Hello,
Here is the patch :
--- gimp-fr.po.orig 2004-03-21 11:38:20.0 +0100
+++ gimp-fr.po 2004-03-21 11:38:43.0 +0100
@@ -5706,7 +5706,7 @@
#. Global Brush, Pattern, ...
#: app/gui/preferences-dialog.c:1422
msgid Paint Options Shared Between Tools
-msgstr Options de painture
Am Freitag, 19. März 2004 03:38 schrieb Robert L Krawitz:
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13 Mar 2004 13:10:08 +0100
Frank Noack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Its the same problem that i had before. It works fine with build in
language (en) if i use it in german it
Hi Dave,
I made a couple of demos of the new GIMP 2 functionality. I believe it works a lot better than just a list of new functionality. They are divx avis and it's approx 80MB. Feel free to mirror it on the gimp.org website and use it for the 2.0 release extravaganza.
On 21 Mar 2004, at 19:17, Jakub Steiner wrote:
I made a couple of demos of the new GIMP 2 functionality. I believe it
works a lot better than just a list of new functionality. They are
divx avis and it's approx 80MB. Feel free to mirror it on the gimp.org
website and use it for the 2.0
From: Frank Noack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 12:04:34 +0100
Am Freitag, 19. März 2004 03:38 schrieb Robert L Krawitz:
From: Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13 Mar 2004 13:10:08 +0100
Frank Noack [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Its the same
Hi Jimmac,
Jakub Steiner wrote:
I made a couple of demos of the new GIMP 2 functionality. I believe it
works a lot better than just a list of new functionality. They are divx
avis and it's approx 80MB. Feel free to mirror it on the gimp.org
website and use it for the 2.0 release extravaganza.
Great. Now, when you say it I remember Sven mentioning it in the past.
But I guess that this new interface is not exported yet to any of
the language bindings? Is that correct? Any plans when this API
will become active?
Regards,
Dov
FYI: the version of libpdb in CVS already uses named
One of the ideas that I believe Sven raised on irc, was that there
should be a minimal and trivial interface to the PDB that is not
based on any particular language but just consists of:
gimp_foo -bar 3 -baz yellow
Having such an interface to the PDB has several advantages:
1. It
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:55:36PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great. Now, when you say it I remember Sven mentioning it in the past.
But I guess that this new interface is not exported yet to any of
the language bindings? Is that correct? Any plans when this API
will become active?
It's
Hi,
Manish Singh wrote:
A PDB revamp is planned.
How far along is the planning? I have heard of Rock's libpdb,
which I believe he wants to finish for 2.2, but I hadn't heard
any concrete plans for the often-mentioned forthcoming PDB
re-write.
What requirements would the new PDB have?
Cheers,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 12:39:23AM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
It is utterly ridiculous that simply because I voiced concerns about and
would like for the ability to have gimp scripts execute properly from the
command line under Windows that you accuse me of making the GIMP suck.
The suggestions
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 10:01:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the ideas that I believe Sven raised on irc, was that there
should be a minimal and trivial interface to the PDB that is not
based on any particular language but just consists of:
gimp_foo -bar 3 -baz yellow
On Sun, 21 Mar 2004, Branko Collin wrote:
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2004 14:22:08 +0100
From: Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Gimp Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Gimp-developer] Press pack
On 21 Mar 2004, at 19:17, Jakub Steiner wrote:
I made a couple of demos of the new GIMP 2
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 09:44:25PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
Hi,
Manish Singh wrote:
A PDB revamp is planned.
How far along is the planning? I have heard of Rock's libpdb,
which I believe he wants to finish for 2.2, but I hadn't heard
any concrete plans for the often-mentioned
- Original Message -
From: Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 2:48 PM
snip
FWIW, the suggestion was ill-researched. (foo image=bar) is so very very
un-Scheme like, which is surprising to hear from someone who has
apparently
written scripts from scratch. It
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 03:32:08PM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 2:48 PM
Finally, wouldn't you also agree that it is better to be polite when
rejecting someone else's well intentioned suggestions,
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 03:32:08PM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Manish Singh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2004 2:48 PM
snip
FWIW, the suggestion was ill-researched. (foo image=bar) is so very very
un-Scheme like, which is surprising to hear
If it's important to you, you'll do the 10 mins of research and critical
thinking needed.
Apparantly you could research this a whole lot faster than I can, which
isn't surprising since you work with gimp development almost every day. It
would probably take me more than that amount of time
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 05:57:04PM -0600, Kevin Myers wrote:
If it's important to you, you'll do the 10 mins of research and critical
thinking needed.
Apparantly you could research this a whole lot faster than I can, which
isn't surprising since you work with gimp development almost
On 03/21/04 15:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the ideas that I believe Sven raised on irc, was that there
should be a minimal and trivial interface to the PDB that is not
based on any particular language but just consists of:
gimp_foo -bar 3 -baz yellow
Perhaps I'm being extremely
Perhaps I'm being extremely dense, but couldn't there be an interface:
gimp -cmdfile filename
I think that the existing --batch option is equivalent to what you are
suggesting. Unfortunately that option doesn't work using Gimp 1.2.x under
Windows. I haven't heard from anyone else and
On 03/22/04 00:45, Kevin Myers wrote:
Perhaps I'm being extremely dense, but couldn't there be an interface:
gimp -cmdfile filename
I think that the existing --batch option is equivalent
Ah, hmm. For some reason I had gathered that this option took the
script on the commandline, which is where
From: Christopher W. Curtis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2004 12:06 AM
On 03/22/04 00:45, Kevin Myers wrote:
Perhaps I'm being extremely dense, but couldn't there be an interface:
gimp -cmdfile filename
I think that the existing --batch option is equivalent
Ah, hmm. For
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 12:56:32PM -0800, Manish Singh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 10:01:26PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the ideas that I believe Sven raised on irc, was that there
should be a minimal and trivial interface to the PDB that is not
based on any particular
24 matches
Mail list logo
