[Gimp-developer] redeye.c and gimp-2.4

2007-11-10 Thread Owen
Tried updating Robert Merkel and Benoit Drooghaag's redeye.c into gimp-2.4 but it failed. I have 2.4 in /opt and called gimptool with that prefix, didn't set any other environment variable Here is a compile error redeye.c: In function ‘remove_redeye’: redeye.c:380: warning: ISO C90 forbids mi

Re: [Gimp-developer] problem (solved?) in gimp-plugin-template

2007-11-10 Thread Carlo Baldassi
Hi, > > In fact, the call to gimp_domain_register() was already present in the > > gimp-plugin-template: > > > > gimp_plugin_domain_register (PROCEDURE_NAME, LOCALEDIR); > > > > It returns success, but the menu entry is not translated. > > I couldn't find any help from other plugins' sources be

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.6 Roadmap

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 11:26 -0800, William Skaggs wrote: > >I don't see GIMP moving towards vector layers, at least not for 2.6. > >Layer groups are also not on the near-term roadmap. Perhaps we can > >target them for 2.8 but that remains to be seen. > > Oh well, consider my suggestions as e

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.6 Roadmap

2007-11-10 Thread William Skaggs
From: Sven Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >I don't see GIMP moving towards vector layers, at least not for 2.6. >Layer groups are also not on the near-term roadmap. Perhaps we can >target them for 2.8 but that remains to be seen. Oh well, consider my suggestions as early contributions to the 2.8

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.6 Roadmap

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 10:34 -0800, William Skaggs wrote: > As GIMP moves toward vector layers and layer groups I don't see GIMP moving towards vector layers, at least not for 2.6. Layer groups are also not on the near-term roadmap. Perhaps we can target them for 2.8 but that remains to be see

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.6 Roadmap

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, I am afraid it is a little late to still suggest features to be put on the roadmap. There was a deadline for the submission process last week already and we only stretched it a little because we were waiting for Mitch to submit the GEGL proposal. We want to get 2.6 done in about six months, w

Re: [Gimp-developer] color deficit simulation filter

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 19:25 +0100, Giacomo Mazzocato wrote: > I've tried to reimplement it in another language I very much hope for you that you are respecting the license that this code has been published under. Your code is GPL, right? > and in the function > cdisplay_colorblind_convert w

[Gimp-developer] 2.6 Roadmap

2007-11-10 Thread William Skaggs
As GIMP moves toward vector layers and layer groups, it will more and more need a capability for "vector selection" -- that is, for the kind of selection capability found in vector graphics programs like Inkscape, whose target is a set of objects rather than a spatial region -- a "vector selection

[Gimp-developer] color deficit simulation filter

2007-11-10 Thread Giacomo Mazzocato
Hi, I'd like to ask a question about the algorithm that filter uses. The file that handles the simulation is cdisplay_colorblind.c. I've tried to reimplement it in another language and in the function cdisplay_colorblind_convert with certain colors (for instance #00) I get a warning of divisi

Re: [Gimp-developer] Angled guides

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 09:05 -0800, Tom Lechner wrote: > I don't understand the double click prohibition. Seeing as how the > mouse barely moves during a double click, how is that less precise than > a single click? A single click would be too imprecise as well. You really want to be able t

[Gimp-developer] 2.6 Roadmap

2007-11-10 Thread William Skaggs
One of the things that GIMP badly needs is a vectorial tool for drawing lines and arrows. This also would make sense as a first usable implementation of vector layers. Here is how I think it could be structured: 1) For UI, there should be a GimpLineTool interface, modeled after GimpRectangleT

Re: [Gimp-developer] Angled guides

2007-11-10 Thread Robert Krawitz
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 09:05:36 -0800 From: Tom Lechner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> On 11/10/2007 08:01:39 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 21:04 -0800, Tom Lechner wrote: > > 1. Angled Linear Guides > > Double click on a line defines a center of rotation. > > Doubl

Re: [Gimp-developer] Angled guides

2007-11-10 Thread Tom Lechner
On 11/10/2007 08:01:39 AM, Sven Neumann wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 21:04 -0800, Tom Lechner wrote: > > 1. Angled Linear Guides > > Double click on a line defines a center of rotation. > > Double-clicking doesn't work for this. Apart from the fact that we > don't use double-click at all in the

Re: [Gimp-developer] Angled guides

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 21:04 -0800, Tom Lechner wrote: > 1. Angled Linear Guides > Double click on a line defines a center of rotation. Double-clicking doesn't work for this. Apart from the fact that we don't use double-click at all in the GIMP user interface, it is also extremely difficult t

Re: [Gimp-developer] Angled guides

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Fri, 2007-11-09 at 21:04 -0800, Tom Lechner wrote: > 2. Guides based on any path > This would make precisely aligned touch-ups easy, especially with > tablet pressure effects when painting, when "Stroke path" just doesn't > cut it. Double clicking could enter and exit a path editing mode

Re: [Gimp-developer] problem (solved?) in gimp-plugin-template

2007-11-10 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, On Sat, 2007-11-10 at 04:59 +, Carlo Baldassi wrote: > In fact, the call to gimp_domain_register() was already present in the > gimp-plugin-template: > > gimp_plugin_domain_register (PROCEDURE_NAME, LOCALEDIR); > > It returns success, but the menu entry is not translated. > I couldn't

Re: [Gimp-developer] 2.6 roadmap items

2007-11-10 Thread peter sikking
Alexandre Prokoudine wrote: > Here is the list of proposed changes in 2.6 that Sven asked for: > > Tools > > - full use of cairo for the select/crop tools (?) > - color-neutral toolbox icons that are quick to recognise and work > with (?) > > The ? character after a name means that exact intenti