Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Dave Neary
Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, went out for some bug-hinting in the 1.2 wilderness tonight and came up with this list of beasts that are still alive and should be killed in 1.2 if possible: #51358 Acquire-screenshot not working with enlightenment

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Austin Donnelly
On Wednesday, 20 Jun 2001, Dave Neary wrote: The default Made with the GIMP comment is hard coded into plug-ins/common/xbm.c - and presumably into the others too. It seems to me that the easiest solution would be to include gtkrc in the relevant plug-ins, and do a read on the gimprc when

[Gimp-developer] show jpeg preview time

2001-06-20 Thread Iccii
Hello, I'm using the GIMP to creat image files for my web site. So, I want to know how much time is necessary for loading the images which is saved by jpeg or other file type. It's useful to show loading time in jpeg saving dialog. See attachment file if you interested in it. Thanks. G'bye.

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Branko Collin
On 20 Jun 2001, at 10:27, Dave Neary wrote: Sven Neumann wrote: #51164 Default image comment not set correctly http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51164 I've added some comments on how one could be fixed to the report. Not sure what is the correct fix for this. Comments?

Re: [Gimp-developer] show jpeg preview time

2001-06-20 Thread Austin Donnelly
On Wednesday, 20 Jun 2001, Iccii wrote: I'm using the GIMP to creat image files for my web site. So, I want to know how much time is necessary for loading the images which is saved by jpeg or other file type. It's useful to show loading time in jpeg saving dialog. See attachment file if you

Re: [Gimp-developer] show jpeg preview time

2001-06-20 Thread Branko Collin
On 20 Jun 2001, at 11:54, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 06:45:23PM +0900, Iccii wrote: I'm using the GIMP to creat image files for my web site. So, I want to know how much time is necessary for loading the images which is saved by jpeg or other file type. It's useful

Re: [Gimp-developer] show jpeg preview time

2001-06-20 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:21:57PM +0200, Branko Collin wrote: What would be nice though, and I hope I am not asking for something that already exists, is a web export filter that shows previews and file sizes of the same image in different formats. I've seen shareware programs for such

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Dave Neary
Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, went out for some bug-hinting in the 1.2 wilderness tonight and came up with this list of beasts that are still alive and should be killed in 1.2 if possible: Speaking of bug-hunting... I couldn't build gimp 1.2 (with gcc 2.96 - RedHat's 7.0 prerelease) for the

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, Branko Collin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Also I noticed that when saving TIFFs, sometimes the 'hard coded' comment is used, sometimes the one I supplied in the preferences. The difference seems to be between images that I acquired from the Windows clipboard and images that I started

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Dave Neary
Sven Neumann wrote: Hi, I'll look into fixing this later or wait for a patch. Please report if you find more of these. Patch attached. If I find any more I'll let you know... I did think that an integer constant 0 could be used in a pointer context without a cast, though... Salut, Sven

Re: [Gimp-developer] handling of image comments (was 1.2 Bug Hunting)

2001-06-20 Thread Raphael Quinet
On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Sven Neumann wrote: [about http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=51164 ] Yes, it's exactly the problem described in the bug-report. Gimp does only attach a gimp-comment parasite to an image if it is created using File-New. Other ways to create an image (Paste as

Re: [Gimp-developer] handling of image comments (was 1.2 Bug Hunting)

2001-06-20 Thread Austin Donnelly
On Wednesday, 20 Jun 2001, Raphael Quinet wrote: On Wed, 20 Jun 2001, Sven Neumann wrote: If we'd fix this by making gimp_image_new() attach a default comment parasite (just like it sets the default resolution), all images touched by The GIMP would get the default comment unless they

Re: [Gimp-developer] 1.2 Bug Hunting

2001-06-20 Thread Dave Neary
Dave Neary wrote: I did think that an integer constant 0 could be used in a pointer context without a cast, though... Hi all, I've confirmed that this code (for the case where the enum value passed is 0) should work in any ANSI conforming compiler (according to the impressarios of