Hi,
Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris wrote:
> But nowadays, who seriously uses it?
I use it all the time to get a first rough draft when cutting out
shapes. It's miles quicker than using bezier, and since
selections are just masks, I convert the selection to a mask and
fine-tune it afterwards. I have
I see that two entries have 3 votes so
far on the www.mokund.org site: One with
grass and the a triple self protrait mock up.
Are there any trademark problems with the
mock up of Rockwell's Triple Self Portrait?
(I'd strongly suggest favoring originality
over adaptation, anyway.
The same woul
Steve Stavropoulos wrote:
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
- useable as a splash
It needs to have a blank or very low-contrast area at the bottom
that is large enough to hold the progress texts we show at
startup. Large enough even for a slightly larger font.
Unfortunately not
Hi,
"Joao S. O. Bueno Calligaris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I should've done this __very__ earlier on the dev. cycle. But the
> fact is that I think developers should seriopusly consider the
> visibility of the "scissors tool" on the tool box.
>
> I mean - it is a good hack, it is there for h
Hi,
Steve Stavropoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Because there are some very _very_ nice ones that don't have the
> area at the bottom, maybe this shouldn't be a reason to reject them,
> if it is trivial to add such an area. I think the purpose is to have
> a great splash for gimp 2.2 and we
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 07:20:59PM +0100, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > i have also been working on some avi's of the splash entries. there
> > were so many of them that now it has been divided into a movie for each
> > day of submissions.
>
> Give
Joao wrote:
> That said, I raise the question: Should the scissors tool be visible
> by default in the toolbox?
Well, the real problem with it is that the edge-hugging algorithm
sucks. It would be a very useful tool if it actually worked. So
I suppose my attitude is:
a) It's too late in the 2
William Skaggs wrote:
Since painting a solid or nearly solid rectangle on the bottom
is quite an easy operation, a splash candidate would not necessarily
need to be rejected on this basis. I feel that this is worth mentioning
because several of the most popular candidates have this problem.
If th
Sven wrote:
> The winning splash should be
>
> [ . . . ]
>
> - useable as a splash
>
> It needs to have a blank or very low-contrast area at the bottom
> that is large enough to hold the progress texts we show at
> startup. Large enough even for a slightly larger font.
Since pain
Hi!
I should've done this __very__ earlier on the dev. cycle. But the fact
is that I think developers should seriopusly consider the visibility
of the "scissors tool" on the tool box.
I mean - it is a good hack, it is there for historical reasons, and
the graphic algorithyms behind it are nice
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004, Sven Neumann wrote:
> - useable as a splash
>
> It needs to have a blank or very low-contrast area at the bottom
> that is large enough to hold the progress texts we show at
> startup. Large enough even for a slightly larger font.
>
>
> Unfortunately not all
Hi,
Carol Spears <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> i have also been working on some avi's of the splash entries. there
> were so many of them that now it has been divided into a movie for each
> day of submissions.
Given your permission, we will show off these movies at the GIMP booth
at 21C3.
Sv
hi,
i have been half following this fun splash stuff. i fully admit to
looking at the splash entries more than reading of the exciting plans
here.
i have also been working on some avi's of the splash entries. there
were so many of them that now it has been divided into a movie for each
day of s
Hi,
there are a few more criterias for a splash that haven't been
mentioned yet. The winning splash should be
- international
Thus it must not show any text besides "GIMP 2.2".
- useable as a splash
It needs to have a blank or very low-contrast area at the bottom
that is large
Hi all,
Quoting Roman Joost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:42:10PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > I have no objections as long as people are happy with this. I
> > would be a little worried about some splashes not getting a fair
> > whack because they were submitted late, but su
On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 02:32:59PM +0100, Dave Neary wrote:
> > > I have no objections as long as people are happy with this. I
> > > would be a little worried about some splashes not getting a fair
> > > whack because they were submitted late, but sure, why not.
> > >
> > > When do you think it w
Hi,
Quoting Roman Joost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:42:10PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> > I have no objections as long as people are happy with this. I
> > would be a little worried about some splashes not getting a fair
> > whack because they were submitted late, but sure,
On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 06:42:10PM +0100, David Neary wrote:
> I have no objections as long as people are happy with this. I
> would be a little worried about some splashes not getting a fair
> whack because they were submitted late, but sure, why not.
>
> When do you think it would be fair to ca
Hi,
"Henry Roeland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm new to GIMP develop and have some (beginners?) questions about the
> dependecies for the current GIMP cvs version
>
> GIMP did build at one time but it didn't started because it demands
> the freetype2 package for the freetype plugin
All you
19 matches
Mail list logo