Greetings.
I'm mentoring the gimp-ruby project. This project allows the writing of
scripts written in the Ruby programming language.
The project has progressed quickly. The project became available via the
gnome.org CVS repository on June 20. As of the mid-term evaluations scripts
could be w
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.3
X-Originating-IP: 69.196.168.218
"
But after this call destPR doesn't reflect the contents of tempPR. I think that
the problem stems from the call
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 11:36 -0400, Brohan wrote:
> Ah, its a scaled *up* picture that I need. The problem with
> GimpZoomPreivew (And I have looked into it), is that there's no way to
> get the zoom factor to set on another preview.
There's gimp_zoom_preview_get_factor() for this purpose.
>
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 10:17 -0400, Brohan wrote:
> Ah, I expected it to do any scaling. Are there any library functions
> that do do scaling? I was expecting gimp_pixel_rgn_resize() to do the
> scaling, as resizing the pixel region might entail scaling.
Resizing in GIMP terms usually just mea
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 10:44 +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> I have no doubts about this but there is a problem discerning these two by
> just looking at the code if you are not that much into the GTK way of doing
> objects. There also is little documentation whatsoever on what parameters
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 10:37 +0100, Mukund wrote:
> IMHO, I prefer Alan Horkan's comment about the descriptive text. I think
> this is what the field is for too, to describe what the application does
> tersely. But if you think it's unnecessary, I'll remove it out.
I think that the long descr
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 10:17 +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 August 2006 10:00, Sven Neumann wrote:
> > Fixing this is as simple as adding the GIMP_CONFIG_PARAM_SERIALIZE flag
> > to the registration of the interface properties. This is a simple change
> > and it is already out
Hi,
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 16:48 +0200, Dave Neary wrote:
> As I said on IRC last night, in case anyone is wondering, the GIMP
> currently has roughly $21,000 in the GNOME fund.
Wow, I wasn't aware that that much money had piled up.
> 1. Paying for the GIMP user manual to get into a publishable
On Tuesday 08 August 2006 10:00, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Fixing this is as simple as adding the GIMP_CONFIG_PARAM_SERIALIZE flag
> to the registration of the interface properties. This is a simple change
> and it is already outlined in the bug report. Please stick to the facts,
> or if you don't know
Hi,
On Wed, 2006-08-02 at 17:57 -0400, Brohan wrote:
> I'm building a plugin to compare two images side-by-side with panning
> and zooming, and I'm having a bit of an issue with getting the zooming
> to work.
>
> The way I'm doing it is initalizing a pixel region with the width
> being (width of
Hi,
On Tue, 2006-07-25 at 23:49 +0200, Karl Günter Wünsch wrote:
> First of all the new one doesn't save it's options. That could be remedied
> but
> the amount of changes (I'm a C++ developer and really can't get my head
> around doing the way object orientation is done in the tool, the
> do
11 matches
Mail list logo