On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 05:21:37 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[re-formatted to include proper quoting]
Alastair M. Robinson wrote:
Robert L Krawitz wrote:
Raphael's proposal sounds right on the money to me.
It comes down to a question of what's most annoying:
(1) having
Campbell Barton wrote:
Will thge gimp move to tiny-fu compleately?
I am not aware of any plans to replace Script-Fu with Tiny-Fu in the
GIMP source tree. Although that might change now that I am about to
start testing the Tiny-Fu changes which added UTF-8 support. If
Script-Fu was pulled out
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 09:38:51PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
now that GIMP 2.2 is out and the major problems with the early 2.2.x
releases seem to have been fleshed out, it would be nice if we could
put some effort into documenting some of the new stuff that's hidden
in the 2.2 version. So
Hi,
Louis Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a translation issue with the most recent version (GIMP 2.2)
and would like more info, please.
While many menus and strings are correctly translated into French,
lots of others remains in the original version, English.
Are there short
Hi,
William Skaggs [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have been working on a new rectangle-select tool to meet some
of the deficiencies of the existing one, and would like to commit
what I have to cvs if it is okay.
Please don't commit this before we have finished this discussion (that
we should
Sven wrote:
This is also akward. The crop tool shouldn't have a dialog, nor should
we add one to a possible new rectangle tool. The current rect-select
tool shows how the tool-options can be used for this.
I'll defer responding to your other points until I see your proposal,
but I would
On 20.01.2005, at 22:07, Sven Neumann wrote:
Please don't commit this before we have finished this discussion (that
we should have had before you wrote the first line of code).
Typically a proof of concept implementation is more than
welcome, so your attitude is hardly understandable.
That sounds
Hi,
Daniel Egger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I for one prefer Bills' approach much to what we have now; but
lets see what you'll come up with.
I didn't say it's worse than the current approach but it completely
contradicts all the work that has gone into GIMP in order to pave the
way for better
Hi,
Raphal Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So the default should be to open the images with the correct
orientation without asking, and there should be an option in the
preferences (gimprc) that allows the user to ignore the EXIF
Orientation tag or to be asked every time. The threshold for
Hello,
I'm not sure if I am understanding the new GimpContext functionality
correctly. I had hoped it would resolve issues that my Gimp Perl script
has with certain non-thread-safe resources when multiple instances of
the script are running concurrently. For example one instance changing
the
Sven wrote:
I want to suggest that we implement this by moving most of the
GimpConfig functionality from the core to libgimpbase or, alternatively,
to a new library, maybe called libgimpconfig.
[ . . . ]
There are a few things that we will need to decide upon, like in which
library
11 matches
Mail list logo
