Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-19 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 07:47:10 -0800, William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Robert Krawitz wrote: [William Skaggs wrote:] 4) When the exif specifies that an image is rotated, the plug-in pops up a query asking the user whether to rotate it into standard alignment. [...]

[Gimp-developer] Improving the dirty flag

2005-01-19 Thread Raphaël Quinet
Currently, each image has a dirty flag associated with it. In practice this is counter for the undo operations, but the users see it as a flag. Unfortunately, this is not very flexible because it cannot tell if the image data was modified or if only its metadata was modified. I think that it

Re: [Gimp-developer] Improving the dirty flag

2005-01-19 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:55:12 +0100, Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Currently, each image has a dirty flag associated with it. In practice this is counter for the undo operations, but the users see it as a flag. Unfortunately, this is not very flexible because it cannot tell if the

Re: [Gimp-developer] mbox archive of [gimp-devel] 2004 and 2005

2005-01-19 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005 19:16:08 +0100, Gerhard Gaußling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thank you for the hint, but unfortunately there is nothing to find for downloading in mbox format :-( If you haven't found any solution yet, I can send you a copy of my own archives of this list. For 2004, that's

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif continued

2005-01-19 Thread Raphaël Quinet
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 21:31:15 +0100, Sven Neumann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The code is available from Raphael's web page, but it isn't in CVS, and it's up to Raphael when to put it there. AFAIK the code available there is somewhat outdated and the

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-19 Thread William Skaggs
Hi Raphael, glad to hear from you. Although I am a bit late to the party, here are my 2 cents: I think that the jpeg plug-in should automatically rotate the image when opening it without marking it as dirty. The default setting should be to do that automatically without asking, both for

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif continued

2005-01-19 Thread William Skaggs
Raphael wrote: Yes to both, although the basic stuff hasn't changed much. I never managed to finish the code that generates the EXIF block from XMP, though, so that's still work-in-progress. The most important thing is the XMP parsing/formatting code. Once that is in place, I can help

[Gimp-developer] Improved rect select tool

2005-01-19 Thread William Skaggs
Hi, I have been working on a new rectangle-select tool to meet some of the deficiencies of the existing one, and would like to commit what I have to cvs if it is okay. Here is an overview of what I have currently: The New Rect Select is implemented as a separate tool, which does not

[Gimp-developer] script-fu documentation

2005-01-19 Thread Tomasz Grobelny
Where can I find a decent script-fu documentation? I mean a document where I can find most supported functions especially string manipulation functions (like split, chop, substring, find etc.). TIA Tomek ___ Gimp-developer mailing list

Re: [Gimp-developer] Improved rect select tool

2005-01-19 Thread Steve Stavropoulos
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005, William Skaggs wrote: If Adjustable is checked, then the shape of the rectangle can be modified after it has been drawn, by moving the corners in the same way that works for the crop tool. Once it is satisfactory, clicking inside the rectangle converts it into a

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 09:32:15 -0800 From: William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Raphael, glad to hear from you. Although I am a bit late to the party, here are my 2 cents: I think that the jpeg plug-in should automatically rotate the image when opening it without marking it

Re: [Gimp-developer] script-fu documentation

2005-01-19 Thread Kevin Cozens
Tomasz Grobelny wrote: Where can I find a decent script-fu documentation? I mean a document where I can find most supported functions especially string manipulation functions (like split, chop, substring, find etc.). TIA The Script-Fu plug-in of GIMP uses SIOD as its Scheme interpreter. The

Re: [Gimp-developer] script-fu documentation

2005-01-19 Thread Campbell Barton
Will thge gimp move to tiny-fu compleately? Kevin Cozens wrote: Tomasz Grobelny wrote: Where can I find a decent script-fu documentation? I mean a document where I can find most supported functions especially string manipulation functions (like split, chop, substring, find etc.). TIA The

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-19 Thread Alastair M. Robinson
Hi Robert, Robert L Krawitz wrote: Won't they have (already be having) exactly the same problem with any other EXIF-aware viewer or editor? I doubt anyone who's encountered this issue opening files in other programs will have twigged that GIMP caused it :) Raphael's proposal sounds right on the

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-19 Thread Robert L Krawitz
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 01:32:44 + From: Alastair M. Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Robert, Robert L Krawitz wrote: Won't they have (already be having) exactly the same problem with any other EXIF-aware viewer or editor? I doubt anyone who's encountered this issue

[Gimp-developer] On French Translation

2005-01-19 Thread Louis Desjardins
Hi, I am new to this list and new to Gimp as well. I have a translation issue with the most recent version (GIMP 2.2) and would like more info, please. While many menus and strings are correctly translated into French, lots of others remains in the original version, English. Are there short

Re: [Gimp-developer] jpeg-exif development summary

2005-01-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
] Raphael's proposal sounds right on the money to me. ] ]It comes down to a question of what's most annoying: ](1) having to rotate manually an unknown, but possibly quite small ]number of existing images, on a one-off basis, or ](2) having to dismiss (or find a way of permanently disabling) an