead of GPT and grub2.
I am leaning toward traditional partitioning, but with grub2. Do those
two not mix well?
GRUB2 works fine
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo