On 25 May 2001 10:29:43 -0400, Carol Spears wrote:
> I hate when I have to wait for a lot of crap to load when I need help
> NOW(!) because someone thought it important for me to know he liked the
> tutorial. I prefer to assume that the people who are running the site
> already knew that it was
Carol Spears schrieb:
> I agree with Simon, comments on tutorials help only with tutorial
> writing. This should be done before the tutorial is put in place.
Ok. No commenting system.
Christoph
--
http://home.bn-paf.de/smokey/
___
Gimp-developer
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 10:29:43AM -0400, Carol Spears wrote:
> Simon Budig wrote:
> >
> > Because the benefit from commenting a (well written) tutorial is probably
> > not worth the additional effort to implement the commenting functionality -
> > aside from discussions about the right system (S
Simon Budig wrote:
>
> Because the benefit from commenting a (well written) tutorial is probably
> not worth the additional effort to implement the commenting functionality -
> aside from discussions about the right system (Squishdot, Slashcode etc.pp.).
> It is hard enough to agree on a system f
Christoph Rauch ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Simon Budig schrieb:
> > At www.gimp.de people post about "how to make red t-shirts yellow"
> > or "do I need a screen resolution of 1024x768 for Gimp with windows
> > or is 800x600 sufficient?" and I dont want this kind of messages at
> > the most impo
Simon Budig schrieb:
> At www.gimp.de people post about "how to make red t-shirts yellow"
> or "do I need a screen resolution of 1024x768 for Gimp with windows
> or is 800x600 sufficient?" and I dont want this kind of messages at
> the most important Gimp Resource. Good tutorials are wayy
Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-05-25 at 1319.34 +0200):
> > Moderation should be as easy as scrathing your head. 2 or more moderators
> > should get e-mails with the article and two links in them. [YEAH]
> > [NO WAY!]
>
> Why links? Why n
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-05-25 at 1319.34 +0200):
> Moderation should be as easy as scrathing your head. 2 or more moderators
> should get e-mails with the article and two links in them. [YEAH]
> [NO WAY!]
Why links? Why not mail too? Like mailing list subscribe (or anything,
admins just forget to
On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 07:51:08PM -0400, Tom Rathborne wrote:
> Good point. I try to keep them composed of all lowercase letters.
Yeah, most parts of totl.net use a capital letter for the top-level
e.g. http://totl.net/Religion/
and we get dozens of 404s every day in our error.log because people
Guillermo -
On Fri, May 25, 2001 at 01:31:15AM +0200, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-05-24 at 1911.00 -0400):
> > Actually, in my system, all of my URLs are _already_ nice and
> > clean, with full functionality. :)
> Just a doubt... all lower case or mixed c
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-05-24 at 1911.00 -0400):
> Actually, in my system, all of my URLs are _already_ nice and
> clean, with full functionality. :)
Just a doubt... all lower case or mixed case URLs? I think lower case
it better, easier to remember, no special tricks, ie when you write
with bloc
Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero said...
|> They should also work if JavaScript is not available. Links
|> should be links - not JS calls!
|
|JS should be avoided, some browsers do not support it, some people
|just turn it off to avoid the pain, links are links and opening
|windows as the ht
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 08:09:41PM +0200, Guillermo S. Romero / Familia Romero wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-05-23 at 1055.42 -0500):
> > >I know, I know. Since we're probably going to rewrite the site in
> > >something less arcane and more known, now is the ideal time to revamp
> > >the look
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-05-23 at 1055.42 -0500):
> >I know, I know. Since we're probably going to rewrite the site in
> >something less arcane and more known, now is the ideal time to revamp
> >the look and feel.
> I hate it when sites change things. (My credit card company changes
> their onlin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (2001-05-23 at 1020.16 -0500):
> |* The design should be fast and clean. It should support all browsers
> | and should not make excesssive use of nested tables or JavaScript.
> | The current design of www.gimp.org is OK from that point of view.
> | But on the other hand, t
15 matches
Mail list logo
