On Wed, 7 Nov 2007 04:03:51 +, Karl Günter Wünsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So you suggest that the GIMP is changing the orientation tag when it is
loading the image.
This is mandatory according to the EXIF specification. A program that
supports EXIF and wants to display the image
Von: Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is mandatory according to the EXIF specification.
Just as a side note: it's Exif, not EXIF.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exchangeable_image_file_format
Not really important for the discussion, but I do suggest that we do it right
from the
On Friday 09 November 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
No, that's wrong. And that's one of the reasons why I want to remove
this confusing question. The EXIF standard defines precisely the list of
tags that must be updated and the list of tags that must be copied
unchanged. Unfortunately, older
On Thursday 08 November 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
The problem is that the question is not interpreted correctly by most
users, as can be seen by the other replies mentioning camera sensors that
sometimes report the wrong orientation. It does NOT mean: allow me to
decide if each image should
Hi,
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 23:55 +0100, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
* jpeg plug-in
+ remove the prompt for EXIF orientation: it should always be done
IMO the current solution of asking and allowing the user to skip this
question is preferred. It requires a user decision once, but at least it
On Sunday, November 4, 2007, 11:09:22, Sven Neumann wrote:
The only problem is that it is rather difficult to discover how to
change that decision later. Currently you need to edit parasiterc. We
might want to find a solution for these Don't ask me again questions
that can be used from all
Sven Neumann writes:
On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 23:55 +0100, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
* jpeg plug-in
+ remove the prompt for EXIF orientation: it should always be done
IMO the current solution of asking and allowing the user to skip this
question is preferred. It requires a user decision
Currently, GIMP tries to do a bit of both in the same jpeg plug-in and
does not do either of them correctly:
Raphael: These subjects were discussed before in the list when I ranted
about almost the same.
Since that some changes were made in the jpeg plug-in for GIMP 2.4.0 and
imo they covered
Here is my contribution to the GIMP 2.6 roadmap: a description of the
remaining tasks related to the metadata viewer/editor and some
enhancements for the jpeg plug-in (and other plug-ins).
In the following list, the tasks marked with a + are the ones that I
would like to include in 2.6, while the
On Friday 02 November 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
There are also some improvements for the JPEG plug-in. As I mentioned
some time ago, I would like to hide the current quality slider among
the advanced options, and replace it by a smaller selection of
pre-defined quality levels.
Sorry to
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 00:06:18 +0100, Karl Günter Wünsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
There are also some improvements for the JPEG plug-in. As I mentioned
some time ago, I would like to hide the current quality slider among
the advanced options,
From: Raphaël Quinet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ remove the prompt for EXIF orientation: it should always be done
I agree with this idea now. The problem I had with it before is
that it would do bad things to people whose EXIF images had incorrect
rotation information, and that would have
On Sat, 3 Nov 2007 00:06:18 +0100, Karl Günter Wünsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 02 November 2007, Raphaël Quinet wrote:
There are also some improvements for the JPEG plug-in. As I mentioned
some time ago, I would like to hide the current quality slider among
the advanced options,
13 matches
Mail list logo
