Re: [Gimp-developer] changes in script-fu in 2.3.14

2007-02-02 Thread Saul Goode
I have a rough draft of some of the differences between SIOD-fu. It is not yet comprehensive but perhaps it might be useful as a starting point. http://flashingtwelve.brickfilms.com/GIMP/Scripts/Script-fu-2/Reference/SIODdifferences-0.1.txt On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 12:53 -0800, Akkana Peck wrote:

Re: [Gimp-developer] Drawing zones

2007-01-17 Thread Saul Goode
Sorry, no. I don't see the benefit over switching between layers. #1: A selection does not overlap its inverse. #2: There is no need to keep track of which layers are associated with each other (and for switching between layers, presumably they would need to be adjacent in the layerstack). #3:

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-15 Thread Saul Goode
gg wrote: I assume a tear-off menu is the context menu I get from a right-mouse click. I dont see the gain here, it's actually one click more than using the edit menu. If I misunderstood, could you explain what a tear-off is? The menus that you obtain with a right-click have a

Re: [Gimp-developer] [GIMP] Suggestion to simplify user interaction

2006-10-14 Thread Saul Goode
gg wrote: I also find as a user that menus often go too deep. One sub-menu is acceptable , two starts to get unwieldy. Eg. I ofter copy a selection and Paste As New , this is three levels deep. I'd like to see this at the same level as Cut: Cut | Paste | Paste as New. I crated a

Re: [Gimp-developer] Script-Fu procedure blurb review

2006-10-05 Thread Saul Goode
we still need the Script-Fu blurbs reviewed for GIMP 2.4. http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351283 Might you perhaps find time to finish this task anytime soon? I have submitted a patch which hopefully will be close to what you are expecting. It is amazing what

Re: [Gimp-developer] Switch to Tiny-Fu, end of Script-Fu maintenance?

2006-10-05 Thread Saul Goode
Unless anyone objects, I would like to commit a trivial patch tomorrow that disables Script-Fu by default in configure.in. It will still be possible to use the old interpreter by using --enable-script-fu explicitely, but otherwise Script-Fu should be considered as obsolete. I should like to

Re: [Gimp-developer] undoo history and automatic script creation

2006-10-04 Thread Saul Goode
Am I missing something about why this is hard to do, or has it just never been a priority to provide record to script capability? If my understanding is correct, the UNDO history does not record the actions you take, merely the result of those actions (by saving the portions of the image that

Re: [Gimp-developer] undoo history and automatic script creation

2006-10-04 Thread Saul Goode
On a related note to this thread, I was wondering if there was any way to have a script perform an Undo or to go back a few steps in the Undo history. I have a script which chops a layer up into multiple pieces and the result is a layer that is centered relative to the original layer. In many

Re: [Gimp-developer] UI improvements (was: Moving selection contents with the move tool?)

2006-10-02 Thread Saul Goode
The space bar feature is still present (as an option) and it has always been implemented by switching to the Move tool temporarily. Sven Indeed, you are correct. I must have switched the affect: option of the Move tool during my experimentation and failed to restore it. These are

Re: [Gimp-developer] UI improvements (was: Moving selection contents with the move tool?)

2006-10-01 Thread Saul Goode
All tools in the current toolbox honor the selection EXCEPT the Move Tool -- though in some cases the selection is not reasonably applicable (eyedropper, zoom, measure, and crop) and in cases of the selection tools, there are modes which modify how selections are treated. To a large extent, all

[Gimp-developer] Moving selection contents with the move tool?

2006-09-28 Thread Saul Goode
On 9/28/06, Michael Natterer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In Current CVS, you have to press alt+shift or alt+control to actually move the pixels with a selection tool. Nobody does that accidentially, and it's a powerful tool for power users. I see no reason to remove it. A feature being